[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 105 KB, 860x1024, Functions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616739 No.7616739 [Reply] [Original]

More stuff like this?

>> No.7616742
File: 659 KB, 800x727, 1440934309317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616742

>>7616739

>> No.7616744
File: 548 KB, 1440x900, 1434771444389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616744

>> No.7616749
File: 776 KB, 3045x2300, 1436202674091.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616749

>> No.7616758

>>7616739
This image could end with so much suffering.

>> No.7616762

>>7616742
>>7616744
I don't see the point on drawing an animated character and expecting people to learn just like magic. Those characters should be doing something more relevant as in this one: >>7616739

>> No.7616763
File: 73 KB, 931x599, 4CC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616763

>> No.7616768

>>7616749
This is awesome

>> No.7616773
File: 286 KB, 1080x1920, 1443107135763.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616773

>> No.7616775
File: 460 KB, 1280x1656, 1442968145280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616775

>> No.7616783

>>7616773
Holy shit

>> No.7616791
File: 734 KB, 1280x960, 1442762165612.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7616791

>> No.7616805

>>7616739
log(x) doesn't look like that

>> No.7616822

>>7616805
sin is wrong too

>> No.7616825

>>7616739
>y=1/x
>y=-1/x
TRIGGERED

>> No.7616832

>>7616762
I don't see how that image is meant to help either. It's kind of cute, but adding the person doesn't help to teach the shape or math when there's so many and they're all similar and you need to memorize the function that creates it or it doesn't even matter.

>> No.7616856

>>7616773
sauce?

>> No.7616973

>>7616783
What?

>> No.7617011

>>7616791
This chart is wrong.

Mathematics is not reducible to logic. Nor is it a subset.

>> No.7617022

>>7617011
I don't think the arrows imply any set relations though.

>> No.7617029
File: 210 KB, 600x324, 1445713162005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7617029

>>7616739
>>>/reddit/
>>>/facebook/IFUCKINGLOVESCIENCE

>> No.7617045

>>7617029
> harrison ford
> scientist

>> No.7617047

>>7616822
>>7616805
for those I think its using the start of his left arm as x=0 , as the sin cos tan graphs are easier to remember from x=0 to x=360

>> No.7617064

>>7617047
you're wrong though

>> No.7617097
File: 9 KB, 471x234, Su36k03_m04.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7617097

>>7617064
am i forgetting what a sine graph looks like? I guess I missed the degrees after 0 and 360, otherwise I don't see your problem

>> No.7617106

>>7616739

Some of them arent even correct, like the logarithm. This is garbage babby shit.

>> No.7617109

>>7617029
wow you're so contrarian and smart, obviously you're smart because you don't like pop sci, how can one be a special snowflake like you?

>> No.7617113

>>7617045
I think you missed the point...

>> No.7617417

>>7617109
The problems with popsci and pretentious self-deluding pseudointellectualism in general have been dealt with at length on this board.

I want to believe you're trolling, but you seem serious. Trolling doesn't usually involve that sort of projection, le edgy contrarian post accusing someone of contrarianism

>> No.7617988

>>7616749
this is just a picture of all of highschool mathematics.

>> No.7618004

>>7617106
how is it not correct, use some imagination you twat.

>> No.7618046

>>7616856
Not that poster, but I screencapped it on my phone from a discussion on the math StackExchange where the guy was asking if pi takes different values in different metric spaces. You can probably Google it if you want the post.

>> No.7618066

>>7616773
>baby's first p-norm

>>7616739
the log one is wrong

>> No.7618085

>>7616791
You are now aware that math is applied philosophy. Let the butthurt flow.

>> No.7618122
File: 124 KB, 573x429, 1421838632884.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7618122

>>7618085
>this is what philosophers actually believe

>> No.7618321

>>7616739
>this is asians learn
God asian people are fucking strange

How in the fuck can people be so fucking strange?

>> No.7618375

>>7616749

Cool looking, but this makes no sense.

>> No.7618554
File: 684 KB, 1696x1088, 1433093265872.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7618554

>> No.7618555

>>7616739
Log (x) is fucking wrong, though.

>> No.7618602 [DELETED] 

shit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitshit fuck nigger shit shit shit shitFUCK

>> No.7618740

>>7618321
>handdrawn
>learning material
>people having fun with learning are strange

>> No.7618844

>>7617011
it goes from abstract to practical

>> No.7619032

>>7618555
Checked

I thought the same thing

>> No.7619473

>>7616739
LOG and SIN are wrong,
I think it's -log and -sin

>> No.7619482

>>7619473
Sine is correct

>> No.7619695

>>7619482
no:
the body=point 0 (see 1/x or cos for example)
so d/dx sin (0) =cos(0)=1, it is reversed or pi-translated.

>> No.7619701

>>7616825
what? it's correct

>> No.7619719

>>7616749
Can so explain please what is meant with the branch differentiation/compound/implicit?

>> No.7619884

>>7619695
Sin(x) = 1 x= pi/2
Left arm is at positive 1

Sin(x) = 0 x=pi
Where the body is

Sin(x) = -1 x= 3pi/2
Left arm is at -1

And please stop posting on /sci/ like you're a know-it-all if you aren't past the level of college algebra

>> No.7619887

>>7619719
Sounds like derivatives

>> No.7620833

>>7616791
thermodynamics are ours, fuck off physics

>> No.7621084

>>7619884
why did you answered >>7619482
saying he isn't passed the level of college of algebra?

he sais derivative of sin is positive in 0,
ie sin x>0 for x>0 (and x near 0),

so he sais aproximatly what you sais...

am I right?

>> No.7621123

>>7616775
I never understood this shit. pythagorean theorems and double angles are like the only ones you ever need, what is with all the other junk?