[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 84 KB, 2000x2101, Transfeminism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8188242 No.8188242[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is it true that science has a problem with women?

>> No.8188245

>>8188242
No. Some men have a problem with women.

>> No.8188246

>>8188242
No, its the other way around.

>> No.8188256

>>8188242
nice bait thread. enjoy the (you)s

>> No.8188261

no

>> No.8188264

>>8188242
Definite science

Define problem

>> No.8189033

In academia we have problem...

>> No.8189061

>>8188242
>vacant chair at my faculty
>they don't even invite any male potential successors
>just woman after woman

I'd say their relationship to women definitely isn't healthy, though it is not the kind of problem you are implying.

>> No.8189065
File: 64 KB, 599x595, stemwomen[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8189065

No women have a problem with science.

>> No.8189131

>>8188242
No.
Most women have problem with logical reasoning though.

>> No.8189160

>>8188246
/thread

>> No.8189161

Allowing women to learn how to read was a mistake. Allowing them to attend schools was an even bigger mistake.

>> No.8189174

>>8188242
No feminism had a problem with science.

>> No.8189183

>>8189174
>>8189161
>>8189160
>>8189065
>>8189061
>>8188246
>>8189131

Well OP, consider it by yourself. Of course probably this people are just teenagers or failures (I hope, it really scares me that some this people could be successful in any field), but as >>8188245 said, and you can see in the post cited above, some men (most actually) have a problem with women, and science is mainly made by men (as everything). So applying that logic that everyone here loves some much...

>> No.8189203
File: 17 KB, 240x151, 1224849707919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8189203

>>8188242
If you are interested in the topic I recommend reading something by Donna Haraway. If you are posting in /sci/ and are not trolling I guess the most interesting book for you by her should be "Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science"; if you're more interested in epistemology, then "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective".

I hope it could be helpful for anybody!

>> No.8189207

>>8189183
Women are not feminism you retard.

>> No.8189210
File: 51 KB, 400x433, Whatever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8189210

>>8189207

>> No.8189223

>>8189203
>Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

I've no idea what I've just read, but it was terrible. I can't believe this is an academic subject.

>> No.8189230

>>8189203
stop telling people to read "How to behave like a cunt"

>> No.8189235

>>8189223
>>8189230

More data for answering your question, OP.

>> No.8189277

>>8189235
Women are not feminism you idiot.

>> No.8189281

>>8189161
t. the taliban

>> No.8189350

>>8188242
Women are ruled by emotion far more often than men. And there is no room for emotion in science.

So, yes. Indirectly.

>> No.8189389

>>8189235
> feminists
> women
goodluck fucking low IQ cunt you faggot