[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 21 KB, 500x445, rope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7982572 No.7982572 [Reply] [Original]

What is your opinion on wi-fi as a risk to human health?
I try and see it as a kind of lamp that heats your body up where prolonged exposure can give you a "sunburn".

It shouldn't be able to cause cancer as the energy isn't high enough to be ionizing.

>> No.7982575

I hope this post will cause cancer.

>> No.7982576

My opinion is irrelevant to the empirical fact

>> No.7982577

>>7982572
No, that's stupid. Do you have any idea the amount of power a router would require to send out WiFi signals that could heat up the room?

>> No.7982579

It's extremely unlikely. If you're worried about cancer, worry about the food, water and air, and all the manufactured stuff you're constantly in contact with. But especially the food.

>> No.7982581

I prefer wired over wi-fi because of the radiation.

>> No.7982671

Wtf mate, we are living on top of a giant mountain of radiation with a giant magnetic field, orbiting a huge fusion reactor, and you are worried about radiation from WIFI?

>> No.7982679

As a bad analogy is kinda like the photoelectric effect. Them WiFi photos aint got enough power to be ionising your DNA, adding more of them doesn't help.