[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 40 KB, 329x499, 51iCoWIekpL._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113012 No.8113012 [Reply] [Original]

Do you agree with the Bell Curve theory?

>> No.8113044 [DELETED] 

>>8113012
It's was proven as fact that race determined intelligence levels. But leftists don't want to admit that non-Whites are less intelligent. Damn liberals.

>> No.8113048

>>8113044
This.

>> No.8113049

>>8113044
dubs comfirm

>> No.8113054

To think that different ethnicities have genetic differences in skin color, hair color, muscle type, propensity for certain diseases(osteoporosis, hypertension, etc), monogenic diseases, but not in brain function, is preposterous.

>> No.8113059

>>8113044
even ching chongs have less smart?

>> No.8113062

The only way Stephen jay Gould could debunk it was to forge his evidence. It is valid and will remain so, it just will not be popularly considered.

>> No.8113064

>>8113059
They are an exception even liberals omit since it destroys their oppressed nonwhite narrative.

>> No.8113077

>>8113059
Careful, /pol/ goes full damage control when you mention that.

>> No.8113083

>>8113077
They're only sore losers about Ashkenazi outcomes

>> No.8113085

It's true but /pol/ is still a trash reddit board and clinging to your race as being indicative of your intelligence is for 115-IQ losers.

>> No.8113105

>>8113044
I don't agree with you anon, I think the concept of "intelligence" is way more complex then Richard and Charles depicted in this book. Their evidence and research were false or incomplete. I was a propagation of political and elitists agenda.

>> No.8113128

>>8113105
g is uncontroversial and it is well proxied as IQ for large populations.

>> No.8113184

>>8113044
Culture determines intelligence actually. If race did, the rednecks and /pol/ retards would be fucking geniuses.

>> No.8113210
File: 249 KB, 843x843, 1420624598755.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113210

>>8113184
Is that why the IQ of children adopted since birth still have their IQ predicted best by biological parents even when offered upper middle class nutrition and material conditions?

>> No.8113222

>>8113210

your graph in the picture is saying that blacks adopted by two white parents gets over 100 in IQ at average. an increase.

>> No.8113224

>>8113012
It's good that these threads act as containment threads for /pol/acks. And they can also be easily distinguished by using this book's cover for thread pics. A favourable tendency overall as long as they don't leak into other threads.

>> No.8113231
File: 25 KB, 625x626, 00c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113231

>>8113210

>> No.8113245

>>8113222
Best predicted. There is a non-biological components but it does not offer enough influence to close the gap by listening to jazz and getting fish fat alone. Just like squats and oats won't change how you muscles insert or the ratio of fire types.

>> No.8113415

>>8113224
You seem to be confused. This is /sci/, not Reddit.

>> No.8113646
File: 46 KB, 500x333, must-not-laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113646

>>8113415

>> No.8113671

>>8113222
Uh, no it doesn't. You can't even read a fucking graph. No wonder you are arguing for your "we're all the same" bullshit

>> No.8113674
File: 281 KB, 490x639, tmp_28669-JohnvonNeumann-LosAlamos-395486506.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113674

Ashkenazi Jews have a mean iq of 115 and have dominated academia for hundreds of years.

HOW CAN THE GOYIM EVEN COMPETE?

>> No.8113814

>>8113674
They have maintained racial purity for hundreds of years. They know that's what keeps the good traits in their people.

Bring that sentence to a real life convo and you'll be called racist and/or antisemite

>> No.8113824
File: 59 KB, 600x600, are-u-sure-0390it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8113824

>>8113674

>> No.8113832

>>8113044
>>>/pol/

>> No.8113843

>>8113012
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem

you're welcome

>> No.8113867

>>8113210
Maybe check the interpretations section. It's not so clear cut as you think.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study#Interpretations

Also...
>Minnesoata
>distorted figures
>jpeg artifacts everywhere

>> No.8113953

>>8113867
>reproducible results are not science when I disagree

>> No.8114058
File: 6 KB, 236x214, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8114058

>>8113953
Are you even serious right now?

>> No.8114585

>>8113012
>Herrnstein
I wonder who is behind this book...