[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 30 KB, 469x600, realgar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249023 No.7249023 [Reply] [Original]

So /sci/, what's your favorite mineral?

Pic is realgar, an extremely poisonous ruby-like mineral with the chemical formula AsS.

>> No.7249024

i see ass again

>> No.7249027

My favorite mineral is stone.

>> No.7249052
File: 186 KB, 1500x1053, cranberry glass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249052

>>7249023

In b4 bismuth.

Mine is sweet beautiful gold.

>> No.7249057

Cummingtonite

>> No.7249087
File: 364 KB, 1500x1129, BismuthCrystal_big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249087

>>7249052
I googled bismuth just because of your post, and WOW those are really cool formations!

What other minerals create very cool formations?

>> No.7249091

>>7249087
mods

>> No.7249092
File: 1.61 MB, 450x337, KJhpB.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249092

Smells like someone is samefagging.

>> No.7249093
File: 129 KB, 636x656, realrealgar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249093

>>7249023
All the realgar I've ever seen looks like this, and is very powdery leading to an actual chance of digesting it.

>> No.7249097

>>7249091
Sorry for not being too knowledgeable about crystal formations of diffrent minerals anon.

can you show me some other really nice crystal formations? please? they look so artsy and nice

>> No.7249099
File: 99 KB, 350x246, mineral.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249099

>>7249097
Take your rocks elsewhere, and quit shitposting.

>> No.7249314

>>7249097
You're taste in minerals is as entry level as your taste in music. Tripfag please go.

>> No.7249318

>>7249093
>AsS. Looks like ass.
God have a sense of humor.

>> No.7249322
File: 920 KB, 597x840, 1353685055923.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7249322

>>7249314
>You're

>> No.7249337

>>7249322
>not getting a meme as old as 4chan itself

>> No.7249757

>>7249023
I like ass too

>> No.7249762

>>7249322
Go be a newfaggot somewhere else.

>> No.7249765

>>7249023
Moissanite, its rare and has a weird chemical formula SiC

>> No.7250234

Any of you tried putting a mineral under a microscope? its pretty fun

>> No.7250237

>>7249337
>I am a failure
>I will start calling my fails memes

>> No.7250526

>>7249093
Its mislabeled, that is mostly Orpiment which occurs regularly with Realgar. Realgar IS in the sample, but why focus on those subhedral crystals?

>>7249087
Most Bismuth crystals are not minerals since they were artificially created

Gotta keep these non-geologists straight.

>> No.7250556
File: 2.03 MB, 4128x2322, 20150510_190422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250556

Here is my sample

>> No.7250577
File: 19 KB, 480x360, musm111c-muscovite-mica[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250577

>Mineral Porn Thread
https://imgur.com/gallery/2FCtC

Have fun.

It's damn hard to find good pics of the pseudohexagonal crystals of mica.

>> No.7250578
File: 320 KB, 827x645, jqirMof[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250578

http://www.reddit.com/r/MineralPorn

Dioptase is one of my favorite minerals, such a deep green.

>> No.7250585

>>7250556
You have realgar, WOAW cool

>> No.7250613
File: 683 KB, 3102x2432, cave_in_rock_fluorite_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250613

mineral thread hell yes

>> No.7250618
File: 1.06 MB, 3939x3508, rogerely_fluorite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250618

this is from england

>> No.7250620
File: 646 KB, 4320x2432, Guanajuato_amethyst.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250620

mexico

>> No.7250627
File: 88 KB, 2035x3031, Ames.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250627

Is this the daily best gem thread?

>> No.7250630

>>7250627
board of children confirmed

>> No.7250696

>>7250627
>dem toes

>> No.7250718

>>7249087
>What other minerals create very cool formations?
LOTS.

A geode full of amethyst is beautiful.
Bornite is known as "peacock rock" because its beautiful colors.

>> No.7250722
File: 1.87 MB, 750x750, 1430520587437.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250722

>tfw work at a Rock/Mineral shop
>Sell all sorts of crystals amethyst, quartz, the works
>Have to deal with hippies and Newagefags
At least the hours are flexible.

>> No.7250727
File: 410 KB, 1280x990, peacock rock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250727

OK I'll fetch the pics too. I used to collect rocks.

>> No.7250732
File: 532 KB, 1466x1024, Amethyst Geode.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250732

pretty

>> No.7250738
File: 84 KB, 800x602, azurite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250738

azurite

>> No.7250739 [DELETED] 
File: 37 KB, 450x372, 0001041605_IMG_840097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250739

>>7250677
They perpetuate the idea that science is about blowing things up and shouting "YEEEAAAAAAAAH" afterwards. If it works getting the young interested (mostly in the US I suppose), I guess that's better than nothing, but at the same time it's worrying that they have to dumb things down that much for it to work.

I prefer pic related's style. It was the gold standard in science outreach, imho.

>captcha: select all hamburgers below

>> No.7250742
File: 52 KB, 747x515, Pyrite___Victoria_Mine__Navajun__La_Rioja__Spain_2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250742

>>7249087

>> No.7250744
File: 260 KB, 1776x1440, Opal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250744

opal

>> No.7250747 [DELETED] 

>>7250739
fuck me wrong thread

i miscliked

>> No.7250752
File: 319 KB, 1024x768, kammerite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250752

kammerite

>> No.7250754
File: 767 KB, 1024x768, clinoclase.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250754

clinoclase

>> No.7250763
File: 931 KB, 1024x768, Cuprosklodowskite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250763

Cuprosklodowskite

>> No.7250767
File: 55 KB, 650x596, osmium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250767

osmium

>> No.7250770
File: 125 KB, 650x502, Crocoite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250770

Crocoite

>> No.7250772

>>7249093
>AsS(s)

>> No.7250773
File: 400 KB, 1000x800, Chalcanthite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250773

Chalcanthite

>> No.7250775

Hey guys, I'm in Chemistry but I am really unfamiliar with minerals, I wanna ask a not so /sci/ question. Do you think I could make a decent knife with any mineral as the blade?

>> No.7250785
File: 28 KB, 560x423, obsidian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250785

>>7250775
Obsidian makes a fantastically sharp knife. But the tradeoff on that is that its almost as brittle as glass. People have been making them for thousands of years. In fact, its so sharp that in modern times flakes of obsidian have been used as surgical scalpel blades. A flake of it is several times sharper than steel can ever be.

>> No.7250797
File: 71 KB, 655x284, 1484dcec14c05d89d65c72e9a56c3417[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250797

>>7250775
You could make a good old fashioned flint knife, or any other microcrystaline silica mineral ie chert, obsidian.

Diamond knives are also a thing, although they are ridiculously expensive because the blade is a single flawless gem quality stone.

>> No.7250801

>>7250775
You probably could with quartz.
Many minerals will likely grind away on a chopping board though, leading to your food being contaminated.
Generally, obsidian makes sharp things, but they're brittle.
>>7250785
adding to that, obsidian scalpels can only be used once because of how much they dull, hospitals spend lots of money on scalpels.

>> No.7250822

>>7250738
>>7250732
>>7250727
>>7250618
>>7250613
>>7250578
>>7249023
>>7250744
>>7250752
>>7250754
>>7250767
>>7250770
>>7250773

>/r/geologyporn ---> top --->all

at least get some original pictures of minerals, but that would require you to go outside....

>> No.7250826

>>7250801
>obsidian scalpels can only be used once because of how much they dull, hospitals spend lots of money on scalpels.

aztec hospitals?

>> No.7250839

>>7250785
>>7250797
>>7250801
>>7250826
Thanks for the replies! I was hoping to go get some really pretty minerals to make a knife, but I guess it'd be better to use as the knife handle then. Has anyone tried this?

>> No.7250853
File: 782 KB, 1179x904, moldavite meteoric.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250853

>>7249023
>So /sci/, what's your favorite mineral?

Moldavite, as it has advantageous metaphysical benefits.

>> No.7250854
File: 86 KB, 613x316, amethyst ha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250854

>>7250839

>> No.7250859
File: 15 KB, 189x267, kot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250859

>>7250853
>metaphysical benefits

>> No.7250873
File: 1.12 MB, 849x694, Screen Shot 2015-05-10 at 2.36.10 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250873

Posting from my pictures

Garnet and wollastonite and some diopside

>> No.7250886

>>7249093
Looks like it's just a typical rock covered in Dorito dust.

>> No.7250897

>>7250873
dat skarn

>> No.7250900

>>7250822
I posted minerals from my collection, nigger

>> No.7250902

Whats with all these rocks

>> No.7250909

>>7250902
I don't know, I just wanted to use them to decorate a knife or a vase. I think they're pretty, not really hard science but a way to appreciate geology maybe.

>> No.7250936

>>7250909
Minerals are a hard science. Ever heard of mineralogy? It's complicated as fuck and full of science.

>> No.7250940
File: 568 KB, 2592x1804, durango_calcite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250940

You've got optical mineralogy, chemical, environmental, and economic mineralogy, and petrology to name a few areas of study

>> No.7250951

>>7250940
dat 60/120 cleavage HHHHHNNNNNNGGGGH

Can you into double refraction with it?
Can you into double refraction with it?

>> No.7250963
File: 203 KB, 600x600, mali.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7250963

>> No.7250971

>>7250951
I spent about an hour looking at the sun through it the other day when I was tripping on acid. Then I realized I should stop looking straight at the sun before I hurt my eyes. The colors are so good though.

>> No.7250978

>>7250826
>aztec hospitals?
No.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/02/health/surgery-scalpels-obsidian/
http://www.finescience.com/Special-Pages/Products.aspx?ProductId=296&CategoryId=56

>> No.7250979

>>7250936
Minerals may be hard but it is no science why my dick is so hard at seeing these rocks

>> No.7250999

>>7250971
I'm pretty jelly that you have your own sample of it. I remember in mineralogy last year we got to use samples that had the double refraction, I spent the whole class period just messing around with it. Its micrography in thin-section because of it is pretty trippy too if you've ever seen it.

>> No.7251013
File: 122 KB, 1278x1181, 1430414169275.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251013

>>7250979
>its no science

>> No.7251017

>>7250979
>its no science

stahp

>> No.7251025
File: 58 KB, 640x519, 6ulexite-tv1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251025

>>7250999
>nice trips

Ever see ulexite, AKA tv rock or nature's fiber optics?

>> No.7251028

>>7251025
I don't think I have no. How is the diffraction in ulexite different from calcite?

>> No.7251031

>>7250618
literally everything in england is salt n pepper, bread n butter level, even the minerals

>> No.7251033
File: 903 KB, 2816x1717, FpT85Go[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251033

>>7250979
Cause diamond is the hardest metal known to man. And your dick is now diamonds.

Pic related.

>> No.7251040

>>7251033
Everyone knows Dragonforce is the hardest metal known to man

>> No.7251052

>>7251028
Ulexite has parts of the crystal with a high refractive index, and parts with a low refractive index.

>n 1956, John Marmon observed that fibrous aggregates of ulexite project an image of an object on the opposite surface of the mineral. This optical property is common for synthetic fibers, but not in minerals, giving ulexite the nickname "TV rock". According to Baur et al. (1957)[full citation needed], this optical property is due to the reflections along twinned fibers, the most prominent twinning plane being on (010). The light is internally reflected over and over within each of the fibers that are surrounded by a medium of a lower refractive index (Garlick, 1991).[full citation needed] This optical effect is also the result of the large spaces formed by the sodium octahedral chains in the mineral structure. Synthetic fibers used for fiber optics transmit images along a bundle of threadlike crystals the same way naturally occurring ulexite reproduces images due to the existence of different indices of refractions between fibers. Additionally, if the object is colored, all of the colors are reproduced by ulexite. Parallel surfaces of ulexite cut perpendicular to the fibers produce the best image, as distortion in the size of the projected image will occur if the surface is not parallel to the mineral. Curiously, In situ samples of ulexite are capable of producing a decent, rough image. Satin spar gypsum also exhibits this optical effect; however the fibers are too coarse to transmit a decent image. The thickness of the fibers is proportional to the sharpness of the projected image (Baur et al., 1957).[full citation needed]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulexite

>> No.7251061

>>7250940
Thats a pretty good Iceland spar

>> No.7251067
File: 375 KB, 2562x1678, Sandrose barite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251067

>>7249023
I own one of these. Its pretty cool looks like a rose made of clay but its a natural mineral.

>> No.7251075
File: 3.28 MB, 3529x3006, Quartz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251075

Even lowly old quartz can be beautiful.

>> No.7251079

>>7251067
Turd blossom

>> No.7251112
File: 893 KB, 1797x1561, apophyllite_prehnite_centreville.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251112

>> No.7251122

>>7251052
.....Gneiss

>> No.7251412

>>7250797
I was under the impression that chert and flint were the exact same thing.

>> No.7251474

>>7251412
Pretty much. I forgot to add agate too. They're all
microcrystaline silica.

>> No.7251537

Man I want to start a mineral collection so bad. Being poor really does suck.

>> No.7251658

>>7251474
Bro you want the best bang for your buck from yo silica you want good old SiC. Carborundum for LIFE

>> No.7251811
File: 15 KB, 284x260, ZHRju_haqEdK_90koLz70L0y5W-KXUZDaaFjkzb_5OJa78PYEyYDadwwSFTp8vTpLiwhnCuJO2eX3sGML0Vu7OYJS3gHPUvDTLFv8V-b9y63BldtvA_i5_Y1GysY0uH4dDu5Y_FRH80S5pBiFk-_LUAkXF3ppWyAeqb0mEA=w284-h260-nc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7251811

>>7251537
You might have already started

>> No.7252513

>>7250854
thumbnail looks like a dick without nuts

>> No.7252783
File: 777 KB, 987x1600, 1341564541114.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7252783

>>7250854
Maybe you could make a really small macahuitl so you could replace blades individually. Also, if you're not doing surgery blades don't have to be discarded after one use.

>> No.7252882
File: 213 KB, 1024x768, pallasite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7252882

>> No.7253029

>>7250775
Steel in a mineral.
Iron is a mineral.
Bronze is a mineral.
Copper is a mineral.
Flint is a mineral.
>The history of human tools in minerals.

>> No.7253032

>>7253029
>Steel
>a mineral
Lrn2metallurgy

>> No.7253073

>>7253032
>Not an animal
>Not a vegetable
Lrn2twentyquestions


I kid. You are right.

>> No.7253119
File: 493 KB, 1024x768, Sexy Uraninite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7253119

>Uranium minerals
unf

>>7250773
Recognized the color and crystal shape as copper sulfate.
Been recrystallizing some for purity's sake and they've gotten quite big.

>> No.7253642

>>7253119
>Been recrystallizing some for purity's sake and they've gotten quite big.
Cool. Glad to hear it. Always nice to see a fellow chemist.

>> No.7255247

>>7253119
I want to fuck Uranium.

>> No.7255300

>>7250526
>mostly orpiment

It could also be pararealgar (As4S4 the same as realgar, although differing in crystal structure. While orpiment is As2S3) which is caused by exposing realgar to light (and probable on a specimen that is regularly displayed)

>> No.7255367

>>7252882

This is something only found in metorite impacts right?

>> No.7255399

>>7253119

get on this guys level
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoRyvpfkc1U

>> No.7255405
File: 198 KB, 1280x942, 1280px-Esquel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7255405

>>7255367
correct.
from Pallasite wiki
>Pallasites were once thought to originate at the core-mantle boundary of differentiated asteroids that were subsequently shattered through impacts. An alternative recent hypothesis is that they are impact-generated mixtures of core and mantle materials

>It consists of centimeter-sized olivine crystals of peridot quality in an iron-nickel matrix.

>> No.7255498
File: 868 KB, 1533x1384, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7255498

>no labradorite

>> No.7256356

>>7250526
I thought that a synthetic crystal was a mineral if it had a analogous mineral in nature?

>> No.7256534
File: 1.15 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_113029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256534

>>7256356
Part of the proper definition of a mineral is that it formed naturally. Man made diamonds, while crystalline, are not considered minerals.

Posting my awesome minerals.

>> No.7256539
File: 1.24 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_113328.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256539

>>7255498
Hell yeah.

>> No.7256557
File: 1013 KB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_102604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256557

>>7256534
>>7256539

>> No.7256571
File: 832 KB, 1920x2560, IMG_20150508_102700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256571

>>7256557

>> No.7256575
File: 1.35 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_111614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256575

>>7256571

>> No.7256577
File: 1015 KB, 1920x2560, IMG_20150508_112603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256577

>>7256575

>> No.7256581
File: 1.17 MB, 1920x2560, IMG_20150508_112516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256581

>>7256577

Celestite

>> No.7256586
File: 1.83 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_111452.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256586

>>7256581

>> No.7256591
File: 1.50 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_114127.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256591

>>7256586

>> No.7256596
File: 1.28 MB, 2560x1920, IMG_20150508_113505.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7256596

>>7256591
That's a Selenite rose.

This is delicious Kyanite

>> No.7257171

>>7256534
Alright, I've always learned in college that synthetic minerals that can be found in nature are still minerals, but I guess there might be room for thought.

>> No.7257184

>>7257171
When they occur naturally, yes, they are minerals.

I think you might be talking about in general, is a specific chemical formula arranged in a specific way created in the lab a mineral. While what I'm saying is that you have to consider the origins of the specific specimen in question.

>> No.7258580

>>7250556
Nice AsS.

>> No.7259043

>>7257184
Yes, what I'm saying that in geology courses I took in college I remember the professor explicitly stating that if a specimen made in a lab could be found in the exact form in nature, it is also considered a mineral, like synthetic gem stones.
To him the origin didn't matter unless it was something that couldn't be found in nature.

>> No.7259927

>>7250627
> elephant feet
> puckered asshole mouth
How could they fuck it up so bad