[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 49 KB, 310x459, Kierkegaard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

7347968

Best Girl Defence Force Tue Jun 23 02:40:34 2015 No.7347968 [Reply] [Original]

Science is wrong because it's empiricism. Read Kierkegaard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 02:46:03 2015 No.7347974 >>7347968 It doesn't matter if it's right or wrong. This board is about it, not philosophy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 02:48:17 2015 No.7347979 >>7347968 As opposed to what? A Holy book? Fuck off with your pop psychology 101 crap.

>>	Best Girl Defence Force Tue Jun 23 02:53:51 2015 No.7347981 >>7347979 >>7347979 Bro. Science is empiricism. That means scientists test hypotheses with observation. That's wrong. You're supposed to sit in a chair all day and read theology. That's how you determine how the universe works.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:11:56 2015 No.7348003 >>7347981 I always thought that Kierkegaard wrote his stuff under pseudonyms because he did not himself believe it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:50:32 2015 No.7348046 >>7347968 Why does the fact that science is empirical make it wrong? You should kind of explain things instead of telling us to go read some Christian existentialist shit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 08:19:03 2015 No.7348299 >>7347968 >Claims science is wrong >Doesn't even bother to justify his claim Typical wannabe philosopher. Well, I haven't seen philosophers launch any rockets on the moon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 09:10:46 2015 No.7348360 >>7348299 Well yeah, but philosyphyers don't wear sexist shirts so HA

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 09:19:27 2015 No.7348375 >>7348299 >because it's empiricism you dipshit, OP did justify his claim

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 09:49:18 2015 No.7348411 File: 134 KB, 653x1024, 1430599455516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >empiricism

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 12:01:55 2015 No.7348568 >>7348411 >Kierkegaard trying to empiricise despair and anxiety but failed miserably as his conclusion rests on a God who may or may not exist. nice bait post my friend

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 20:52:51 2015 No.7349459 >>7347968 >Science is wrong because it's empiricism. Read Kierkegaard. Who is this kierkegaard Where did he say this? Why should I believe his words coming out of your mouth?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 21:06:21 2015 No.7349477 >>7349459 >not knowing existentialist philosophers Non-BA detected.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 21:06:34 2015 No.7349479 >>7348003 People at that time wrote under pseudonyms because philosophy was actually taken seriously (topkek) and opinions could get you in troouble.