[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 955 KB, 4400x2475, Black_Holes_-_Monsters_in_Space.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7686420 No.7686420 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.storypick.com/nasa-black-hole-theory/
How legit is this, I mean what does it even imply?

>> No.7686423
File: 22 KB, 306x306, Disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7686423

>>7686420
>http://www.storypick.com/nasa-black-hole-theory/

>> No.7686431
File: 82 KB, 832x584, 144598220784.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7686431

>>7686423
>frogfag

>> No.7686434
File: 258 KB, 438x355, Are you a retard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7686434

>>7686431
>le trashman fag

>> No.7686467

>>7686420

i would stick to Hawkings, his explanation really seems legit enough for me and there are no exceptions, it seem to hold all the way. I am always open to suggestions but this article has really poor elaborations, to me it sounds like some psuedo scientist who is trying to stir something up in order to make a career.

>> No.7687914

>>7686467
>I am sticking with the old theory simply because I learnt it first