Why do you believe in catastrophic global warming without any evidence?

[Anonymous No.8674186]

Why do you belittle skeptics and people who don't wanna take part in your religion?
I thought skepticism was one of the pillars the scientific method was built upon, and there was no room for dogmatism and irrational beliefs in science and instead you built a vacuous death cult around it. Sad.

[Anonymous No.8674201]

>>8674186
"more ice than ever"
i dont think that is any better than global warming, this is more of a global freezing

[Anonymous No.8674209]

>>8674186
>>8674201
GOOD LUCK WINTER CHAN
I LOVE YOU WINTER CHAN

[Anonymous No.8674226]

>>8674186
You're a moron, and your persecution fantasy is purely fantasy.

Also, your picture is absurd. The Antarctic ice grow is small, very regional, and doesn't even come close to offsetting the loss of Arctic ice. Even a trivial amount of research would have told you this.

[Anonymous No.8674244]

Are you the same guy that said that this climate change was a good thing?

[Anonymous No.8674260]

>>8674186
Al gore is propaganda not science.

[Anonymous No.8674263]

>>8674186

Al Gore is a narcissistic rich boy with a messiah complex, the AGW argument never depended on him in any way, he merely jumped on the bandwagon and made himself the face of anti-global warming, pocketing billions on carbon credits as he did so.

[Anonymous No.8674281]

>>8674186
>Why do you belittle skeptics and people who don't wanna take part in your religion?
I have never belittled a skeptic. You seem to be confused about what a skeptic is and what a religion is. A skeptic is someone who determines the validity of something through reason and evidence. Someone who clings to their belief and ignores all evidence to the contrary is a religious individual. AGW denial is the religion, and calling yourself a skeptic is pure hypocrisy.

[Anonymous No.8674304]

>>8674186
>The noted scientist, climatologist, and public intellectual; Al Gore.

Why the fuck do you retards keep shilling that bloviating expolitico?

[Anonymous No.8674338]

>>8674281
hi sockpuppet

[Anonymous No.8674363]

>>8674338
Those "talking points" are true though. There IS a vast consensus that AGW is real and bad, and there IS concrete evidence linking several companies to "advocacy" groups. I'm not sure what the "IPCC scientists" thing is supposed to mean.

[Anonymous No.8674368]

>>8674363
Don't bother engaging, these people are delusional and can't be reasoned with.

[Anonymous No.8674377]

Reminder to report these bait threads as rule violation.

[Anonymous No.8674801]

Long time believer in catastrophic global warming here.

I have to admit that recently much evidence has come out against it and I feel my once unwavering faith has been shaken.

[Anonymous No.8674807]

>>8674377
Making false reports is a violation of the rules, though.

[Anonymous No.8674872]

>>8674186
This "prediction" is fake. Al Gore did not ever make that prediction.

[Anonymous No.8674876]

>>8674186
Also, the claim that a "2015 NASA report" says there's "more ice than ever" is also false.

[Anonymous No.8674880]

>>8674801
>"I was once an atheist sinner and believed in evolution because I secretly hated God's judgement, but then I found the LORD Jesus Christ and was born again. Buy by new book to get the full story".

[Anonymous No.8675125]

>>8674186
>m-muh global warming!
but in some places its getting colder and all our predictions and hypothesis over the last 30 years have been falsified
>m-muh man-made climate change! we can just go back and change our assumptions so that the data fits, we were right all along!
our models were wrong again, egad! its time for our routine data modification. also our name doesn't sound "sciencey" enough
>m-muh anthropocentric climate change! aha!
>lets use taxpayer money to mass produce current technology (from companies that me and my friends own) that has no hope of sustenance rather than R&D, and pay no attention to the larger issue of overpopulation! don't forget we are 100% certain the data will fit this time even though we've been wrong every time in the past, 97%(*) of the climatologists that we fund through the state agrees!

i did get a laugh out of the "icebergs are sexist" peer reviewed and published papers, at least. i say let it ride

[Anonymous No.8675245]

>>8674186
>a vacuous death cult around it. Sad.

Wrong. I do NOT take climate warming as a certainty, as idiots will and do.
But it is "reasonable" to think it is happening (cause and effect, consequences, karma). It is unreasonable and insane to deny it with certainty and deniers are as stupid as any believer in certainty.