[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.00 MB, 1716x1710, B92B512C-7FF6-42FE-B19D-D24096052994-218-000000014B132DD9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8988841 No.8988841 [Reply] [Original]

Reminder that if you do not engage with philosophy (analytic and scientifically related, at least), then you are nothing but a mindless calculating cog and not an actual seeker of truth.

>> No.8988882
File: 1.47 MB, 2048x2048, sexsphere.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8988882

Since you mention truth seeking, ever wondered if you can trust those authorities on their vast achievements or data?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvmED6XH-3Y

>> No.8988964
File: 410 KB, 770x500, 3881538fcff663dd6cf4c000dc01779f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8988964

>>8988841
>(analytic and scientifically related, at least)
You made the mistake of thinking that knowledge can be mutually disjoint. Ironic then that Hegel became relevant to quantum mechanics. New ideas supersede past ideas precisely by saying the opposite, by swapping the particular for the universal and vice versa, effectively beating them at their own game, only to be beat again in the same way. Philosophy is converging on quantum and quantum is converging on philosophy and neither will really be complete until the relation thereof is understood, just how the universal lacks something of itself in the particular.
As it stands philosophers are interpreting quantum mechanics as a fundamental flaw in the making of the universe. That's basically what zizek says but I don't really agree with that.
Do you put metaphysics prior to epistemology or epistemology prior to metaphysics. Both are equally true in the end given the dialectical nature of their relationship, but the fact that one must come before the other may be a purely human limitation keeping us from seeing the whole picture, or it might be a limitation of the divine intellect itself, expressing itself in its own lack of itself.

>> No.8989075

>>8988841
Philosophy makes me feel like a brainlet

>> No.8989079

>>8989075
Good, it means you're learning things.

>> No.8989110

>>8988841
The truth is in the Bible, sweetie.

>> No.8989314
File: 94 KB, 480x608, 432943292111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8989314

>>8989110
gtf0 christfag

Although it's perfectly rationale to believe in the possibility of a God, the bible is hardly a comprehensive guide to philosophy and it fails to bridge the gap between theology and physical reality in any meaningful way.

>> No.8989324
File: 35 KB, 371x286, Disecting Darwin (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8989324

>>8989314
>implying the truth of God has to fit your preferences

>> No.8989339

>>8989110
>a book about some higher entity demanding praises which clearly is egotistical and arragont as fuck (a human trait)

>> No.8989353

>>8989339
>a human trait

Man was made in G-d's image, sweety pie.

>> No.8989361

>>8989110

Which one? There are like a thousand versions.

>> No.8989366

>>8989353
aha so you admit that god is not so perfect after all?

>sweaty pie
stop talking like that, its cringey my dude.

>> No.8989371

>>8989366
Oh honey, G-d is perfect in all ways. He is perfectly loving and perfectly wrathful.

>> No.8989704

>>8989314
The Bible is a distillation of certain philosophical truths.

Schelling would routinely drop references to scripture in some of his densest works.

>> No.8989847

Free will and qualia exist

>> No.8990012

>>8988841
OP I am intrigued. Say I wanted to learn more about the philosophy of science; could you recommend a text to me? What would be a good starting place? First year biomedical engineer.

>> No.8991049

>>8989075
>>8989079
This is the most inspiring shit I've read in all my life.