/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.7669572]

>when u finally understand why 0.999.. =/= 1

[Anonymous No.7669795]

>>7669572

[Anonymous No.7669806]

Imagine what learning analysis will feel like, OP.

[M. Fractals No.7669808]

> >>7669795
bro... no... > >>7669572
1 is entirely subjective; any equation can sum it and the same applys vice versa
In my unpublished studies there's 16 to 34 to 41 types of 1 depending on what space scope you're using

Back to >>7669795
The real kicker is in 2=/=1.9999...9888....98.....{.9898989.}.... , and up to 10 where 9.9999....90000.....

after that it's just silly....

....No such this as irrational ;)

[Anonymous No.7669842]

>>7669806
Give an example please.

[Anonymous No.7669862]

>>7669808
Ah. I see you received your degree in Nigeria

[Anonymous No.7670817]

>>7669572
0.999... = 1 - epsilon
0.999... is an element of the hyperreals

[Anonymous No.7670818]

>>7669862
Kek

[Anonymous No.7670827]

I don't get it, why is it so hard to understand? If 0.999... was the same as 1, then it would be 1, not 0.999...

[Anonymous No.7670836]

>>7669808
>M. Fractals
>incoherent meaningless shitpost/baitpost
At least your name makes sense. Crackpots have a strong boner towards fractals.

[Anonymous No.7670842]

>>7669572
Given two numbers a and b, if it holds that d(a,b) < eps for every real positive eps, then a = b. 0.99... = 1.

[Anonymous No.7670844]

>>7670827
[math] \displaystyle
1 = \frac {3}{3} = 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333... = 0.999...
[/math]

[Anonymous No.7670853]

You people are chumps.

>>7670844
Thats a fallacy, prove this part right here:

<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0">
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>3</mn>
<mn>3</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>3</mn>
<mo>&#x22C5;<!-- ⋅ --></mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>3</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>3</mn>
<mo>&#x22C5;<!-- ⋅ --></mo>
<mn>0.333...</mn>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0.999...</mn>
</mstyle>
</math>

Prove the equality. Oh wait, you can't its an arbitrary axiom. Dedekind and set theory shits on your amateur mathmatics. >>7670817
This nig knows whats up

[Anonymous No.7670857]

You people are chumps.

>>7670844
Thats a fallacy, prove this part right here:

\displaystyle 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333...

Prove the equality. Oh wait, you can't its an arbitrary axiom. Dedekind and set theory shits on your amateur mathmatics. >>7670817
This nig knows whats up

[Anonymous No.7670861]

You people are chumps.

>>7670844
Thats a fallacy, prove this part right here:

[math]\displaystyle 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333...[/math]

Prove the equality. Oh wait, you can't its an arbitrary axiom. Dedekind and set theory shits on your amateur mathmatics. >>7670817
This nig knows whats up

[Anonymous No.7670864]

[Anonymous No.7670865]

>>7669572
When will you learn to define what number set are you using?
It's true in hyper reals but not in reals. Stop being an idiot and educate yourself.

[Anonymous No.7670901]

>>7669808
>this fucking guy shitposting in every thread

[Anonymous No.7670903]

>>7670827
If 3/3 were the same as 1 it would be 1 and not 3/3.......

[Anonymous No.7670942]

>>7669572

[Anonymous No.7671117]

>>7670861
>prove this part
prove it isn't