[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 68 KB, 500x750, sexologyFinal-FJM_Low_Res_500x750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7432675 No.7432675[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

what is /sci/'s policy on semen retention? does it make you smarter to hold in you jizz?

>> No.7432684

yes, it does, but people are going to say otherwise.

if you can't figure out why, fuck you.

>> No.7432693

>>7432675
>if you can't figure out why, fuck you.

ok, you can fuck me, I'm holding in my jizz so I'll be smarter than you right?

>> No.7432731

>>7432675
Forcibly preventing ejaculation can do serious harm. It's a misinterpretation of tantric practices which cause dry orgasms.

>> No.7432743

>>7432731
gtfo jidf

>> No.7432752

>>7432675
Do you know which culture practices semen retention? Indians. Are Indians smart?

>> No.7432755

>>7432675
>does it make you smarter to hold in you jizz?

Think about it Op, by what mechanism could sperm stockpiled inside your testicles possibly aid your cognitive processes?
Despite popular feministic theory guys do not actually have the power to think with their cocks.

Any material on this subject from scientific sources I've ever come across on this topic all lists physiological benefits from sex/masturbation.
Instead the evience points to the opposite is true, not letting nature run it's course in this regard have adverse consequences on your health.
Benefits of seminal retention is part sports myth (proven false) and part religios agenda to keep hands off your junk to satisfy the alleged will of imaginary entities.

>> No.7432767

>>7432675
the fucking truth is that you waste creative energy, and will force, when you do so. these faux scientist types don't have the intelligence to imagine that this is physically true and find the correlations of fine nutrients and hormonal feedback loops. nor are they intelligent enough to understand how a strong morality will correlate to a strong health, despite the vast evidence that it does. emotions are physical objects.

the absurd ideas that not ejaculating causes cancer have all been proven wrong. its laughable, and quite the opposite; masturbation will cause cancer.

plus if you don't masturbate, you get laid, which contributes to health.

>> No.7432768

>>7432752
yes?

>> No.7432792

>>7432755
>by what mechanism
Supernatural mechanisms described by Indians and Chinese.

>> No.7432801

>>7432792
they're not supernatural, not at all, but they're too complex for someone that will refuse to believe in something he can see but can't earn him 'peer approval' to mess with.

stick at your level.

>> No.7432802
File: 1.52 MB, 1065x902, 1437172285420.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7432802

>>7432768

>> No.7432849

>>7432767
>masturbation will cause cancer.

Whoever indoctrinated you in the dogma of your belief system did an ace job.

>> No.7432862

>>7432849
anyone who's ever masturbated for a period, and has a brain, could just tell from how it feels that you're getting cancer.

that's honestly what i have to say to you about not masturbating causing cancer though.

>> No.7432882

>>7432862
>that's honestly what i have to say to you

I reckon my life shall be marginally richer as a result.

>> No.7432890

>>7432862
> how it feels that you're getting cancer.
dis nigga serious?

>> No.7433018

>>7432675
>spending time on sci when you could be looking at porn
I certainly don't feel smarter

>> No.7433214

>>7432767
>plus if you don't masturbate, you get laid, which contributes to health.

Best dating advice ever

>> No.7433228

>>7432752
they're pretty good at EE tbh

>> No.7433237
File: 16 KB, 360x270, ripper-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7433237

Women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I do not avoid women, Mandrake, but I do deny them my essence.