[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 54 KB, 500x500, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970438 No.7970438 [Reply] [Original]

Can anyone see what the pattern is here? Or at least how to go about solving it?

>> No.7970443

f(x,y,z) = 2x + 4yz

>> No.7970450

>>7970438
How are we supposed to see a pattern of z when it's the same every time in your example?

>> No.7970451

2x + 8y

>> No.7970458

f(x,y,z)=z(x+4y)
Post another

>> No.7970467

>>7970438
There are at least infinitely many C-infinity functions that meet all of those constraints.

>> No.7970469
File: 53 KB, 500x500, Untitled-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970469

thanks guys

>>7970450
sorry im stupid

>> No.7970481

>it's an OP horribly tries to hide the fact he's asking us to do his homework episode

>> No.7970491
File: 18 KB, 281x240, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970491

>>7970458
Here you go.

>> No.7970496

>>7970469
2x + 4yz again.

>> No.7970526

>>7970443
How did you come up with this? Does a non-brute force method exist?

>> No.7970553

>>7970491
-9xz -3y
Damn the second one is the trick :(

>> No.7970570
File: 40 KB, 596x491, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970570

>>7970496
thanks it worked :)

>> No.7970591 [DELETED] 

>>7970526
Looking eq 1 and 3, we see the only difference is x changes by 1. This results in a change in f of 2. The same is true of eq 2 and 4.

So our first guess will be f(x,y,z) = g(x,y,z) + 2x.

g = f - 2x.

g = {0, 8, 0, 8}

So we have a new set:

g(0, 0, 2) = 0
g(0, 1, 2) = 8
g(1, 0, 2) = 0
g(1, 1, 2) = 8

We notice that if y is zero, then g is zero. Also, comparing eq 1 and 2 or eq 3 and 4 we see y changes by 1 and g changes by 8.

So we conclude that g(x,y,z) = 8y.

Since z is 2 in all cases, we can replace any appearance of 2 with z.

Thus our solutions thus far are:

g(x,y,z) = 2x + 8y
g(x,y,z) = 2x + 4yz
g(x,y,z) = 2x + 2yz^2
g(x,y,z) = 2x + yz^3
g(x,y,z) = xz + 8y
g(x,y,z) = xz + 4yz
g(x,y,z) = xz + 2yz^2
g(x,y,z) = xz + yz^3

>> No.7970593

>>7970526
Looking eq 1 and 3, we see the only difference is x changes by 1. This results in a change in f of 2. The same is true of eq 2 and 4.

So our first guess will be f(x,y,z) = g(x,y,z) + 2x.

g = f - 2x.

g = {0, 8, 0, 8}

So we have a new set:

g(0, 0, 2) = 0
g(0, 1, 2) = 8
g(1, 0, 2) = 0
g(1, 1, 2) = 8

We notice that if y is zero, then g is zero. Also, comparing eq 1 and 2 or eq 3 and 4 we see y changes by 1 and g changes by 8.

So we conclude that g(x,y,z) = 8y.

Since z is 2 in all cases, we can replace any appearance of 2 with z.

Thus our solutions thus far are:

f(x,y,z) = 2x + 8y
f(x,y,z) = 2x + 4yz
f(x,y,z) = 2x + 2yz^2
f(x,y,z) = 2x + yz^3
f(x,y,z) = xz + 8y
f(x,y,z) = xz + 4yz
f(x,y,z) = xz + 2yz^2
f(x,y,z) = xz + yz^3

>> No.7970605
File: 437 KB, 245x118, 1419611870230.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970605

This thread turned out surprisingly interesting, cheers lads!

>> No.7972195

So why did you pick the second solution?

>> No.7972197

>>7970438
f could just happen to map those points to those scalars and do something completely different everywhere else

you need more information about f

>> No.7972201

Why do people post funtions that depend on z if it's always set to 2?

2x+8y

is the simplest solution

>> No.7972576

[math]\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 \end{matrix} \right)\cdotp a = \left(\begin{matrix}0\\8\\2\end{matrix}\right)[/math]

[eqn]a = \left(\begin{matrix}2\\8\\0\end{matrix}\right) \\f(x,y,z) = 2x+8y+0z[/eqn]

>> No.7973115

>>7970438
2x+8y+0z

>> No.7973132

>>7970451
>>7972201
>>7973115

bingo

>> No.7973160

>>7972576
baby's first LA

>> No.7973445

>>7970438
Can you not just do High School simultaneous?

>> No.7973480

>>7970438

ac+4bc