/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.8890624]

These do not describe the universe. Infinite precision such as in 'pi' or 'e' does not exist.

I'm okay with mathfags using the reals but at least admit it's just pointless circlejerking that has no actual real world application.

[Anonymous No.8890628]

>>8890624
>These do not describe the universe.
right, but these do

[Anonymous No.8890811]

>>8890628
but they contain the reals

[Anonymous No.8890814]

>>8890811
>but they contain the reals
right, but you the reals aren't enough to describe the universe

[Anonymous No.8890830]

>>8890624
2 has as much precision as pi you imbecile

[Anonymous No.8890833]

The numbers that describe the universe are like your sex life OP, imaginary.

[Anonymous No.8890837]

Nor do Hodge theaters or exact sequences and yet we don't refrain from using them

[Anonymous No.8890859]

>>8890837
Nobody but Memezuki uses (or even knows) Hodge theaters.

[Anonymous No.8890860]

>>8890624
>no actual real world application

Your theory doesn't have to perfectly match the real world to have real world application.

[Anonymous No.8890868]

Wildberger need to leave

[Anonymous No.8890870]

>>8890830
Found the brainlet

[Anonymous No.8890877]

>>8890870
you can ask for any decimal digit of both 2 and pi and get an answer no matter how far you want to look, infinite precision.

try again brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8890916]

>>8890877
t undergrad

[Anonymous No.8890917]

>>8890870
Probabily of finding 2 in a interval that contains it is 0, just like pi, so it is pretty much the same, just a real number

[Anonymous No.8890929]

>>8890916
grad student actually

next?

[Anonymous No.8891603]

>>8890868

[Anonymous No.8892878]

>>8890624
>Infinite precision such as in 'pi' or 'e'
Consider actually reading a book for once in your life.