[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 110 KB, 900x891, I'm ready..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843157 No.8843157 [Reply] [Original]

Let n be an integer.

>> No.8843163

>>8843157
sure, n is always an integer
if you said let n be something else then we'd have trouble

>> No.8843165

OK,done it


What now?

>> No.8843174

>>8843157
>relies on something as vague as axiom of choice
kek

>> No.8843205

>>8843157

because n is for integer

>> No.8843217

Let i be a nigger

>> No.8843218
File: 3 KB, 225x225, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843218

N IS FOR NATURALS YOU FUCKING BRAINLETS REEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.8843220

>>8843218
lmao
n = -3
m = 23.2 + e^i
get rekt

>> No.8843231

>>8843220

z = 7/5
r = 1 - i
p = 4

>> No.8843236

>>8843157
I use n for continuous variables

>> No.8843241

>>8843231
>p = 4
I used p for something that wasn't a prime in a test once and my professor told me to stop asap lmao

letters have meaning

>> No.8843258

>>8843236
>continuous variables
it's okay anon you won't contribute anything of worth anyways so no one will really mind

>> No.8843259

>>8843163
People use n for a natural number or unit normal vector, among other things.

>>8843174
Variable assignment doesn't use the Axiom of Choice.

>>8843241
We often use p for a polynomial.

>> No.8843269

>>8843259
stop being an autist. the first was clearly in the context of numbers, the second a joke, and the third one again in the context of numbers.

even in A[x] one will often note arbitrary elements by f, g and reserve p for irreducibles / primes when doing anything serious

>> No.8843271

>>8843205
What's k for?

>> No.8843276

>>8843271
kilo you brainlet

>> No.8843286

>>8843258
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_and_discrete_variables
Back to high school for you

>> No.8843288

>>8843286
>if someone says something bad about me that means they don't understand the basic things I'm talking about
this attitude will get you nowhere honestly

>> No.8843292

>>8843269
>stop being an autist

Look who's talking.

>A[x]
>anything serious

Hows intro to algebra going?

>> No.8843294
File: 52 KB, 470x359, hank (yelling).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843294

>>8843157

Let [math]n \in \mathbb{C}[/math] be an integer.

>> No.8843304
File: 14 KB, 600x600, 06d343c23f10648450f8e148510e1981_clip-art-of-lowercase-n-lower-case-n-clipart_600-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843304

They told me I could be anything I wanted to be, so I became an integer.

>> No.8843321

Let x be a number.

>> No.8843328 [DELETED] 

>>8843157
n = nigger
amidoinitrite

>> No.8843333

>>8843292
>Polynomial Rings
>Not involved in serious work

How is being a brainlet who can't into algebraic geometry going?

>> No.8843341

>>8843333
Nice quads but mentioning polynomial rings and irreducibles like this is a little embarrassing. Yeah algebraic geometry is important, but you are like a little babby, trying to impress me with your knowledge of arithmetic.

>> No.8843346

>>8843333
nice quads buddy

>> No.8843353

>>8843333
>brainlet BTFO by anon with good taste in math
>bonus quads
checked

>> No.8843374
File: 538 KB, 800x800, 1492562281344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843374

>>8843286
>posts a high-school level wikipedia article backing up his high-school level understanding of mathematics
>tells me to go back to high-school
you trying to start a fight?

>> No.8843378

>>8843294
>[math]\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{C}[/math]
oh boy i'm fucking triggered

>> No.8843382
File: 61 KB, 960x698, wow..um..ok.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843382

>>8843378
WTF you can greentext latex? i did not know this

>> No.8843385

>>8843378
if it's not true then why is it so common to represent an arbitrary complex number by "z"?

>> No.8843386

>>8843378
fuck off
that notation is understood to mean canonical inclusion by literally anyone
even children understand that the integer 1 and the complex 1 are "the same"

>> No.8843393

>>8843217
>let nigger be i
better

>> No.8843398

>>8843386
yeah i know faggot but it still triggers me

>> No.8843410

I use dot products, cross products, [math]\times[/math], multiplication dot and decimals all interchangeably, possibly even in the same expression

>> No.8843412
File: 23 KB, 280x373, 1490654082708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843412

>assume g = 10m/s

>> No.8843414

>>8843386
>"the same"
you can't even bring yourself to take the quotes off

>> No.8843417

>>8843410
>not denoting all of them and function application by writing them one after the other in the same expression
[math]fgxvw[/math]
>what do you mean it's not clear? they're all algebra actions you faggot, they commute. brainlet.

>> No.8843421

>>8843414
they're obviously not literally the same, as I said before, canonical inclusion. I always call isomorphism "the same" with quotes

>> No.8843425

>>8843417
>he doesnt study anabelian geometry

>> No.8843428

>>8843410
Decimals are haram.

>> No.8843434

>>8843428
i have no option but to use them in my nuclear physics course

>> No.8843442

>>8843271
k is the "sample" number of the frequency domain when you convert a discrete time function f[n] with a discrete time fourier transform

>> No.8843447

>in ODE class
>write all my differentials as [math]\partial[/math]

i am unstoppable

>> No.8843456
File: 123 KB, 460x460, 1488047014546.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8843456

>tfw writing + D instead of + C

>> No.8843468

>assign every variable [math]\xi_i[/math]

>> No.8843483

>>8843276
Kys.
>>8843442
I don't follow your meaning. Consider the following: You roll a k-sided die n times. What is the probability that each of the k faces appeared at least once? why'd the author elect k?

>> No.8844025
File: 1.96 MB, 286x400, 1468876618152.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8844025

>>8843456
>tfw changing [math]e^C[/math] into [math]C[/math] without further comment

>> No.8844144
File: 14 KB, 300x300, 300x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8844144

let [math]f(x)[/math] be a function

>> No.8844502

Alex is a stupid INTEGER

>> No.8844522

>>8843157
Let OP be a faggot.

>> No.8844528

>>8843157
P=NP
P/P=N
1=N

>> No.8844562 [DELETED] 

Let n stand for all niggers

>> No.8844655

let x be a constant

>> No.8844662

>>8843425
That's because I am too busy studying Anabel's pussy instead.

>> No.8844670

>>8843241
Rudin uses p and q for rationals iirc.

>> No.8844850

>>8844025

just gave my an ODE flashback, good times

>> No.8844853
File: 296 KB, 500x375, 1484626197547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8844853

>Let x be a real number

>> No.8844945

Let n be a nigger.

>> No.8844976

>>8844562
>>8844945

What is sqrt(n)

>> No.8844989

>>8843412
It's m/s^2

>> No.8845005

>>8844976
ur mom

>> No.8845022
File: 41 KB, 720x439, bullshit but.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845022

let ur mom be of schwarzschild radius -1/12m

>> No.8845027

>>8843157
>let n be an engineer.

>> No.8845064

Let u and v be vectors...

>> No.8845075
File: 1.29 MB, 195x229, 1488270089368.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845075

>Solve for x

>> No.8845098

>>8843412
>engineers

>> No.8845101

>>8844662
kek

>> No.8845156

is w the most neglected letter in math?

>> No.8845161

>>8844025
there's nothing wrong with this, if [math]e^c[/math] where c is an arbitrary constant, then it's an arbitrary constant [math]C[/math]

>> No.8845163

>>8845156
It's the second complex variable, after z.

>> No.8845165

>>8845156
o is up there

>> No.8845166

>>8845156
>w
just before x, what a shame. Always in it's shadow

>> No.8845214

>>8844025
There is nothing wrong with this though

>> No.8845312

>>8845165
This and non-script l

>> No.8845502

>>8845161
>>8845214
no it's not faggots
if [math]C \in \mathbb{R}[/math] is arbitrary, then it cannot be [math]e^{C}[/math] since [math]\forall x \in \mathbb{R} e^x > 0[/math]

>> No.8845511
File: 174 KB, 265x258, 052.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845511

>>8845502
>he doesn't know about the fixed point of the exponential function

>> No.8845528

>>8845156
Use it all the time in stats and ML

>> No.8845549
File: 258 KB, 1920x2318, Engineers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845549

>>8843412
i had a chuckle at this

>> No.8845555 [DELETED] 

>>8845502
but most of the time people do what that guy does, C>0

>> No.8845573

>>8845555
nevermind I am retarded, deleting these quads

>> No.8845586

>"for all epsilon < 0"...

>> No.8845679

>>8845511
please explain

>> No.8845766

>assume [math]\pi=3[/math]

>> No.8845835

>differentially small

>> No.8845871

>>8843157
I'll buy that for a dollar.

>> No.8845901

>using [math]x^2 \sin y dx dy dz[/math] for your differential element of volume instean of [math] r^2 \sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi [/math]

>> No.8845909
File: 11 KB, 278x200, this is some next level shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845909

>>8845766

>> No.8845927
File: 86 KB, 944x622, 1482716813303.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8845927

>Cylindrical coordinates

>> No.8845949

>>8845901
>>8845927
>coordinates