[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 3.34 MB, 400x300, 1f212b4e1cd29fa03218c49e75ec880f-147722965 (1).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7350926 No.7350926 [Reply] [Original]

Math is essentially sudoku puzzles

>> No.7350927

Everything in life is sodoku puzzles all the way down.

>> No.7350928

OP is essentially sucking dicks

sage

>> No.7351014

>>7350927
You're right :(

>> No.7351026

>>7350926

That's a weird way to spell organic chemistry

>> No.7351049

>>7350926
No, math is formal logic where we replace propositions with numbers, and logical connectives with mathematical symbols.

>> No.7351193

OP is essentially a faggot

>> No.7351268
File: 61 KB, 460x300, grothendieck_wizard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7351268

>>7351049
>he thinks math is about numbers
Bask in the Great Wizard's disapproval.

>> No.7351598

>>7351268
Schemes are just more general magic squares.

You can prove Grothendieck–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch with the pigeonhole principle.

>> No.7351653

>>7351598
>just generalized
Exactly - numerical devices are just just special cases of more fundamental trinkets, which should be (and are) appreciated and studied outright.

>> No.7351725
File: 849 KB, 245x192, Amongst our arsenal are such elements as.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7351725

>>7351598
Either GHRR is correct or it is not, this means there's a 50-50 chance of a proof of it being right. Consider two proofs of GHRR: Grothendieck's, and the one on this thread. This is definitely an incorrect proof of GHRR. Since there's a 50-50 chance of a proof being correct, and only two proofs, there's a 100% chance of Grothendieck's proof being correct.

Where's my Fields medal?