[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 30 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.7395956 [Reply] [Original]

What does sci think of Platos The Allegory of the Cave

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTWwY8Ok5I0

>> No.7395962

>>7395956
>What does sci think of Platos The Allegory of the Cave
It tells us a lot about Plato, but nearly nothing about the world itself

>> No.7396059

>>7395956
Plato copied the matrix

But really, while we could all be living in an illusion

A)pointing that out doesn't fix it
B)an illusion can still be studied

>> No.7396063

>>7395956
Only people who are obsessed with conspiracies and retarded what ifs find this interesting.

>> No.7396281
File: 134 KB, 540x1391, 20101109.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

There's some evidence that our reality is a computer simulation. But if you think about it a computer simulation doesn't need to be simulated by a computer. It could be created by a meat computer or living being. It's much more likely we're literally living in someone else's cosmic dream.

If Platos Cave theory proves correct then we'll it shouldn't be possible for us to contemplate life outside the dream, much like it's impossible for the brain to visualize 4 dimensions of space. However we're able to create a computer that can compute 4D space so that sorta disproves Platos Cave theory.

That's enough out of me. I wonder tho, do people in our dreams have dreams of their own?

>> No.7396285

>>7396281
What the fuck are you on about?

>> No.7396287
File: 242 KB, 612x1989, 20121214.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>7396281

>> No.7396288
File: 271 KB, 576x3045, 20120229.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>7396287

>> No.7396309

>>7396281
>There's some evidence that our reality is a computer simulation.

No there isn't. If you assume that we're in a simulation then you can find some justification for thinking it, like the universe being quantised. But without presupposing that we are in a simulation there's no reason to assume that quantisation implies a simulation. Or in other words "we live in a simulated universe" is the presuppositional apologetics of physics.

>> No.7396317
File: 46 KB, 1200x600, red-pill.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>7396285
You're living in Platos Cave. Wake up John.

>> No.7396325

plato's cave has nothing to do with computer simulations

>> No.7396869

>>7396281
>If Platos Cave theory proves correct then we'll it shouldn't be possible for us to contemplate life outside the dream
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave#Departure_from_the_Cave

>> No.7397259
File: 62 KB, 800x737, liturgy-hours.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>7396281
>we're literally living
Allegory of the Cave is allegorical, not to be taken liturgically.

>> No.7397283

Society is the cave, 4chan is the light outside

>> No.7397366

>>7397283

By that analogy what is /d/ then? :)