/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.8337149]

Who are the biggest trolls/radicals/punks of STEM?

[Anonymous No.8337234]

Women

[Anonymous No.8337310]

>>8337234
/thread

[Anonymous No.8337314]

>radical

>regularly failed his exams in school while he concentrated on reading Legendre's Geometry cover to cover.

>Péclet wrote of the young genius "He knows absolutely nothing. I have been told that this student has mathematical ability; this certainly astonishes me. Judging by his examination, he seems of little intelligence, or has hidden his intelligence so well that I found it impossible to detect it"

> Galois also failed to gain admittance to the École Polytechnique not once, but two times. During the first of these examinations, in 1829, Galois was so frustrated by the inane questions that he vented his anger by throwing an eraser at his examiner

[Anonymous No.8337343]

>>8337149
Your pic is pretty high up there.

He uploaded a video today where he says that big natural numbers don't have a prime factorization.

That is fuuucking crazy, specially when it is a proven theorem. I can kinda respect him for it but god damn.

[Anonymous No.8337353]

>>8337343
I adore Norm but when he says large numbers are too complicated to divide/factorise/etc I can't help but think that's all a posteriori (numbers bigger than atoms in the universe, no way to work with them, etc), when a priori it's all completely fine.

[Anonymous No.8337356]

>>8337314
>got shot in a duel over a woman

lel, beta cuck.

[Anonymous No.8337361]

>>8337353
>posteriori
>a priori

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZCRxxb_rwY

Please rewrite your post in human speak.

[Anonymous No.8337367]

>>8337361
Not sure if trolling or just stupid.

[Anonymous No.8337369]

>>8337149

[Anonymous No.8337372]

>>8337367
Not trolling. Why do you have to speak like a fucking nerd?

Seriously, people who use latin words instead of their modernized versions trigger me so hard because of their autism.

Some days ago we had some fucking autist saying 'ergo' and it disgusts me.

Like, I get that you are a virgin at 40, have 2 PhDs but no major complications, and erectile disfunction since you were 10 but does speaking latin words really help with your limp dick?

[Anonymous No.8337381]

>>8337361
>Please rewrite your post in human speak.

Little Billy thought of a number so big, that even the number of atoms in the universe didn't come close to it! Bobby said "How can we ever work with such a number! There's no calculator that could handle it!" Billy said "But taken out of the physical world there's no problem with it!"

Happy, dumbshit?

>>8337372
Oh wow, you're really upset. Funny that you're accusing others of having autism when you openly admit big words "trigger" you.

[Anonymous No.8337389]

>>8337381
>big words "trigger" you.

No, I got no problems with big words. People who use big words trigger me because it is so easy to see through their insecurities.

I posted that video for a reason, watch it. If a dumbfuck youtubber can see people who use obscure words as complete autists then believe me, everyone can.

I really hope you just do this on /sci/ to look intelligent because if you actually say shit like 'posteriori' in real life then allow me to tell you a little secret: Your peers laugh behind your back.

[Anonymous No.8337397]

>>8337389
>if you actually say shit like 'posteriori' in real life

Of course I don't. I used it here where it had a context and a reason. What fucking context would anyone have to use it IRL?

I think you've projected all your insecurities onto me, because I'm nothing like what you described. Just settle down, okay? We're on /sci/ not at Chad's house party.

[Anonymous No.8337416]

>>8337389
Wew lad, you're freaking out cause someone used a philosophical term to express their point
I think you're the one who needs some self evaluation

[Anonymous No.8337751]

>>8337353
>Implying there can't be a posteriori necessary truths