[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 49 KB, 500x750, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8500860 No.8500860 [Reply] [Original]

DUTCH PROFESSOR ERIK VERLINDE OVERTURNS EISENSTEIN'S MODEL
NEW FORMULA DERIVED FROM THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE ANSWERS THE QUESTION OF "DARK ENERGY", AND SUPERSEDES EINSTEINIAN SPACE-TIME.
Dutch prodigy and Amsterdam University Professor Erik Verlinde published a paper on arXiv yesterday, November 7, titled "Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe." In the paper, Verlinde derives gravity from the so-called Holographic Principle, which – simply put – states that gravity emerges from the interplay between and entropy re-arrangement of sub-atomic "strings" that live in a negatively curved spacetime. At that level […] spacetime and gravity are emergent from an underlying microscopic description in which they have no a priori meaning." Most importantly, Verlinde's paper has as a consequence that dark matter, nemesis of many an astronomer, is nothing more than an illusion. Verlinde, who was awarded the Dutch national Spinoza science prize in the recent past, already completed the tour de force of deriving Newtonian gravity from the same principles in a 2010 paper, also on arXiv. We are probably looking at Nobel-prize material here, as Verlinde is acknowledged by his peers to "go one better than Einstein's General Theory of Relativity."
http://phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269.pdf
Trump BTFO's the Jewish media, and a Dutchman BTFO's Jewish physics. All within 48 hours.

>> No.8500872

>>8500860Bumpo

>> No.8500875
File: 27 KB, 400x400, Lubo__Motl_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8500875

http://motls.blogspot.ca/2016/11/verlindes-de-sitter-mond-is-highly.html

> Verlinde's de Sitter MOND is highly incomplete, to say the least

> But within weeks, it became clear that his theory was just a wrong collection of speculations and misunderstandings about the relationships between the fundamental concepts of physics.

>I wouldn't okay this wrong piece of work as an undergraduate term paper but he got 6.5 millions of euros for this absolutely worthless pile of feces so many people who are impressed by the money but don't have an idea about science – which includes virtually all journalists – started to think that Verlinde is a top physicist. And he may have decided that he must justify the award by producing even greater piles of bogus hype.

>
At any rate, I do believe that if you're thinking about reading Erik Verlinde's paper but you're not certain and you have read my abstract, you may save the time because it's unlikely that you will find something important yet sensible there. I think that he wrote 51 pages primarily to create the illusion that he's doing "lots of work" on his "revolutionary" ideas. But there's really no content that would be proportional to the volume (to 51 pages) here. ;-)

>> No.8500882
File: 11 KB, 250x250, 1263938280347.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8500882

>>8500860
>dark matter is literal meme
>meme drive actually works
Have physicits ever been so BTFO in a single year?

>> No.8500888

>>8500860
>yesterday, November 7
But yesterday wasn't 7.... It was 26...

>DUTCH PHYSICST BEATS EINSTIEN
No, just no.

>Most importantly, Verlinde's paper has as a consequence that dark matter, nemesis of many an astronomer, is nothing more than an illusion
>We are probably looking at Nobel-prize material here
The problem is that his theory does NOT match the data we have: http://motls.blogspot.de/2010/01/erik-verlinde-why-gravity-cant-be.html

>> No.8500891

>>8500860
Kinda looks like CIA

>> No.8500894
File: 78 KB, 424x480, cia.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8500894

>>8500891

>> No.8500993

that guy look like is fox mulders dad

also note, this theory not new, many have theorized dark matter is hidden side effect of holographic principle

if remember properly, it is simple derivation from simple string theory, though hard to discover

>> No.8501000

>>8500875

Motl's avatarfagging now?

>> No.8501068

>>8500860
>You'll never pleasure a famous person orally

I just want to be a good boy, and be praised, why is it so hard to find a dom to punish and cherish you?

>> No.8501093

gravity isnt real. its a concept.

graviton: In theoretical physics, the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force

>> No.8501678

is he /our guy/?

>> No.8501689

What's the next step in his master thesis

>> No.8501711 [DELETED] 

>>8501093
>gravity is a social constuct

>> No.8501714

>>8501093
>gravity is a social construct

>> No.8501716

>>8500860
who tf is eisenstein? the filmmaker?