[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 109 KB, 800x575, global_bullshit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7418323 No.7418323 [Reply] [Original]

Why is this wrong?

>> No.7418326

>>7418323
because it suggests volcanoes cause global warming, when volcanoes contribution to the greenhouse effect is <1% and unlike what this image shows, volcanic eruptions happen non-stop.

>> No.7418329

It's not wrong. The graph clearly suggest that there is an anomaly in the last hundred years. The last two warm periods lasted very short compared to those of preceding millenniums.

The only explanation for this anomaly is that this was caused by human pollution.

>> No.7418344

>>7418323
Its wrong because there are no quantifiable units on the y axis. Garbage graph you got there brah

>> No.7418348

>>7418326
those are major eruptions and have a noticeable effect on temperatures.
Also it doesn't suggest anything, you're the one trying to imply this. I didn't even notice the eruptions, only the constant swinging.

>> No.7418351

>>7418344
there are two values : normal 57F and 58.3F in 1998.

>> No.7418352

I cant speak for the data. However the statement in orange bottom left is incorrect.
1. Whenever solar radiation has decreased: There are no possible measurements and corellations of solar radiation on that graph.

2. Volcanoes spew ash. Ash occludes sunlight. Reduced sunlight = colder extremes.

And so...... ? Your point please ?

>> No.7418355

>>7418326

I don't see that as the volcanoes are on the up and down side cycles

>> No.7418360

>Hebrew Exodus from Egypt

Where the kek did you get this "infographic" from?

>> No.7418363

>>7418352

No, you don't see! Volcanoes = Hot Lava = Very hot climate.

You know like Iceland...

>> No.7418370

>>7418351
Still no units on y axis. Just by giving us 2 points of reference they can skew the graph and make things look better/worse than they are, which means it doesnt really convey any useful info at all. Since that info can be shown however the graph maker wants it to be shown.

>> No.7418384

>>7418370
>full assblast
>full denial
k bro, whatever pleases you

>> No.7418408

>>7418348
>those are major eruptions and have a noticeable effect on temperatures.
it discludes many major eruptions (e.g, mt st. helena) that don't fit the pattern. Also,
>have a noticeable effect on temperatures.
citation needed
>Also it doesn't suggest anything, you're the one trying to imply this. I didn't even notice the eruptions, only the constant swinging.
literally look at the bottom left box you retards
its trying to imply that volcanoes are the magical cause of all temperature changes. Anti-anthromorphic global warming cranks are pretty evenly split between volcanoes global warming/cooling, this guy is on cool side.

to summarize the problems:

>no y axis units, most of these data points are probably just qualitatively placed
>regular natural fluctuations don't disclude man-made global warming
>selectively shows volcanic eruptions based on no scientific metric (even then it doesn't really make sense, the suggested relationship between volcanoes and temperature)
>doesn't show solar radiation despite implying it as an effect
>natural fluctuations don't disprove the possibility of man-made global warming
>overall there is nothing scientific about this graph

>> No.7418484

>>7418408
>Anti-anthromorphic global warming cranks
>Anti-anthromorphic
dead giveaway, acolyte