Are there any good educational YouTube channels? >pic possibly related

File: 252 KB, 1024x576, 1419101283266.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:37:41 2016 No.8139233 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any good educational YouTube channels?

>pic possibly related

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:38:23 2016 No.8139234 Numberphile

Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:40:18 2016 No.8139239

I think Numberphile can get pretty good but it's more informative than educational.
I don't know if that make sense, but what I'm trying to say is that you could watch a certain video and learn 'about', say, graph theory. But you aren't really going to 'learn' graph theory.

Vsauce is garbage.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:42:26 2016 No.8139244 >>8139233 I think Veritasium is pretty good. https://www.youtube.com/user/1veritasium

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:50:15 2016 No.8139254 File: 296 KB, 500x375, 1419955984626[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8139233 >implying Wilderberger doesn't exist

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:54:17 2016 No.8139262 >>8139233 viascience is one of the few above meme quality channels

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 20:56:40 2016 No.8139267 >>8139233 PBS SPACE TIME.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 22:53:56 2016 No.8139431 Underrated channel https://www.youtube.com/user/SeriousScience

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 22:55:20 2016 No.8139434 >>8139431 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS9h7j5vpr0

Anonymous Sun Jun 12 23:15:35 2016 No.8139456

>>8139434
>SeriousScience
>philosophy
you'll have a hard time in this board, m8. for some reason, edgy people in this board hate to mix these topics.

in any case, I don't think the trolley problem is analogous to having 5 dying patients and one healthy person that could be killed to save the other people. it would be... if this person was also dying, but compatible with all the other people.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 23:20:44 2016 No.8139462 >>8139434 oh, and forgot to mention... I love the political propaganda he's spreading (perhaps unintentionally)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 23:21:39 2016 No.8139463 >>8139233 >>pic possibly related Fuck no.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 23:26:25 2016 No.8139468 >>8139267 Second

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 12 23:39:37 2016 No.8139482 >>8139234 >>8139239 >numberphile What is this guy, some kind of pedophile for numbers or something?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 02:07:05 2016 No.8139641 >>8139262 Any more channels like this?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 02:14:37 2016 No.8139643 >>8139262 Thanks! Also, I googled before I searched youtube, check out this amazing meme splash page for this unrelated garbage: http://www.viascience.com/

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 03:08:02 2016 No.8139685 >>8139233 I love Vsauce, but sometimes his videos are too pseudoscience for me.

Anonymous Mon Jun 13 03:24:15 2016 No.8139697

>>8139233
It is angering to me that you would post Vsauce. I personally think he is trash, and although I don't have proof right now to prove it, I remember him spouting out inaccurate and conjectural information as fact. Same goes for fucking backyard """""""""""""""""""scientist"""""""""""""""""

Veritasium is good.

Anonymous Mon Jun 13 04:19:46 2016 No.8139756 [DELETED]

chomsky's philosophy. It's just short excerpts of this dude's talks put into categories on various topics, but I think I've learnt more actually meaningful things than from all channels mentioned in this thread together. I think it's because he's a person commenting on social issues who actually makes sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FHNMZbnvYU

Anonymous Mon Jun 13 04:26:02 2016 No.8139760

chomsky's philosophy. It's just short excerpts of this dude's talks put into categories on various topics, but I think I've learnt more actually meaningful things than from all channels mentioned in this thread together. I think it's because he's a person commenting on social/human issues who actually makes sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FHNMZbnvYU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwTht2L4jqA

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 06:07:27 2016 No.8139841 >>8139482 >Phile >Denoting a person or thing having a fondness for a specified thing How old are? 12?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 06:31:59 2016 No.8139860 >>8139456 You need to learn philosophy if you want not only to know, but also understand. Lack of proper understanding is a major problem in modren science.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 06:33:21 2016 No.8139863 >>8139482 He likes small numbers

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 06:35:13 2016 No.8139865 >>8139233 Ted-ED

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 08:15:07 2016 No.8139949 File: 22 KB, 600x315, 19d3efc90067d1cf6ffb0067bd0848cb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8139697 >I don't like things that are popular What a pathetic basement dwelling faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 20:14:35 2016 No.8140745 File: 19 KB, 373x559, 1465778934566.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Mit ocw

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 20:22:51 2016 No.8140762 File: 184 KB, 996x610, TghsnOl.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Obligatory image.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 20:23:58 2016 No.8140766 >>8139841 -1/12

Anonymous Mon Jun 13 20:43:37 2016 No.8140807

>>8139254
What is he all about? I watched some videos and all he is talking about is how infinity and reals don't exist etc. He is limiting maths because there is no physical equivalent. BUT does this make sense? Is mathematics not proposed to be limitless as long as it's rigourous and logically correct?

I'm a physicist but this seems interesting.

Also, are there any other "big famous" people acknowledging his work or is this just a circlejerk for autists?

Anonymous Mon Jun 13 20:55:13 2016 No.8140830

>>8140807
> He is limiting maths because there is no physical equivalent

I think he just wants to prove that you don't need to get into high level abstraction to do stuff.

> Is mathematics not proposed to be limitless as long as it's rigourous and logically correct?

That's the funny part of it, there is no such thing as a "math." What we do have are sets of laws that we like to work with, because they apparently work in our universe. We also like to work with stuff that doesn't belong to our world, but looks promising and we like to mess around with.

You can create any kind of set of laws, and they don't even need to be consistent. Nobody will give two fucks about it, but that doesn't mean that your abomination isn't valid.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 21:14:35 2016 No.8140860 >>8139267 Third. Their video explaining mass-energy equivalence is unmatched. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSKzgpt4HBU

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 21:23:57 2016 No.8140872 File: 64 KB, 780x487, 1464100085901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8139233 >pic possibly related

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 21:28:53 2016 No.8140879 >>8140872 Who made these and when?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 21:30:31 2016 No.8140880 >>8140879 idk, i only have this one, i forgot what thread it was in

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 21:44:10 2016 No.8140890 >>8140872 this is just gold

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 23:50:07 2016 No.8141045 >>8140879 V de la sauce. There's a whole bunch of them out there.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 13 23:58:23 2016 No.8141060 >no one mentioned 3blu1brown graduate level maths guy talking about maths stuff with really nice animations https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYO_jab_esuFRV4b17AJtAw

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 00:32:06 2016 No.8141125 >>8139949 >Veritasium is not popular I gave my reasons for why I don't like Vsauce, are you projecting much?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 00:45:51 2016 No.8141154 >>8141060 this guy got me into some weird cello music

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 11:24:58 2016 No.8141933 File: 60 KB, 878x814, 1448574354936.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8140880

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 11:26:22 2016 No.8141936 File: 34 KB, 780x566, CfJrC7fWQAAUDrC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8140880 another

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 12:15:42 2016 No.8141991 >>8140860 >individual photons don't have time Huh. What's that mean?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 12:17:25 2016 No.8141993 >>8141991 They are moving at the speed of light, so from the photon's frame of reference, there is no time.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 12:31:54 2016 No.8142012 File: 180 KB, 350x362, Thord face.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8140762 >>8140872 >>8141933 >>8141936 There's just not enough of these.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 12:41:58 2016 No.8142020 >>8139233 >lets talk about lemon sandwiches >10 seconds into video >so thats why crocodiles cant fly

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 12:53:38 2016 No.8142034 >>8139234 > the -1/12 channel is good education

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 13:44:02 2016 No.8142075 >>8139233 I like CrashCourse. Loved their series on astronomy. https://www.youtube.com/user/crashcourse

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 13:56:49 2016 No.8142087 File: 89 KB, 600x484, 1456872465151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Sixty Symbols Computerphile Periodic Videos Nottingham Science DeepSky Videos

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 13:57:52 2016 No.8142088 >I'm trying to make a popsci meme video on neutron stars should I kill myself

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:00:31 2016 No.8142092 File: 26 KB, 200x108, 1456876348983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8142088 >popsci you never should've been born

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:13:48 2016 No.8142109 Vsauce is good, fuck you!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:17:57 2016 No.8142118 >>8139267 Yeeeess Yale's channel's pre' good So is Stanford's. I think NOVA might have one? Nvm, but I found a channel called 'Universe TV' during my search. All educational programming therein.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:20:18 2016 No.8142123 >>8142075 Mah niggah Their history course was dope, and I had some fun with their chemistry as well.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:24:23 2016 No.8142129 >>8142109 Nothing can save you from your shit taste. also I can easily say with confidence you are under 18. pls go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8DtojIWZC4

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:36:16 2016 No.8142143 >>8142129 That proves nothing. If you watch his videos you will actually see that he uses many sources. A parody saying he doesn't is nothing. I don't get why this is the reason you don't like him

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:46:06 2016 No.8142150 Sometimes ill find myself watching kurzgesagt when im drunk but i dont really know how well they actually hold up.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:47:44 2016 No.8142151 >>8142150 >when im drunk Why do people do this?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:50:19 2016 No.8142156 >>8139254 his math history series is pretty great tbqh

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:50:23 2016 No.8142157 >>8142151 Im a raging alcoholic and have no particular excuse, but its the only time i really bothered with the videos so I don't have any proper opinion of them other than them being "cozy" i guess

Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:50:41 2016 No.8142158

>>8142143
Hes scatterbrained
He caters to add milenial trash with his constant clipping and the fucking terrible cantor of his voice.
Hes so uncomfortably intense and dramatic its cringeworthy
He mixes science with ludicrous opinionated and occasionally flatout wrong conclusions

I could go on, but frankly Ive lost interest

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:51:44 2016 No.8142162 >>8139267 Too thinly spread knowledge imo. Deep sky videos is muuuch better for me. Also, sixty symbols, numberophile, thunderf00t (if you don't mind anti- feminism, anti-religion stuff) and smarter everyday

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 14:51:44 2016 No.8142163 >>8142158 *ADD

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:02:18 2016 No.8142172 Mathologer Vihart EEVblog

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:06:57 2016 No.8142176 >>8142129 Have you seen his newer videos on math? They're actually pretty good. He focuses on one topic a lot more and doesn't run off on tangents as much. Check out his Banach-Tarski paradox video.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:09:48 2016 No.8142180 >>8142176 I suppose I havent. Maybe Ill give him another shot sometime this week.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:15:09 2016 No.8142188 >>8139431 I already see a low amount of American sounding names in the title, must be of higher quality than most channels already.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:17:39 2016 No.8142193 >>8139949 It's always the same on 4chan, gets so boring hearing brainless hate towards popular things without arguments.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:18:58 2016 No.8142197 >>8142176 This isn't the point of vsauce, god some people are so fucking autistic (not towards you specifically, just autistic downies who think everything that doesn't go in depth is bad)

Anonymous Tue Jun 14 15:24:42 2016 No.8142202

>>8142197
Is it autistic to not want to hear a fucking spastic tell you shit you already know in a lilting cadence and conclude his videos with some emo feel good shit that has fuck all to do with the original topic?
This is a science board, we all know the shitty popsci we hear it every day.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 20:15:25 2016 No.8142661 >>8139697 STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 20:18:00 2016 No.8142666 >>8139233 Mathologer is one I like.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 20:23:32 2016 No.8142674 >le fuck vsauce xD am i cool and contrarian enough guys?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 20:31:40 2016 No.8142684 >>8142092 its more of a meme video since it wont appeal to popsci retards probably maybe idk ill just kill myself

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 20:36:00 2016 No.8142691 >>8139697 backyard scientist used to do actually cool shit like making chloroform and chlorobutynal and show the math behind it, but now he just pours shit in watermelons

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 14 22:29:03 2016 No.8142821 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLAAy_pM-k8

>>	Anonymous Wed Jun 15 18:35:26 2016 No.8144569 >>8142821 fucking great, watched a few videos, fucking amazing.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jun 15 18:37:15 2016 No.8144573 >>8142674 people hate spams and advertising you shitposter. deal with it.

Anonymous Thu Jun 16 09:32:28 2016 No.8145878

>>8140807
>Is mathematics not proposed to be limitless as long as it's rigorous and logically correct?

Think about the terms you're using

>limitless and logically correct

You can't prove the existence of something that does not terminate. You can at most say "it does not terminate", but you can never verify even that. Read up on non-referring terms. This is a very old problem in the philosophy of language and has definitely not been "solved" by set theorists, or anyone who claims to have solved it. To be dismissive of this is foolish.

>are there any other "big famous" people acknowledging his work or is this just a circlejerk for autists?

You have to verify that the conclusions follow from the premises according to the rules, on your own, and then demonstrate this to others so they can verify it too. The central authority with which we appeal to is the rule itself, which, is an abstraction of nature, and did not come about "arbitrarily". Appealing to authority is poor form.

>>8140830
>That's the funny part of it, there is no such thing as a "math"
>What we do have are sets of laws that we like to work with
>You can create any kind of set of laws, and they don't even need to be consistent
>Nobody will give two fucks about it, but that doesn't mean that your abomination isn't valid

It's funny, I transferred from the college of art at my university to get away from the contradictions, pseudo/anti-intellectualism, and absurdity of mod/contemp art, and thought I could find refuge in the mathematics department, thinking surely mathematics would be safe from the toxic and trendy deconstructionists- but no, math has been corrupted too. What happened in the last century? Who is telling people to abandon their senses, to abandon reason? Why has it become so popular to give up on reality? Was it the post-war brain-drain? Did we get more than just the nobel laureates but their 12 influential schizophrenic cousins? What the fuck is going on in our academic communities?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jun 16 10:13:33 2016 No.8145924 >>8145878 Bait

Anonymous Thu Jun 16 10:29:14 2016 No.8145947

>>8145924
>people who disagree orthodoxy are trolls

Again, it's funny that whenever I post my views on this *I* get called the troll. Are people so convinced that they can understand infinity that I just *have* to be a troll to think otherwise? What am I missing if it is so obvious how simple it is to resolve the contradiction of a finite understanding of the world comprehending infinity?

I mean, do you really know what infinity means? Sometimes I think it is the people who are telling everyone they're using the term "infinity" incorrectly are the ones who *actually* understand what it means. How is what I am saying "bait"? I'm trying to argue my point of view and instead I just get dismissed as a troll? that's very frustrating. I'm not making these arguments in bad faith.

I probably shouldn't even respond to these types of posts.

Also, to anyone who is afraid to speak up about this, but wants to read more about the philosophy of math, I suggest reading some of the papers that Vlad Shaposhnikov has written on the "theological underpinnings philosophy of modern mathematics". he makes some connections between the increase in secularization and the need to replace what was lost with a new absolute certainty. He cites some of bertrand russell's journal entries, so it's not just conjecture! worth a look. you can d/l them for free on academia,edu. also, James Franklin, who is a colleague and faculty member at the same university that wildberger is from (university of new south wales) also writes on the philosophy of math. Worth reading if you're confused about these things like me!

And as always...

"The truth does not fear investigation"

>>	Anonymous Thu Jun 16 11:16:50 2016 No.8146033 >>8139233 https://www.youtube.com/user/LookingGlassUniverse/videos She also has a really qt voice

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 03:46:38 2016 No.8147735 >>8141060 >>8141154 is there anything else like this?

Anonymous Fri Jun 17 04:04:06 2016 No.8147753
File: 61 KB, 500x384, mite b cool.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

hugefloods is pretty damn good, though tends to focus soley on the geology of WA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STgbHFvUMlE

if you look hard enough you can find full episodes of Beakman on YT.

Anonymous Fri Jun 17 09:42:56 2016 No.8148146

>>8139233

These videos exist and are successful through rewarding the viewer with instant gratification.

The video will appear to teach the viewer, with statements communicated clearly and explicitly, spanning just 9 minutes. What a win-win situation! Just 9 minutes out of their busy day, some interesting information, and they're on they're way.

Despite the seeming win-win, any video watched will have the viewer forgetting what they just watched 2 weeks down the road.

Sure, the main 'idea' of the video will be remembered for these few weeks, and perhaps the video made such an impact on the viewer that they'll repeat the concept to their friends and seem intellectual for a fleeting moment.

However, in reality, basic understanding or lasting knowledge would never be gained through watching five, ten, or twenty 10 minute videos on differing topics. Although, they do a rather good job of making the viewer feel like they've learned something, hence why viewers return, but in the end its all an illusion filling the modern nurtured craving for a consumer's instant gratification.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 10:17:03 2016 No.8148197 Just read IFLS posts on Facebook

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 12:35:18 2016 No.8148384 >>8148197 kek

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 12:50:12 2016 No.8148402 >>8148146 its not like its the video's fault if the viewer doesn't retain the information I mean a lot of kids take Algebra II for a whole year get an A and still forget most of it

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 13:39:42 2016 No.8148469 >>8148402 While that might be true, I doubt any video is going to provide lasting understanding in any worthwhile subject, no matter how much of that video the viewer remembers.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 13:44:52 2016 No.8148478 File: 70 KB, 560x386, Bibliothek-Admont-560.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8139233 No, books are the only true source of knowledge

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 13:47:23 2016 No.8148483 This : https://www.youtube.com/user/Kurzgesagt/videos

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 17 15:53:55 2016 No.8148698 File: 23 KB, 240x240, periodic-videos_medium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8142087 /thread

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 18 10:05:47 2016 No.8149959 Youtube channel 'Brian Douglas' has some videos on Laplace & Fourier transforms, control systems and mathematical modeling of physical systems.

Anonymous Sat Jun 18 10:20:20 2016 No.8149972

I don't know if it has been posted yet but this the only serious mathematical channel I look at:

>https://www.youtube.com/user/MathDoctorBob

Of course it doesn't have silly number magic and/or weirdly explained theories, it's simply a good channel to watch. Sit back and enjoy some good videos.

It's also useful for revising subjects. It doesn't go into proofs but everything is explained rather clearly. Also I like the dude. Go MathDoctorBob!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 18 14:34:28 2016 No.8150327 >>8149972 yes, this dude

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 18 14:49:08 2016 No.8150356 >>8139233 Veritasium is a shitty channel.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 08:33:29 2016 No.8151565 >>8142172 >Vihart Are you fucking retarded ? All she does is ramble about the mainstream, especially why a common and useful representation of a number is less appropriate than some other.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 14:32:57 2016 No.8152010 I tried. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT4ccNTIE0A How did I do?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 15:03:37 2016 No.8152073 >>8152010 Pretty bad. Write a script next time. Far too much umming and aahing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 15:13:34 2016 No.8152110 >>8152010 A better title wouldn't hurt :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 15:28:27 2016 No.8152156 >>8152010 Left her a comment :^ )

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 16:58:58 2016 No.8152342 >>8152073 that would happen even with a script, I'm afraid

Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:07:06 2016 No.8152358
File: 406 KB, 1280x870, white-house-wallpapers-27.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://www.youtube.com/user/AlternateHistoryHub/videos

Less science and more speculative discussion and history, but still educational.

Alternate History is a subject that needs more attention.

Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:07:23 2016 No.8152359
File: 78 KB, 789x391, 1234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I quite like the Because Science stuff

its kinda junk food science but its nice to just leave on in a playlist whilst you're doing other stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW56dMH0T2s

Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:13:58 2016 No.8152374
File: 66 KB, 775x465, Artifexian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Artifexian is relatively new on YouTube, but he's been making some shockingly competent and well-made videos on the subject of world-building in science-fiction based on planetary physics.

https://www.youtube.com/user/Artifexian/videos

Yes, it's slightly derivative of MinutePhysics, but last time I checked you can't copyright drawing in front of a camera.

Many of his videos contain excellent thought-experiments based around fictional planets and solar-systems.

https://youtu.be/1J4iIBKJHLA

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:15:38 2016 No.8152375 File: 151 KB, 1500x1500, Practical Engineering YouTube Logo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:22:49 2016 No.8152387 >>8152375 grady is a breddy cool guy, his videos are nice unlike every other popsci bullshit channel, he actually goes slightly more in depth with the topic, i've found

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:23:49 2016 No.8152389 What about CrashCourse ? :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:27:11 2016 No.8152403 >>8152389 Hank's stuff is alright but John is a liberal faggot(well Hank is too but doesn't effect his video)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 19 17:28:02 2016 No.8152404 >>8151565 Her videos on golden ratio were a piece of art. But why would you care, that's too mainstream for you.

>>	Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Sun Jun 19 18:03:16 2016 No.8152498 >>8139233 Aronra for a specific domain (evolution and cladistics).

Anonymous Sun Jun 19 18:42:43 2016 No.8152618
File: 28 KB, 480x360, Vsauce 2 Toilet Video.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Kevin from Vsauce 2's videos is NOWHERE NEAR as good as Michael, mostly because the channel focuses more on stupid Internet shit rather than specifically on science, but when he DOES make a video focusing more on Science/History, it's actually pretty damn good. Almost as good as a regular Vsauce video.

https://youtu.be/6Ha5Rs2r4F0

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 05:02:07 2016 No.8153602

>>8145878
Non-euclidean geometries were 'contradictory, pseudo/anti-intellectual, and absurd.' The 'toxic and trendy deconstructionists' studying it were 'corrupting math', as well as 'abandoning their senses', 'abandoning reason' and 'giving up on reality.'

Until GR.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 05:08:00 2016 No.8153605 File: 182 KB, 600x367, 1462546041549.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8139234

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 05:15:21 2016 No.8153621

>>8148146
I mostly watch the videos just to get used to problem solving in general. For example, Vsauce's Banach-Tarski video. It's a pretty dope paradox, but so theoretical that its pretty much useless on its own. The real value is seeing how you can start from a few simple rules and build up to some crazy ass shit just by sticking with a problem long enough.
If some mathematician can make two spheres out of one, you can probably figure out your calculus homework.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 06:50:21 2016 No.8153695 >>8140766 underrated post

>>	Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Mon Jun 20 06:51:51 2016 No.8153697 >>8140807 He's just a crank. An educated, informed crank, but a crank nonetheless. Don't worry too much about him. In short, his critique is "I don't like the aesthetics" / "I'm a Platonic Realist".

>>	Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Mon Jun 20 06:53:07 2016 No.8153698 >>8145878 >You can't prove the existence of something that does not terminate. Precisely why the axiom of infinity is one of the axioms of ZF.

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 07:11:23 2016 No.8153705

>>8145878
>What happened in the last century?
People started doing what we're doing now, analyzing other people's ideas instead of coming up with our own new ones and putting them to the test. It seems to me that around the turn of the century, the general tone of academic work changed from "I have an idea!" to "These ideas are good/bad". No one is coming up with novel ideas any more. It's why I love people like Wildberger, even if I'm not totally convinced of his position, I appreciate someone trying to expose the world to new ideas. Why are people so afraid to do that nowadays?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 08:30:56 2016 No.8153758 Kurzegsagt MinutePhysics/Earth Piled Higher and Deeper Khan Academy ASAP Science CGP Grey for social science

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 09:07:39 2016 No.8153795 >>8152404 >SJWhart >2016

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 09:37:40 2016 No.8153837 https://www.youtube.com/user/EugeneKhutoryansky noone can top this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:06:00 2016 No.8154120 >>8153795 ok.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:28:24 2016 No.8154139 >education >youtube it's all popular science, if you wan't to educate yourself read a book

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:38:25 2016 No.8154144 >>8152404 some of her stuff is indeed quite interesting, but I would not call most of her stuff "educational" besides stop using the word mainstream when she brags about being different whenever she has the context

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:38:50 2016 No.8154145 >>8139267 Fourth, best quick overview channel you're going to get

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:40:05 2016 No.8154146 File: 69 KB, 800x600, Cipher has an intense dog fight over Area B7R.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Is it educational to laugh at non scientific cuckballs from a marketing scheme? https://youtu.be/42a1jW3gceQ

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:41:15 2016 No.8154148 All of Crash Course. Got me through school flawlessly.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:41:48 2016 No.8154151 >>8148698 But he's fucking crazy. Just look at those eyes. Also whatever language he's speaking I can't understand it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:41:58 2016 No.8154152 >>8153605 good thing your post ended with the right number

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 13:55:27 2016 No.8154171 >>8154144 >2016 >haven't noticed being different is mainstream besides, see >>8154139

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 14:00:31 2016 No.8154183 >>8154148 >flawlessy elaborate

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 14:35:35 2016 No.8154244 >>8142012 fuck me i havent laughed this hard in ages

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 14:46:10 2016 No.8154270 >>8154171 don't act dumb, i mean different in that way this >>8154139 is also wrong in its own way, having a bit of awareness you can sort out almost as much information from youtube than from reading in the same amount of time

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 14:47:33 2016 No.8154272

>>8139234

a fucking autist who desperately attention-whoring over mathematics is educational?

Last time i saw that channel were that pointynose wanting to giveaway the shitty cardboard he wrote calculations on for the best subscriber or something.

That channel is fucking cringe and unhumanly idiot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:02:24 2016 No.8154301 >>8154270 >having a bit of awareness you can sort out almost as much information from youtube than from reading in the same amount of time >this is what kids believe today

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:11:02 2016 No.8154325

>>8154301
and what's up with that ?
you're just gonna leave my quotes like that for the sake of argument ?
that's a bit sad
what's more saddening is that you think that knowledge is only accessible with "muh privileged medium" when you only need a little fucking bit of curiosity and hard work

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:15:13 2016 No.8154339

Well, I don't see AvE here, that canuck bastard is entertaining and educational.

I like when educator admits they are stupid in some ways. Some of you autofellating cucks here make me vomit. Humility is the first thing my HS math teacher imparted on me, some of you could use buckets. Not to mention the pretentious popsci non-science Top-X List like Hank Green peddles, that makes me ill.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:22:04 2016 No.8154351 >>8154325 >>8154339 something tells me you should visit a shrink.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:30:28 2016 No.8154369 >>8154351 don't know if that really matters but for what reasons ?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:39:55 2016 No.8154390 >>8154351 As a matter of fact I do. Lets be honest here, you can't do proper rigorous science unless you are at least a little fucked in the head.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:41:45 2016 No.8154396 File: 44 KB, 960x540, 17263812371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8154390 you can you just stop being an autistic little shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:42:28 2016 No.8154398 >>8140762 more?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:43:08 2016 No.8154399 >>8154369 >>8154390 the way you write makes it clear you are a troubled person

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:48:11 2016 No.8154405 >>8152010 pedantic pseudo intellectual who feels the need to share her psuedoscience babbling with the world in hopes that she will get validation from other people boosting her ego and leading to an even more smug self absorbed bitch

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:49:03 2016 No.8154407 >>8154399 Boo hoo, who fucking isn't. We are on a sperglord mongoloid export site, do you realy think you are any better, anon? Look around you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:53:16 2016 No.8154412 >>8154183 They teach core units almost perfectly, so you don't miss much important stuff.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:55:36 2016 No.8154417 >>8154399 please tell more, i'm genuinely interested (i am >>8154369 if you want to clarify that)

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 15:56:17 2016 No.8154420 File: 95 KB, 486x330, im-projecting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8154407

Anonymous Mon Jun 20 16:25:07 2016 No.8154458

>>8154417
Can't really put a finger on it, I'm not a psychologist, but I've seen people in college who were about to have a breakdown having that zealous, manic feel about them before it happened.
They could be triggered even by minor details which would occupy them as if they were the most important things in their lives, and then suddenly they would loose interest in it just to start the same thing with some other random thing.
I'm probably stretching it, but when I've read your posts at least two people come to my mind which manifested similar style.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 16:36:08 2016 No.8154471 >>8154458 that's a bit scary i guess but, in what way do i tend to manifest that ? i mean, when i responded, sooner, i structured my post in function of each "argument" in the previous post and how did those people you know act ?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 16:54:16 2016 No.8154499 >>8154471 sigh this bait has gone too far

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 20 19:02:36 2016 No.8154744 Artifexian, while technically not a science channel, is probably my favorite. One of the only channels that actually shows the math unabashedly.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math