/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.7242415]

what is acceleration*velocity?

[Anonymous No.7242418]

>>7242415
After deep thought and intense calculations, I have come to the conclusion that it is equal to acceleration multiplied by velocity.

[Anonymous No.7242422]

>>7242415
Work per second divided by mass.

[Anonymous No.7242458]

>>7242422
meters^2 / seconds^3, which is like the rate of change of the rate of change of the rate of change of an area.

[Anonymous No.7242462]

(m/s^2) * (m/s) = m^2/s^3

i've seen this quantity used in fluid mechanics, not sure what it's called though

couldn't you have done this yourself?

[Anonymous No.7242469]

>>7242415
what is avagadro's number*time?

[Anonymous No.7242482]

>>7242469
Moles per second, a quantity that is used all the time in kinetics

[Anonymous No.7242490]

>>7242482
Look again. You mean moles per hertz. Which is also a quantity that I could sort of imagine having some meaning.

[Anonymous No.7242491]

>>7242458
how bout da rate of deez nuts bitch

>>7242462
I can pick my nose

[Anonymous No.7242498]

What is time/time?

Before you say "nothing" consider this: let's say I'm in a spaceship traveling close to the speed of light such that for every 9 seconds that pass for me, 10 seconds pass on Earth. Thus, I experience time at a rate of 9 seconds per 10 seconds, or 0.9 seconds per second. But what does the unit "seconds per second" measure?

[Anonymous No.7242511]

>>7242498
Time in frame A / time in frame B

Calculated using Lorentz Transformation

Good to note that any quantity/same quantity is just a fucking pure number. Your question is like asking "What is meters to the 10,000 divided by meters to the 10,000? What does it measure?"

[Anonymous No.7242523]

>>7242498
It would just be a coefficient. it would be unitless, like the coefficient of friction or the index of refraction.

[Anonymous No.7242527]

>>7242498
that would literally just be the relativistic factor 'gamma'

[Anonymous No.7242531]

>>7242527
But that's impossible. Gamma also measures length per length of a Lorenz contracted object, which is clearly different from time per time.

[Anonymous No.7242533]

>>7242415
accelerocity

[Anonymous No.7242547]

>>7242422

d/dt (1/2 m v^2) = m v a

[Anonymous No.7242553]

>>7242415
Jerkmeters

[Anonymous No.7242554]

>>7242533

[Anonymous No.7242571]

>>7242415
Specific power

[Anonymous No.7242575]

>>7242547
Holy shit, I thought it was a joke, but now I see it!

>>7242553
Underrated post

[Anonymous No.7242953]

By the way, is there a science where the definition "Jerk", i.e. the derivation of acceleration, is useful.
My professor for classical mechanics told us that every important formula only needs the parameters time, position and the first two derivations of the position. He says he has no idea why there no higher derivations appear in natur, but so it is.

[Anonymous No.7242955]

>>7242953
>derivative
Not that I know of though, you're probably gonna look into some mechanical engineering books

[Anonymous No.7242959]

>>7242422
>>7242458
>>7242462
>>7242482
>>7242490
>Giving definitions with respect to specific units

[Anonymous No.7243226]

>>7242959
>implying implications
>not explaining that it is actually called buoyancy flux
>not explaining where it is used in fluid mechanics
>not asserting your dominance as the most intelligent person in the thread
>on /sci/

get a load of this fucking plebian

[Anonymous No.7243270]

>>7242415

buoyancy flux

[Anonymous No.7243571]

>>7243226
>plebian
from the Alpha Centauri constellation

[Anonymous No.7243651]

>>7242953
I think I've seen snap used in path planning, so jerk would probably be useful there too.

[Anonymous No.7243670]

>>7242953
anti-jerk motor control circuits for elevators
you can even feel it (especially its absence)

[Anonymous No.7243700]

>>7243670
>you can even feel it
You can feel jerk? Could you also still feel the derivative of jerk? And the derivate of the derivate of jerk and so on?