[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 2.76 MB, 2844x1600, mit-vs-stanford.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8560822 No.8560822[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Who here Stanford/MIT/Caltech master race? Are you enjoying your time? What are you majoring in? What are the ups and downs? Do the kids live up to the name of your school? Does the school itself?

Also, apologies to Caltech ahead of time: I couldn't find a pic with all three schools in my cursory google image search

>> No.8560827

>>8560822
I'm from Canada, I am pursuing a doctorate at at MIT. The undergrads are worse than most community colleges desu

>> No.8560833

MIT
> Are you enjoying your time?
Yes
>What are you majoring in?
Math is the plan.
>What are the ups and downs?
The dining halls are closed and I have no money so I cant eat, and will die over the next week.
>Do the kids live up to the name of your school?
No
>Does the school itself?
Yes

>> No.8560851
File: 85 KB, 302x313, IMG_0043.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8560851

The masterrace will always be the Ashkenazim.

>> No.8560871

Caltech
> Are you enjoying your time?
Yes
>What are you majoring in?
Physics
>What are the ups and downs?
Food is stupidly overpriced.
>Do the kids live up to the name of your school?
A good fraction of them.
>Does the school itself?
Yes.

>> No.8560891

>>8560822
Texas A&M master race here.

>> No.8560899
File: 547 KB, 488x488, BE_Logo__RGB_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8560899

>>8560822
Fuck Stanfurd.

>> No.8560905

>>8560899
>He goes to a public school
lul
(if ur a grad student its k)

>> No.8560907

>>8560905
>He buys his grades

>> No.8560910

>>8560907
actually with financial aid rich alums buy them for me :^)

>> No.8560914

>>8560910
I mean I chose Cal at least partially because of the financial aid I'm getting, my dad's veteran status gets my tuition paid up through a PhD if I want/need it to.

>> No.8560919

My uni isn't even listed

>> No.8561079

>>8560899
safety schools get out

>> No.8561094

>>8560822
>Equating MIT and Caltech to Stanford
lol, someone's a nervous failure, isn't he?

>> No.8561111

>>8561094
I can't tell which one you're trying to roast

>> No.8561115

>>8560891
Hey TAMU master race here too. Major?

>> No.8561121

>>8560822
ITT: Snobs who thought their high ranked universities would make them special but day by day the realization that it won't hits deep and now the only sense of superiority they can get out of it is by posting about it on an imageboard where nobody gives a shit.

>> No.8561124

>>8561121
Projecting

>> No.8561126

>>8561121
sorry you couldn't get in, bud. the smart person life isn't for everyone :(

>> No.8561131

>>8561124
>>8561126

No, don't think too much about it. A thread where I was heavily shitposting in just got deleted and I wanted to check if I was banned and this was the first thread I saw.

That said, you are still tools.

>> No.8561151

>>8561131
nah man, you're a tool

That said, you are still a tool

>> No.8561156

>>8561151
I am not the one making threads to increase my little, little ego.

>> No.8561164

>>8561156
bud, I didn't go to any of the schools I mentioned in the OP. And never did I insinuate it. I was just wondering what life was like in those schools. Calm down, big boy

>> No.8561173

>>8561164
Wait, you don't go to any of those schools and yet you call them "masterrace"? Fuck man, what kind of cuckold brainwashing did you undergo.

I thought the people saying things like "masterrace" were supposed to be the thing they are claiming is superior but you... you as an outside come here to suck people's cocks. Holy fuck. Who hurt you? It is okay man, ranking is literally just a meme.

>> No.8561178

>>8561173
jesus, bud. I can't tell if you're yanking my chain right now, but please don't take a bunch of meme words so seriously. have a good one

>> No.8561180

>>8561173
fuck off retard

>> No.8561239

Does it matter really matter where go to school? I'm looking at public universities because GI Bill will cover full tuition. I'm in community college and working on transferring for computer engineering.

>> No.8561245

>>8560822
God Tier Howard University checking in.

>> No.8561251

>>8561245
fuck out of here nigger

>> No.8561257
File: 327 KB, 1051x1024, IMG_4399.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561257

Sorry, brainlets. Real genius coming through

>> No.8561370

>>8561239
It doesn't really as long as its ABET accreddited and is well known/has a good job fair (the former usually leads to the latter)

Its just better schools have better internship opportunities. As an example, although Cornell and Wisconsin both have great oppurtunties for internships, Cornells are obviously going to be far better as they are a better program and have more prestige.

For engineering and (to a certain degree) science where you went becomes largely irrelevant for jobs unless you are being hired by a fellow alum. The prestige of the school matters while you are there as internships. State schools almost always have great connections within the state, especially Big 10 schools and Southern State schools.

>> No.8561386

>>8561257
>claims Harvard
>no time stamp
>no ID card
>no proof

>> No.8561416
File: 10 KB, 225x225, 1357580662400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561416

>>8560822
>parents went to stanford
>brother went to MIT
>I went to a state school for undergrad and am currently still there for my master's

I need to knock it out of the park for my PhD program fuck me

>> No.8561437

>>8561416
>This is how the system of classism and capitalism corrupts the souls of the people, making them not proud of having a higher education in a time when like 10% of people go to university, but instead make them suffer because they didn't go to a "good" enough place. Good being defined by how useful it is for the establishment of rich politicians and banks who wish to make college more expensive to incentivize young people to take out loans and fall into the biggest trap of capitalism

This is why I say you people are tools. You were fed the meme of prestige and now you suffer when you should be overjoyed.

>> No.8561444
File: 188 KB, 1539x1182, denison.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561444

big boy reporting in

>> No.8561445

>>8561444
>big boy

I've never even seen that logo before.

>> No.8561452

>>8561437
The bottom line is, you are either going to an elite college or a shit college. The difference is night and day. Few things are more important for long-term economic prospects than the prestige of your degree-granting institution.

>> No.8561455
File: 30 KB, 355x362, IMG_3979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561455

>>8561416
>dual-parent legacy at a top school not named MIT
>didn't get in
You were probably too stupid anyway

>> No.8561478

>>8561452
If you truly believe this then you are way beyond the point you can be saved. You have been succesfully brainwashed by the establishment.

The sad thing is that it is really weird. It is usually the case that the delusional person is the one who goes to a mid/low level college but then says that ranking as ABSOLUTELY no impact at all. That is the kind of delusion I expect becausen that person's delusion helps them cope with their own internal failure. It helps them feel better about themselves.

But you, you are even worse. You are going to a mid/low level and you believe that the difference between your college and an "elite" one is as big as the difference between night and day. Your delusion HURTS you, but you still believe it.

Why? How did you get this brainwashed? Why do you not know that the only person who will care about your university is the HR person who hires you for your first job ever. Then you work for 5 years and after all that those 5 years of experience will be all you get asked about in the future.

The american system is trully corrupt and I can't believe it works.

cont.

>> No.8561479

>>8561455
more like i was too busy being addicted to World of Warcraft to care about where I was going for college or my future and then senior year came and I was like "oh well I guess I should try to do a little more"

Put forth minimal effort to get straight A's in high school and reaped what I sowed.

>> No.8561483

>>8561452
>>8561478


>encourage high spending by colleges for any kind of bullshit. Bigger buildings, stadiums, an inside merch industry, etc.
>then encourage banks to lend a lot of money to students who then directly pay for unis and therefore pay for the senseless spending that was pushed before.
>Create a ranking system in where if your college does not meet a checklist of useless bullshit then you are pushed down.
>Then push for universities to charge an amount directly proportional to their ranking
>Then convince people that if you are not going to the highest ranking institutions (read: most expensive) then you are getting robbed out of a meaningful and worthwhile education
>That kickstarts a meaningless race to the top when in reality everyone should be going to the most affordable college near their own area, unless they were confirmed child geniuses with a 300 IQ
>Then succesfully create a system where 90% of the population feels bad about their higher education, more vulnerable to in the future want to spend on more meaningless bullshit

It is like a second capitalism. Oh, you are middle class? LOL WHY ARE YOU NOT A MILLIONAIRE. ARE YOU LAZY NOW? LAZY MIDDLE CLASS LOL!

Oh so you are a millionaire? Well, it won't last for long unless you become a MULTI MILLIONAIRE, SPEND MORE NOW AND DON'T FORGET TO DISPLAY YOUR WEALTH BUYING BIG THINGS YOU DON'T NEED ;^)

Oh, you are a multi millionaire? Well, fuck. If you are not a billionaire then you are basically DIRT POOR. SPEND MOOOREEE BUY MORE BUSINESSES BUT DON'T FORGE TTO ALSO BUY MORE HOUSES AND CARS AND EVERYTHING, SPEND SPEND SPEND.

It is the same thing. Oh, you are going to an ok- state uni? LOL WHY AREN'T YOU GOING TO THE TOP 1 IN YOUR STATE! YOU ARE SO CHEAP AND PROBABLY DUMB!

You are top 1? Then why not TOP 50 IN THE COUNTRY!

What, you are top 50? But not top 10? Lol you are basically a peasant LOL. Get out of here.

>> No.8561485

>>8561478
Because it's actually true? Plenty of prestigious companies will only interview grads of elite colleges, for example, which gives graduates of these colleges much better opportunities for resume building.

They also have an advantage in admission to prestigious graduate programs, where the situation is as bad or worse in many fields of science, as in you will have a very hard time getting a long-term science job if you don't attend an elite institution.

>> No.8561490

>>8561485
As I said, where you graduated only matters for the first 5 years of your career. After that people will only see your work experience. Nobody cares about the university history of a 30 year old.

Do you think that everytime you get into a business venture or go for a job they will ask again and again for your college? In less than 3 years your college will be a footnote, buried below paragraphs and paragraphs of experience. Nobody will care.

But you were made to believe that everyone will care. That you will be a failure if you do not have TOP 1 stamped on your degree. As my favorite politician would say

SAD!

>> No.8561494

>>8561485
>Plenty of prestigious companies will only interview grads of elite colleges, for example, which gives graduates of these colleges much better opportunities for resume building.
(Citation needed)
Seriously this is complete horseshit unless your definition of elite college is extremely loose, in which case define it.

>> No.8561498

>>8561490
If you worked for, say, Google, for your first 5 years, you will have far better exit opportunities than someone from a merely top-40 or so who worked at a less name-brand company. If that person wanted to get an MBA they would again be at a disadvantage due to having less prestigious accomplishments.

>>8561494
How about most of Wall Street, and quite a few Silicon Valley companies? I'm defining elite here as US top 15-20 or so. I'm sure they will have people working there who did not attend elite colleges but they are few and far between.

I'm thinking MIT, Stanford, Caltech, Berkeley, Ivies, maybe a few elite liberal arts colleges, a few other public schools (but this is really pushing it)

>> No.8561499
File: 592 KB, 2000x2000, Boston_University_seal.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561499

I-I'm close to MIT and Harvard geographically.

>> No.8561502

>>8561499
How do you stand it? Especially that one line from The Social Network where Mark says his gf doesn't need to study because she "goes to BU".

>> No.8561505

>>8561502
She wasn't in a STEM major, I take it?

>> No.8561508

>>8561498
>If you worked for, say, Google, for your first 5 years, you will have far better exit opportunities than someone from a merely top-40 or so who worked at a less name-brand company. If that person wanted to get an MBA they would again be at a disadvantage due to having less prestigious accomplishments.

This is true but how much is the difference? And can it be overcome?

I would say that the difference would simply be a couple of thousand dollars a year. That is not a class difference. They would be the same, just one would have not pocket money.

And could it be overcome? Of course! Save money and start a business! When you are the boss none of your clients will ask for your degree. At that point your education will be the only factor, not what degree came attached to it.

That is another problem with the BIG UNI industry. For some reason most people think that the end game of our society is to get a great job. But no, having your own business is the end game. That is how you truly become wealthy, succesful and satisfied with yourself.

It is really sad that if you interview kids, teens and young adults to ask them about their life goals 99% of them will say or imply that they want to work for someone else. How has this system corrupted the capitalist dream.

SAD!

>> No.8561510

>>8561505
I don't remember. It's been a few years since I watched it.

>> No.8561511

>>8561502
By avoiding anyone from the fine arts, communications, social works, and education schools, and most of the College of Arts and Sciences students.

>> No.8561512

>>8561498
Stop the backpedaling, you said
>Plenty of prestigious companies will only interview grads of elite colleges, for example, which gives graduates of these colleges much better opportunities for resume building.
>will only interview grads of elite colleges
Completely ignoring the fact that plenty outside of top 15-20 get jobs on Wall Street (and I know plenty do as a family friend who used to work at Goldman Sachs directly recruited from schools outside the top 15-20), logically if people who are
>working there who did not attend elite colleges but they are few and far between.
then they logically must interview many who didn't attend a top 15-20 school.

>> No.8561516

>>8561505
You don't need to study that much to do well in a STEM major. I didn't study that much in undergrad at a US top 40 in math/physics and still ended up with like a 3.8 despite taking a fair number of advanced graduate courses in both fields.

I don't really care that much about business anyway, I already haven't gotten any calls for jobs ~6 months out of school with an MS, so I'm just going to go back to academia and hope I get in to an elite institution for my PhD.

>>8561512
I'm just basing this on friends I know who have worked on Wall Street for awhile and told me that they have a fairly small set of "target" schools from which they interview candidates which basically amount to the places you'd expect.

>> No.8561520

>>8561502
Also we're allegedly among the most employable schools in the world.

>> No.8561524

>>8561516
Companies do recruit directly from certain schools, but many such as Boston College fall significantly outside your definition of elite. Its small in the sense that if you go to SUNY-Purchase you aren't going to work on Wall Street.
Remind yourself that your friends likely aren't the recruiters and are probably full of shit.
Silicon Valley doesn't exclusively do this.

>> No.8561527

>>8561524
meh, it just feels like I ruined my life by being lazy in high school and not pursuing enough extracurriculars to get in to an elite college, my grades and SAT scores were good enough but I didn't really know what was doing.

>> No.8561532

>>8561527
What college do you even go to anon

>> No.8561537

>>8561532
It doesn't matter, I just gave a rough idea of the ranking based on US news ranking in >>8561516

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/data

The problem is, academia is even worse, in physics you are really going to struggle if you don't go to a top tier institutions because you won't find your way in to a top postdoc without the right recommendation writers. Almost everyone employed at R1s has their PhD from an elite institution.

>> No.8561539

Unrelated to the topic
I live in Maryland, what is a good Maryland undergrad school?

>> No.8561542

>>8561539
Johns Hopkins, UMD is pretty good in some fields.

>> No.8561544

>>8561537
You have to do internships or research to get any sort of job for most majors anon, it didn't have anything to do with your uni

>> No.8561553

>>8561544
I know, I did summer research internships in both math and in physics during undergrad, and I did research as part of my masters. As far as I can tell, I don't have sufficient corporate experience to get hired, but I can't exactly get an internship at this point. This whole situation is all because my physics GRE was too low for a top tier institution this year.

>> No.8561561

>>8561553
Then I don't know, are you being picky with what jobs you apply to?

>> No.8561567

>>8561561
Not really. Maybe it's just taking companies a long time to call back, I don't know. I mostly apply to defense or programming jobs. NEETing isn't the worst thing ever, but it is an odd sort of pressure in a way, because it feels as if I will be in this exact situation in 3-4 years after I get my PhD, if I don't go to a name-brand place.

>> No.8561569

>>8561567
Maybe try a different area, although 6 months and no job looks a bit bad

>> No.8561571

>>8561569
Yeah, the problem is once you don't get hired for too long, you can't get ever get hired, due to not being employed for too long. I also fucking hate working, if my experiences working summer jobs in HS is any indicator. I don't really enjoy anything much, but I actively dislike going to work.

>> No.8561580
File: 116 KB, 584x617, MIT-Cheers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561580

>I'm a beaver!
>You're a beaver!
>We are beavers all!
>And when we get together, we do the beaver call!
>e^ u du dx, e^x dx.
>cosine, secant, tangent, sine, 3.14159.
>integral, radical, mu, dv
>slipstick, sliderule, MIT!

>GOOOO Tech!

>> No.8561599
File: 36 KB, 865x526, 1482635118074.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561599

How many hours are you Ivy people investing per class approx. per semester?

>> No.8561608

>>8561599
None, In ivies the system is pay4grade.

>> No.8561619

>>8561599
None. My dad owns one of the biggest factories that produces rubber for tires in north america. I just spend my time doing molly with stacy sluts. I get C's on my exams and assignments but usually it gets curved up to an A.

I also got an A in UG research but I only showed up to the lab once.

>> No.8561885
File: 115 KB, 546x903, scghahi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8561885

>>8560822
>Caltech

you're joking right?

Shanghai rankings rank University of Washington, Berkeley, Oxford, Chicago, etc. higher than caltech (which is only decent for research)

>> No.8561888

>>8561885
We are talking undergraduate faggot, also in what world is University of Minnesota better than virtually any college on that entire list

>> No.8561892

>>8561888
again, caltech isn't good.

http://www.thebestschools.org/features/best-mathematics-programs-in-world-today/

Look on here, this factors in undergrad (and shanghai does do)

Caltech is still ranked below Washington, Ecole, Princeton, Berkeley, and other elites. Caltech might be tier 2 or 3.

I go to Caltech for undergrad, and their math program is pretty shitty.

>> No.8561925

>>8561885
>UCLA #9
YEAH DAMN RIGHT

>> No.8562072

>>8561444
Literally who school

>> No.8562073

>>8561452

I've jumped around from different fields STEM fields (Engineering,finance, entrepreneurship) and have done pretty well for myself. I'd say there are 4 tiers in the working world. Only US unis in here. Did my BS (Math and ME) and my Masters at two different tier 2 schools btw.

Tier 1

> Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton, and Caltech in that order. Wharton also falls somewhere in the middle here.

Top jobs handed out like candy and unparalleled recruitment and alumni network, plenty of trust fund babbies and brainlet minorities but these are the only schools where you can be of average intelligence compared to the student body and land top positions.

Tier 2

>Top publics (Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, GT) and everything in the top 20 USews besides WashU and Emory. Notable exceptions here made for Georgetown, CMU and USC. All ivies and ivy equivalents are here. Columbia, Hopkins and Uchicago can be argued for tier 1.5. Top military academies, Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore and Harvey Mudd are the only LACs here.

If you are here, pretty much every employer at a non-shit company will recognize these names and know a little bit about each school. Fantastic recruiting relative to the general population although you cannot get by on being average at these schools.

Tier 3

>Good state publics (UF, Wisconsin, OSU). WashU and EMORY and most of the USnews top 50 falls here. Good LACs (Middlebury, Bowdoin, Vassar) fall here due to name recognition, assume anything past 15 in the LAC USnews ranking is not in this tier. Notable exceptions are Purdue, Texas A&M and Virginia tech.

You will have a good job if you fall here. However, don't expect to be anything more than a wagecuck who maybe peaks at 100k a year in a STEM field. There are exceptions to this of course but they become exceedingly rare at this level

Tier 4

>Everything else

Honestly better off not going to college and learning how to code. These schools are a waste of time and money.

>> No.8562076

>>8562073

Literally the most accurate rankings I've ever seen. Too bad OP doesn't know how to write sentences, must be one of those trust fund babbies.

>> No.8562082

>>8562073
>>8562076
Samefag, and its accurate until tier 4 which is objectively incorrect. Most colleges are worth something although it is significantly more difficult to get a good job the lower you go. When it comes to engineering it literally just matters if its ABET accredited or not.

>> No.8562091

>>8562082

If one isn't planning on going to grad school, engineering is the only thing worth studying at tier 4. Even then, becoming a quality self-taught coder will almost certainly get you farther than an engineering degree at low-tier ABET accredited school

>> No.8562092

>>8561257
Friendly reminder that this guy's a Harvard graduate :^)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HABNe7_D22k

>> No.8562222

>>8561539
Johns Hopkins if you got the money
UMD for parties/journalism
Towson for teaching
UMBC if you want to be a good scientist
Most others are memes

>> No.8562299

>>8561892
Caltech here,
Math and physics. Last year.
Have had more opportunity to do research than I would have been provided with anywhere else. Going to grad school @ZurichETH. Caltech is a research powerhouse, I'd contend it to be the best in the world in regards to opportunity and productivity.

>> No.8562342

>>8562073
Where are TN Tech and Vanderbilt?

>> No.8562459

>>8561885
You're either retarded or a troll. If you look at the methodology for Shanghai, you'll see that 90% of the ranking is TOTAL number (of laureates, papers, etc.). For a smaller school like Caltech (there are literally less than 250 undergrads per year) of course it will be ranked "lower" than giant state schools.

>> No.8562470

>>8561892
Can you read? This is literally the same ranking as the shanghai one lmao. Don't try and pass it off as independent.

At Caltech I am pretty sure undergrad math is actually one of the best (or at least has the highest minimum amount of rigor required, and the most opportunities for research), whereas grad school, maybe not so much. It's great if you want to do math-ph or hep-th type things (5/19 faculty are cross-listed with the physics department, and 4 of the others do really physics-y stuff) but is a little weak otherwise.

>> No.8562477
File: 66 KB, 742x156, cims_banner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8562477

I think you guys are so focussed on the name and general reputation of your school that you didn't actually think to look at faculty and departments.
Having said that, if you study math and don't study here, you've wasted your time. Harvard, MIT, you can go fuck yourselves. Princeton, kiss my ass. Stanford, suck a dick. Berkeley and UCLA, you have my respect.

>> No.8562483
File: 9 KB, 250x250, 1465879258819s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8562483

>>8560822
>ywn have to experience of going to an actually good school
>you will forever be banished into shitty state schools with terrible unmotivating professors

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I WANT OFF THIS RIDE

HOW DO I RESTART LIFE

>> No.8562491

>>8562483
State schools aren't all bad.
UC, U Washington, UT Austin, U of C Boulder, U W Madison, UIUC, U Michigan, SUNY Stony Brook, UVA, OSU, U Indiana Bloomington, UNH, Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech, UNC Chapel Hill, William & Mary, Penn State, Purdue, U Florida, Maryland, Clemson, and U Georgia are all solid schools.

>> No.8562561

>>8561553
>I did summer research internships in both math and in physics during undergrad

Did you do original research or what? How was it? Describe it please, I'm a scared and immensely stressed yuropoor.

>> No.8562574

>>8562299
>Have had more opportunity to do research than I would have been provided with anywhere else.

I'm >>8562561 I'd also appreciate your feedback. I made a thread once but only got 2 replies saying "just bee urself" and I'd like to know about your experiences and see your take on the issue.

>> No.8562576

>>8562561
I did computational physics. Then I did combinatorics the next year with a different professor. I think Euro grad schools are easier to get into and work a little differently but I'm not sure. I wouldn't stress too much about it. Try to get one if you can.

>> No.8562586

>>8562483
College is a scam anyways. Just become a math monk and freelancer until you reach next level and can start your own company.

>> No.8562590

anyone know the Ecole Normale Supérieure ?

>> No.8562592
File: 5 KB, 200x153, loansarefuckingstupid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8562592

>>8561257
Hey there second pick

Hopkins
> Are you enjoying your time?
Yes
>What are you majoring in?
My degree is in biology. Going for regular MD.
>What are the ups and downs?
Great school and working with some of the brightest people I've ever met. Living in baltimore is pretty aids though.
>Do the kids live up to the name of your school?
Yes.
>Does the school itself?
Yes

>> No.8562625

>>8562576
>I wouldn't stress too much about it.
I can't not stress about it, I just fucking can't.

>Try to get one if you can.
I have no idea how to, though, and I feel if I were to ask my tutor I'd be wasting his time with my whining, and probably embarass myself in some way or another or something, I don't fucking know.

>> No.8562946
File: 41 KB, 769x996, Illinois.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8562946

I attend this school for EE.

Should I end it?

>ywn be tier 1

>> No.8562961

>>8562946
UIUC is fine for EE. In fact, UIUC is fine for anything.

>> No.8562975

>>8562961
But I don't wanna be fine, I wanna git gud.

I always get this idea that the stuff we learn here isn't on par with the shit that MIT and Stanford (especially Caltech) kids go through and it just sabotages my entire self esteem and focus in class. I have a 4.0 until now but I still feel inferior because of this

Am I being retarded? Fuck my life.

>> No.8562989
File: 4 KB, 437x115, cal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8562989

hmm i didnt expect calstate to be on the list next to stanford and mit.

I'm studying math. I like the school as a whole, but the professors suck. my precalculus teacher cannot teach for shit. i didnt know my school was so prestigious tho. i shouldnt take it for granite

>> No.8562993

>>8562989
>Caltech
>Cal State

haahahahahahaha

>> No.8562994

>>8562975
Chill the fuck out you hyper autist, UIUC is literally a top 10 engineering school.

>> No.8563090
File: 35 KB, 480x480, dapper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8563090

>caltech rejected me
FUCKING FAGGOTS FUCK YOU
why ;_;

>> No.8563109

>>8562342

Vandy is solidly in tier 2

TN Tech is tier 4. Every TN school besides Vandy is tier 4 IMO. Viable for CS and Engineering, and worthless for everything else.

>> No.8563128

>>8562073


I disagree about the tier 3 LACs. Bowdoin, Middlebury, Wellesley and a couple others are very elite schools with endowments per student that rivals or surpasses the ivys. These schools feed excellently into grad school which is what really matters and even without the name recognition, you are basically getting a more personalized Ivy league education at these schools. The alumni networks at these schools are also really powerful because they are known to be more proactive in the success of former students than ivys or tier 1s.

>> No.8563442

>>8562994
Yeah but its like tier 3 in >>8562073 isn't it?

>> No.8563463

>>8562073
Wash U? Is that Washington University in St. Louis or the University of Washington? I know that the latter is really good for computer science, I know almost nothing about the former though

someone enlighten me

>> No.8563491

>>8563442
That guy's rankings are accurate until the 4th tier (because its just blatently incorrect and extremely delusional)
UIUC is tier 3 overall but its one of the absolute best in engineering, probably a tier 2 for engineering.

The reality is that most schools that have any sort of name are worth going to. If you go to USnews most schools in the top 150 for national universities and most schools in the top 75 of national liberal arts are worth going to for something, as long as you don't just sit around and be proactive about jobs after college from the minute you get to there.

>> No.8563695

>>8563463
WashU is the one in St.Louis. An overrated school that is known to game rankings and isn't particularly great at anything academically. They lure students in with good dorms, food, campus and overall quality of experience but fall behind their supposed peers when it comes to anything academic.

>>8563442
In the hiring world no one actually cares how good a school is in their major. Sure any intelligent company will know about UIUC and know that they're pretty good at engineering, but they don't know the specifics of how they stack up compared to everyone else. They also know that schools like Columbia, GT, and UCLA fall in the "good at engineering" tier as well and that's basically the only tier that matters. Once a school is in that "good at engineering" tier, name recognition will always get the nod over specific major rankings.

>> No.8563752

>>8562592
where do u live? i'm on maryland ave

>> No.8563874

>>8563463
My experience with WashU is that it's a good medical school, and decent otherwise, but not in the same tier as the actual national-level schools. It's probably the best school in the fly-over states, however little that means.

Anecdotally, of the three people I know who went to WashU, one did their graduate degree at Harvard and the other two are reasonably successful medical professionals.

>> No.8563964

>>8563491
>>8563695

>In the hiring world no one actually cares how good a school is in their major.

Do I still have hope for grad school then?

>> No.8563974

What are the Tier 1 schools, then? MIT, Harvard, and Caltech? More than that? Does it depends on the department? Is size a factor? Reputation? Funding? What about non-American schools like Oxbridge and ETHZ?

>> No.8563976

>BS in engineering
Is about knowledge and passion (which comes through in interviews and resumes), experience, and connections.
No one gives a fuck about what school you went to, lmao. So many retards graduate with engineering degrees with no intuitive knowledge about machines or background with machines.

Academia is a whole different story. But, to think someone in the industry cares if you went to UCSD, Cal Poly, or Caltech outside of alumni circlejerking is laughable.

>> No.8563980

>>8563974
For undergrad, all the schools you think.
For grad, department and faculty are more important. Example: UCLA > Harvard for analysis, NYU > all for applied math, Princeton > all for physics...

>> No.8563989

if you ignore ivies then aim for:

UNC Chapel Hill
Duke
Berkeley
UCLA
Caltech
Michigan
Chicago
MIT
Northwestern
USC
CMU
UVA
NYU
Georgia Tech

I can't think of any others. If it isn't in the list it's probably shit.

Although I will say schools like

Virginia Tech
Purdue
Penn State
NC State

are heavily recruited from in industry and known at larger companies like Amazon.

>> No.8563993

>>8563980
Thank you for the explanation; is Courant really the best for applied math? I had heard great things about it, but not that it was better than literally anywhere else.

>>8563989
Is UT Austin not at the same level as Michigan and UVA? "Public Ivies" or something like that?

>> No.8563997

>>8563993
UT Austin is solid.

For a list of non-HYPS/elite private tier colleges check out:

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/top-public

These will be the best overall public intuitions you can possibly attend.

>> No.8564001

>>8561524
Is grad school not popular for a lot of people on Wall Street? I imagine many people go to a good but non IVY tier school like BU but go to an elite grad school.

>> No.8564003

>>8563997
>Taking US News Seriously

>> No.8564006

>>8564003
Most of the programs I checked out that are ranked highly are also considered top math programs by others in the field. So good way to gauge which schools are top departments in X field.

>> No.8564030

>>8564003
then who do you trust for ratings?

>> No.8564032
File: 49 KB, 594x442, 4e1add32b86e1dda82d6673f582f66d48c794c38ea298b55056d16dba09e82ef_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8564032

>>8560822

I'm going to MIT for a winter course, plane leaves 30th dec. What happens at MIT over new-year? Course doesn't start before 2. jan

t. yuroshitter

>> No.8564069

>>8562092
Jesus is an allegory for love, retards

accept love into your heart.....

>> No.8564073

>>8564030
/sci/

>> No.8564079

>>8564032
1% of the student body like myself lives at the dorms doing nothing while everyone else has traveled home for the holidays. place is a ghost town right now

>> No.8564153

>>8564030
For the most part, I don't.

>> No.8564161

>>8564153
>t. NEET

>> No.8564217

>>8561437
To be fair though, of that 10% of people who do go to university, about 90% of them are retards.

>> No.8564412

>tfw not a single good school has a pharmd faculty
>Stuck in fucking albany for 4 years
>Gonna be counting pills for the rest of my life
Give me a reason not to end it

>> No.8564631

bumping ded thred, but how is UPenn for Med?

>> No.8564921

>>8560822
I feel like people who go to the best schools don't really post on /sci/ to make themselves feel better.
I might go crazy(madlad) and say that most people who post on /sci/ about their school being the 'master race' are the human equivalent to popsci and "I fucking love science".

>> No.8564954

>>8564412
>2016
>still going pharmd

good luck