Pretty pictures: OC edition

[Anonymous No.8454878]

Copper (II) cyanurate

[Anonymous No.8454883]

>>8454878
Recrystallized paracetamol from acetone

[Anonymous No.8454885]

>>8454883
Sulfur recrystallized from toleuene

[Anonymous No.8454888]

>>8454885
Some KMnO4

[Anonymous No.8454890]

>>8454888
Benzoic acid

[Anonymous No.8454898]

>>8454890
Another run of benzoic acid synth and recrystallization

[Anonymous No.8454902]

>>8454898
I don't get it why it's so streched out. Now it certainly isn't as pretty as before.

[Anonymous No.8454911]

dude you some kind of freak? wtf.

[Anonymous No.8454916]

>>8454911
Now what would make you say such a thing?

[Anonymous No.8454921]

>>8454916
come on dude youre creeping me out..

[Anonymous No.8454937]

>>8454898
Not OC but still looks cool

[Anonymous No.8455060]

Bump

[Anonymous No.8455115]

Old picture of my ghetto reflux set-up

[Anonymous No.8455190]

>>8455115
Muh makeshift hydrogenation apparatus

It....uh...didnt work

[Anonymous No.8456588]

>>8455190
Is that a balloon? Did you just put hydrogen in there?
Also what did you try to hydrogenate?

[Anonymous No.8456601]

Bald ass eagle

[Anonymous No.8456606]

>>8456601
some mf mallards

[Anonymous No.8456865]

>>8454878
if you want pretty pictures of crystals lookup birefringence. Pic related, its a pic I took thru microscope of crystallised BHT

[surreal No.8456873]

the CDC has a pretty nice collection of bacteria images

[Anonymous No.8457175]

>>8454878
enjoy your cacer chemfag

[Anonymous No.8457182]

>>8457175
I actually spilt some chromic acid a few weeks ago. Wiped it up and I think a bit got on my finger, so we're probably on with the cancer.

[Anonymous No.8457194]

Here's an HE plate cultured with some opportunistic enteric bacteria

[Anonymous No.8457208]

>>8457194
Another HE plate with Salmonella

Those yellow/orange colonies mutated to ferment lactose. Kinda spooky

[Anonymous No.8457218]

>>8457208
A blurry Mycobacterium culture. Looks like mini string cheese or that crap that clogs up your pores

[Anonymous No.8457231]

>>8457218
Staph aureus on a blood agar plate with a novobiocin tablet to determine susceptibility

S. aureus will fuck your shit up look at all that hydrolyzed blood senpai

[Anonymous No.8457232]

>>8457194
>>8457208
OP here. These are amazing. On the second picture did the yellow colonies mutate by themself or was it intentional?

[Anonymous No.8457238]

>>8454878

this is the picture that appears in "The art of computer programming: bitwise tricks"

I think the title is wrong though, and it's backwards

[Anonymous No.8457240]

>>8457232
We think it mutated by itself. There may have been some interaction between the Salmonella and Shigella species on that plate that enabled the lactose fermentation but it's largely a mystery

[Anonymous No.8457242]

>>8457238

[Anonymous No.8457244]

>>8457242

[Anonymous No.8457246]

>>8457242

not a duplicate reply

[Anonymous No.8457249]

>>8457246

[Anonymous No.8457259]

2016 in a version of Jacob Barnett numbers using lines to represent 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-DZMmQBng

[Anonymous No.8457261]

>>8457249

[Anonymous No.8457262]

>>8457240
Biology is fascinating. It's so spontanus and unpredictable. Just wow

[Anonymous No.8457265]

>>8457259


this is 2050

[Anonymous No.8457300]

>>8457259
>>8457265
I was thinking about this the other day. How do you think he represents 4, or 8, or 16? I think since he rotates the shape 180 degrees whenever multiplying by two, if you want to represent 2*2 you need to move into 3 dimensions, basically a plus sign that comes out of the screen. If you want to represent 8, you need to move up to 4D, and so on. Maybe this is how Barnett visualizes higher dimensions so easily?

[Anonymous No.8457342]

It's just pretty

[Anonymous No.8457348]

>>8457259
>>8457265
>Jacob Barnett numbers
this shit is just fucking stupid man im sorry

[Anonymous No.8457468]

>>8457300

Powers of 2 on this program are just single straight lines. This is just because it allows me to use the same geometry shader for all shapes, and not handle any inconsistencies. What it does is takes 2pi, divides by the number of sides to get an increment, and then iterates through generating points with the given angle.

Ideally, I think it would be best to define all shapes using this algorithm because it is more consistent. One change I might make is have the starting angle be normal to the unit circle, instead of always being 0. It wouldn't even be that hard to implement, I would only have to change the geometry shader.

The only problem is what to do with the first line. I would probably just make it so you can toggle which of the two starting positions you want

>>8457348

I get it anon, I am jealous of the kid as well.

[Anonymous No.8457481]

>>8454885
nah that's an onion

[Anonymous No.8457548]

>>8457481
Looks more like sauerkraut to me haha

[Anonymous No.8458933]

>>8457231
So what would happen if it got in your system via IV?

[Anonymous No.8458944]

>>8457468
>Powers of 2 on this program are just single straight lines.
So 2 looks the same as 4 looks the same as 8 and so on? All of them just straight lines?
Also for >>8457265
Why did you start out with a straight line instead of a pentagon, or a 41-gon? When you did it here >>8457259 you started out with the highest prime factor which seems like the logical starting point.

[Anonymous No.8459129]

>>8458944

it starts with the factors in order of smallest to largest, and it lets you cycle through all possible permutations.

also you can fuck with the proportions, which can be pretty trippy. If I had stuck with keeping them overlapped like the kid does in the video, this Sierpinski triangle made by powers of 3 wouldn't have formed because it requires the triangles to be as close as possible without overlapping, for example.

[Anonymous No.8459147]

>>8458944

and yes, all powers of 2 look the exact same