[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 345 KB, 1754x1214, you-cant-convince-a-believer-carl-sagan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8150137 No.8150137 [Reply] [Original]

Quotes Thread

>> No.8150240

“In my own professional work I have touched on a variety of different fields. I’ve done work in mathematical linguistics, for example, without any professional credentials in mathematics; in this subject I am completely self-taught, and not very well taught. But I’ve often been invited by universities to speak on mathematical linguistics at mathematics seminars and colloquia. No one has ever asked me whether I have the appropriate credentials to speak on these subjects; the mathematicians couldn’t care less. What they want to know is what I have to say. No one has ever objected to my right to speak, asking whether I have a doctor’s degree in mathematics, or whether I have taken advanced courses in the subject. That would never have entered their minds. They want to know whether I am right or wrong, whether the subject is interesting or not, whether better approaches are possible… the discussion dealt with the subject, not with my right to discuss it.
But on the other hand, in discussion or debate concerning social issues or American foreign policy…. The issue is constantly raised, often with considerable venom. I’ve repeatedly been challenged on grounds of credentials, or asked, what special training do I have that entitles you to speak on these matters. The assumption is that people like me, who are outsiders from a professional viewpoint, are not entitled to speak on such things.
Compare mathematics and the political sciences… it’s quite striking. In mathematics, in physics, people are concerned with what you say, not with your certification. But in order to speak about social reality, you must have the proper credentials, particularly if you depart from the accepted framework of thinking. Generally speaking, it seems fair to say that the richer the intellectual substance of a field, the less there is a concern for credentials, and the greater is the concern for content.”
― Noam Chomsky

>> No.8150248
File: 68 KB, 650x560, science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8150248

>>8150137
I don't like Bill Nye

>> No.8150340

>>8150137
If the quote is from Bill Nye, why there is a picture of Carl Sagan?

>> No.8151142

>>8150340
That's actually a picture of Edward Stone.

>> No.8151573

>>8150240
perfect

>> No.8151789
File: 89 KB, 1680x1050, Epicurius quote.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8151789

>> No.8151863

>>8150240
chomsky is a hack outside of academia

>> No.8151885

>>8150340
It's Neil Tyson. Another great quote: "If the universe wasn't expanding, there wouldn't be room for all this dick" - Nelly DeGrasse Tyson (theoretical geologist).

>> No.8151921

>>8150240
I agree, but what a whiner.