[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 946 KB, 1920x1080, 58784818_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8633148 No.8633148 [Reply] [Original]

Who is Kurisu of the 3d?

>> No.8633339

Kurisu is a dumb worthless whore who should be punched in the face repeatedly, so all women qualify.

>> No.8634029

>>8633339
woah there

>> No.8634046

>>8633339
>anon loses his mind after failing all the "you should be able to solve this" problem threads

>> No.8634073
File: 81 KB, 937x960, 1484628115010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8634073

>>8633339
>he wasn't able to solve this

>> No.8635732

>>8634073
the answer is C.
MCQ has only one answer, hence P(correct)=25%.
Therefore probability of picking 25% is 50%

>> No.8635735

>>8634073
50%

>> No.8635958

>>8633148
There is no equivalent in 3d because there aren't any REAL women scientists.

>> No.8635959

>>8635958
Nice no true scottsman.

>> No.8635964
File: 80 KB, 500x500, 1420069083263.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8635964

>>8635959
Brainlet

>> No.8635972

>>8635958
gb2Arabia Abdul

>> No.8635984

>>8635959
>a woman is below average/average/good looking
>a woman breezes through uni because professors go easy on her since she has a vagina
>she goes out and fucks around and has a 'complex' social life which leads to no time to actually learn her field with depth, she just crams in best case scenario
>she has skin-deep superficial knowledge of her field, she also usually forgets what she learns after she is done with the subject
>she scores a job since she has a vagina
>she starts using her vagina to make babies and forces her employer to find a replacement while she gets paid to do nothing
>she then brags about being a successful scientist AND a MOTHER to five kids
The only women who can be scientists are shrek women, and shrek women are basically guys desu.

>> No.8635999

>>8635732
that's a bad assumption
not all questions have correct answers

>> No.8636003

>>8635999
things that don't have an answer aren't proper questions

>> No.8636006

>>8636003
then perhaps you made a mistake assuming the above question was a proper one

>> No.8636011

>>8636006
I'm not the guy whom you originally replied to

>> No.8636016

>>8636011
neither am I