/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.8536235]

>2016
>still believing in climate change and """global warming"""

kek. /sci/entists BTFO

[Anonymous No.8536236]

literally no one cares

most posters from sci are from europe anyways

[Anonymous No.8536238]

We already have this thread

>>8534076
sage

[Anonymous No.8536239]

>>8536235
Rex Tillerson believes in man made global warming. He also has a masters from UC Berkeley in chemical engineering. Didn't you read Private Empire?

[Anonymous No.8536248]

>>8536235
The /pol/tards are at it again.
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-perspectives/our-position
>The risk of climate change is clear and the risk warrants action. Increasing carbon emissions in the atmosphere are having a warming effect. There is a broad scientific and policy consensus that action must be taken to further quantify and assess the risks.

Speaking of ignoring the facts, here are a few papers from to top 3 general science journals. Don't ignore the science.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/289/5477/270
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/11/e1501923.full
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/302/5651/1719
science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6313/aaf7671
science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6311/465
science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6293/1517
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n2/full/nclimate2876.html
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v536/n7617/full/nature19082.html
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n3/full/nclimate1784.html
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n10/full/nclimate1963.html
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n11/full/nclimate2397.html
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n11/full/nclimate3110.html
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/38/16120.abstract?sid=e88a32fa-d470-486d-92ea-97bf18db30c9
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/4/1406.abstract?sid=39886508-9022-4ac9-a270-9bb8f2c84dac
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/Supplement_2/19729.abstract?sid=39886508-9022-4ac9-a270-9bb8f2c84dac
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/14/5743.abstract?sid=39886508-9022-4ac9-a270-9bb8f2c84dac

[Anonymous No.8536261]

>>8536248
this is numale marxist SJW globalist jew science, doesn't count, when will you sheeple learn

[Anonymous No.8536274]

>>8536261
0/10

[Anonymous No.8536276]

>>8536261

[Anonymous No.8536321]

In 50 years time, when the world has turned to shit for numerous reasons, at least I'll be able to say "I told you so".

[Anonymous No.8536324]

>>8536261

[Anonymous No.8536575]

>>8536248
You really should stop link-dumping. No one is going to read any of that and it's incredibly counter-productive to actually educating people on climate science.

Also, Red Tillerson doesn't deny climate change. I don't think he belongs in Trump's cabinet, but at least he doesn't outright deny it. Not that he will do anything to change it, considered he's essentially a special interest party himself for the petro industry, but at least he doesn't deny the science I guess, unlike morons like Trump and his other cabinet members.

[Anonymous No.8536597]

>>8536235
tillerson is actually the first guy in the cabinet who doesnt deny it and advocated switching from coal to gas to keep emissions low.

[Anonymous No.8536609]

>>8536575
people used to have to dance around controversial issues
then trump came along and just said all the dumb shit out loud
so who knows, maybe people can freely state their biases now
if so, I'm sure we'll see this guy come out and deny climate change exists or is an issue

[Anonymous No.8536625]

>>8536609
if anything, trump made public debate even less fact based and more emotional. i hated the left as long as i can properly think, because they are the original "fuck facts, only feelings matter"-people. but trump's victory is not good news, now everybody in politics is as retarded as the most retarded leftists while putin is laughing his ass off about how easy it was to put the west into self destruct mode.

[Anonymous No.8536638]

>>8536235
/pol/ should be gassed

[Anonymous No.8536641]

Tillerson actually believes man has an effect on climate change. I'm assuming he doesn't believe we have a large enough effect for change to be enacted or he just doesn't care.

[Anonymous No.8536654]

>>8536261
2/10 made me reply

[Anonymous No.8536670]

>>8536239
This. Tillerson also supports a carbon tax. T-Rex is actually super fuckin' liberal but that don't matter cuz "muh scrooge mcduck stereotype"

[Anonymous No.8536678]

>>8536670
it's extremely difficult to believe that there's even a remote possibility that there's a guy at the top of exxon mobile who will do anything positive in terms of climate change

[Anonymous No.8536681]

Didn't Exxon's own research in the fucking 70s conclude that manmade global warming was real and it was why they shelved the report?

[Anonymous No.8536684]

>>8536670
>>8536670
he isnt pro-carbon tax because hes a liberal, but because he wants to put coal out of business and have people burn gas instead. exxon has no business mining coal, but they are one of the worlds biggest gas producers.

[Anonymous No.8536691]

>>8536678
gas has little emissions. exxon has lots of gas. switching from coal to gas will make exxon filthy rich. and it will reduce emissions by a lot.

[Anonymous No.8536704]

>>8536691
>gas has little emissions
>and it will reduce emissions by a lot.
This isn't necessarily true because you're only counting the emissions resulting from burning coal vs gas
it doesn't include the amount of gas that enters the atmosphere due to leaking during extraction, and there's a huge amount of it

[Anonymous No.8536707]

>>8536248

(((science)))

science is fucking worthless. nothing more than an attempt to gain a monopoly on what people consider 'factual', it's just part of the dissassociation from reality that is being pushed onto us by (((globalists)))

[Anonymous No.8536721]

>>8536707
Sweet jesus this is either 10/10 b8 or 10/10 retarded.

[Anonymous No.8536725]

>>8536721

wake the fuck up. science is fake.

[Anonymous No.8536733]

>>8536684
Climate scientists are like the last few pawns in an end game.

[Anonymous No.8536822]

man, after 35 years of being the best at whatever job i'm put into i'm going to take the defining position of my career and totally do a shitty job and sell out to my old company, haha, that'd be choice.

[Anonymous No.8536846]

>>8536822
>I don't have any idea how politics works in America or how corporate America defines success

[Anonymous No.8536849]

>>8536725
u r on the wrong board son

[Anonymous No.8536866]

>>8536846
lol, shut the fuck up nerd. there is literally zero precedent for a CEO with no political experience being appointed secretary of state.

any ideas you have about "how politics works" in this scenario is baseless speculation.

[Anonymous No.8536878]

>>8536822
man, after 35 years of being the best at whatever job i'm put into i'm going to suddenly change my positions and become a force for good and completely abandon all of the things I previously thought were important to me, haha, that'd be choice.

[Anonymous No.8536898]

>>8536866
Also, he's got yuuuuuuge conflicts of interest.

>Mr. Tillerson has perhaps the closest ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, having negotiated a 2011 energy partnership deal with Russia that Mr. Putin said could eventually be worth as much as $500 billion.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/exxons-rex-tillerson-is-top-candidate-for-secretary-of-state-1481318464

[http://is.4chan.org/sci/148147(...) No.8536905]

>>8536236

this.

The Americans post on /b/ and /x/

[Anonymous No.8536909]

>>8536866
Bruh.
These people want government positions because it gives them more power in their real jobs at their banks and fossil fuel companies

[Anonymous No.8536933]

still believing in global trolling...

[Anonymous No.8536939]

>>8536898
Probably better than an interest in conflict.

[Anonymous No.8536952]

>>8536725
Then take a hammer and bash at your computer till it breaks into pieces. If science is fake your computer should still be working if the level 96 defensive spell it was enchanted with still holds up.

[Anonymous No.8536953]

>>8536235
Every one knows global warming is the shekel source for many """"scientist"""". People should be free to criticise the Theory without being subjected harassment by the scientific community because climate science isnt an exact science like physics and chemistry (with this cases experience usually BTFO one of the parties).

[Anonymous No.8536955]

>>8536638
>Jews trying to cosplay Hitler

[Anonymous No.8536961]

>>8536248
>>8536261
>>8536575
>>8536638
>>8536707
>>8536721
>>8536725
>>8536933
>>8536953
The ultimate real Red Pill
>Algebraic proof
>Alg((h))ebraic
>hebraic

Have you swallowed the hardest red pill yet? So called ((science)) and ((mathematics)) are a jewish creation, an instrument to subjugate and destroy the white man.
>create ((science))
>build a whole structure around it to make it look logical and reasonable
>attribute every invention the white man achieved through his intuition to ((science))
>foster ((science)) to religious status and use it to subvert centuries long traditions and supplant Christianity
>use ((science)) to push sexual perversion and loathing of the white man
>use ((((scientific consensus))) to create the global warming hoax
>use ((global warming)) to create the perfect tool of white genocide: carbon tax

[Anonymous No.8536963]

>>8536961

Please see this >>8536952

[Anonymous No.8536968]

>>8536961
Have you broken your computer yet as described here? If science is fake it should not break apart, I promise! ;^) >>8536952

[Anonymous No.8536977]

>>8536721
Actually he's right. Every scientist should have critical spirit, otherwise we would have never made the great discovers we've made on science.
Global warming looks like the Ptolemaic theory of the solar system where the church was homologous to the today elites and the so called scientists that shill for this shit
>ou vey the earth is in the centre look at our astronomical observations it's almost the same abs the theory predicts
>but I've got a much simple simple that says the sun is in the centre
>fucking retard look the out proofs go back to medieval /pol/ retard. I bet you believe the earth is flat. Ha ha fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.8536979]

>>8536961
Although I agree global meme is a meme mathematics has a solid logical foundation that you can prove it by yourself. Jews can't control the fabric of the universe.

[Anonymous No.8536984]

>>8536952>>8536968
>>8536961

Don't listen to this nigger loving jew. Obviously a hammer would break your compute . Magic is the work of the devil and there is nothing """defensive""" about it. Your best bet would be to unplug your computer from the (((mains electricity))) power and use the faith of our LORD to power it. If your computer shuts down then it is obviously cursed by the jew devil and you should not think of buying a new one ever again.

[Anonymous No.8536985]

>>8536979
Hello rabbi

[Anonymous No.8536991]

>>8536985
Go back to elementary school. Study maths by yourself and become the master Jew like me

[Anonymous No.8536996]

>>8536979
>Jews can't control the fabric of the universe.

Yes, goyim! Yes! You are absolutely right!

[Anonymous No.8537002]

>>8536961
You pasted it again.
AGW is really a religion dressed up as science because we still have too many priests lurking about, maybe more than ever.

[Anonymous No.8537006]

>>8536996
Oh wait Jesus was a Jew and Jesus is God according to the master race Catholic Church. Holy shit.

[Anonymous No.8537138]

mmmmh that's a good interesting thread. bump

[Anonymous No.8537140]

>>8536939
>implying Romney is interested in conflicts.
>wanting to sell out allies for short-term profit
hello comrade.

[Anonymous No.8537170]

>>8536681
Wikipedia has a very well sourced read on exactly what Exxon has done over the years to create a controversy over climate science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExxonMobil_climate_change_controversy

[Anonymous No.8537178]

IT'S A HOAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrWznOFq38s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AwNKQqLESc&

[Anonymous No.8537292]

>>8536261
pol please go back!

[Anonymous No.8537365]

>>8537178
>Molyneaux
lel, /pol/ actually believes this """"internet (((philosopher)))"""""guy is a legitimate source on scientific issues.
First issue from this video, using Monckton as a legitimate authority on climate science. This is a man who has for years claimed he was a member of the House of Lords with no evidence. For years he has claimed he was a primary science adviser to Margaret Thatcher, with zero evidence. Even her own autobiography makes no mention of Monckton, not one single mention of her, and she even names a completely different person as her main scientific adviser. Monckton is not a scientist, he has no scientific training, and has never published a single scientific paper in the field of climatology, despite him making the false claim that he has for many years:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM

Also, view his rebuttal to Monckton's response on WUWT:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9K74fzNAUq4

>Inhofe
First off, did you even watch the second video you linked, or did you simply type "climate change hoax" into youtube and then copy / paste the URL thinking it would back your "argument?"

James Inhofe is a complete uneducated retard by the way, and has direct funds linked from the petroleum industry, as do many other conservatives who insist on ignoring the scientific evidence (not that these retards could understand even the most simplistic statistics anyways).
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/15/exxon-mobil-gave-millions-climate-denying-lawmakers

Honestly I'm going to copy and paste this into the same reply you made in the other thread as well. I'm so fucking tired of having to fight the mass amount of ignorance from the types of people who deny climate science, and if you think I'm fucking tired just combating shitposts on 4chan, imagine how the legitimate scientists, who publish papers feel when some bumfuck retarded politician takes their data and tries to comprehend it.

[Anonymous No.8537386]

>>8537178
James Inhofe? As in Jim Inhofe? As in the retard Oklahoma senator? I live in Oklahoma and if you take anything he says seriously you fucked up. Want to see what a conservative "paradise" looks like stay here for a while.

[Anonymous No.8537390]

>>8537386
He obviously didn't even watch the video. The second video he posted is an argument against climate skeptics, not an argument for AGW being a hoax.

It's hilarious because it shows just how uninformed these idiots are. I know the guy who posted it won't respond to us because he probably realized what an idiot he was and ran off with his tail between his legs.

[Anonymous No.8537394]

>Nerds are STILL mad that they lost

[Anonymous No.8537400]

>>8536961
climatology is utterly incomparable to algebra

[Anonymous No.8537423]

>>8537394
this thread wasn't made by a nerd

[Anonymous No.8537426]

>>8537365
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCU6bzRypZ4&

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU&

>HURR DURR ONLY MY EXPERTS ARE EXPERTS, EVERY EXPERTS THAT DISAGREE WITHE THE CHURCH OF GLOBAL WARMING IS A HERETIC
don't worry i got plenty of sources.

[Anonymous No.8537435]

>>8536235
is trump literally just picking random people who have no experience in politics ?

[Anonymous No.8537452]

>>8537435
yes but i don't see the problem with it

[Anonymous No.8537456]

>>8537426
You didn't respond to a single argument I made in my post, how predictable. Not only did you not address that the second video you posted had nothing to do with climate change being a hoax (you do a great job on your own making yourself look stupid), but you failed to respond to a single thing I said about Monckton.

All you can do is post conjecture, not formulate an actual argument of your own, and rely on people like Molyneaux interviewing William Happer, oh yes look who he chooses to interview on climate science, someone who isn't even trained in the field!

http://powerbase.info/index.php/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/cif-green/2010/sep/14/montford-climategate-gwpf-review

Happer is a member of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, an organization which is essentially a lobbying firm for fossil fuel interests once again, he also has similar links to the George C. Marshall Institute. REALLY MAKES YOU THINK. Guess what, the GWPF doesn't even need to report its sources of funding legally, and of course they don't. Why would they? How would it benefit them to expose the companies that fund climate change denialism? It's so hilarious because this organization attempts to make cherry-picked statements that the Earth is not warming by showing narrow datasets, so typical.

Why is it that people like Molyneaux never invite people like Gavin Schmit, or James Hansen, experts in the field who understand the science to discuss the claims? Why is it that the only people they ever invite are people like Spencer, Monckton or Happer?

Why are they afraid of seeing the evidence, looking at the data and observations that support the theory? Why do they only interview people within their own echo-chambers?

[Anonymous No.8537473]

>>8537456
Shut up. Stefan molyneux is easily one the greatest intellectuals of out time.

[Anonymous No.8537484]

>>8537456
Here's another example showing how one single company, Exxonmobile, has funded climate change denial.

In 2007 Exxon pledged that they would cease funding to organizations like Heartland and GCM, and claimed that they accepted the science of climate change. If only that were true, their organization still places heavy investments in their lobbying efforts in direct support to AGW deniers.

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/index.php

>>8537426
LITERALLY all you can do is post climate blogs like WUWT or Realclimate, or Climateadviser.

Go ahead and post the typical denialist links you people always post as "proof" that the evidence is a conspiracy or some other such nonsense. Yes, evidence. That's a word that deniers really don't like. You see, if you're going to discredit / debunk AGW, you need evidence. You need data and you need research. You have to go out into the field, or use the databases of available climatological data in order to formulate an argument. Publish this argument in a peer-reviewed journal in order to have other scientists within the field review it, and it they find that the evidence you researched is substantial and correct, and that your methodology was also correct, then you get published and your paper will become a groundbreaking paper in the field. However, not a single denialist scientist (and there are very, VERY few of them in the field, only real ones are Roy Spencer, John Christy and Richard Lindzen) in the field publishing anything that discredits the evidence scientists have built up over decades of research.

All you have is conspiracies and other such nonsense typical of a /pol/-brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8537502]

>>8536235
agw is real but only a dumb hyper-empathetic cuck would allow themselves to be taxed and regulated so that the unborn come into existence. carbon-taxer's are the environmental equivalent of pro-lifers.

[Anonymous No.8537506]

I'm pretty much convinced that of the people who post on this board claiming to be climate change deniers, only like 3% tops are real and the rest are just in it for the keks

[Anonymous No.8537508]

>>8536235
agw is real but only a dumb cuck would allow themselves to be taxed and regulated so that the unborn come into existence. carbon-taxers are the environmental equivalent of pro-lifers.

[Anonymous No.8537510]

>>8537508
ow the edge

[Anonymous No.8537512]

>>8537435

No, the guy is picking a bunch of CEOs, recommended war vets and political contrarians.

It's only random because most people didn't think he was actually going to fucking bring in actual CEOs into the cabinet.

If you fucking thought Washington was all about special interest groups you haven't seen nothing yet now that the public voted in a billionaire to run it.

[Anonymous No.8537516]

>>8537473
Your post actually isn't an argument.

[Anonymous No.8537519]

>>8537510
kys for the planet, it's the best way to reduce your carbon footprint. there is nothing edgy about putting one's own self interest first. sorry we aren't like you who are easily duped by appeals to emotion.

[Anonymous No.8537520]

>>8537508
>carbon tax introduced
>install solar panels
>install electric stove
>install electric clothes dryer
>drive electric car
prablum salvd

[Anonymous No.8537522]

>>8537520
you willing to pay for that or will i have to be taxed to pay for it? yup the cost will go to me for your moral grandstanding.

[Anonymous No.8537525]

>>8537519

[Anonymous No.8537527]

>>8537525

[Anonymous No.8537531]

>>8536704
not that anon, but a lot of upstream leakage comes from deliberate venting (using gas pressure to drive pneumatic mechanisms). there's lossless tech available (uses electricity instead) but it hasn't been all that widely adopted, even though it pays for itself pretty quickly.
if Tillerson is serious about environmental policy, he'll push for a regulatory mandate on all gas extraction.

[Anonymous No.8537535]

>>8537522
That wouldn't be such a problem if the USA didn't have shit-tier upward mobility. But the root cause is u̶n̶s̶k̶i̶l̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶l̶a̶b̶o̶r̶ ̶b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶s̶u̶p̶p̶l̶a̶n̶t̶e̶d̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶a̶u̶t̶o̶m̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶ the Chinese.

[Anonymous No.8537542]

>>8537535
you're the one who wants to "save the planet" so you can pay for it. only fair, because the way i see it you moral busybodies who want to tax and control my person are the only problem here.

[Anonymous No.8537546]

>>8537542
Where do you think we are?

[Anonymous No.8537547]

>>8537522
if the price of fossil fuels goes up for any reason and the price of alternatives (like solar) stays the same or decreases, then you will have people switching like I described

even you, the anti-tax curmudgeon will benefit from it because it makes our country less reliant on limited and valuable resources

[Anonymous No.8537551]

>>8537542
That's not how capitalism works and I suspect you know it.

[Anonymous No.8537553]

>>8537547
ok then get to work to make these alternatives you want to be a reality and stop being controlfreak busybodies.

[Anonymous No.8537558]

>>8537527
Inconceivable! How can I, the great and powerful Anon, be butthurt if I don't experience any of your precious, insipid FEELIES! MWAHAHAHA!

[Anonymous No.8537559]

>>8537551
what isn't? the fuck are you on about now? i'm merely saying you can piss off with your control freak taxes for things you want to happen. you can pay for it.

[Anonymous No.8537560]

>>8537542
>you're the one who wants to "save the planet" so you can pay for it. only fair,
we are

[Anonymous No.8537562]

[Anonymous No.8537563]

>>8537558

[Anonymous No.8537565]

>>8537553
I could do that
or we could just increase the price of gas artificially and solve the problem right now
that would be a lot easier.

[Anonymous No.8537566]

>>8537560
>A BILLION
why aren't all billionaires like bill?
he restores my faith in capitalism a little bit every time

[Anonymous No.8537567]

>>8537560
and yet you still want to tax me when you got 1B. how greedy are you people? fuck off already. do something with that money instead of whining that not everyone cares about your problems.

[Anonymous No.8537570]

>>8537560
why do americans turn orange as they age?

[Anonymous No.8537571]

>>8537567
I'm sorry to inconvenience you, it's for your own good retard, now get vaccinated.

[Anonymous No.8537574]

>>8537559
Energy companies have been deliberately patent-hoarding emergent tech until it's unprofitable to sell oil. Don't expect ecofacists to play fair in an unfair game.

[Anonymous No.8537577]

>>8537565
not going to happen, it'd fuck over the economy. but unlike the environmental crises which aren't going to be problems for us in our life time, the economy does matter to you and me despite how little you think about it.

[Anonymous No.8537579]

>>8537570
mfw
also, pic related

[Anonymous No.8537581]

>>8537574
good post

unfortunately, this is the real world

[Anonymous No.8537584]

the mong still had those tweets up a week ago when i checked

[Anonymous No.8537586]

>>8537571
>le everyone i disagree with is an agw-denying antivaxxer
sorry show me some evidence aside from irregular weather patterns that agw is a problem for me? a bigger problem than fucking over the eocnomy anyway?
pro-tip: you can't. look at this shit, all these models are all over the place.

>>8537574
then deal with them. stop trying to control me when they're your problem.

[Anonymous No.8537587]

>>8537581
You misunderstand.
Anthropogenic climate change exists.
Sci will make wolfposting great again.

[Anonymous No.8537589]

>>8537577
that's utter nonsense
the price of gas takes big swings up and down every few years on its own due to speculation and/or problems in saudi arabia or some other 3rd world shit hole

in fact, it could be better for us to artificially control the price by setting it at a constant higher level because it's much easier to handle shit when you have stability

[Anonymous No.8537590]

>>8537586
>your problem
Where do you think we are?

[Anonymous No.8537594]

pic related is if all land ice melted, we'll have to be building WALLS long before that happens it seems, instead of using our efforts on something useful

[Anonymous No.8537596]

>>8537589
lmao, except industry and everything relying on the price on gas to be low will suffer like food, etc. with rising costs people will have less money to spend and the economy would suffer in turn from low sales.

[Anonymous No.8537597]

>>8537584
Of all the things he could walk back, I really doubt this is one of them
the entire republican party is united around climate change denial

[Anonymous No.8537598]

>>8537586
look at these models carefully and without any bias

[Anonymous No.8537599]

>>8537594
Good! Let it sink. White people have brought pain and suffering to POC for too long.

[Anonymous No.8537603]

>>8537598
i did and with most i'll be dead before they're a problem for me. unlike a carbon tax which would be an immediate problem for me. also considering how alarmist climate science has been and how desperate researchers are for funding i have little reason to believe the worst case scenarios.

[Anonymous No.8537605]

>>8537599
yeah POC want to genocide whites and deport us back to europe

[Anonymous No.8537609]

>>8537599
No! Sci will walk the middle path. We are not SJW cucks. Anthropogenic climate change exists!

[Anonymous No.8537610]

>>8537603
>i did and with most i'll be dead before they're a problem for me. unlike a carbon tax which would be an immediate problem for me.
this is precisely why the carbon tax is such a great idea
it gets people who otherwise would never care, to have a reason to care

[Anonymous No.8537611]

>>8537610
and turn against you.

[Anonymous No.8537614]

>>8537599
>>8537605
We all know what kind of cruse this is.

[Anonymous No.8537617]

>>8537611
They turn only against themselves.

[Anonymous No.8537620]

>>8537603
Even the best case scenarios are kinda shitty in the long run.
anyway I agree rationally, we'll probably be dead, I'm appealing to emotion, the emotion I have is I don't like fucking the planet man

[Anonymous No.8537621]

>>8537617
you keep asserting that, but i have yet to see any evidence of this claim. agw happening doesn't automatically make it a problem for an individual.

[Anonymous No.8537625]

>>8537611
at least they'll be giving a fuck
certainly nothing will ever get done if we can't even get people to give a single fuck

[Anonymous No.8537626]

>>8537620
I like fucking the planet, you cuck
GAS KIKES! BURN COAL

[Anonymous No.8537632]

>>8537621
Did you have another homeworld in mind?

[Anonymous No.8537634]

>>8537620
and i don't like fucking my bank account and nor should you like fucking yours. you are aware though that we live in an entropic universe and everything goes to shit anyway? why waste our only lives bickering over it when we can enjoy them? no point m8.

[Anonymous No.8537636]

>>8537626

[Anonymous No.8537637]

>>8537632
do you have the cure for aging to make me care what happens to it past my life expectancy?

[Anonymous No.8537640]

>>8537634
Yeah! Y-you tell 'em Rick!

[Anonymous No.8537643]

>>8537637
Not yet :^)

[Anonymous No.8537651]

to the anti-taxxers
what if it was only like $10 per year tax? would you still be vehemently opposed?

[Anonymous No.8537654]

>>8537651
yes, it's a matter of principle. you want this, you can pay for it. do donation runs and charities. you got billy gates to cough up 1B, keep at it.

[Anonymous No.8537655]

>>8537651
TAX IS THEFT YOU PINKO COMMIE

[Anonymous No.8537676]

>>8537654
if we could get you all to cough up $10, then that's like $3 billion though
what if we just take it out of your entitlements instead? then you wont even notice it's gone

[Anonymous No.8537677]

>>8537654
>you want this, you can pay for it
That's not how capitalism works and I suspect you know it.

[Anonymous No.8537683]

>>8537676
>what if we just take it out of your entitlements instead? then you wont even notice it's gone
LOLBERTARIAN BTFO INTO ORBIT

[Anonymous No.8537684]

>>8537655
and of course theft isn't part of capitalism.

[Anonymous No.8537686]

>>8537634
you're doing exactly what they said you would do.

outsmarted by the russians.

[Anonymous No.8537690]

>>8537676
lets take your entitlements instead since it's being used for something you want. only fair.

>>8537677
back in circles already are we. see: >>8537559

anyway this argument is fucking boring, you guys are as zealous as the pro-lifers when it comes to their stances on abortion. lets enslave the living for the unborn. useful idiots the lot of you.

[Anonymous No.8537695]

>>8537686
yuri bez pls.

[Anonymous No.8537701]

>>8537686
Bezmenov stated that he was also instructed not to waste time with idealistic leftists, as these would become disillusioned, bitter, and adversarial when they realized the true nature of Soviet Communism. To his surprise, he discovered that many such were listed for execution once the Soviets achieved control. Instead, Bezmenov was encouraged to recruit the persons in large circulation, established conservative media, rich filmmakers, intellectuals in academic circles, and cynical, ego-centric people who lacked moral principles.

science of subversion

[Anonymous No.8537703]

>>8537690
its a little different though
what's the point in planting my seed now if my family line will end in a couple generations?

[Anonymous No.8537705]

>>8537690
Where do you think we are?

[Anonymous No.8537706]

>>8537703
that'd be your problem for falling for the reproduction meme, not mine.

[Anonymous No.8537708]

>>8537706
>>8537703
also having kids is what ruined the environment in the first place. no kids means no one around to pollute

[Anonymous No.8537710]

>>8537706
>>8537708
genius

[Anonymous No.8537711]

>>8537706

[Anonymous No.8537715]

>>8537711
apply liberally

[Anonymous No.8537718]

>>8537586
>a problem for me?
It's not, fortunately a carbon tax will get selfish people like you to do things for the good of your descendants and the planet.

[Anonymous No.8537720]

>>8537715
>>8537711

[Anonymous No.8537726]

>>8537718
kys for the planet, faggot. every moment you're alive your carbon footprint gets bigger.

[Anonymous No.8537727]

>>8537715
I'm just saying, that was pretty edgy.

What's more, there's nothing inherently wrong with appeals to emotion.

Humans aren't thinking machines; we're feeling machines that think.

[Anonymous No.8537732]

>>8537727
edgy or not, it is a fact. sad state we live in when the truth is deemed edgy. safespaces have really gone too far.

[Anonymous No.8537733]

>>8537726
>every moment you're alive your carbon footprint gets bigger.
Nope! It's even possible to have a negative carbon footprint.

[Anonymous No.8537736]

>>8537733
not while you're breathing.

[Anonymous No.8537742]

>>8537736
This kind of shit shows how deeply and fundamentally deniers just don't understand the science.

[Anonymous No.8537745]

>>8537732
>reproduction is a meme
>fuck the future of mankind nothing matters
>ur just gonna die anyway
>mfw

[Anonymous No.8537746]

>>8537742
actually it shows how autistic you are thinking that was a serious reply. i also don't deny agw, but do you realize how costly carbon capture is?

[Anonymous No.8537751]

>>8537745
when you're dead nothing matters though.

[Anonymous No.8537757]

>>8537746
>LOL GUISE I WAS JUST KIDDING I WUZ TROLLIN LOL GOT U FELL FOR IT KIDDO HAHAHA LOL IS DIS UR FIRST INTERNET TROLL KIDDO? HAHAHA LOL I WUZ ONLY PRETENDING GOTCHYA, YA UR THE AUTIST NOT ME HAHAHA TROLLFACE XD

[Anonymous No.8537764]

>>8537751
If nothing I do matters, why should it matter if I fuck your life up? To me, you're just another signal in the noise.

[Anonymous No.8537768]

i think that if the last line of defense is "nothing matters anyway let's just enjoy ourselves" then it's really as over as it can be

[Anonymous No.8537770]

>>8537764
because i'd fuck you up six ways to sunday if you tried, you little unarmed beta numale.

[Anonymous No.8537780]

>>8537768
keep telling your wife's son that. lmao.

[Anonymous No.8537785]

>>8537768
I gotta be honest
I'm getting pretty close to holding that position myself
I really don't see any way that we're going to come out ahead of this issue

[Anonymous No.8537792]

>>8537768
The arguments of """skeptics""" have gone from
>It's not happening there's no proof, no evidence, there's nothing, the science isn't a valid science, only "real science" matters
to
>Uh, ok, maybe the planet is on a warming trend and sea ice is decreasing, but this is all just a natural process, humans have absolutely nothing to do with that (conveniently ignores all the isotopic / O2 data linking the industrial revolution to the current CO2 trends).
to
>Ok, maybe there's some evidence and the planet is indeed warming due to human activity, but CO2 isn't that bad and warmer planet isn't bad either, I mean look we're gonna be able to grow crops further north now in some places! See, it's good!
to
>Ok yes CO2 increases are bad, and getting warmer is bad, but we can't do anything to stop it at this point so there's no point in trying so we might as well just do nothing, there's no point!
to
>It's all a NASA conspiracy, all the data is faked, nothing is real, green energy conspiracy, look at these blogs, its proofs! Fucking big government trying to take my money carbon taxes! Fucking commie pinko watermelon enviroterrorist! Look at this glenn beck interview! Oh look another interview on Fox News, see climate scientist, ur BTFO lol ur not even real scientists see

[Anonymous No.8537804]

>>8537770
I'm 1.9 meters bitch whatchu got?

[Anonymous No.8537812]

>>8537804
reduce your co2 emissions by putting a 5.56 between your eyes.

[Anonymous No.8537818]

>>8537711
>>8537715
there isn't hentai of this yet

[Anonymous No.8537830]

>>8537812
M800 have you BEEN to Australia?

[Anonymous No.8537847]

>>8537792
What exactly is the end game of the AGW enablers?
A global government - corporation that rations and controls energy through strict CO2 emissions monitoring?
If you reduce your energy consumption someone else will use it. Until you address the root problem which is too many monkeys not enough bananas, it's just pissing in the wind my friend.

Do you think the hypocrite on the left would consider spreading some birth control and sex education in Africa? Or the hypocrite on the right would reduce his footprint to that of a small African nation?
Noooooooo!
At least you used skeptic and not denier or climate heretic, that's encouraging!

[Anonymous No.8537852]

>>8537847
>Do you think the hypocrite on the left would consider spreading some birth control and sex education in Africa?
what?
it's traditionally the people on the right who block birth control and sex ed in africa...

[Anonymous No.8537879]

>>8537852
>what?
I know it's standard cult building protocol to ban birth control and abortion, keep people ignorant about sex but the hypocrisy is getting outstanding. The church is going to start training their clergy in the art of regular AGW propaganda dissemination to their congregation of 1 billion plus. AGW, it's not just political, it's getting eerily religious too.

Serious question though, bickering aside, what is the end game, assuming AGW is correct and immediate action taken what exactly would that constitute? What would the typical AGW supporter want to come of it?

[Anonymous No.8537886]

/pol/ belongs on /pol/, /sci/ belongs on /sci/

this board miscegenation is destroying our board culture and heritage

resist /pol/ at every opportunity

[Anonymous No.8537891]

>>8537879
please seek treatment

this is beyond conspiracy theory and into delusion

you need help

I know I'm just one of your imagined persecuters but please

seek help.

You need to find something healthier than posting on /sci/ all day, you're getting further into your delusions every time you make one of these threads.