[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 75 KB, 937x960, 538606.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333460 No.7333460[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

It's time.

>> No.7333464
File: 83 KB, 260x266, Dentist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333464

B?

>> No.7333466

>>7333460
Picking an answer makes that answer wrong.


Except for b. B is the correct choice.

>> No.7333475

I'd give anything to spend an evening with Kurisu discussing Kerr black holes, and stuff.

>> No.7333476

>>7333460
B. you either pick the correct one or you dont. it's 50-50

>> No.7333484

Could 25% be the correct answer? If so, you would select it in 2 of 4 equally likely choices. But then you’d have a 50% chance of randomly selecting the answer, and so clearly 25% cannot be the correct answer.

Can 50% be the correct answer? If so, you would select it in 1 of 4 equally likely choices. But then you’d have a 25% chance of randomly selecting the answer. But we just showed 25% cannot be the correct choice.

By the process of elimination, the answer must be 0%. But if that’s so, you would select it in 1 of 4 equally likely choices, so you’d have a 25% chance of being correct. But we already showed that’s not possible!

So the question is self-referential and paradoxical. None of the answer choices can be chosen randomly with the correct probability.

Like a game of rock-paper-scissors, the three choices defeat each other in a non-transitive cycle.

>> No.7333520

>>7333464
>>7333476

but there are 4 answers and 3 values so it cant be 50%

>> No.7333527 [DELETED] 

Let me test Tex.

<div class="math"> \frac{1}{2} [\eqn]</div>

>> No.7333531

<div class="math"> \sum_{k=0}^n \cos(\frac{1}{k}) + \sqrt{2}</div>

>> No.7333540

> question is self-referential
> not a well-formed-formula
> thread is invalid

>> No.7333548

>>7333531
>Not using \left(\right)

You people disgust me.

>> No.7333685

>>7333484
You're forgetting that "no answer" is also an incorrect choice, since that equates to 0%, which means you think there is an answer. The beauty of this question is that even if you entirely ignore it, you're still wrong and Kurisu wins.

>> No.7333693

The set of solutions is (25, 50, 0)
Assuming a multiple choice question can only have one answer, and that the answer is there, the probability is 1/3.
If the answer is not there, the it is there so its also 1/3.

>> No.7333697

>>7333685
No answer is not the same as 0%.

>> No.7333700

>>7333460
Correct answer: E
Probability Paradox

>> No.7333702

>>7333697
By no answer I mean that you say none of the answers are right, I guess I slipped.

But if you decide that even 0% can't be an answer, that means you think you have a 0% chance of being right, which is an answer.

>> No.7333718
File: 442 KB, 937x960, Solve.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333718

>>7333460

>> No.7333721
File: 983 KB, 1140x1128, autism test.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333721

>> No.7333725

>>7333718
>0_0_0=6
I'd let krisu bait me all day long

>> No.7333727
File: 466 KB, 937x960, solved1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333727

>>7333725
You're just not smart enough.

Cardinality of a multiset.

>> No.7333729

>>7333725
(0!+0!+0!)!=6

>> No.7333732

>>7333718
1. (0!+0!+0!)!
2. (1+1+1)!
3.2+2+2
4.3*3-3
5.sqrt4+sqrt4+sqrt4
6. 6+6-6
7.7-7/7
8.floor(ln8+ln8+ln8)
9.ceiling(√(9+9+9))

>> No.7333744

>>7333727
{0,0,0}={0}, right? So that does not work.

>> No.7333747

>>7333744
how about |{0,0,0,{},{{}} }|?

>> No.7333748

>>7333727
Sorry, I am a retard. You said a multiset, soz.

regards this faggot: >>7333744

>> No.7333751

>>7333729
Oh dam, got me.

I jumped to the conclusion that these were all meme questions

>> No.7333758

>>7333460
C only contradicts itself when you pick it randomly,
but if you pick it non-randomly, it is actually the right answer, for when you are picking the answer at random, each one will contradict itself.

>> No.7333763

>>7333727
I've got all of them but the 8 series, and without being a rounding faggot like >>7333732

>> No.7333775
File: 452 KB, 937x960, autism test 3 solutions.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333775

>>7333763
Done

>> No.7333793

>>7333775
You can't just delete the factorials.
-1 internets for you!

>> No.7333798

>>7333793
When did I delete any factorials?

>> No.7333810
File: 34 KB, 156x256, captcha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7333810

>>7333758
Yeah, but the question says "if you choose an answer at random".

Also what's with these captchas? Pic related. Baby seals are food now.

>> No.7333836

>>7333810
Baby seal would probably be really good deepfried

>> No.7333840

>>7333836
Isn't that an Icelandic delicacy?

>> No.7333859

>>7333840
I think you're thinking of Greenland.

>> No.7333862

>>7333859
I might be.

>> No.7333866

>>7333862
Kiviak maybe?

>> No.7333874

>>7333460

On one hand I want to be mad at you for posting this shit all day, but then I remember the real culprits are the fucking dregs who will keep replying every single fucking time.

>> No.7334634

>>7333464
This problem is a mindfuck that doesn't have an answer (and 0% is on there so even not having an answer is listed as an answer) but it's impossible to solve.

>> No.7334653

>>7333460
33.33333% chance, so since it isn't listed, I cross out the question and call the instructor a fucking moron.

>> No.7334663

>>7333721
connect them to the middle house and then the middle house can supply the other two houses

>> No.7334673

The answer is 25%. How can people be this retarded?

>> No.7334675

>>7333725

I'd let her bait me for days on end. Oh Kurisu the godess hear my wish