[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.00 MB, 2000x2000, 1463491412379.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338216 No.8338216[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Just a reminder.

:^)

>> No.8338227

>>8338216
You'll die and be completely forgotten.
Just a reminder.

:^)

>> No.8338232

>>8338227
Everyone in this board will, no point in dreaming otherwise.

:^)

>> No.8338236

>>8338216

>/lit/ is the highest
>look at me! i can read! I'm the smartest!

>> No.8338237
File: 94 KB, 640x500, 1462157690498-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338237

>>8338216
>tfw average IQ

>> No.8338238
File: 58 KB, 443x490, 1421135262407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338238

>>8338236

>> No.8338241

>>8338216
Its pretty obvious that someone from /lit/ whom hadn't visited half of those boards made this.

>> No.8338249

>>8338241
Hahahaha, look at this level of denial, it's pathetic.

>> No.8338251

>>8338216
Almost every board is either too high or too low. Being able to read doesn't imply you will do well on an IQ test especially because of the recent emphasis on spacial questions and patterns.

The average IQ of most boards is probably around average.

>> No.8338254

>>8338241
>whom

>> No.8338264

>>8338216
>trying this hard to be a troll
Grow up, kid.

>> No.8338266

>/sci/ this high

>> No.8338276

I've got an IQ of 1488888888 so this chart obviously doesn't factor in my score.

>> No.8338285
File: 43 KB, 463x484, really.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338285

>>8338241
>whom

>> No.8338286
File: 88 KB, 1199x666, stephen_hawking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338286

>> No.8338295

>>8338216
....like why does /wg/ have one of the highest IQs, all they do is post HD pics....i can't imagine intellectual conversation going on there.

>> No.8338298

>>8338286
>Stephen Hawking

>> No.8338301
File: 40 KB, 199x177, iwnwdcw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8338301

>>8338241

>whom

>> No.8338308

>>8338285
>but.. But anon, if I use frequently misused and misunderstood words, then I'm smart, even if I use them incorrectly, right?

>> No.8338371

>>8338216
>/fit/
>131
>/fit/ smarter than /biz/

Ksy

>> No.8338380

>>8338216
>negligible
I laffd

>> No.8338931

Where is the source?