[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 109 KB, 766x544, Screen Shot 2017-03-23 at 10.33.51 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8772830 No.8772830 [Reply] [Original]

This course just started today. Anyone else gonna work through it?

https://www.edx.org/course/nuclear-reactor-physics-basics-mephix-mephi005x

>> No.8772835
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8772835

>nuclear physics taught by a Russian
based

>> No.8772839

>>8772830
>neutron sources
>light nuclei
>no liquid PbBi spallation target

>> No.8772858

>>8772830
Nuclear science is dead.

>> No.8772861

>>8772858
isnt it ironic how pro-environmental lefties who know nothing about science are the ones most against nuclear energy?

>> No.8772890

>>8772861
very, familiar with LFTRs?

>> No.8772896

>>8772861
It is as stupid as refusing to ride a plane. Yes if things go bad, then they go really bad. But the chance of that actually happening is extremely low.

>> No.8772938

>>8772896
see
>>8772890

>> No.8772948

>>8772861
>projecting this hard
>shilling this hard

>> No.8773145

All nergy on earth including potential is directly or indirectly resultant solar nuclear.......

>> No.8773160

>>8773145
What about gravitational potential energy?

>> No.8774034

>>8772861
Not all of them! Ya boi did a ten page shit paper in 8th grade and all that accomplished was hours of wikipedia basically saying "we can incinerate trash for energy without destroying the planet" and "nuclear energy is fantastic once we figure out what to do with the byproducts." There are reasons but surely nuclear energy is way more pro than a bunch of freedom apes burning """"clean"""" coal for Trump's asswarmer.