/sci/ - Science & Math

[Muh Fractals No.7457061]

When thought, as determined as a nihilistic point of nature; the expression of reflective ingenuity of action as nothing that is reaching a climax only after an anti-climactic operation of description as a point of physicality has been derived as a point of reaction as the of how it, thought, can be addressed as a reflex to the conceptual relapse of pre-space, or the void, as terms of identification as there is no concrete picture of critical thought as a relaying factor for the negotiation of action to be deconstructed by reaction, which is a thing of infinite potential points of origin so to the ends of making a action un-bindable, and can be observed as fractions of potentials of action at any given point, as to say that the point of action can be the reciprocal of infinite reactions.
Now, this being established we can say that nature accumulates on a point of what conscious fission's are occurring in given fusions of elementary portals, and make for the example of our sentience being the least speed adapted development in the history of existance by the bounds of our emotional prolapsing in the sets of what is deemed positive to negative and their mixing and how critical we make them to how uncritical they are.
Hence nihilistical in the bounds of superiority.

>...how critical we make them to how uncritical they are.
That being referring to the negative side of life

[Anonymous No.7457069]

>>7457061
This is incomprehensible. Take your meds and then post.

[Anonymous No.7457073]

>>7457061
really?
couldn't you at least start us off with a valid independent clause?

>When thought, as determined as a nihilistic point of nature

And couldn't you, at the very least, bring us down safely from its landing?

>Hence nihilistical in the bounds of superiority.
>nihilistical

[Anonymous No.7457079]

>>7457061
New pasta

[Anonymous No.7457107]

>>7457061
Yeah. The adaptation of superior consciousness into the higher realms of thought can, and will, be determined purely by itself, when the linguistic processes of our brains, whether or not autonomously, accumulate enough momentum for said purposes, although the quality of its nature remains comprehensible not only to us, but to all sentient beings in this state of reality and beyond with purely positive outcomes and non-existential negative energies, such as those that are generally viewed as incomplete aspects of our purposeless existence. It's not that hard.

[Anonymous No.7457115]

>>7457107

if we take the in-der-welt-sein of heideggerian gelassenheit as the dasein's surmounting reductionistic semantics, we note that qualia as a noumenal Kantian-Leibnizian monad is phenomenologically meaningless in a Parmenidean capacity - emptiness qua "empty-ness"

[Anonymous No.7457134]

>>7457061
i read this four times, very slowly, word for word, and i do not understand what it means.

[Muh Fractals No.7457156]

My argument and proof via context simply state that the fundamental nature of what we consider superiority is fatally flawed by just how contrived the format of what we expect from the things that are based in what we react to as opposed to the things that are more passive and react to grander things.

>Though we're learning, faster than such things, but not as peacefully
Hence my view on the nihilistic bounds of superiority

>>7457107
>...incomplete aspects of our purposeless existence.
Oxymoron imo, if it's incomplete there is still purpose, jk it outlined your previous point quite nicely

[Muh Fractals No.7457160]

>>7457134
Identify the points backwards or read it outloud.

[Anonymous No.7457166]

>>7457156
>>7457107
>>7457061

obviously having a conversation with himself.

have fun, OP

[Muh Fractals No.7457170]

>>7457166
no actually, I was suprised just as much as you were at how well rounded his/her post was

[Muh Fractals No.7457570]

>>7457166
> >>7457170
I would also say the difference between those of you that can read this extensive variety of fluidity of text is the apathy and shortsightedness acquired by the internet and not reading the simplicity of poetry to learn how to guide your eyes across the many hinged rings of what is the diatribe of the point that is being conveyed

On that note
>Apathy
As apathy is a thing of redundant persuasion of self to be a awake in a dream state of focus, the best conical of what describes it can only be the dead dreamless sleep many of the dwellers of the internet, for some outlandish and undefinable reason, think they need, as to say that if you're not having an active sleep you're not getting the sleep you need, as a remedy to the outsourcing of their brain to the internet and its simplicity of connotative cyborg likeness, each feeding off the other until their resources of A: fusion as a means of taking the delinquency of anyone and producing an "I'll never try that because it's dumb" there by eliminating a potential and creating a supplement to the already looming apathy as per not persuading the substitution of the innate indifference to an inspired placebo of motivation to experiment for ones self and B: fission to the ends of understanding the implications of what any given set of definitions is to the point of never giving any conditions to what the ends of what the aspect would yield if given the proper direction by the reader or the application of it in a normally reserved and abstract field of reason for the means of naturally obscuring the field to the ends of inconsequentiallity, or as to say apathy by exhaustion and/or something resembling a tribbles scenario. BUT! these things can be solved, DNA is a very flexible thing and builds tirelessly and repeatedly with everything you supply it, so in the cases of apathy being the rational norm the conclusion can be observed as to treat it with blunt force, or clever diatribes

[Anonymous No.7457579]

>>7457061
Iamverysmart

[Anonymous No.7457662]

>>7457061
>>7457570
>Hence nihilistical in the bounds of superiority.
So you're saying the hunt for the best stuff out there is an occult of the elite and well educated?

[Muh Fractals No.7457712]

>>7457662
That's a good take away from those two.

ironically yes, as, in my opinion, the nature of what we can achieve with our current state of... various things, my opinions are books worth of aggressive satire on the subject of various things, is so limited that we might as well write a new operating system and go live in that
>pic related

[Muh Fractals No.7458151]

Give me a word any word I'll turn it into a coloured streamer

[Anonymous No.7458189]

>>7457570
Short sightedness is when things in the distance appear blurred. You are thinking of long sightedness.

If you wish to flaunt your poetic skills on a science thread, then you may do so, however do not mistake your talent of being a mediocre wordsmith with intellect. Also please present your philosophy diploma so we can openly laugh at you.

[Muh Fractals No.7458236]

>>7458189
eh heh heh

Shortsightedness is a social idiom for not thinking ahead, please check your culture privileged good sir before lauding over your self appointed superiority, I mean wasn't the OP exactly to the point of how trying to be better than someone is the most pointless goal in life? Self satisfaction and beating off to star magazine like >>7458189 it's much more... how do you say... understandable? Especially as someone in said posters position

[Anonymous No.7458271]

>>7458236
Well I assumed you did not mean the idiom, since a lack of foresight has nothing to do with paying attention. I thought you were referring to eyesight.
But since you do not mean the latter, why don't you explain to us, how exactly does the internet cause problems with foresight? And how, in your medical opinion, does that correlate with attention deficit?

[Anonymous No.7458277]

>>7458236
You know how to say it, stop acting how do you say.... Wise. You are not a guru with a laptop, nor are you very adept at keeping your grammar consistant. In other words, you act smart, then go back to...how do you say...dumb.

[Anonymous No.7458298]

oh my god its fuggin' muh fractals again. he's had another lightbulb explode in his brain, be warned

[Anonymous No.7458301]

This shit makes no sense lolo

[Muh Fractals No.7458364]

>>7458277
Like actually laughed my ass off about this, take how you see it I have no problem with that

>>7458271
>since a lack of foresight has nothing to do with paying attention
You pay attention to something do to the foresight you have to, whether it will A: Entertain you, B: further your purposes to a point of regulation in your sense of identity or whatever you consider the mind to be, or C: you as a thing that is part of the universe and as such inherently at one with the universe, lets just leave universe with those rather ambiguous terms at the moment, have the foresight to maintain an interrelationary conquest over non-space long enough to serve as a function of foresight for those deeply warranted pieces that depend on you to provide a stable environment.

> >how exactly does the internet cause problems with foresight?And how, in your medical opinion, does that correlate with attention deficit?
>Limited field of view causing a lack of full inducement of your optic nerve, severe lack, causing this to be the passive in day to day life, ever had a problem finding your keys and they were sitting right on the table? Blame your computer
>short simple contexts and abbreviations to feel a light sense of intimacy with(as to say you know and understand them (*cough* memes)), leaving you with a shallow identity and poor interpersonal skills- traits of the ADD peeps out there
>poor relationary accessiblility skills do to single view field video games with HUD systems and the constants of often visited websites

>k bruh?

[Muh Fractals No.7459211]

> >looking for

>my irrational urge to procreate has turned literary on me

[Anonymous No.7459332]

I bet there are plenty of psychology grad students that want to complete their PhDs with you

[Muh Fractals No.7459408]

>>7459332
Awww well thank you, I do consider myself a little rare- but that's just because I've never eaten cooked meat

#africanlyfe

[Anonymous No.7459532]

>>7457061
Don't try to be smart. Longer sentences does not mean you are saying more.

Come on man, don't be that guy.

[Muh Fractals No.7459594]

>>7459532
I'm not trying to be smart, the sentences are constructed the way they are because they're meant to cause the reader to deconstruct their point of view for the means of acquiring a variable in their thought process.
Which is just handy
>just saiyan

[Anonymous No.7459825]

[Anonymous No.7459924]

> /sci/

Plz stop i beg

[Muh Fractals No.7459977]

>>7459924
What I'm not using pathetic allegories or metaphors I'm trying to pinnacle the metaphysics behind and of topics in a perfectly rational(proof by reduction), natural(proof by induction), and normal(proof be deduction) way!

[Muh Fractals No.7460220]

[Anonymous No.7460262]

>>7458236
>>7457570
I love you, anonymous hero.

[Muh Fractals No.7460276]

>>7460262

[Anonymous No.7460290]

>>7457061
I didn't know Reggie Watts posted on /sci/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdHK_r9RXTc

[Muh Fractals No.7460319]

>>7460290
Never seen a TED talk outside of all those years ago in school and don't intend to start now

[Anonymous No.7460336]

>>7457061
>>7460262
Wow. So many words with naught being said.
>>7459594
Literal autism.

[Anonymous No.7460370]

>>7460276
How can I follow you and your deeds?

[Muh Fractals No.7460384]

>>7460370
>
Short of you being really, and I mean REALLY turned on by this stuff I'm not posting any means of people reading my hole freaking life's work

Which is about 3 years worth of posting
>on my facebook

[Muh Fractals No.7460406]

>>7460370
> >>7460384
Just kidding, I kinda find sex disgusting

Howabout this, you first

>>7460336
So apperantly someones either A: Illiterate or B: A Rihtarhd

[Anonymous No.7460440]

>>7460406
I'm s-shy

[Muh Fractals No.7460542]

>>7460440
>Shy
Noticeable to the average introvert, there is this lack of enthusiasm for the interaction with members of their species, this usually doesn't have any continuum outside of this paradigm but in special cases it involves the reduction of said other species, and in more common cases a natural empathy for other species; this demonstrates in regards to their own species, the involvement of anything that can see them as an equal or potential advocate or see them as a case for shaming can be directly noted as a disillusionment to the natural course of natural selection whereby the action of shyness implies that an invite of potential involvements will cause an immediate and direct path to the potentially expected, as mentioned, simple breakdowns of what course of action the manipulations of the {person, substance, creature} involved with them at the time of their (of the shy ones) obliqueness that causes them to be involved in a way that gives reason believe that there will be an immediacy of as mentioned actions do to the nature of someone who is extroverted who will try to withdraw the impartiality and give rise to recent or personal events and beget a very slippery slope for someone who has felt themselves left behind by the world and then so quickly exposed to is.
This is not necessarily a bad thing, the immediacy, but again the disillusionment of the fact that immediacy in a social parameter is not necessarily reflective and is more a built and then tuned element of the parameter, unless there is a precedent for otherwise (see: Tinder, /r/, sketchy meet up areas, animals compassion, etc), but the case being that there is no ultimatum immediate reaction that causes a determinism of what is going to happen when you are not being shy, hence the term disillusionment in the course of natural selections in regards to a shy's perspective set.

Got anything else on your mind /sci/?

[Anonymous No.7460550]

>>7460542
I-I love you anon

[Muh Fractals No.7460551]

> >>7460550

Also I'm not going to do a blurb on love, Psy-Cooperative Sciences can go quite a few directions

[Anonymous No.7460566]

>>7457061
From what I gather, you have fun with words, you have posulations about superiors, and you like Dragon Ball Z.

[Anonymous No.7460580]

>>7460551
Please anon

[Muh Fractals No.7460588]

>>7460566
I'm 22, I watched DBZ when it was a fresh thing on tv, the nostalgia is for real

>On a side note >>7460550, if you really are identifying deeply with what I'm posting and getting the feels I advise you get drunk in the morning and go to the beach and shout lude comments at the hot guys until one of them comes over, at which point give'm a ride

[Muh Fractals No.7460604]

>>7460580
>Please
The connotal of the satisfaction one would feel in a case of being so egoly disturbed as to disrupt the flow of someones work by endearing a personal note of self superiority to the ends of exercising ones privilege to assert their authority and dominance as a member of civil society as easily as passing gas for the means of bending someones actions then... fuck I'm done, goodnight, perhaps more tommorow

Always thought that SJW shit was such contrived bullshit

[Anonymous No.7460608]

>>7460604
G-good night but
I don't ever want to be away from you again

[Muh Fractals No.7461549]

>>7460608
>

>I don't ever want to be away from you again
Implying anyone on the internet truly gets the feels anymore
Good Luck Anon

> >>7460604
Not to say that there arn't places in the world that couldn't use SJW's

[Anonymous No.7461580]

>>7457061
> derived as a point of reaction as the of how it,
>as the of how it,

[Muh Fractals No.7461688]

>>7461580
You're right,

The sentence goes as:
>..as the how of it..

I'm quite dyslexic and I almost never proof read

[Anonymous No.7461948]

What does this shit mean boys

[Muh Fractals No.7462036]

>>7461948
Means you should pay less attention in class and pay more attention to doing the bloody work in your head instead of insisting on substitution and blanket methods

[Anonymous No.7462161]

>>7461688
Still doesn't make sense nigger

[Muh Fractals No.7462357]

>>7462161
Then you're an illiterate fish fucker

[Anonymous No.7462432]

>>7461688
>dyslexic
>berates people because they can't comprehend what he WRITES
>hurr i'm not gonna re-write what I just said what are u stupid or sumthin? lel just think for urself

[Muh Fractals No.7462493]

>>7462432
Honestly that was the only error I found in 3 different text groups, on a word for word basis that's like one in a thousand.

Deal with it

[Anonymous No.7462554]

>>7457061
>nihilistic point of nature

[Anonymous No.7462575]

>>7462493
Your retarted

[Anonymous No.7462576]

>>7457061
wut?

[Anonymous No.7462578]

>>7457061
forever and never are two sides of the same coin

[Anonymous No.7462589]

We /b/ nao?

[Muh Fractals No.7462592]

>>7462578
Yeah but the coin has an edge, and that can be infinite or anti-infinite so pick your poison

[Muh Fractals No.7462599]

>>7462589
Read the whole flippin thread dingus

[Anonymous No.7462613]

>>7462599
I'd rather not, your first post already gave me retardation.

[Muh Fractals No.7462965]

>>7462613
Retardation is for those that are inclined for it

[Muh Fractals No.7462971]

>>7462613
Fuck you I was born this way. Nigger.

[Muh Fractals No.7462974]

>>7462971
Classify yourself

[Muh Fractals No.7462984]

>>7462974
I'm white. Nigger.

[Muh Fractals No.7463002]

>>7462984
Try Elaborating on your answer

That or you're obviously in the wrong place

[Muh Fractals No.7463013]

>>7463002
I am in the wrong place! I belong on >>>/s4s/
Nigger.

[Anonymous No.7463046]

>>7457061

It's called Word Salad.