[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 17 KB, 903x526, 9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8541896 No.8541896 [Reply] [Original]

Are you smarter than a Nip?

>> No.8541900
File: 192 KB, 500x395, w7C4ZGi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8541900

Fuck off

>> No.8541902

>>8541896
-1/12

>> No.8541904

>>8541896
9

>> No.8541907

>>8541896
9.0

>> No.8541908

>>8541896
9.0

>> No.8541912

>>8541904
>>8541907
>>8541908
its 8 you fucking brainlets

>> No.8541916

>>8541896
9.0

>>8541912
>inb4 "I'm just pretending to be retarded"

>> No.8541918

>>8541896
8.999999...

>> No.8541919

>>8541896
9.0 +/- 0.05, as we don't know the precision on the numbers.

>> No.8541931 [DELETED] 

>>8541919
>precision on the numbers

That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.
So it should be 9.0 +/- 0.6

>> No.8541933

>>8541919
>precision on the numbers

That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.
So it should be 9.3 +/- 0.3

>> No.8541943

>>8541896
its ten you fucking retards, round the decimals 6+ 4 ya goofs

>> No.8541963

>>8541896
Do any Japs here know the answer?

>> No.8541974

-1.0/12

>> No.8541993

32

>> No.8541995

>>8541902
I know what you did there

>> No.8542002

>>8541993
3*9 + 5*1

>> No.8542003

>>8541908
>>8541907
computer science
>>8541918
physicist
>>8541943
economist
>>8541993
philosopher
>>8541993
woman studies

>> No.8542005

>>8542003
drop out

>> No.8542012

>>8542002
>not using dot for multiplication and comma for decimals

>> No.8542013

>>8542003

mathematician

3.9 + 5.1 = there is an unique solution and it's trivial

>> No.8542014

>>8541896
Depends. In what group are we and what do the symbols '3.1' and '5.9' mean in terms of the elements of that group? Also, what is the explicit definition of the operation '+' for this group?

>> No.8542018

>>8541896
a white man spitting on a black man

>> No.8542024

>>8542003
>>8541993
>32
philosopher
>>8541993
>32
woman studies

K E K

>> No.8542033

>>8541963
Even if they did theres only 1% chance they will be right.

>> No.8542037

>>8542013
>further proof will be left as an excercise for the reader

>> No.8542041

>>8542033
/thread

>> No.8542051

>>8542003
memelord

>> No.8542365

9.00000000001

>> No.8542370

>>8541896
Why you shouldn't build a reactor on the japanese coastline.

>> No.8542441

>>8541933
>That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.

found the ''grades arent important Im wise in a way that cannot be measured'' guy

>> No.8542465

>>8541933
That's not how that works

>> No.8542503

>>8541896
obviously the answer is ???

>> No.8542906

>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = ??? = 3?
? = (3.9 + 5.1)/3 = 3

>> No.8542909

>>8542906
>??? = 3?
>not ?^3
shigeridoo

>> No.8543655

>>8541896
>Are you smarter than a Nip?
Nein

>> No.8543670

>>8541896
Who the fuck cares lol
Only nerds work with numbers and care about precision in their crunching

>> No.8543685

>>8541896
As we lack definitions for any of the symbols/groups of symbols in the picture, particularly the three question marks, we cannot deduce anything.

q.e.d.

>> No.8543691

>99% of jap school children are not autists
Pretty reassuring, actchually.

>> No.8543716

Hard to believe unless schoolchildren is defined as being quite young.

>> No.8543905

>>8541896
easy

just consider 3.9 as 4-0.0999... and 5.1 as 5.0999....

and then triple integrate

>> No.8543993

>>8541919
9.0+/-0.1 you fucking brainlet

>> No.8545645

>>8541896
8.1

>> No.8545656

>>8541896
? = 3

Q.E.D

>> No.8545664

>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
3? = 9
? = 3

>> No.8545666

>>8545664
3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
?^3 = 9
? = 2.08

>> No.8545715

>>8541896
8

>> No.8545735

>>8541896
It's 9, japanese children are just complete idiots, that's why there are only 1 % who are right.

>> No.8545951

>>8545666
lel

>> No.8545990

>>8545666
this guy fucks

>> No.8546083

>>8541919
9.0 implies [math]\pm[/math] 0.05.

>> No.8546101

8

>> No.8548015

>>8542003
quality post, kekked out loud

>> No.8548027

>>8541896
? = 3

>> No.8548083
File: 67 KB, 526x400, 1481659502013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8548083

>>8542003
dats it mang

>> No.8548115

3.9十5.1
(3.9)(十)(5.1)
十 is japanese for 10
(3.9)(10)(5.1)

193.9 is the correct answer

>> No.8548116

it's 11

t. asian chemist

>> No.8548294

>>8541896
10.
t. Engineer

>> No.8548326
File: 3.88 MB, 344x203, 1441819520339.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8548326

>>8542003
>philosopher
>woman studies

got a laugh out of me

>> No.8548561
File: 35 KB, 364x364, 1478708579275.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8548561

it's 9 considering the precision is implied to be two significant figures if there are no zeroes ahead of them.

>> No.8548865

>>>8545666
checked and keked

>> No.8548869

>>8548561
There are quantum digits after the first decimal points you just can't see them like in real life

>> No.8548885

>>8548561
reverse image search gives me nothing, sauce?

>> No.8548944

>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = 8.10

>> No.8549000

>>8541896
Assuming the equality sign is a test for equality (e.g. in Pascal)

> 3.5 + 5.1 = ???
Compilation error. Symbol ??? not found.

>> No.8549002

>>8549000
3.5 => 3.9

>> No.8549015

>>8541896
109.1 including dark numerals and dark operands.

>> No.8549031

>>8541896
my calculator it says 9 so...

>> No.8549210

What the fuck is going on, is /sci/ just pretending to be retarded?
9.0 +/- 0.1

>> No.8550747

>>8541896
Ive got $5.1
Ive got $3.9
How much do i have all together?
Fuck if i know because you dont show the full amount, ya cunt
9.000000000018284827e738wi4747