YLYL

[Anonymous No.8538538]

/sci/-related humour thread

[Anonymous No.8538540]

[Anonymous No.8538544]

[Anonymous No.8538546]

[Anonymous No.8538549]

[Anonymous No.8538550]

[Anonymous No.8538551]

/r/ing the one with the geologist at a party with his back at the wall and says something with 'gneiss cleavage'

[Anonymous No.8538553]

[Anonymous No.8538554]

[Anonymous No.8538558]

[Anonymous No.8538559]

[Anonymous No.8538560]

[Anonymous No.8538561]

>>8538540
Kekd

[Anonymous No.8538584]

>>8538549
The sage, lol

[Anonymous No.8538632]

[Anonymous No.8538634]

[Anonymous No.8538636]

[Anonymous No.8538643]

[Anonymous No.8538644]

[Anonymous No.8538658]

[Anonymous No.8538666]

>>8538643
me likey

[Anonymous No.8538668]

>>8538666

[Anonymous No.8538670]

>>8538668

[Anonymous No.8538673]

>>8538670

[Anonymous No.8538682]

>>8538668

[Anonymous No.8538716]

[Anonymous No.8538729]

>>8538670
>not simply checking the last digit of the number

[Anonymous No.8538736]

[Anonymous No.8538740]

[Anonymous No.8538768]

>>8538729
The code doesn't even work.

Also you don't check the last digit you check the last bit. Unless you have a decimal computer.

[Anonymous No.8538837]

>>8538644
Lost it at the cell cycles.

[Anonymous No.8538849]

>>8538729
I think thats part of the joke.

[Anonymous No.8538856]

[Anonymous No.8538861]

[Anonymous No.8538865]

WTF is this bullshit.
why the fuck do I have to wait to post?

[Anonymous No.8538869]

[Anonymous No.8538875]

[Anonymous No.8538877]

[Anonymous No.8538880]

[Anonymous No.8538886]

[Anonymous No.8538914]

>>8538880
took me a while to catch on to what the fuck s going on

[Anonymous No.8538954]

[Anonymous No.8539007]

>>8538914
brainlet

[Anonymous No.8539121]

>>8538877
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/1481723478-20161214%20(1)%20(1).png

[Anonymous No.8539143]

>>8538954
Congrats. You made me guffaw on public transit.

[Anonymous No.8539169]

[Anonymous No.8539172]

>>8538954
Kek. This guy was the substitute lecturer on maxwell's equations yesterday for my calc class.

[Anonymous No.8539186]

>>8538682
Giggled

[Anonymous No.8539201]

>>8538768

Why couldn't you do this, I don't understand?
Convert from an int to a str type. check the last char in the string against the 5 even endings?

[Anonymous No.8539203]

>>8539169
the absolute madman

[Anonymous No.8539229]

>>8539169
I zozzled, but it's obviously fake.

[Anonymous No.8539245]

>>8538560
Got me

[Anonymous No.8539250]

[Anonymous No.8539253]

>>8539229
It's funny because the teacher appeared to take it seriously anyway.

[Anonymous No.8539489]

>>8538880
What math should I learn to understand this

[Anonymous No.8539504]

>>8539489
IUTT

[Anonymous No.8539525]

>>8539504
Don't make me look up weird shit

[Anonymous No.8539535]

What do you call a room filled with the RNC pointing in the air?

[Anonymous No.8539666]

>>8539201
Variables are stored as bytes, which are base 2 conversions. If you wanted to check if it's even, just check if the byte ends in a 0.

[Anonymous No.8539669]

>>8539535

>'Look everyone!' Cruz has returned!'
>'Hand over the delegates Dahnald and nobody gets hurt.'

[Anonymous No.8539733]

>>8539169
>61%
Fucking hell mate, I've done worse on some essays than that.

[Anonymous No.8540389]

>>8539489
complex numerical analisis in geometric spaces.

[Anonymous No.8540397]

>>8538540
>numerologist

[Anonymous No.8540419]

>>8538670
>the number is false

[Anonymous No.8540440]

>>8538632

you should leave this board
this is the big bang level

[Anonymous No.8540456]

>>8539201

Honestly kill yourself

[Anonymous No.8540530]

>>8538560

Lold

[Anonymous No.8540573]

>>8538560
Chuckled

[Anonymous No.8540574]

>>8539733
>tfw you handed in a 2 page essay that was only one page long and every other line was unreadable because your printer was crapping out and still got 44/50

[Anonymous No.8540579]

>>8538666
>engineering
I can't imagine being too young to do anything an engineer can do.

[Anonymous No.8540588]

>>8538736
But that's not even difficult.
We DON'T use the integral in quantum; not for anything that's quantized, at least. Literally the first quantum mechanics was defined by the use of non-integrals (Rayleigh and Jeans fucked this up and used the integral, and got the wrong answer, Planck said "no integrals" and got the right answer).
The second part, while valid, doesn't violate anything; again, nobody is assuming that's continuous. It violates nothing. This is 2nd year stuff.

I hope you guys aren't ACTUALLY all just freshmen in engineering... Right?

[Anonymous No.8540594]

>>8538643
9 - 3/(1/3) + BB(7918) = BB(7918)

I don't even know where to start on the BB part other than perhaps probabilities, but fuck if the rest of it isn't the additive identity of fucking 0

[Anonymous No.8540610]

>>8539121
Fucking saved.
SMBC is so good sometimes.

[Anonymous No.8540641]

>>8539201
just use fucking modulo 2

[Anonymous No.8540703]

>>8540419

[Anonymous No.8540723]

>>8538634
So, uh... where does one acquire?

[Anonymous No.8540724]

>>8538856
>Schopenhauer
>/sci/ - science and math

[Anonymous No.8540772]

>>8540641
>not taking an unsigned and doing AND 1

gay

>>8539201
Hey man, I know CS is tough and all, but I'll always be here for you to assist you with your suicide.

[Anonymous No.8540781]

>>8538540
The title though. Do people really think so little of pure mathematics?

[Anonymous No.8540783]

>>8540781
No. Only retards confuse number theory with numerology.

[Anonymous No.8540786]

>>8538736
hey I took that ss on my phone :^)

[Anonymous No.8540788]

>>8540724
philosophy is the father of science.
also fuck you.

[Anonymous No.8540792]

>>8539489
>>8538914

>there are people on /sci/ who have never done pre-calc

[Anonymous No.8540794]

>>8540788
Keep dreaming, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8540963]

>>8539169
sad fact the kid who did this died recently

[Anonymous No.8541054]

>>8540588
i knew that too but i thought the response was funny

[Anonymous No.8541063]

[Anonymous No.8541065]

[Anonymous No.8541068]

[Anonymous No.8541073]

[Anonymous No.8541075]

[Anonymous No.8541078]

[Anonymous No.8541149]

>>8538880
I love gifs that illustrate math

[Anonymous No.8541233]

>>8541149
you might enjoy this one (too big for 4chan)
http://i.imgur.com/bj5odek.gifv

[Anonymous No.8541255]

>>8541073
lold

[Anonymous No.8541673]

bump

[Anonymous No.8541715]

Can someone post the thread where some anon made a nuclear reactor in his basement and later went to the hospital?

[Anonymous No.8541779]

>>8538658
keked heartily

[Anonymous No.8541825]

>>8538546
>Drawn by butthurt Philosophy major

One of my favorite's.

[Anonymous No.8541880]

>>8538658
Holy fuck my sides.

[Anonymous No.8541969]

>>8541073
Lost

[Anonymous No.8542054]

[Anonymous No.8542058]

[Anonymous No.8542060]

[Anonymous No.8542061]

[Anonymous No.8542067]

[Anonymous No.8542070]

[Anonymous No.8542076]

[Anonymous No.8542080]

[Anonymous No.8542084]

[Anonymous No.8542088]

[Anonymous No.8542091]

[Anonymous No.8542125]

>>8541825
I know a postdoc like that.

[Anonymous No.8542142]

>>8538643
>Busy Beaver
No thank you.

[Anonymous No.8542182]

kek. thanks, paperanon

[Anonymous No.8542259]

>>8538670
This just enters an infinite loop if num isn't 2...

[Anonymous No.8542278]

>>8539169
lost here

[Anonymous No.8542325]

>>8538729
>>8538768
you're both doing it the hard way. find the remainder mod 2, if it's 1 it's odd otherwise even
here:
>return num % 2 == 0

[Anonymous No.8542718]

[Anonymous No.8542731]

>>8542325
return n&1

[Anonymous No.8542732]

>>8542718
These never get old

[Anonymous No.8542735]

[Anonymous No.8542800]

>>8538877
My sedimentology and stratigraphy teacher has that on his door.

[Anonymous No.8542807]

>>8538634
kek i remember that thread

[Anonymous No.8542857]

>>8539489
You learn all except the last one in high school..

[Anonymous No.8543097]

What DC comics think about scientists

[Anonymous No.8543148]

>>8542070
>O.Hai and I. B. Hakkenshit

[Anonymous No.8543195]

>>8542718
This would have been funnier without the "cuck" and the ub3r h4x0r part.

[Anonymous No.8543236]

>>8538670
>the number is false
gets me every time

[Anonymous No.8543242]

>>8539489
Inter-universal Teichmüller Theory

[Anonymous No.8543304]

>>8539169
Holy shit. I haven't laughed in months. Thanks guy

[Anonymous No.8543323]

>>8538673
kek

[Anonymous No.8543343]

>>8541075
Kek

[Anonymous No.8543400]

[Anonymous No.8543415]

>>8541073
the area seems pretty obviously bounded. maybe he means the circumference is getting unbounded?

[Anonymous No.8543429]

>>8540788
and, in a way, single celled organisms in the ocean are "fathers" of complex mammalian life on land.

still, you wouldnt try to have an intelligent discussion with marine bacteria now, would you?

would you??

[Anonymous No.8543444]

>>8543236
But anon 1 kb IS 1000 bytes, 1kib is 1024

[Anonymous No.8543530]

>>8543444
How can a purely complex number ever equal a real number?

[Anonymous No.8543541]

>>8543530
>implying that real numbers aren't also complex numbers

[Anonymous No.8543568]

>>8538636
This was funnier when it was just the tweet

[Anonymous No.8543575]

>>8542259
No it just keeps increasing i until it reaches 2147483647

[Anonymous No.8543589]

>>8543541
>implying the real numbers aren't actually isomorphic to a subset of complex numbers

[Anonymous No.8543647]

[Anonymous No.8543678]

>>8543415
Well if it's a 3d shape with any thickness then it is the area that's getting unbounded but the volume stays bounded.
Still the whole joke there is that he meant painting with a brush or something and wasn't aware of that strange physical property of liquids that they are able to flow into all the nooks and crannies of objects.
Which brings me to the last point: paint molecules are not infinitely small so at some iteration they'd stop getting into the smaller holes of the figure. I don't think we even need to go beyond the realm of possibility there, since paint molecules are pretty huge and we can make structures that are pretty small. But I guess I'm getting into the realm of philosophy there since the ultimate question is "what's the definition of painted"

[Anonymous No.8543820]

>>8543647
is this book real?

[Anonymous No.8543874]

>>8543589
damn....

and 0.999...=1 ....

[Anonymous No.8543903]

>>8542061
Better

[Anonymous No.8543978]

>>8539489
algebra 2?

[Anonymous No.8544010]

>>8543978
Thanks anon.

[Anonymous No.8544058]

>>8543148
>Journal of Apocryphal Chemistry

[Anonymous No.8544095]

>>8538682
kek'd

[Anonymous No.8544125]

>>8542054
Cited 291 times? wtf.

https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9602/rediscovery-of-calculus-in-1994-what-should-have-happened-to-that-paper
>I think it truly is a bit sad that the paper made it past the researcher, her immediate colleagues and friends, a Yale professor of electrical engineering who is thanked for “his expert review”, and most importantly reviewers, without someone giving the author a hint.
>In my opinion, the most optimistic view is to see it as an educational paper: the method is not new, but that particular medical community didn't know about it, so it was worth publishing. However, that is not what the paper states: the author clearly presents the method as new and names it after her.

[Anonymous No.8544682]

bump

[Anonymous No.8544764]

>>8542070
lul

[Anonymous No.8544788]

>>8542070
>>8544764
explain

[Anonymous No.8544868]

A recent Harvard research showed that the average human has 1.85 legs.

http://www.stat.harvard.edu/Colloquia_Content/Legs185.pdf

[Anonymous No.8544973]

>>8543575
No it doesn't ever get increased if i is not equal to num. Look at the code again

[Anonymous No.8545037]

>>8543820
https://www.amazon.de/Introductory-Calculus-Infants-Omi-Inouye/dp/0987823914
yes its real
here comes the best part
>It is colourful and interesting for a little child, but it is a little bit hard to understand

being to stupid for a book made for infants is beyond me

[Anonymous No.8545468]

>>8544868
In related news: Statisticians have demanded to be allowed to carry bombs onto airplanes with the reasoning "the probability of two bombs being on the same plane is insignificant"

[Anonymous No.8545474]

>>8538560
my pops worked on his case.

[Anonymous No.8545527]

[Anonymous No.8545529]

[Anonymous No.8545535]

[Anonymous No.8545539]

[Anonymous No.8545542]

[Anonymous No.8545568]

>>8540772
2s complement still holds parity. Taking unsigned is unnecessary.

[Anonymous No.8545598]

[Anonymous No.8545610]

>>8545527
Is this implying that writing proofs involves having a lot of wrong turns, or that proofs usually have a lot of unnecessary bullshit but it's the only way that it's been solved for now?

[Anonymous No.8545650]

>>8545610
Mathematicians usually just publish right after they find a proof, and don't bother spending time trying to reduce it and really understand what's going on. Proving something is only halfway to understanding why it'd true

[Anonymous No.8545676]

>>8543304
>>8542067
Topkek

[Anonymous No.8545713]

>>8545650
>>8545610
I thought it states that mathemiticians take years and a lot of "thinking bridges" to get a proof done but then just release a reduced and compact version which doesn't help with understanding it at all.

[Anonymous No.8545821]

>>8544788
In the US, pseudoephedrine was a key ingredient in cough syrups. It's also a convenient precursor to making methamphetamine, which is illegal. People making meth would buy lots of cough syrup to extract the psuedoephedrine for making meth. Because of this, cough syrup with pseudoephedrine is really hard to get now. Lot's of cough syrups use much less effective replacements, and ones that do still have pseudoephedrine have to be dispensed directly by a pharmacist. The paper proposes using (plentiful black market) methamphetamine and reversing the usual synthesis to get pseudoephedrine.

tl;dr, it's lampooning the War on Drugs.

[Anonymous No.8545841]

>>8545610
>>8545713
This is sort of it. More what it's referencing is that the both the collective and individual efforts to prove something generally go all over the place in every direction with many false leads and dead ends (and beneficial tangents too) before something is found that works.

In the case of the Poincare conjecture (theorem) that the comic is talking about, the final proof ended up relying on Ricci-Hamilton flow as the "correct" tool but it's not as though that was the first or even the hundredth thing somebody tried applying to the Poincare conjecture

[Anonymous No.8545984]

>>8538658
Oh god

[Anonymous No.8546018]

>tfw no humor related to my area of expertise

Was EE a meme all along?

[Anonymous No.8546052]

>>8546018
>>tfw no humor related to my area of expertise

A 747 was flying along and was full of Polish people. As they were going past some beautiful landmarks, the pilot came over the intercom and instructed all who were interested in seeing the landmark to look out the right side of the plane. Many passengers did so, and the plane promptly crashed. Why?

[math]\mathbf{Spoiler} % Too many poles in the right hand plane [/math]

[Anonymous No.8546060]

>>8546052
Thanks mane.

[Anonymous No.8546206]

>>8538729
>not modulo

PAJEET

[Anonymous No.8546211]

[Anonymous No.8546227]

[Anonymous No.8546231]

[Anonymous No.8546542]

>>8542125
Had a similar experience as a student.
>Topic is how to determine volume by integrating small parts
>Chose sphere
>TA demonstrates integrating a stack of cylinders on top of each other to make up a sphere.
>TA succeeds
>Everyone cheers!
>TA feels superhuman
>TA wants to demonstrate getting the same result ... using coaxial cylinder shells.
>TA starts struggling
>something is wrong
>TA starts sweating
>something goes completely wrong
>TA uses the entire lecture and nearly collapses, having failed to proof.

[Anonymous No.8546547]

>>8543444
>But anon 1 kb IS 1000 bytes, 1kib is 1024
No.

1 kb is 1 kilo bits, not kilo bytes.

[Anonymous No.8546599]

>>8538880
>>8539489
are you fucking kidding me

[Anonymous No.8546622]

>>85386
haha buzzwords

kill yourself

[Anonymous No.8546624]

>>8540389
>misspells analysis
>high school level "calculus" fag

[Anonymous No.8546648]

>>8545598
CLOSE
THE FUCKING
PARENTHESE

[Anonymous No.8546660]

>>8543530
S = { x | x ∈ ℕ, x ∈ C }

retard

[Anonymous No.8546673]

>>8546660
AWW GODDAMN I FUCKED UP

*R

[Anonymous No.8546687]

[Anonymous No.8546709]

>>8541063
Could have bluffed and said they were organized by grade, there's a good chance it'd work.

[Anonymous No.8546789]

>>8539169
Fuck that was good!

[Anonymous No.8546913]

>>8546673
embarrassing

[Anonymous No.8546916]

[Anonymous No.8546924]

>>8546916
kek

[Anonymous No.8547006]

>>8546687
WOULD THIS WORK

[Anonymous No.8547078]

>>8538914
>took me awhile to catch on to waht the fuck is going on...

that the stick man is using semaphore to spell out the numbers or the fact that the math in the GIF is completely wrong. y=k? bullshit. Y cant equal K because then it would be Y.

[Anonymous No.8547095]

>>8547006
Try it yourself and find out

[Anonymous No.8547111]

>>8538549
This thing about soccer balls could be incorrect. Fewer panels doesn't always lead to more air resistance. This is the reason golf balls have dimples http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/sports/golf/basics/question37.htm

[Anonymous No.8547122]

>>8538658
Can someone explain this 1?

[Anonymous No.8547126]

>>8547122
/sci/ constantly has these retard arguments about whether or not 1+2+3+4... would equal -1/12

[Anonymous No.8547155]

>>8540579

then whats a best way to learn thermodynamics, come on enlighten us faggot.

[Anonymous No.8547164]

>>8538549
That's actually pretty good. Very quirky writing still yet still entertaining.

[Anonymous No.8547180]

>>8538658

Does this mean that -12-24-36-48-...-n = 1?

[Anonymous No.8547204]

>>8538869
Can't tell if you're athiest or not...

[Anonymous No.8547211]

>>8538538
fake and gay

[Anonymous No.8547232]

>>8547006
Only if your legs are strong enough.
How many kilometers high can you jump?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYETuh5iurY

[Anonymous No.8547246]

>>8547232
I can ascend by kicking the air

[Anonymous No.8547263]

>>8546687
>>8547006
>>8547232
If you change momentum so much that you stop falling or reverse direction (jump up), your body will get hit just as hard by the deceleration and it'd be no better than hitting the ground. You could only use it to halve your speed, and get hit twice at half the intensity

[Anonymous No.8547303]

>>8547006
I guess the chair can't get destroyed enough to save you

[Anonymous No.8547377]

>>8542325
>Calls an O(1) solution harder then this O(n) piece of garbage

[Anonymous No.8547461]

>>8546052
Wahh, this is neat way of making spoiler tags here!

[Anonymous No.8547469]

>>8547006
Yeah I used to do this all the time when I was still a grad student and was too lazy to walk all the way down to the free food stuffs the idiots from the BioNanotech department had every Wednesday. But I had to stop because my promoter got tired of having to buy new chairs so frequently.

[Anonymous No.8547510]

>>8538658
neato

[None !!BJiYgff8zf2 No.8547573]

>>8547377

>32 bit division is O(n)

Uhuh.

http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/1643/how-can-we-assume-that-basic-operations-on-numbers-take-constant-time

[Anonymous No.8547601]

>>8546206
>not "(num & 1) == 0"

[Anonymous No.8547628]

>>8547006
Yes, haven't you seen all the youtube videos where they jump from a plane with a stool in their hand and when they approach the ground with hundreds of miles per hour they make sure they stool is right under their feet and then they step off right before impact?

[Anonymous No.8547633]

>>8539172
Why don't they give him a full time position? he's brilliant.

[Anonymous No.8547745]

[Anonymous No.8548036]

>>8539489
basic

[Anonymous No.8548246]

[Anonymous No.8548314]

[Anonymous No.8548435]

>>8539504

[Anonymous No.8548506]

>>8542070
> Readily available meth
what a legend

[Anonymous No.8548640]

[Anonymous No.8548645]

[Anonymous No.8548649]

[Anonymous No.8548696]

>>8543575
Even if it did, i would jump from 2147483646 to –2147483648 and the loop would never exit.

[Anonymous No.8548701]

>>8539535
Nobody got this one?

A conservative vector field

[Anonymous No.8548795]

>>8539169
>page is to big
This is like a math teacher messing up basic arithmetic. Embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.8548878]

>>8540963
source or I call bullshit

[Anonymous No.8548886]

>>8545529
medical subhuman here, can someone explain this? seems potentially interesting but I lack the maths to intuit it

[Anonymous No.8548916]

>>8548886
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E2%8B%AF

[Anonymous No.8548971]

>>8548649
Who else here likes Mathematical Mathematics Memes on Facebook?

[Anonymous No.8548991]

>>8548971
that guy ripped all 3 of his posts from that page

they Banepost on occasion and I see a lot of their shit on here so I'd imagine there's a fair amount of crossover

[Anonymous No.8549025]

>>8546648
Is that what you think the singular of 'parentheses' is?

Follow up question: do you really think you're allowed to complain about people making correctable errors if you make such errors yourself?

[Anonymous No.8549581]

old but gold :^D

[Anonymous No.8549649]

>>8539525
What book is that from and what was the chapter about?

[Anonymous No.8549728]

>>8547263
A mathematician would just take an infinite number of chairs and reduce his falling speed incrementally.

A physicist is visiting Los Angeles. As he takes photos from the top of a skyscraper and helpfully points out the position of a couple of amateur aeronatus to them upon request, the fire alarms sound. Trapped atop the building, his only chance of surviving is to jump from the building into a tiny swimming pool several stories below him. He quickly pulls out a few slips of paper and a pen, and frantically scribbles on them. Then he stands up, takes a deep breath, jumps and flies off into orbit. What happened?

[Anonymous No.8549734]

>>8549728
He changed his reference frame and the direction of gravity for his falling body problem... I guess

[Anonymous No.8549741]

>>8549734
Well, yes. The answer is "sign error".

[Anonymous No.8549753]

>>8548696
Python uses bigintegers in such cases so it won't overflow.

[Anonymous No.8550068]

you don't even need to anything at this point.

[Anonymous No.8550195]

>>8550068
numberphile more like letterphile

[Anonymous No.8550319]

>>8549581
>BSc in EE
>hold the horses

[Anonymous No.8550730]

>>8550068
Kek i just saw that in my sub box, do they do it on purpose?

[Anonymous No.8550738]

>>8538666
I used this book for thermo.

It isn't that complicated of a book.

[Anonymous No.8550739]

>>8549728
if he floated, it's cos he declared himself to have 0 potential

[Anonymous No.8550749]

>>8538553
i love this one

[Anonymous No.8550787]

>>8550068

[Anonymous No.8550850]

>>8549581
>>8550319

The engineer explicitly said even he couldn't get the answer right nor explain the common core approach.
He was making an obvious joke and did it on purpose but the autist who wrote that paragraph below didn't get it.

[Anonymous No.8550886]

Not sure if this one has been posted yet

Also have a Youtube Poop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7JlbnvGpVE

[Anonymous No.8550888]

>>8550850
>implying

[Anonymous No.8550935]

>>8549649
looks like it's about the hairy ball theorem

[Anonymous No.8550946]

>>8550787
>mfw recommended

[Anonymous No.8550950]

>>8538538
>This guy walks up to you and your girl in math class and slaps her in the ass. What do you do?

[Anonymous No.8550952]

>>8550950

[Anonymous No.8550953]

>>8549581
i bet that engineer was sucking a dick when he wrote that letter

[Anonymous No.8550956]

>>8549581
nice false flag desu

[Anonymous No.8550991]

>>8545535

[Anonymous No.8551011]

>>8538869
wut... the intelligent design is just modeled after the functional product of trial-and-error evolution. Do people really believe the "god made man" meme?

[Anonymous No.8551058]

>>8546227
kekked

[Anonymous No.8551183]

>>8546211
Well, this is easy. All you need to do is buy a 10-mile radius plot of land in a desert along with a private plane ride for a year later at that location. You will escape the bears and gain a fortune in their dead corpses.

[Anonymous No.8552027]

>>8550886
>Check out my haircut man.
lmao

[Anonymous No.8552041]

>>8547122
The sum of all numbers is equal to -1/12 according to I can't remember what.

[Anonymous No.8552046]

>>8548886
Watch this :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0NjbwqlYw

[Anonymous No.8552167]

>>8545535
>4 people
>1 pizza
no

>inb4 american

[Anonymous No.8552178]

>>8552167
do americans actually do this?

[Anonymous No.8552212]

>>8548649
[eqn]i^i={(e^{\ln(i)})}^i=e^{i\ln(i)}=e^{i{\frac{i\pi}{2}}}=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{e^\pi}} \approx 0.20787957635[/eqn]
Is it really that hard not to be a brainlet?

[Anonymous No.8552277]

>>8538729
Bruh that's a one liner. You just use mod.

return num%2==0? true:false;

[Anonymous No.8552370]

>>8552212
do you have to worry about which branch of ln you take when you substitute ln(i) for ipi/2?

I haven't taken complex in a long time but I remember my russian prof always busting our balls over branches of Log, deriving 1/2 = 1/5 and shit like that from equations that looked fine (like yours.)

[Anonymous No.8552409]

>>8552178
Depending on the pizza size and toppings, for sure. 2 slices for each person might only be ~400 calories, which is hardly a meal

[Anonymous No.8552435]

>>8539201

This is a joke guys, he is making a joke.

[Anonymous No.8552456]

>>8552370
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_unit#i_raised_to_the_power_of_i

[Anonymous No.8552461]

>>8538540

>tfw people don't realize that the title is a fucking glorious cherry on top.

[Anonymous No.8552495]

>>8542259

No. It prints out "The number is even." for every even number from 2 to 2147483647 (1073741823 times) and then after that prints "The number is false."

[Anonymous No.8552522]

>>8539489

Sacred quantum geometry.

[OHP No.8552658]

>>8549025
Parentheses and parenthesis are both used to designate either a pair of the symbols or a single symbol. Is there an accepted alternative? I'm genuinely curious.

[Anonymous No.8553016]

[Anonymous No.8553061]

>>8540588
i'm just a humble mathfag but thanks for the enlightening post

[Anonymous No.8553137]

>>8544682
this is actually how algebra: chapter 0 introduces groups

[Anonymous No.8553240]

>>8553137
it's a screenshot from the book bro

[Anonymous No.8553254]

>>8545535
a family of 4 anorexics, maybe

[Anonymous No.8553260]

>>8553254
To a pack of wolves, maybe.

[Anonymous No.8553261]

>>8548645
el oh el!

[Anonymous No.8553264]

>>8553254
American spotted

[Anonymous No.8553330]

>>8538634
so this is what developing pedos do in their free time?

[Anonymous No.8553496]

>>8538634
Wow

[Anonymous No.8553544]

>>8538544
I will never not laugh at all the retards with non-asians with asian tattoos on them

[Anonymous No.8553556]

>>8538560

[Anonymous No.8553558]

>>8539169
holy shit im dying

[Anonymous No.8553567]

>>8538634
what the fuck

[Anonymous No.8553578]

>>8539169
How'd he get a damn 61%

[Anonymous No.8553579]

>>8538634
Someone add a final "/sci/ - Science & Math" banner please.

[Anonymous No.8553591]

>>8539169
Lost it at fucking Dr Dre. Jesus Christ, my fucking sides. Fucking fuck.

[Anonymous No.8553596]

>>8541825
poor lad, those students are cunts

[Anonymous No.8553600]

>>8542067
My gen chem prof literally said that nature was one of the most prestigious chemistry publishers in the west, and that it's very difficult to get your research on there. What is this horseshit?

[Anonymous No.8553640]

>>8538549
I interpret this as sci-fi wherein a lonely girl is dating an expensive android, but the story is told from the perspective of the machine. The machine's actions aren't highlighted, but rather, its thoughts are. Its cold, analytical thoughts.

>>8547111
>I knew that fewer panels meant that the ball traveled through the air with less air resistance
>less air resistance
Misread.

Also, general statements are usually meant to be taken as statistical tendencies and not actually how all instances behave in all conditions.

[Anonymous No.8553658]

>>8538634
>>8553579
It's much more representative of the /agdg/ threads over on /vg/.

Never change, /agdg/.

[Anonymous No.8553737]

>>8538736
>>8540588
Even if the specific energy levels are quantized, the integral is still important when considering the probabilistic distributions of electrons in a three-dimensional space, which is what he was asking about. It's more a question of statistics than of quantum mechanics as a whole.

Also, I've long been convinced that this board is full of insecure undergrads. I came here a lot as an undergrad and wound up learning something new every now and then just by lurking the board.

I think a good estimate of the actual expertise of these discussions would be around the level of people with associate's degrees in physics/pre-engineering, above community college but below university-level. For topics beyond that, actual discussion seems to slow down significantly.

[Anonymous No.8553850]

>>8552277
>not just return num%2==0;

[Anonymous No.8553857]

>>8553600
No, he is right.

Science and Nature are top tier publications. Focus is a little wider than most other publications in that they want things a little more flashy/astounding/illustrated bordering on tabloid, yet still scientifically top notch.

Also articles in one field is meant to be mostly readable to scientists ion other fields, the purpose being to not lose track of the overall picture in science in general.

So yes, getting an article there hard. Getting a front page article requires also a very nice and colourful diagram or figure.

[Anonymous No.8553864]

>>8542731
This guy is right:

Modulo is not sure to be optimized for base 2. Worst case the CPU is assigned to do integer divisions which are both super slow in instructions and also clog up CPU pipelines.

The fast way is to do:

return (num & 0x1);

[Anonymous No.8553875]

>>8553857
The really skilled people get tired of that, go get a comfy cottage and do their own science in isolation from all the stupid fancy pants air-castle building and patting-each-others-back in publishing.

[Anonymous No.8553879]

>>8553875
There's a fair share of skilled people burning themselves out trying to reach those air castles too, my friend.

[Anonymous No.8553907]

>>8553879

Yeah. I'm not skilled enough to do that stuff so I'm doomed to try and steer and whip the ones who have the potential. Quite fun. I can act out my frustrations of being a failure myself.

[Anonymous No.8553954]

>>8553875
>>8553879
>>8553907
>Burnout
Yup, I saw a lot of it, had my share of near fatal accidents and I got out and into industry. Thankfully only a few of the accidents left permanent damage.

It is when you risk incineration in your lab that burnout doesn't seem so bad.

[Anonymous No.8553991]

[Anonymous No.8553993]

[Anonymous No.8553995]

[Anonymous No.8554005]

[Anonymous No.8554011]

[Anonymous No.8554020]

[Anonymous No.8554036]

>>8554020
t. Trump voter

[Anonymous No.8554042]

[Anonymous No.8554043]

[Anonymous No.8554045]

>>8542054
Did he really just copy how an integral works and get published? I am no mathematician so I might got this wrong. please enlighten me

[Anonymous No.8554046]

[Anonymous No.8554047]

[Anonymous No.8554050]

[Anonymous No.8554052]

[Anonymous No.8554756]

>>8545598
oh fuck I know this exercise. This is sheet 9 from the DS at TUM, right? They fixed the parenthese (but not the "hfkkthxbb") by the way.

[Anonymous No.8554986]

>>8538546
Kekd

[Anonymous No.8555246]

>>8543678
Correct. Saying that the object isn't properly painted because the paint molecules don't fit into the smaller infinite spaces, is similar to saying that nothing is truly painted because of the electromagnetic repulsion of all atoms.

[Anonymous No.8555375]

>>8539489
Math. Just math.

[Anon !!3wHWqEMsmPf No.8555398]

>>8539525
>consider a spherical cow

[Anonymous No.8555558]

>>8542718
>sasha grey built a sex robot and it's beautiful

>we hire a hitman to kill pewdiepie
>by the government of sweden

[Anonymous No.8555574]

>>8545539
Didn't the Native Americans suffer between 6 and 10 hitlers?

[Anon !!3wHWqEMsmPf No.8555634]

https://www.amazon.com/Discrete-Mathematics-Ducks-Sarah-Marie-Belcastro/dp/1466504994
>buy now

>>8546052
I doubt a lot of people here know the basics of control theory. That's on the later end of undergrad study.

[Anonymous No.8555892]

>>8548435
Dear God