Is this the big one?

[Anonymous No.8361273]

So the internet says we're gonna be hit by a big old asteroid on 24-25 September. Supposedly governments have been nuking the heck out of the thing without much luck. What does /sci/ think of this?

>Sept 17 Important Update – Space Detonation(s):
>A fresh sighting, of a short lived bright illumination, has been confirmed. The dimensions and shape of the bright illumination indicates a wide debris field, as it had an oblong and rough shape & tilted (i.e. debris field shape tilted with respect to the horizon).
>This sighting was less than 2 days ago. A followup of the exact location 24hrs later confirmed that the illumination was not present (not an artifact).
>It is believed that this illumination was from a distant space detonation of a direct hit of the “object”. However, this was not the first “detonation” … information and data indicate 3 and possibly 4 space detonations have occurred.

>Earth Referenced coordinates:
>The direction of this illuminated “debris field” was in the Earth’s northern hemisphere view, observed at sunrise Pacific Daylight Time (U.S. PDT), at an angle – to the stars – of approximately 42 degrees north (earth plane Latitude intersecting to object).
>The location was from the northern Pacific Coast Range, to the nearest town, is 45° 35′ 11″ N 123° 12′ 53″ W. This data confirms that the object is approaching from a sun light illuminated direction (from a low angle “sun approach”).

[Anonymous No.8361294]

>>8361273
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.8361310]

>>8361273
What the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.8361317]

what is this nonsense

[Anonymous No.8361319]

>>8361310
>Two “deflection” detonations:
Tracking data of this object has shown two distinct changes in its vector trajectory eight days ago and thirteen days ago. The prior nine+ days had a consistent and straight trajectory – minus a very small arc.
>Both of these trajectory changes, considered “deflection detonations”, were in the same direction (indicating – “to vector the object on a path away from earth”).
(note: the indicator that these were “nuclear surface detonations”, for deflection, is due to the subsequent degree of change in direction relative to the size of the object.)
>The first “deflection detonation” resulted in a change in a slight, but a consistent new vector heading.
>The second “deflection detonation” (approximately 5 days later) was more dramatic with nearly 3 times greater resulting vector heading change compared to the first.
>Following the second deflection, the object started a curve in its direction back towards earth, most likely from it getting closer and experiencing the influence of earth’s gravity well.

[Anonymous No.8361326]

>Earth intercept date:
>With all of the recent deltaV (velocity) changes induced into the “object”, it will require further observation to provide a new “best estimate”.
>Some slowing had been observed, and was later confirmed to be caused by the first deflection detonation. A calculation estimate of this first slight slowing, shifted the earth intercept solution(s) from Sept 25 out to up to a week.
>However, with the additional deflection detonations, the direct hit detonations, and the new acceleration into earth’s gravity well, this will create an uncertainty that can only be determined by days of new observational information/data.
>Note: A possibility exists that the illumination of a wide distribution of the debris may give a very short advance warning, even in the daytime – depending on clear skies.

[Anonymous No.8361329]

>>8361319
Who are you quoting??
Literally

[Anonymous No.8361331]

>>8361329
http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/20/update-3-asteroid-to-hit-possibly-25-september-2016/

[Anonymous No.8361336]

>Early Asteroid fragment(s) may arrive sooner from Space Detonation “deflection attempts”
>It is very possible that an early arrival of an asteroid fragment or fragments may occur days sooner than the main body of the larger pieces of the asteroid.
>This would be from the two prior “deflection detonations” (see Sept 17 update). A “deflection” detonation would be on the side of the asteroid at a desired deflection angle to the heading of the asteroid.
>The degree of movement, or deflection result of the object, after the detonation* likely would eject fragments at a lateral angle or angles at a higher velocity than the velocity of the main body.
>This boost of momentum to the fragment or fragments would be equal to (main object velocity + energy boost in momentum/speed to fragment/fragments) based on the energy transfer & dislodge resistance of the detonation*
>The world should watch for such asteroid/meteor events days prior to the original estimated Sept 25 date. This could serve as an early warning to the world and the people that the main body of the asteroid is to follow.

[Anonymous No.8361342]

>>8361331
>http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/20/update-3-asteroid-to-hit-possibly-25-september-2016/
AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHA
HAH
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.8361343]

>>8361331
kek

[Anonymous No.8361344]

So, could this possibly be real, or are we just gonna go with
>no it's impossible because I didn't think of it first

[Anonymous No.8361348]

>>8361342
How is this paranormal?

[Anonymous No.8361351]

>>8361348
>>8361344
just fuck off, youre on the wrong board.
shouldve said >>>/trash/

[Anonymous No.8361353]

>>8361351
Thank you for your open-mindedness, /sci/.

[Anonymous No.8361354]

>>8361273
what kind of orbital path would cause an object to come from the direction of the sun?

I know this thread is retarded and I'm an idiot for bumping it.

[Anonymous No.8361355]

>>8361273
And what is the size of this "object"?

[Anonymous No.8361360]

>>8361353
>don't eat up sensationalist bullshit from substantiated sources seriously
>"omg y u so close minded"

[Anonymous No.8361361]

Nuking a meteor makes no sense. Most of the destructive power of nuclear fission relies on the presence of a gaseous atmosphere.

[Anonymous No.8361362]

>>8361355
Dunno, that's why I was asking for help

[Anonymous No.8361363]

>>8361348
Well it sure as hell isn't scientific.
Some proper grade-A psudo crazy stuff though, with a nice sprinkle of tinfoil on top

[Anonymous No.8361364]

>>8361273
You're telling me that a large asteroid is heading to earth, world governments fired missiles to deflect and apart tell me that nobody noticed or knew anything about this.
.-.

[Anonymous No.8361367]

>>8361362
that's one of the first things people know about asteroids, man. this guy you're following is full of shit.

[Anonymous No.8361368]

>>8361331
Holy shit are you serious?
Do you have one iota of self reflection or skepticism?
How do people like this zombie through life?

[Anonymous No.8361369]

>>8361361
>meteor
Or asteroid, whatever.
The asteroid becomes a meteor when it enters the atmosphere, which I think is as senseless as puddles from rain having a different word than puddles from other water sources.

[Anonymous No.8361370]

>>8361361
Nuking Dangerous Asteroids Might Be the Best Protection, Expert Says
http://www.space.com/21333-asteroid-nuke-spacecraft-mission.html

[Anonymous No.8361375]

>>8361361
>Jun 11, 2016, a Delta IV Heavy was launched from Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 37, by the U.S., identified to be containing a classified satellite for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).
>Jun 24, 2016, Atlas V 551 was launched from Cape Canaveral Space Complex 41 carrying a satellite for the U.S. Navy
>Jul 28, 2016, Atlas V launched from Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 41 carrying a classified payload for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
>Aug 19, 2016, a Delta IV Medium+ was launched from the same Launch Complex 37 which was identified carrying a high altitude GSSAP satellite for observing earth orbital space objects & debris.
>Sept 8, 2016, an Atlas V 411 was launched from Cape Canaveral Space Complex 41 carrying an asteroid investigation spacecraft to meet up with Asteroid Bennu two years out.

[Anonymous No.8361377]

>instead of a haven for down-to-Earth realistic conspiracy theories, /x/ became a pestilent nest of magic worshipers and reptilian believers who buy into all the pseudoscientific bullshit they can chew while shitting on the scientific method

just end me

[Anonymous No.8361386]

>>8361377
>just end me
I mean, that's what we're talking about here...

[Anonymous No.8361393]

>>8361273
Its a nice break from the weekly FlatEarth-shitposting, i'l give you that.

[Anonymous No.8361398]

>>8361375
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101955_Bennu#Possible_Earth_impact

[Anonymous No.8361410]

>>8361362
And what the hell is this article without the size of this asteroid?

[Anonymous No.8361417]

>>8361368
Well ok, but if one *were* to have info on something like this, and one *were not* interested in being v& by an alphabet agency, might not one consider assuaging one's conscience by "whistleblowing" to a small but under-the-radar (as it were) blog that's highly interested in said cosmological event?

Which is why I was hoping someone could say whether this is real or BS by offering some semblance of reality, without just laughing at the premise. Y'know, sciencey stuff.

[Anonymous No.8361418]

Someone in / sci / it is true what the post or page where the information was taken? It's just a piece of shit more out of / x /? Or has something true?

[Anonymous No.8361420]

>>8361410
Again, that's why I was asking the scientists.

[Anonymous No.8361425]

>>8361410
>This object is sizeable to where it is faintly bright enough in being tracked from a distance of nearly 2AU (1 Astronomical Unit AU = Earth distance to Sun). Small asteroids would not be detectable from this distance by this sensitive telescope. Yet, with this sizeable object, with enough near-infrared light making it distinguishable from this near 2AU distance, there has been no notification of such a class of object in the current Earth-asteroid watch list provided by NASA/JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratories).
>The object’s trajectory towards earth is following an incoming angle that is roughly 46 degrees north of the earth’s celestial equator (Latitude). The object is approaching near the nighttime to daytime transition (pre-sunrise to sunrise) hours.

[Anonymous No.8361433]

This reminded me of a notica of weeks ago, in which he said that an asteroid would pass about 14 times the distance from Earth to the moon and came with a small asteroid of 17-43 yards in diameter, ofcourse that this was already weeks I wonder if the guy who said this try to confuse people, I see the dates match when I saw the news.

[Anonymous No.8361436]

>>8361417
oh god
your logic is so flawed. youre the most gullible person on the planet.
if someone were to "whistleblow". why would they go to a blog that wouldn't be taken seriously by anybody?
Anyone can e-mail that retard and say whatever they want. I can start e-mailing them a play-by-play of the secret alien invasion tomorrow and they would eat it up.

Why didn't Snowden contact infowars?

[Anonymous No.8361442]

>>8361425
Where did you get the information?

[Anonymous No.8361445]

>>8361442
he got it from http://littlepebble.org/
not kidding, he straight posted a link from that website
lmfao

[Anonymous No.8361453]

>>8361273
heres another post from the same website OP you stupid fuck
http://littlepebble.org/2016/05/12/message-to-the-little-pebble-6-may-2016/

Dated May 12 2016
"Jesus revealed to me last week about the Sun — it was going to have an explosion causing the Earth to have a meteorite shower which would cause great problems for the World.As these types of messages are given to me often, I did not put it to the public. Jesus had told me this before. Then today I was surprised to read the same in Luz de Maria's Message of the 8th May."

[Anonymous No.8361463]

I knew I was gonna get beat up by the bullies here. Sigh. This is what happens when muggles ask for help.

[Anonymous No.8361466]

>>8361436
>Why didn't Snowden contact infowars?
Because it's disinfo. Instead he went to an almost-noname reporter. Y'know, like here.

[Anonymous No.8361470]

>>8361273
OP is a fag.
If you are coming with stupidities drawn from a page dedicated to religion and the page has its own section of "science" better fuck

And do not be afraid of this, because it is false, you have nice night OP.

[Anonymous No.8361481]

This is even worse than seeing the Ken Ham/Bill Nye debate.

[Anonymous No.8361490]

>>8361463
We're giving you our opinions.

Believe what you want.

[Anonymous No.8361491]

>>8361466
He went to a reporter who covered the war in iraq - thats why he chose her. She then got that fag from The Guardian formerly known as Salon.com.
Either way the reporter he went to was serious and on an FBI watchlist.
Watch Citizen Four the name is gay but its a good movie.

[Anonymous No.8361496]

>implying humans aren't deserving of annihilation

[Anonymous No.8361499]

Op is either really young or completly lacking critical thought.

[Anonymous No.8361503]

>>8361417
Believing a rumor because, to you, it sounds like it could be true is a horrible way to go through life.

Believe what there is evidence (and don't take hearsay as evidence like truthers or other conspiracy theorists) to believe and everything else is a mire.

[Anonymous No.8361531]

>>8361503
Well, I didn't believe a rumor exactly... I came and asked for help.

After the /sci/ bullies beat me up a bit, a few more helpful folks came in, and for that I'm thankful. Though I really wish some backyard astronomer would check it out.

[Anonymous No.8361546]

>>8361531
There are places with astronomical telescopes to which they can turn normal people to see the sky, you can go to one place and observe wanted more.

[Anonymous No.8361574]

>Dear diary: today i asked a really stupid question. I could have used a single shred of common sense or critical thinking, but i did not. The mean people here has pointed out these things to me. It hurt. Today was not a good day. I am also 12

[Anonymous No.8361594]

lol u tk him 2da bar?

[Anonymous No.8361601]

September 25 is not the end of the world, enough crap for this day, I will fill with a little shit /b/ and good night for everyone.

[Anonymous No.8361623]

>>8361601
Whats with September/November and doomsday-shit anyway? Each year its comet-thus and Niburu-that. Never fails.

[Anonymous No.8361629]

>>8361623
Maybe because Mercury retrograde is ending?

[Anonymous No.8361801]

So, this is real or not? I stay Doubt (fear) a serious answer, please.

[Anonymous No.8361846]

>>8361801
kinda hasn't really been answered

[Anonymous No.8361855]

>>8361846
Theres no info to retort.
There was one person who posted a name of an asteroid and its not shown to get anywhere close until 2100s

[Anonymous No.8361857]

>>8361855
>>8361846
So, this is true or false?

[Anonymous No.8361868]

>>8361857
true?

[Anonymous No.8361889]

>>8361857
False, given that that no real information was given and the entire scenario is extremely unlikely

[Anonymous No.8361921]

>>8361889
You read the "information" given by that page, right?
So it is false ...? Answer :'3

[Anonymous No.8361935]

>>8361921
Yes, its nothing and not true

[Anonymous No.8361952]

>>8361921
Well...not him but.

If you mean an asteroid able to erase life on this planet, I think I have good/bad news for you.

The chances of that happening in your lifetime are as low as you winning the lottery and a lightning impact at the same time.

Still... OP don't give a exact size of that asteroid...And not to mention how close it would be assuming that would impact to us in 3 to 7 days.

So... for me this has a 20% credibility of what OP is saying is truth.

[Anonymous No.8361961]

>>8361952
According to the source, its coming from the direction of the sun and was 2AU away 3 months ago. Also there have been 3(!!) successful nuclear detonations on or near the object that have only managed to delay(??) the objects time of impact. Its bullshit

[Anonymous No.8361964]

>>8361961
Really think about how celestial bodies orbit the sun. How the fuck could could something be orbiting the sun and be coming from the direction of the sun? It can't unless it was fired out of a cannon.

[Anonymous No.8361966]

>>8361952
Practically you're telling me that according to your statistics it has a 20% chance? even without knowing the size, not knowing that is directed, without any further information, you say you have 20% chance of being right?

[Anonymous No.8361970]

>>8361964
Its not impossible, not everything is on a nice circular orbit. That russian one a few years ago come from the direction of the sun

[Anonymous No.8361976]

>Posts an astronomical happening
>Doesn't list a single citation

[Anonymous No.8361980]

>>8361976
There are none, its just some emails from a "scientist" to some christian blogger. The whole thing is ridiculous and made up

[Anonymous No.8361983]

>>8361331
>possibly

I'm sure there's a shit load of weasel words, if-related words, fear-mongering, and fuck all citations in that article.

[Anonymous No.8361985]

>>8361976
Is something out of a religious site, it sounds like shit I know, but it's about a guy who received information from a person within NASA (sounds like a cheap film and also was taken or brought from / x /) sounds interesting what say the messages assumptions that gives the person within NASA, but it's just that, nothing more, no photo or someone else who says that is true, it is rare that only one of the many people who are in the NASA post only he

[Anonymous No.8361987]

>>8361976
apparently it's top secret ELE stuff

[Anonymous No.8361988]

>>8361985
The author also seems to think that NASA is the only organisation that watches for asteroids

[Anonymous No.8361993]

>>8361970
This desu, that's why they couldn't see it coming. You can't exactly point optical instruments at the sun and expect to see an asteroid (or anything because your sensors will be saturated to fuck).

That being said, this shit about "we are firing nukes but it ain't working cap'n" is retarded.

So will we get hit? I don't think the chances are any greater or less on those days than they are any other day. But maybe.

[Anonymous No.8361996]

>>8361993
>So will we get hit?
By what? There is no asteroid the whole thing is made up

[Anonymous No.8361998]

>>8361988
I asked questions to people at CERN and ESA for twitter and have always given me answer without any problems.

[Anonymous No.8362001]

>>8361998
Yeah they totally wouldn't lie about something like this

[Anonymous No.8362002]

>>8361998
Ok?

[Anonymous No.8362007]

>>8362001
>>8362002
I try to say I've done ask people included in agencies or global companies and give me answer.

[Anonymous No.8362009]

>>8362007
I have no idea what you're saying

[Anonymous No.8362011]

>>8362009
My English sucks?

[Anonymous No.8362014]

>>8362011
Yes. Are you trying to say you have asked CERN and ESA about this asteroid? If so what response did they give?

[Anonymous No.8362016]

>>8362014
Other questions.
¿Ask to CERN about this? would be idiotic.

[Anonymous No.8362020]

>>8362014
probably
>stop bothering us and go away

[Anonymous No.8362021]

>>8362016
>¿Ask to CERN about this? would be idiotic.
Yes it would, which is why i'm struggling to understand what you mean

[Anonymous No.8362027]

>>8361987
oh of course, it always is with these types
Christ, at least flip out about real conspiracies like hillary clinton having people murdered or the EU trying to turn europe in to a single country.

[Anonymous No.8362030]

>>8362021
If we want a true answer would have to ask in the twitter NASA and other space agencies (would be better "Bombing" the agency workers, these would respond really fast)

[Anonymous No.8362036]

I CAN'T DIE BEFORE CALC 2

I MEAN COME ON

[Anonymous No.8362038]

>>8362030
If they knew something they didnt want publicly known they would just lie

[Anonymous No.8362046]

>>8361273
can we let this thread die? there is no asteroid you stupid fucks

[Anonymous No.8362049]

>>8362046
No

[Anonymous No.8362051]

The problem here is we do not have any information, true information or given by someone with some credibility, we only have a religious site with a person saying that messages arrive some course worker NASA which gives us an apocalyptic message that would come in less than 10 days.

That involves science because it is an asteroid that allegedly killed us, the "NASA worker" does not give any more information only tells us that comes from the direction of the sun and therefore is invisible to normal telescopes.

As always, and most likely this is false, but this take a lot of strength from the fact that "a worker of NASA," says it's real.

[Anonymous No.8362052]

>>8361294
>>8361317
>>8361342
>>8361343
>>8361351
>>8361354
>>8361360
>>8361363
>>8361367
>>8361368
>>8361393
>>8361436
>>8361445
>>8361453
>>8361470
>>8361499
>>8361503
>>8361855
>>8361889
>>8361935
>>8361961
>>8361964
>>8361966
>>8361980
>>8361983
>>8361985
>>8361988
Any good scientist will never accept the word of another entity as fact. That is not to say that the word of an untrustworthy entity does not warrant investigation.

[Anonymous No.8362055]

>>8362051
>world is going to end
>nasa worker scared to reveal identity
riiight

[Anonymous No.8362056]

>>8362046
>>8362049
Right now i kinda want the asteroid to come. The idea of OP being able to vote and reproduce is just more depressing.

[Anonymous No.8362057]

>>8362052
No evidence has been provided, it is therefore reasonable to dismiss the claim

[Anonymous No.8362060]

>>8362052
we have to investigate a claim made by a website that makes similar claims once a month?
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.8362061]

>>8362057
But an opportunity to make a determination as to whether this is real is sort-of there, no?

[Anonymous No.8362064]

>>8362061
NO, LOL
i bet you think we should investigate if jesus is really talking to the author as well

[Anonymous No.8362065]

>>8362061
No. There is literally no evidence and nothing to investigate

[Anonymous No.8362068]

>>8362064
Please stay on topic...

[Anonymous No.8362074]

>>8362057
Could you please explain your reasoning, if you believe it to be reasonable? Or is your reasoning implied?

[Anonymous No.8362075]

>>8362068
>Any good scientist will never accept the word of another entity as fact. That is not to say that the word of an untrustworthy entity does not warrant investigation.
>the word of an untrustworthy entity does not warrant investigation.
The author said they spoke to Jesus, and that Jesus said the world was going to end. Based on your logic we should investigate that as well. >Has a picture explaining strawman
>Still doesnt understand strawman

[Anonymous No.8362080]

>>8362074
Yea because the burden of proof definitely resides on him and not OP
You don't belong here

[Anonymous No.8362089]

>>8362074
There is no reasoning. A claim was made, no evidence was offered to back it up, the claim was dismissed.

Aside from that, the story is silly. It involves an asteroid coming from the direction of the sun crossing 2AU in 3 months, being intercepted 3 times by spacecraft from earth each of which detonated a nuclear device on or near the object. The detonations somehow "slowed down" the object so that it will still impact the earth but take longer to do so than it would have originally.

None of that is plausible and some of it is absurd

[Anonymous No.8362124]

>>8362075
Jesus has nothing to do with the conversation, so don't use it to represent OPs claim.

>>8362080
Sure, there exists the burden of proof, however that is not to say that OP is wrong. You yourself have no proof that OP is wrong.

>>8362089
I am not familiar with our current knowledge and technology on asteroid redirection, so I couldn't say. However...

> It involves an asteroid coming from the direction of the sun crossing 2AU in 3 months
Lens flare is a thing, so if you don't take the sentence so literally. It is plausible.

>intercepted 3 times by spacecraft from earth each of which detonated a nuclear device on or near the object
This also seems plausible depending on how far the asteroid was at the time of intercept. Again, I am not familiar with how accurate we can intercept asteroids.

>The detonations somehow "slowed down" the object so that it will still impact the earth but take longer to do so than it would have originally.
This is consistent with how collisions and orbital mechanics work, obviously it won't solve the problem, but it is still plausible.

[Anonymous No.8362129]

>>8362124
IMO he was talking about his logic, and used an example from the source to support his claim that his logic was flawed. Don't see why you two are having trouble understanding that.

[Anonymous No.8362136]

>>8362124
>Lens flare is a thing, so if you don't take the sentence so literally. It is plausible.
This one is actually plausible


>intercepted 3 times by spacecraft from earth each of which detonated a nuclear device on or near the object
In 3 months, for an object that was 2AU away 3 months ago. Extremely implausible

>This is consistent with how collisions and orbital mechanics work,
No it isnt. At all. If the object was on a collision trajectory, then slowing it down enough so that it is supposedly going to arrive 3-5 days later than originally expected as the story claims, means it misses completely

[Anonymous No.8362142]

>>8362136
Point is, nobody's still dismissed this claim with anything better than "Conspiracyjesus = false!!1!"

[Anonymous No.8362145]

Where would one go to survive the meteor?

Anyone who knows the location of the meteor knows the time it will strike earth, down to the second.

The planet spins in a direction opposite to the sun, so should i go leftwards, like to europe?

[Anonymous No.8362148]

>>8362142
I just did, because the claim is retarded and has no evidence to support it

[Anonymous No.8362150]

>>8361273
We get at least one of these bullshit theories every year. Why is this thread even still up?

[Anonymous No.8362157]

>>8362150
Because involving a "worker NASA".

[Anonymous No.8362163]

I hope it lands in an Arab country like Germany

[Anonymous No.8362170]

>>8362055
Why the "worker" would be afraid to give his name? likewise die by the collision of the asteroid.

A point to "false".

[Anonymous No.8362191]

>>8362170
>afraid to give his name
In case they manage to deflect it? Or because he has a family and a place to hide?

[Anonymous No.8362198]

>>8361273
Hopefully this time it will kill off bedbugs, rather than dinosaurs.

[Anonymous No.8362204]

>>8362191
According to the assumptions messages like on the page, nowhere to hide, it sounds stupid, no?
So I say, do not say his name for fear of being? If it is real and what sidetracked, give the same result that was real and not deviate.

[Anonymous No.8362213]

>>8362204
Option #1 - Blow the whistle anonymously, clean-ish conscience, die in horrible but spectacular impact event next week

Option #2 - Wife, children, parents v& and killed in horrible ways over the next day or two as a warning to other whistleblowers and maybe even media to keep quiet about same event

Which do you prefer?

[Anonymous No.8362214]

Well, after many messages, repeat the question: Is this true or false?
Serious answer please.

[Anonymous No.8362216]

>>8362204
You will never experience a mass extinction due to scrohdingers law

[Anonymous No.8362218]

>>8362142
Thats actually a good reason to dismiss a claim. If a dirty homeless man came up to you and told you the world was going to end today would you believe him?

[Anonymous No.8362221]

>>8362214
False. The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim, and so far there has been no proof.
The reason no one has refuted it is because theres nothing to refute, no proof has been given. Its just a bunch of empty words with nothing to back it up.

[Anonymous No.8362223]

>>8361436
>Anyone can e-mail that retard and say whatever they want. I can start e-mailing them a play-by-play of the secret alien invasion tomorrow and they would eat it up.

Do it

[Anonymous No.8362224]

>>8362214
If dubs it's true and it's delivering girlfriends for everyone.

[Anonymous No.8362229]

>>8362223
damn. okay i will.
Ill tell him about the Reptillian coup that is currently underway in the US. Their plan is to give all children in the US gay autism through vaccines.
PROV ME WRONG

[Anonymous No.8362232]

>>8362052
this. we philosophers have been trying to explain that to you guys for years now

[Anonymous No.8362235]

>>8362224
>Serious

[Anonymous No.8362247]

>>8362232
lol
>philosophers
ah philosophy, what a shitty meme-tier major
literally gets us nowhere. stopped being useful a thousand years ago

[Anonymous No.8362296]

>>8362136
>In 3 months, for an object that was 2AU away 3 months ago. Extremely implausible
The time of intercept was not necessarily three months ago unless stated otherwise.

>slowing it down enough so that it is supposedly going to arrive 3-5 days later than originally expected as the story claims, means it misses completely
I do not follow. However, I do know that the current speed of such an asteroid would likely be lower than the average speed over the past three months (2/3 AU per month) if it is to collide within the week (due to work done by the sun on the asteroid). A redirect would have a lot more of an impact on the asteroids momentum at lower speeds.

[Anonymous No.8362323]

>>8362247
ok, kid

[Anonymous No.8362362]

>>8362247
Nice one, freshman

[Mr. Derp No.8362367]

>>8362362
ad hominem, nice
who knew philosophers were so eloquent

[Anonymous No.8362378]

>>8362362
ad hominem, nice
who knew philosophers were so eloquent

[Anonymous No.8362386]

So, this is true? It is the end of the world on September 25? I have really very afraid, if someone could better clarify please.

[Anonymous No.8362392]

>>8362386
Nobody has clarified except to say that it's ridiculous to consider any source that isn't a nasa press release

[Anonymous No.8362401]

>>8361361

If something's far enough off, you only have to change it's angle of approach by a few degrees. Also a direct hit or near hit is going to vaporize material and rapidly heat the surface of the object, resulting in jets of debris and hot gas being vented form the surface. Which gives it a push.

That's in theory. I have no idea how many hits it would take, and that would depend on how massive the object was and how far away/how fast it was traveling.

[Anonymous No.8362440]

>>8361623
None of us want to go through the winter.

[Anonymous No.8362444]

Youtuber BPEarthwatch has gotten in on this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1lS8gvVEjY

[Anonymous No.8362454]

>>8362296
>The time of intercept was not necessarily three months ago unless stated otherwise.
It was 2AU away 3 months ago. In that time, there have supposedly been 3 rendezvous' with this object

>I do not follow
Because you clearly dont understand orbital mechanics. An orbiting objects velocity IS its trajectory. If you change the velocity even a little bit it has a massive impact on the trajectory. To slow it down but have it still intercept the same target is basically impossible

[Anonymous No.8362473]

>>8362444
I get lazy watching the video, you could summarize what thinks that guy?

[Anonymous No.8362474]

>>8362444
>>8362473
>tl;dr
>bpearthwatch discusses internets rumors of a 24-25 Sep impact
>he doesn't know exactly what's going on from his sources
>but it seems that there's unusual nasa/whatever activity that supports possible weirdness
>"heads up, be safe"

[Anonymous No.8362512]

>>8361273
Ok... I begin to believe it's real ...

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/22/open-letter-to-the-people-of-god-22-september-2016/#more-1185

[Anonymous No.8362517]

>24-25 September
Damn, that's cutting it short to the deadline on my math assignment. Here's hoping it hits later in the day on the 25th.

[Anonymous No.8362518]

>>8361273
Sorry guys my fault.

[Anonymous No.8362520]

>>8362518
Dafuq happened to meteor you cunt?

[Anonymous No.8362544]

>>8361273
Apparently the name of the asteroid is P052, any known with this name?
It was out of this page:

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/22/open-letter-to-the-people-of-god-22-september-2016/#more-1185

[Anonymous No.8362568]

>>8361273
As a representative of the space agencies of the world, we are deeply sorry about this. Turns out it is a really bad idea to send a bunch of oil drillers to an asteroid rather than train astronauts to be oil drillers.

Their failure to adapt to microgravity conditions was a direct contributor to the redirection mission's failure. All of them had really bad cases of space adaption syndrome, we're talking as bad as Jake Garn here. If we weren't going extinct, this would be worth investigating further.

We must admit though, some of their deaths were pretty funny in a dark sort of way. We will be sure to release a death montage sped up and sync'd to Benny Hill music a day before impact.

We of the PR department also cordially invite you take part in our global 'end of the world orgy,' where we will fuck ourselves to death. My boss says I'm not supposed to post this, but fuck it who cares we're all gonna die.

[Anonymous No.8362753]

>>8361996
>there is no asteroid

There are a metric fuckton of asteroids out there m8.

>Will we get hit? I don't think the chances are any greater or less on those days than any other day.

Just reread that and let it sink in.

[Anonymous No.8362758]

>>8361273
WHERE IS THE OFFICIAL NEWS SOURCE YOU BUTTSICKLE ??

[Anonymous No.8362767]

>>8362753
>There are a metric fuckton of asteroids out there m8.
None of which have even a remote chance of hitting earth in the next few decades


>>Will we get hit? I don't think the chances are any greater or less on those days than any other day.
Since the odds are pretty close to zero im not fazed

[Anonymous No.8362812]

>>8362767
>None of which have even a remote chance of hitting earth in the next few decades

Just like there was not even a remote chance that the Russian one a few years back existed, right?

YOU CANNOT FUCKING SEE ASTEROIDS COMING FROM THE DIRECTION OF THE SUN.

For the second time, go back and read >>8361993 .

Just so I don't have to spoonfeed any more retards, I'll greentext explain it.

>Are they nuking asteroids?
No, that is retarded

>Are we aware of all of the asteroids that are possible threats to Earth?
All of them except for the ones that are coming from the direction of the Sun.

>Are we going to get hit with an asteroid on September 24?
Probably fucking not; that 'news' article is horse shit. But that being said, there is always a VERY MINUTE chance that an asteroid could be coming toward us from the direction of the Sun and it would be impossible to detect.

However, the odds of that are VERY FUCKING LOW so don't worry about it. But yes, it IS TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE.

This shit is literally common sense. I swear to fucking christ, /sci/ is getting worse every day.

[Anonymous No.8362830]

>nuking asteroids

This is not Armageddon, Bruce Willis is not an astronaut.

[Anonymous No.8362835]

>>8362812
>ASTEROIDS COMING FROM THE DIRECTION OF THE SUN
>that somhow goes through the sun and keeps coming from the suns direction
>that somehow doesn't get sucked into the suns hugh mungus gravitational field
>that somehow is still invisible even though sun-earth position changes constantly

1/10 for the effort

[Anonymous No.8362842]

>>8361273
>The direction of this illuminated “debris field” was in the Earth’s northern hemisphere view, observed at sunrise Pacific Daylight Time (U.S. PDT), at an angle – to the stars – of approximately 42 degrees north (earth plane Latitude intersecting to object).
> sunrise Pacific Daylight Time
Sunrise has nothing to do with timezone, you don't specify celestial coordinates with respect to a timezone.Something seen at sunrise at place X can be seen anywhere along that line of latitude. The fact it hasn't been reported elsewhere is solid evidence this is nonsense.
>, at an angle – to the stars – of approximately 42 degrees north
If you're specifying north it's not and angle "to the stars". Whoever made this bullshit up doesn't know enough astronomy for this to be true.

>>8362812
>All of them except for the ones that are coming from the direction of the Sun.

Please don't talk out your ass. Even when LSST comes online it will take years to reach even 99% completeness of PHAs. Why do people just make shit up instead of saying "I don't know"?

[Anonymous No.8362843]

>>8362835
You're right, it's impossible, even though it happened in fucking Russia a couple of years back.

As has been explained at least three times in this thread.

You should get your chromosomes counted, friend.

[Anonymous No.8362844]

>>8362835
>>that somhow goes through the sun
That's not what he said, you moron.
The other questions are just as stupid.

[Anonymous No.8362845]

>littlepebble.org

[Anonymous No.8362848]

>>8362843
What happened in Russia ?
>>8362844
The butthurt...it consumes you...

[Anonymous No.8362849]

>>8362842
>Please don't talk out your ass.

Tbqh I was just tossing the lad a bone so he'd listen to my point, which is that we have a gigantic blind spot in the direction of the sun.

Considering they can't even understand that part, I think I made the right call.

[Anonymous No.8362851]

>>8362848
>What happened in Russia ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztrU90Ub4Uw

[Anonymous No.8362861]

>>8362851
>sum weak ass shit that couldn't even destroy the building it hit
>zero casualties in an urban area

omfg panic !!!

[Anonymous No.8362866]

>>8362849
You were dismissing the claim based on your bullshit statements. It had nothing to do with people listening to your point.

[Anonymous No.8362870]

>>8362861
You missed the point. It was unobserved. A larger one could remain unobserved too. The probability is lower but the risk is real. This is why NASA is considering NEOCam which would sit in an orbit inside the Earths orbit.

[Anonymous No.8362874]

>>8362870
I hope the next one crashes on your dick :)

[Anonymous No.8362879]

>>8362812
>YOU CANNOT FUCKING SEE ASTEROIDS COMING FROM THE DIRECTION OF THE SUN
Yes you can, its just hard to do it from the ground. The russian meteor was 20m across, not big enough to be a serious threat. Anything big enough to worry about would be spotted

[Anonymous No.8362886]

>>8362879
How would it be detected?

[Anonymous No.8362888]

>>8362886
with detectors

[Anonymous No.8362890]

>>8362886
Space telescopes, which is how we find most of them anyway

[Anonymous No.8362912]

>>8362890
The only ongoing space based asteroid mission is NEOWISE which points at 90 degrees from the Sun, always. It would never detect something close to the Sun.

So no.

[Anonymous No.8362978]

Distance/Location of Asteroid:

The first intercept and nuclear bomb detonation on the Asteroid was close to 2.365 LD (Lunar Distance) away. The slow relative closing velocity provided an opportune rocket intercept & mitigation potential due to this speed.

Since the series of multiple nuclear detonations, the angle of the asteroid, relative to the earth’s ecliptic, has been deflected from 27.5 degrees to its current position of 16 degrees and has been slowed significantly (as of Sep 18).

(note:this translates to near 39.45 degrees North in Latitude with respect to Earth’s equator). The Asteroid is in the sunlight side of the hemisphere of the Earth.

[Anonymous No.8363051]

>>8361273
More information

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/22/update-4-asteroid-to-hit-25-september-2016/

[Anonymous No.8363056]

>>8363051
>littlepebble.org
Ironic that it has a name like little pebble and its talking about small asteroids...

[Anonymous No.8363077]

>>8363056
> The asteroid is 50 or 100km

[Anonymous No.8363080]

>>8363077
>no evidence

[Anonymous No.8363092]

>>8363080
I know that there is no evidence, I just want to know if what it says on the page can have some truth (From what I see the only certainty might come from the direction of the sun and so can not see it "normal" telescopes) but I try to calm my fear with some real science trying to explain that this is false or not, and yes, it frightens me.

[Anonymous No.8363106]

>>8361348
Sadly we don't have a science fiction board, but if there was it would have been perfect for that.

[Anonymous No.8363121]

>>8363077
>50 or 100km before the detonations.

Still... I don't think this asteroid is a "end of the world" size.

[Anonymous No.8363123]

HOLY FUCKIN SHIT - its little pebble

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/22/update-4-asteroid-to-hit-25-september-2016/

the cunt has changed his name

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Kamm

this dude ran a religous doomsday cult near my hometown and molested the fuck out of kids, William Kamm (aka little pebble) is now William Costellia and his doomsday predictions are as strong as ever.

holy shit. he got out in 2014. the cunt is wearing a wig, pic related

[Anonymous No.8363145]

>>8363092

>it frightens me

in that case you would be a prime target for little pebble; have you ever been to Nowra ? you should visit anon :D

[Anonymous No.8363147]

>>8363123
Lol, ok, then this man has had his apocalyptic events, beyond the sexual assault of children.

[Anonymous No.8363183]

>>8363123
OP here.

What the fuck. What the fucking fuck.

Finally some good news comes along (asteroid/earth/kaboom) and it turns out this piece of shit has to be involved, making some sort of a piece of shit moment out of it. Fucking piece of shit.

The intensely fucked-up thing is that it doesn't entirely negate the original question, though it does shoot just about every hole imaginable into the source -- assuming this shithole is the original source and that he didn't just steal it from someone else. So that more or less destroys my hope for the future.

Mother fucker. Maybe we'll luck out and a space-shard will hit him in the head anyway.

[Anonymous No.8363192]

I did see something pretty big & bright low in the sky, just on dusk in the west recently
Must've been in the last week

[Anonymous No.8363287]

>>8361273
Well, now we know a little more about all this, what is your conclucion? truth or false?

We have a pedophile religion which has already created alerts about the apocalypse in past years, a story with nothing preceding it and nobody talks about it in some other "important" page.

I repeat: What is your conclusion?

[Anonymous No.8363297]

>>8363287
False you retarded brainlet now shut the hell up

[Anonymous No.8363398]

>>8363287
>What is your conclusion?
Is there a second source?

[Anonymous No.8363437]

The day /sci/ was trolled by /x/ and /pol/ stood by watching the googles get assblasted by skypes.

[Anonymous No.8363468]

>>8363398
There is nothing else, just "seers" and that religious page with Mr. pedophile.

[Anonymous No.8363518]

>>8363437
Keep trying op. Anybody with the ability to read properly will see that you got btfo in every reply to one of your sensationalist posts.

[Anonymous No.8363661]

OP here. Found a second source of this information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBUagrysqrc

>tl;dw
>whistleblower from kuwaiti MoD
>presumably unrelated to diddler
>says same thing/dates, maybe the diddler stole from this guy
>nasa lies, you might need an umbrella on 25 September

[Anonymous No.8363673]

Just curious, but where is this supposed asteroid's impact location?

[Anonymous No.8363684]

>>8363673
Earth

[Anonymous No.8363685]

>>8363673
ur mums dick

[Anonymous No.8363718]

>>8363661
You might find this interesting. It's an interview and commentary of one researchers depiction of the effects of the kt impact. It's pretty nuts if this guys model is right.

[Anonymous No.8363722]

>>8363718
http://www.radiolab.org/story/dinopocalypse/
whoops! Here's the link.

[Anonymous No.8363731]

>>8363661
I wish this was true. I'm going camping this weekend in eastern washington where the skies will be clear.

[Anonymous No.8363746]

>>8363722
>incoming asteroid
>earth-shattering kaboom
>illudium pu36 space modulator status unknown
Thanks anon, I'll listen tonight

[Anonymous No.8363837]

Fuck.

/sci/ Is this real or not?

I want a serious answer, out of stupid, something that says if it's real or not.
And yes, I'm afraid.

[Anonymous No.8363844]

>>8363837
Dumbass its not real. I cant wait till the 26 hopefully this thread will be bumpable. Even considering this as fact means youre on the wrong board. These types of threads belong on /x/. This board isnt about conspiracies to cover up asteroids that are on their way to destroy the earth.

[Anonymous No.8363859]

>>8363844

Again, even if this asteroid is real, it will not fucking destroy the earth.

It has to be much larger to do terrible harm to all of us.

[Anonymous No.8363883]

>>8363859
On page said "50 or 100 kilometers" that would be small for an asteroid?

Assuming it is real.

[Anonymous No.8363894]

>>8363883
it said 50 or 100? wouldnt they know how big it was if they detonated 3 nukes on it?

[Anonymous No.8363903]

>>8363883
not small, but not big enough to destroy the planet.

And based on the article, it was split into several pieces after the nukes.

[Anonymous No.8363904]

>>8363894
According to what I read on the page, in the last message (what gave this day) that were 5nukes, the size was reduced but is still "very, very big" and that more delay.

[Anonymous No.8363915]

If you want to read about it, here is the "information".

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/22/update-4-asteroid-to-hit-25-september-2016/

I hope and what you say / lol / is true and this is false. (i´m scared)

[Anonymous No.8363923]

>>8363915
I meant: /sci/
Sorry.

[Anonymous No.8364050]

>>8361361
Why would we use a fission weapon when most are fusion based now?

[Anonymous No.8364130]

>>8363903
So ... I am assuming it was real and which was divided into pieces ... assuming that those pieces of "small" sizes have entered will impact our planet , what would be the range of destruction ? Do you think that if this were true , would be a global catastrophe ?

[Anonymous No.8364145]

Boys, NASA just confirmed that the asteriods real and that there was a joint effort in repelling the threat it poses. We're hooped.

[Anonymous No.8364152]

>>8364145
Not true.

[Anonymous No.8364162]

>>8364050
Lol?

[Anonymous No.8364163]

>>8364145
News links or it's real

[Anonymous No.8364175]

>>8364145
>>8364152
Okay, anon is a faggot and a liar.

[Anonymous No.8364180]

NO

OFFICIAL

SOURCE

FROM

NASA

----------------------------

SAGE

THIS

RETARDED

THREAD

[Anonymous No.8364222]

>>8362861
>it was completely unobserved
>it didnt hit a building
>the explosion from it hitting the ground shattered windows in nearby buildings

It was a significant impact. It could have been 4x as big and we still would have never seen it. The possibility of being struck by an unobserved world ending asteroid is there, however improbable. If you deny it could happen you are clearly retarded.

[Anonymous No.8364226]

>>8364222
don't reply

[Anonymous No.8364246]

ITT: We learn that sciency people hate and/or fear anything that doesn't come from a dork in a labcoat.

[Anonymous No.8364332]

>>8364226
No

[Anonymous No.8364415]

>>8364246
I am a normal person, a scientific subject told me that your mother is a lesbian, do not know, but told me it is.

And now you think

[Anonymous No.8364431]

>>8364415
I mean... considering she's married to a woman, it doesn't take a genius to figure that out. And that has zero bearing on the rest of this thread.

[Anonymous No.8364490]

>>8364246
> anything from a dork in a labcoat
I think you meant "scientist" right?

Would you ask a maid to help you fix your car? No, youd ask a mechanic because he specializes in fixing cars.

[Anonymous No.8364555]

>>8364490
But bill nye isnt a scientist and he wears a lab coat.

You don't call someone without a phd a scientist, you call them mister.

[Anonymous No.8364635]

I wonder, for the last time.

This asteroid is real or fake?

serious answer please.

[Anonymous No.8364667]

>>8364635
Fake. It's some doomsday cultist getting their rocks off.

[Anonymous No.8364695]

>>8364667
Thanks for your answer.

Does anyone else want to add something before I stop talking about this?

[Anonymous No.8364747]

you guys know this is a troll thread, right?
RIGHT?

he's asked this same thing
>>8364635
about 15 times now.

its just some faggot with a lot of time on his hands. why are you so easy to bait?

[Anonymous No.8364913]

>>8361342
Same

[Anonymous No.8364934]

>>8361425
Do you know how fucking massive an astronomical unit is? And how much fucking energy it takes to travel? If we were to detonate anything, it would not be on the other side of the fucking sun all secret like. If there is actually evidence of what appear to be detonations, that shit happens all the time in space. Massive rocks crashing into eachother isn't quiet. If it were of importance, it would be recognized. And the first people to hear about it are not going to be ridiculous religious fanatics whose beliefs aren't even based on evidence. This is stupid as shit. Be self aware for fucks sake, be critical of what you believe. if we could map out a trajectory to even be aware of danger, we would know a lot of physical properties. Mass, make-up, danger potential. We have teams of people around the clock looking for near earth asteroids. They'd fucking know. Get out of here with your bullshit excuse for a claim.
>ironically calling /sci/ open-minded
This should show you exactly how fucking ridiculous and unfounded your beliefs are when no one who has passion for science and knowledge agrees at all. Most of us on here talked about the idea, thought it through, looked at the evidence, and determined it was bullshit. Being open minded isn't equal to accepting different ideas. It's equal to entertaining the idea. I entertained the original post and it wasn't worth the time.

[Anonymous No.8364938]

>>8362052
That's retarded as fuck, kill yourself. A true scientist will entertain every single idea, no matter how ridiculous or who happens to be representing the idea. True Scientists fight with ideas. They don't pick an enemy to discount. They give the idea a work through, try it, and if it doesn't stand to scrutiny, it's denied. Your claims have been denied by most of /sci/. Not on the basis of "hurrr this guys stoopid so fuck his ideas". It's "Looking at it, this guys ideas are stupid as hell, so fuck him". Your ability to reason went to waste, huh?

[Anonymous No.8364941]

>>8364747
It's more for my sake. I like talking about what's in the world, even if the person making the claim isn't honest. It's still a claim that stupid people honestly make. We're anonymous anyway, and it only brings me good feels when I recognize retarded ideas as retarded.

[Anonymous No.8365150]

The AMS has received over 240 reports so far about of a fireball event over seen over Montréal, CA on September 21st, 2016 around 9:35pm EDT (Sept 22nd, 1:35 UT). The fireball was seen primarily from Québec but witnesses from Ontario, New Brunswick, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire also reported the event.
>It's beginning

[Anonymous No.8365158]

>>8365150
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/bright-fireball-meteor-flashes-over-southern-quebec/72518
It's the size of a baseball, and exploded, retard.

Check your facts.

[Anonymous No.8365163]

>>8365158
This was just a fragment before the big one

[Anonymous No.8365166]

>>8365163
No. It isn't.

[Anonymous No.8365168]

>>8365163
Also, by the way, NASA set a date for a press conference on the 26th. Do you think they would do that if a meteor was coming BEFORE that?

[Anonymous No.8365312]

>>8361273
>the internet says
good source

[Anonymous No.8365508]

I hate this diddler

[Anonymous No.8365514]

[Anonymous No.8365727]

>>8365514
Bumping.

[Anonymous No.8365781]

>>8365168
>NASA set a date for a press conference on the 26th

It's classic redirection. Fake news conference re Europa on 26 Sep to block out chatter and intercept keywords about a very real asteroid about to hit Europe on 25 Sep.

Did anyone bother to look and see if they actually reserved a conference room and set up chairs? Doubt it.

[Anonymous No.8365789]

>fireballs incoming

[Anonymous No.8365809]

>>8365781
GUVMENT CAME N DUN GON TOOK MUH BAYBAY

[Anonymous No.8365813]

>>8365789
I begin to have doubts

[Anonymous No.8365826]

Why does this have 200 replies?

[Anonymous No.8365828]

>>8365826
People love alarmism.

[Anonymous No.8366308]

>>8363183
>good news
>dying
ok

[Anonymous No.8366329]

>>8366308
>good news
>dying
pic related

[Anonymous No.8366358]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTfM4iQBIB4

TV news report about meteor activity

[Anonymous No.8366364]

>>8361273
Dear god i hope it fucking hits, that way we can stop with these stupid treads

[Anonymous No.8366368]

>>8363287
That you should have finished high-school?

[Anonymous No.8366436]

http://www.trunews.com/listen/trunews-09-23-16-special-edition-dr.-raul-morales-borges-a-fireball-is-comi

[Anonymous No.8366438]

>>8365789

There's dozens of reports every day anyway. Unless you can show a significant increase in them, it doesn't mean much.

[Anonymous No.8366456]

>>8366438
>increase in fireball reports

You mean like this?

[Anonymous No.8366463]

>>8366436

>On a Special Edition of TRUNEWS, Rick Wiles shares an exclusive interview with a Puerto Rican physician who claims he has a God inspired prophecy about an asteroid and tsunami striking Mona Island. Accompanying the warning, Rick revisits previous episodes where he forecasted a fireball is coming, and that he will not change his message until the coming of New Jerusalem.

What do you want to prove with this garbage...?

[Anonymous No.8366497]

>>8366456
The biggest day with fireballs was 13, but does not match what was said by "littlepeggle

[Anonymous No.8366510]

>>8366497
Yeah because that's not until somewhere between now and Sunday night

[Anonymous No.8366534]

>>8366510
What he told in "littlepeggle" can not hold, since nothing of what he said is consistent.

[Anonymous No.8366587]

ITT: People who belong on >>>/x/

[Anonymous No.8366641]

>>8366463
The funny thing is, he is willing to trust this as a source over NASA not saying anything...

[Anonymous No.8366646]

>>8361273
fucking a

[Anonymous No.8366769]

http://www.meteorscan.com/meteor-live.html

http://spaceweatherradio.com/

http://livemeteors.com/

[Anonymous No.8366817]

>>8366769
And that's for ...?

[Anonymous No.8366933]

>>8366817
Monitoring incoming bogeys

[Anonymous No.8367088]

>>8366456
Remembering that day was a baseball game and many people saw it.

[Anonymous No.8367103]

>>8361273
Top kek.
This reminds me of an /x/ thread where OPfag claimed that we had 4 days of this world left. Even there he was a joke and he still is. Hi, End of the World dude!

[Anonymous No.8367121]

Simple trigonometry provides a solution to a conversion of astronomical coordinates using the provided latitudinal sighting reference position, the angle of intersect to the object, the LD revealed in the prior updates, and an elevation of 10 degrees above the horizon at 6:55:24 PDT. If a person has been following the updates, the last unknown parameter in the incoming of the “object” necessitated a “sighting”. Thus once a highly accurate and detailed sighting was reported, then the last parameter was identified. In addition, again, if a person has been following the updates, they would recognize that there has been multiple noted angular changes in the trajectory – simultaneous to noted slowing (velocity change).
However, to provide precision level astronomical coordinates, in a series of sightings to determine a trajectory and/or new changes, would require an ability to observe this object from the “sun light” side of the hemisphere (using any terrestrial based telescope*). Thus, the only parameters that could be determined and provided were those from a “flash type of sighting” merged with the data at the time of the sighting. It was very providential that a high quality sighting occurred and that the person was able to contact and provide this information.
It is recognized that the Amateur Astronomical community are very skilled, dedicated, and have quality state-of-the-art equipment, including sophisticated computational capabilities.

[Anonymous No.8367137]

Well, the guy is still talking about "science" given to him by "scientists" and amateur observers can read the "article" in this link:

http://littlepebble.org/2016/09/24/update-6-asteroid-to-hit-25-september-2016/

I do not know what to think about this.

[Anonymous No.8367157]

This asteroid is real or fake? someone answers?
It is a serious question.

[Anonymous No.8367161]

>>8367157
It. Is. Fake.

We have answered this for the past few days this thread has been up. The answer will always be the same.

[Anonymous No.8367162]

>>8367161
Thanks.

[Anonymous No.8367166]

>>8367157
at least two whistleblowers online plus a big uptick in fireballs the last couple days... this could just maybe be legit

[Anonymous No.8367170]

>>8367166
I read that page "little peggle" but does not match what the scientific course, he says that the entry of meteorites would start the 23th, but does not match seen lately.

[Anonymous No.8367172]

>>8367170
the page said the 25th, with some fragments possible as early as 23rd

[Anonymous No.8367173]

>>8367172
It's what he said, on page says that after 23th we would see many fireballs, but apparently nop.

[Anonymous No.8367186]

>>8367166
Every day there are fireballs, so I'm not surprised to see that at this time there are "events" of this kind, as there always are.
So :/

[Anonymous No.8367688]

Just one day left

[Anonymous No.8367694]

>>8367688
And even a large meteor sighting is not presented.

[Anonymous No.8367924]

>>8367694
we won't see it coming

[Anonymous No.8367936]

>>8367924
Now it became invisible?
Not even space agencies will see it?

[Anonymous No.8367951]

>>8367936
sort of like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor

[Anonymous No.8367974]

>>8367951
>17-20 meters

That is small, the supposed asteroid tomorrow is 50 - 100km.

[Anonymous No.8368022]

>>8367951
Well ... a couple of days without enter and now I see a supposed asteroid.
Where does the information?

[Anonymous No.8368049]

>>8367924
>we won't see it coming

Prove your argument.

[Anonymous No.8368074]

>>8368049
From what I see, it rests with the asteroid 2013 in Russia.
Was a small asteroid 17-20 meters, not see it coming by sunlight.
And there is no argument, because the asteroid is magical and nobody has seen and has been invented.

[Anonymous No.8368080]

>>8368049
gimme a day or two and you've got it

[Anonymous No.8368101]

>>8368080
Then you do not have any argument to prove this

>>8368074
>because the asteroid is magical and nobody has seen and has been invented.

What.

[Anonymous No.8368102]

>>8368080
Hey hey, it is supposed to be tomorrow.
Best wait a month or longer.

[Anonymous No.8368113]

>>8368101
The alleged asteroid was invented, and say they will impact tomorrow, but as they see there is no evidence. The asteroid cross it during the rest of the month, and perhaps throughout October.

[Anonymous No.8368138]

>>8368113
Oh, i don't get it because my english is not my primary language, sorry.

>>8361273
>>8368080
>>8368049

Yo, check this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4VyxR7dOFQ

[Anonymous No.8368152]

why the fuck does this thread has 291 replies

i fucking hate this place

[Anonymous No.8368239]

I live in Florida about 400 miles from Kennedy Space Center. When they do a launch I can go outside and watch it. The larger the launch vehicle (rocket) the further away you can see it. There are historical account of Siberian rocket launches being seen by the naked eye in Europe. During the lunar mission amateur astronomers watched the Apollo vehicles in flight.

So assuming we are launching a rocket from the surface that can intercept a asteroid approaching earth much further away than the moon why do people not see it? A large launch like that would be visible over thousands of miles radius. At sea it would be visible even further.

The SpaceX launches are visible up and down the eastern seaboard. http://www.space.com/28164-spacex-rocket-launch-east-coast-visibility.html

So has anyone seen any launches? Have any astronomers professional or amateur seen anything? Has any reputable rumors of launch facilities and vehicles surfaced? Courtesy of the internet we have much better communications, there are twitter channels for everything. The US and Russian government "secret" spy satellites are watched from launch and into orbit by amateurs!

OP is on good drugs....

[Anonymous No.8368394]

>>8362378
>being literally retarded

[Anonymous No.8368813]

>>8368394
hours left

[Anonymous No.8368815]

>>8368813
Shut the fuck up faggot.

[Anonymous No.8368856]

Sad thing is, 24-25 september will come and go, and OP will still swallow the next retarded internet rumor he reads, hook line and sinker. And at no point will he think "oh wait..the last one turned out to be a bunch of psychotic rambling by a doomday-cult crazy person" and actually dismiss the whole idea.
Really makes you think, huh? Well, not OP, but you know...the rest of us.

[Anonymous No.8368859]

>>8361353
OP, genuine question, not trying to roast ur ass. how will your world view change when nothing becomes of this impending doomsday event, like every other impending doomsday event thus far? likely no one here, including you, knows enough about astronomical object tracking nor has the technological means to verify this claim. so we have to rely on experts in the field who actually can verify the claim. seeing as how no actual experts in the field have chimed in about a doomsday asteroid (like this), i think it's safe to assume it's just a bogus claim, like the 10 million other conspiracies and bullshit that is made up every single day on the internet. now the useless philosophers will scream "appeal to authority!", and sure that might be the case, but we have no other accurate means of verifying it for ourselves. you can sit at the computer all day, thinking that you are unraveling the mystery, but more likely, you are fooling yourself into thinking that you have stumbled upon good information. you don't have enough knowledge about the field to determine whether these claims are bullshit, so you come here. we don't have the know-how and instruments needed either. so, when this thing blows over like everything else does, will you still have this world-view that you can rely on random internet blogs for scientific claims?

[Anonymous No.8368860]

>>8368859
see >>8368856

[Anonymous No.8368862]

>>8368856
Explain yourself better.

[Anonymous No.8368925]

The world may or may not be ending / ended /saved or whatever, whatever the outcome is, I am just glad that we got to the bottom of it on a chinese cartoon website

[Anonymous No.8368943]

>>8368925
what?

[Anonymous No.8369007]

Damn ... this is true or false?

[Anonymous No.8369014]

>>8361273
>So the internet...

>>8361294
fpbp

>>8362052
Most times it's not worth spending the time investigating internet voodoo claims.

[Anonymous No.8369018]

>>8369014
>image
Why did this remind me of Chrono Trigger.

[Anonymous No.8369019]

>>8361273
how does this have 300+ replies...

[Anonymous No.8369031]

>>8369019
Because many people are stupid and does not deign to look a little more for fear is real, but don´t is.

[Anonymous No.8369270]

Leave a laptop lit with tool to put a comment at a certain time, day and year.
I can already leave the bunker?

If you respond with a "Yes" the same tool will communicate me by a mechanism.

[Anonymous No.8369408]

>>8361273
>we're gonna be hit by a big old asteroid on 24-25 September.

Oh, hay, are we all dead yet?

[Anonymous No.8369411]

I hope this is real, cause if the world doesn't get anally fisted by a huge space rock Im about to fail this calc test on Thursday

[Anonymous No.8369685]

>>8368925
Its a mongolian underwater basket weaving blog you dip.

[Anonymous No.8370891]

>>8369411
Would reptilians,greys or any other higher being even allow a rock to blow this planet up?
As much as I wish for it to happen I don't think it will.

[Anonymous No.8371210]

Still waiting for that rock, OP. I mean, with a source as great as the one you use, surely it should arrive any minute now.