[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 49 KB, 500x500, 124124144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7456403 No.7456403 [Reply] [Original]

Will science ever discover things smaller than atoms?

>> No.7456413

yes

>> No.7456417

Nothing is smaller than atoms

>> No.7456431

lol

in case you're not trolling, smaller things have already been discovered

>> No.7456438

>>7456417
>what are subatomic particles

>> No.7456440

Yes, autismos. They are the particle responsible for the autism field, which you seem to be fully immersed in.

>> No.7456475

>>7456417
>>7456438
>>7456440

Your penis is smaller
But it will never be discovered cause its below plank length

>> No.7456489

>>7456475
> believing in planck length
your brain is smaller than my penis

>> No.7456501

>>7456489
lol, he got ownedddd

>> No.7456508

>>7456475
Oh my, jokes about the dimensions of my genitalia
Now my manhood is truly threatened

Come on, you can come up with better insults

>> No.7456511
File: 32 KB, 625x626, Careful.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7456511

>>7456403
Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
This is like basic scientific knowledge if you are aware of atoms.

>> No.7456513

>>7456511
But are there smaller things than a proton?

>> No.7456515

>>7456511
>don't fall for the bait!
>(falls for the bait)

irony

>> No.7456516

>>7456511

Those are just parts of atoms u goof nut

>> No.7456517
File: 80 KB, 500x501, 1438739229233.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7456517

>>7456513
pic related

>> No.7456521

>>7456508
hey he insulted me, not you you shitkid. go get your own internet fight partner

>> No.7456526

"Atom" literally means indivisible part. So of course not, or else we'd be using the word wrong. And I don't think we'd do that.

>> No.7456657

>>7456513
http://htwins.net/scale2/

>> No.7456658

quarks and protons and electrons are a few examples of things that are smaller than a complete atom . the future is now

>> No.7456661

memes

>> No.7456665

>>7456403
nope. we never will

>> No.7456703
File: 63 KB, 473x480, IMG_3217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7456703

>>7456403
Are you crazy if we were to find something smaller than an atom, all of physics would break down.
>CERN would be the biggest waste of money since the cold war space race.

>Not only that but String theory and the Big Bang would fail.

>If they were to fail than God help us because then Einsteins theory about the Higgs Bosson (god particle) would be true and that would mean our basic mathematical algorithms would fail.

Please anon go educate yourself, by reading some books on astrology and quantum derivation... jeez "smaller" than an atom it gives me shivers just thinking about it.

>> No.7456725

quantum foam?

>> No.7456727

>>7456521
Ah, my mistake. I guess you were insulting OP then.

>> No.7456839

>>7456703
Wouldn't that just mean we're wrong and just have to learn new stuff?

Whenever I hear an argument such as that, I can't help but think that we're afraid to explore or theorize beyond what we "know", because it would then make us wrong. Is being wrong that scary?

>> No.7456841

>>7456403
No.

>> No.7457068

The real question is will we ever break apart quarks.

>> No.7457078

>>7456703
congrats, this almost looks genuine

>> No.7457084

Could matter be created out of nothing ?
What is Infinity ?
How do subatomic particles work ?
Vsauce explains
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s86-Z-CbaHA

>> No.7457110

>>7457084
is that how a quark becomes 2 quarks out of nothing to become a meson?

>> No.7457144

>>7457084
Wonder what would happen if they worked out more with Marvel...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkvo-DrU2gM

>> No.7457163

>>7456516
>subatomic particles can't exist independently from atoms
2/10, you're not putting much effort into it

>> No.7457206

>31 answers.
Yes, yes, my goyim! Keep attempting to correct the OP's ignorance!

>> No.7457222

>>7456511
but you feel for it, idiot.

>> No.7457225
File: 180 KB, 404x416, giphy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7457225

>>7457222
nice

>> No.7458450

>>7456489
Lmao

>> No.7458499

>>7456513
An electron. P:

>> No.7458511

>>7456440
>Anonymous
look anon the autism field isnt technically considered to exist just because cern says it conducted a test and provedid it dont mean its a foreality. it has to be confirmed by at least 2 independant research groups to be really real bro

>> No.7458938

>>7456403
>>7456403

>obvious bait thread
>37 replies

this board should be renamed to /aut/ - Autism General

>> No.7458980
File: 65 KB, 516x566, 534339598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7458980

>>7456403

nothing is smaller than an atom, except maybe your fucking brain

>> No.7458981

>>7458938
>this board
Is there any board here that wouldn't have done the same?

>> No.7459243

>>7456438
OH SHIT HE TOOK IT

>> No.7459251

Subatomic particles

>> No.7459258

>>7456403
half an atom
/thread

>> No.7459264
File: 31 KB, 300x400, JheriCurl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7459264

>>7456403

Was ant-man based on good science?

>> No.7459271

>>7456839
Is this still bait?

>> No.7459277

>>7456403
>what is a proton
>what is an electron
>what is a quark
>what is a gluon
>WHAT IS A BOSON

>> No.7459284

>>7459277
>WHAT IS A BOSON
Any particle that obeys Bose-Einstein statistics. Deuterium and 4-He are bosons... but since they are atoms, they are not smaller than atoms. Hell, you can get molecules that are bosons.

>> No.7459295

>>7459284
Derped
>WHAT IS A HIGGS PARTICAL

>> No.7459307

>>7457068
Or just get a quark by itself.

>> No.7459335

>>7459295
>PARTICAL
take a lap

>> No.7459340

>What is a spork.
OP, take a seat because I believe you have just been
>BAZOOPLED

>> No.7459665

>>7458499
kek

>> No.7460206
File: 2.03 MB, 304x226, 1438728799780.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7460206

>>7456440

>> No.7460221

Things are actually going to start getting bigger the smaller we go.

>> No.7460226

>>7456440
>People in this board think this is funny
And this is the "smarter" board. Pff.

>> No.7460236

Yes, as evidenced by this thread, some brains are infinitely smaller than planck length even.

>> No.7460284
File: 8 KB, 250x250, alim.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7460284

>>7460206