[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 3 KB, 345x161, 1486155094477.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Feb 6 21:07:18 2017 No.8656892 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

prove me wrong

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 21:10:01 2017 No.8656894 >>8656892 0 != 1

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 21:12:01 2017 No.8656895 >>8656892 But Thom Yorke said it's true.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 21:13:21 2017 No.8656898 Assume lesser values of 2

Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:31:41 2017 No.8657018

>>8656892
I;m glad you posted this. My esteemed father-in-law had a running joke with his daughters that 2+2=5, which got my wife into trouble in school once, and became a family motto of sorts. He passed away this year, and I miss him -- he was a great guy.

>/sci/ brought an unexpected smile to my face this day.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:32:49 2017 No.8657020 File: 43 KB, 719x548, OP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8656892

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:43:16 2017 No.8657031 xx (2) yy (2) = xxyy (4) ___ xx(2) yy(2) =/= xxxyy(5) or xxyyy(5) I'm a fucking math wizard

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:44:17 2017 No.8657033 >>8656894 I actually read somewhere that 0! = 1

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:45:43 2017 No.8657035 >>8657031 Prove xxyy != xxxyy

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 22:57:27 2017 No.8657067 >>8657035 nigga count

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 23:03:26 2017 No.8657076 >>8656892 this works for large values of 2

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 23:03:54 2017 No.8657077 >>8657033 of course it is, otherwise math wouldn't work

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 23:07:57 2017 No.8657082 [[f(x)]], when [2,3) Multiply by 2 You get 5. I don't know what the fuck I'm doing

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 23:19:01 2017 No.8657096 >>8656892 I think our buddy Kripke can explain better than I could. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE9m6Bu0RGI&t=1327s

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 6 23:20:58 2017 No.8657100 >>8656894 dirty coder

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 00:10:32 2017 No.8657153 >>8656892 prove it's possible to prove you wrong first

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:01:54 2017 No.8657211 >>8656892 2=/=7 Wow that was easy

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:04:29 2017 No.8657213 >>8656892 Define "5"

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:17:31 2017 No.8657228 File: 81 KB, 550x679, vwHFS0w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:20:08 2017 No.8657231 >>8657228 Does this mean i can go back to my 1st grade teacher and demand a regrading of all of the questions i got wrong?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:37:01 2017 No.8657248 >>8656892 Just let S(3) = 5, now 2+2 = 5

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 01:42:48 2017 No.8657254 >>8657035 something something a value must be equal to itself

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 05:39:17 2017 No.8657484 >>8657213 define "define"

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 05:55:31 2017 No.8657496 >>8656892 Would you give me a 50 for two twenties?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 08:07:20 2017 No.8657669 >>8656892 12345 12 34 2. 2. One two. One two One two. Three four. 2. 2 4 Four This proof has no fancy concepts or discusstractions but just the numbers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 08:10:15 2017 No.8657674 >>8656892 4 =/= 5

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 09:21:18 2017 No.8657757 >>8657076 Underrated

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 10:05:22 2017 No.8657807 >>8657076 Holy shit my sides

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 10:06:53 2017 No.8657810 >>8656892 Redefine peano arithmetics and it's about right

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 10:08:21 2017 No.8657812 >>8657213 5 := 2+2

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 14:11:25 2017 No.8658144 >>8656892 1+1=10

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 14:14:59 2017 No.8658156 >>8658144 >using the one true base >mynigga.jpg

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 14:28:15 2017 No.8658189 >>8657231 No, but your parents can.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 14:35:27 2017 No.8658208 Earth is a rhombus please respond

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 14:58:46 2017 No.8658259 >>8656892 how many fingers winston? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKtpCo8fPE

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 15:14:45 2017 No.8658288 >>8656892 Of course and 2+3 = 4. You just replaced a symbol. kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 15:43:51 2017 No.8658341 >>8656892 Use your fingers

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 15:44:20 2017 No.8658342 >>8656892 Prove yourself right

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 15:57:44 2017 No.8658364 >>8656892 0 is a natural number All S(n) is a natural number S(S(n) + S(n)) S(0) = 1 S(S(0)) = 2 and so on All S(n) != S(S(n)) S(S(0)) + S(S(0)) = S(S(S(S(0)))) in decimal notation, that's equal to 4 and thus not 5.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 16:13:23 2017 No.8658383 >>8656892 you hold the burden of proof for claiming something

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:14:53 2017 No.8658501 proof: suppose that 2 + 2 = 5 then 1 + (2 + 2) = 5 + 1, which implies that (2 + 1) + 2 = 6, which further implies that 3 + 2 = 6. this is a contradiction, so our assumption that 2 + 2 = 5 is wrong. QED

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:18:31 2017 No.8658508 >>8656892 2+ 2 = (1+1) + (1+1) = 1+1+1+1 = 2+1+1 = 3+1 = 4 =/=5

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:28:45 2017 No.8658528 >>8656892 Get two objects now get two other objects now count them, what number do you get?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:29:47 2017 No.8658530 >>8657228 This doesnt make any sense how can 1+1=3?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:37:48 2017 No.8658542 >>8657018 shut up nigger

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 17:41:58 2017 No.8658554 http://www.idt.mdh.se/~icc/principia.gif

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 18:14:07 2017 No.8658611 >>8658501 >then 1 + (2 + 2) = 5 + 1, Prove it. >which implies that Implying 5 + 1 = 6, which you haven't proved either. >which further implies that Again, implying that 2 + 1 = 3, Prove it. >this is a contradiction Why?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 18:15:37 2017 No.8658614 >>8658528 Define "two" Define "objects" Define "count" Define "number" Define "get"

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 18:20:03 2017 No.8658621 >>8658614 Is this a meme?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 18:24:21 2017 No.8658626 >>8658611 >Prove it. Why?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 21:00:34 2017 No.8658922 >>8656892 I've got a better one, and that's already been mathematically proven 1+1=1 Now tell me how

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 7 21:02:35 2017 No.8658927 >>8657228 But how is 2+2=5?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 00:14:19 2017 No.8659277 >>8657669 >One two. Three four. >2 + 4 + 4 + 4 the answer is clearly 14

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 05:52:57 2017 No.8659679 >>8656892 >how a physicist does math >2+2=/=5 Just add hypothetical "dark" number >2+2+"1"=5 Now you can do MATH like a physicist.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 07:40:25 2017 No.8659788 \|\| + \|\| = \|\|\|\|

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 07:51:18 2017 No.8659802 x = y ergo x = x 1 = 1 5 = 5 2 + 2 + 1 = 5 Q.E.D

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 09:27:45 2017 No.8659913 define a new type of addition as [math]a \bigoplus b=a+b+1[/math] it's commutative and associative no problem

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 09:30:18 2017 No.8659920 >>8658614 Define "define"

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 10:12:03 2017 No.8659961 >>8659920 Define define

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 10:23:19 2017 No.8659977 File: 38 KB, 1000x764, the-four-lights-6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8657020

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 8 10:25:04 2017 No.8659979 >>8656892 there is nothing wrong with feminist mathematics in fact you just qualified as rocket scientist at ESA praise KEK and sabotage ESA missions until they apologize for work life balance bossing of Matt Taylor

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]