[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 10 KB, 276x183, ganja.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7227354 No.7227354 [Reply] [Original]

There's so much bs around weed these days, both for and against it. What are the cold hard facts that we know for sure in terms of its short and long term impact on health?

>> No.7227357

Weed is good for your health. The people who are against it aren't blazed enough.

>> No.7227360

Harmful effects:
>you might become obese due to increased appetite
>may cause inappropriate laughter
>smoke may irritate lungs (can be prevented by using vaporizer)

Good effects:
>grows brain cells
>has anti-cancer effects
>can be helpful in treating various mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety and schizophrenia
>impossible to overdose
>cardioprotective effects

>> No.7227369

>>7227360
Add trigger for psychosis.
I know some people going loco, but they already had psychossis cases in the family and apparently it just triggers it.

>> No.7227373
File: 14 KB, 218x339, cancer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7227373

>>7227360
>has anti-cancer effects
Get out.

It's fun to smoke weed, but it never passed clinical trail test for being good against cancer.

>> No.7227375

>>7227360
That cancer shit is just a ruse, has yet to be well documented by empirical evidence, only a group of stoners claiming miracles.

>> No.7227380

>>7227369
Yeah you can get psychosis. I had a college friend who went totally paranoid and started to booby-trap his home against possible invaders. I lost touch with him after he showed me his collection of exploding light bulbs.
...
On the other hand, have a look at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eA_jeDi1Kc
...
Then there's wacky theories that I rather like: Just as certain plants evolved in parallel with certain animal species in a mutualistic relationship like specific species of butterfly who feed on very specific plants, cannabis and humans seem to go together. There's also an idea that cannabis influenced human evolution and was responsible for communal feelings of empathy resulting in primitive communities forming. Or that it perhaps influenced human intelligence in a positive way.

>> No.7227382

>>7227369
I've had it trigger a round of psychosis in combination with a lot of meditation. It helped me unlock a lot of traumatizing stuff that happened to me as a kid that had given me a personality disorder with which I lived all my life without knowing.

The weed paranoia combined with the surfacing of very old memories combined into a breakdown and then an awakening.

It has been good and bad for me. I don't want to live in delusions, but it also has left me with a bottle of old emotions that I had shut down because my brain can't process them without malfunctioning.

>> No.7227386

>>7227354
Don't use it when younger than 18, harmful if use excessively. Don't use it when working or driving. You know - just like alcohol.

>> No.7227400

If you have a genetic predisposition to developing schizophrenia or similar disorders, cannabis could induce you into developing it on spot, much earlier.

>> No.7227404

Weed helped me to understand algebraic topology, and caused my dick to grow by three inches. Blaze it, faggots.

>> No.7227436

I think it causes memory loss, I used it in excess as a teen and noticed myself having a hard time remembering names and when things are due. Minuscule stuff that I used to just store in my head and remember later.

After I quit it came back after a month or so.

>> No.7227437

>>7227354
May cause chronic derealization.

>>7227373
Cannabidiol induces autolysis in certain tumor cells.

>> No.7227832

Taking all bets on citation-to-posts ratio once this thread hits 100 replies.

>> No.7228235

>>7227437
>May cause chronic derealization.
this. Do you have it anon?

>> No.7228297

>>7227360
>>impossible to overdose
you clearly have not smoked enough weed

>> No.7228340

weed is a terrible drug with no real benefits

eating broccoli and onions and drinking green tea has a stronger effect that weed on cancer

>> No.7228344

>>7227354
It has loads of Dankium-420 which has been shown to increase thermogenic energy in surrounding areas

>> No.7228362

>>7227354


Harmful effects:

http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v18/n1/abs/nn.3892.html

It gets harder to learn and it fucks with your short term memory, your brain recovers to normal after a few months tho, but I smoke everyday anyway lol

>> No.7228363

here's a question

what's the comparison between driving drunk and driving high? Obviously both will impair your reflexes, but I have a friend who drives while stoned as hell all the time, and he claims it isn't any more difficult besides the fact that he forgets where he's supposed to turn sometimes.

Have there been studies done on this? I can't find anything very concrete

>> No.7228394

>>7228363
> Smoking pot doubles car accident risk
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/smoking-pot-doubles-car-accident-risk-1.1216818
> hit up the external links for actual papers comparing

Now, that's just a correlation... maybe people who smoke and drive are the kind of people who are going to get into accidents anyway.

>> No.7228645

>>7227382

What it's done for me is help me realize the severity of my already-existing anxiety and OCD. It's at much better control now, but that's mainly because I used weed for more than "feelin good bro". I mean when I got home the first time I got high, I still did some OCD habits. In fact, I made sure I did them.

Meditating helped my clear my head. I'm not always conversing with my head or have invading thoughts nowadays and when I do, I can choose to ignore them.

>> No.7228658
File: 1.79 MB, 1024x576, satisfiedsamurai.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7228658

>>7227382

What personality disorder?

>> No.7228659
File: 33 KB, 486x489, 1430422474531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7228659

>>7227360
>has anti-cancer effects

>> No.7228830

>>7228658
its actually a group of different disorders

http://www.psi.uba.ar/academica/carrerasdegrado/psicologia/sitios_catedras/practicas_profesionales/820_clinica_tr_personalidad_psicosis/material/dsm.pdf

>> No.7228841

I feel like I'm "addicted" to getting high, but not in the traditional sense. I just like getting high because when I'm bored and having nothing to do, it makes me want to do things. It also makes things like reading or even studying a lot more interesting, and things tend to stick more.

Also when I bring up how it helps my OCD and anxiety, people brush it off. Some stupid, sick, twisted and monumentally retarded social stigma seems to suggest that anxiety or OCD isn't all that serious.

A year ago I'd be spending hours awake because I didn't do one thing the right way or I didn't close the door the way I was supposed to, and I'd be doing this while being anxious as fuck because I'd think something could've happened if I didn't do it. Marijuana was the spark to the fire that helped me control it.

>> No.7228854

>>7228841
Damn I'm exactly the same as you, sometimes I can't go to sleep because I'm lazy and don't work enough during the day to be intellectually stimulated.
Weed seems to help

>> No.7228991
File: 98 KB, 529x381, Ohgod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7228991

>>7227360
>grows brain cells

>> No.7229088
File: 601 KB, 500x664, lrwCVCI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7229088

>>7227354
smoking anything is bad for you. free radical carcinogens.

bake an oz of bud at 275 for 30min, then mix with 1/4 bottle bacardi 151. strain through cheese strainer and now you have tincture. test at 1/4 teaspoon. high wont hit for 1hr but will last 5hours.

nothing detrimental about tincture to long term health. bud will make short term memory not as good though, however the pros of feeling great in life and thinking deeper than you ever have before is worth it. theres a lot more cannanaboids in tincture than smoke that is beneficial to health: suppresses tumors, brain cell growth, etc

>> No.7229162
File: 54 KB, 357x459, jes420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7229162

anecdotal, since its based on my personal experience but:

pros:
-cured my social anxiety
-helped better mange my chronic clinical depression (notice i did not say cured)
-very enjoyable experience that helps me think and look at life in a different way
-enhances auditory, gustatory and tactile sensations
-most effective sleep aid
-as good as viagra, can maintain my boner all night, keep pumping, my girl was against me smoking, but know encourages it before we have sex

cons:
-smoking not good for you, but now i mostly vape instaed

>> No.7229179

>>7227360
>treats schizophrenia

wow

thank for advice Dogtor Weed

>> No.7229185

>>7227380
the only way a plant could significantly influence the selection of genes in an organism is if the organism is, at some time, wholly dependent on the plant for survival.

No ancient humans died because they couldn't smoke a bowl. Nobody mated or didn't mate enough because of the chronic

That's a pitifully stupid idea

>> No.7229192

>>7227360
>can be helpful in treating various mental illnesses such as depression
It's not. I tried any kind of drug I could find here, none of them helped. Some things happened in my life and I'm getting better each day, but weed didn't help.

>> No.7229486

>>7227373
>>7227375
>>7228297
>>7229179
>>7229192
Stop hatin, start blazin. 420 quickscope faze clan.

>> No.7229577

>>7229192
Your anecdote doesn't tell anything of the general case. I'm not saying it's this way or that in general but your anecdote is just your personal experience.

>> No.7229591

THC is not a neurotoxin. Unlike alcohol, it does not cause physical damage to the brain. However, if taken while the brain is still developing it can alter brain development in such a way as to lower iq and increase the chances of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a disorder of brain development, late-onset schizophrenia is rare and probably completely unrelated to regular schizophrenia. The effects of chronic use on adult brains are significant, but more or less reversible with abstinence.

"Cannabis psychosis" is not a thing, people who have psychotic episodes with cannabis are close to schizophrenia (50% who are hospitalised for "cannabis psychosis" go on to develop schizophrenia within a year).

>> No.7229626

>>7227354
it can't cause schizophrenia unless the person in question is already genetically predisposed to it
(various studies)

like most other drugs it will make a person more apathetic
(anecdotal evidence)

the high school dropout rate is supposedly much higher for those that smoked weed when compared to those that didn't
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2910149/))

if its legalised it will see a lack of use as its no longer taboo
(may sound wrong but i saw a study once [best evidence])

supposedly being high lowers accidents when driving
(i may have remembered seeing an article but maybe not so take that with a grain of dank kush)

>> No.7229680

>>7227360
Hell Doctor Green Thumb.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xExSdzkZZB0

>> No.7229798

>>7227354
>what are the cold hard facts that we know for sure in terms of its short and long term impact on health?

I've experienced some very strange health effects from cannabis, most people I tell outright won't believe me but I'm telling the truth.

I can only speak for myself but cannabis causes my heart to skip beats whenever I am high and occasionally gives me a seizure, it's not me being paranoid as I've seen it on an ECG, my friends have felt it and I've got two permanent scars from collapsing before a seizure. it hasn't stopped me from smoking I just take temazepam and/or mirtazapine before I'm going to smoke which simply reduces the hard beat feeling that happens just after it skips and completely stops the seizures (I don't know why).

It first started happening when I woke up after my very first seizure and my heart felt very odd, (I was in ventricle fibrillation) I tried to wait it out but after about 14 hours I decided it's time to call an ambulance.

Long story short it turns out my right temporal lobe is underdeveloped and apparently this in itself can cause seizure.

I wanted my doctors to do everything they could for me so I told both my cardiologist and neurologist about my cannabis use, my cardiologist called it a "one off" and advised me to stop smoking but not for this reason, my neurologist said it's very likely the weed because it is known to cause seizures and because my temporal love is underdeveloped it increases my risk.

None of my doctors have been able to explain why my heart skips beats though, it's usually about 1 skip per 2 minutes, It's very worrying to feel and I really really want to know why it does it to me.

>> No.7229805

>>7227360
>cardioprotective effects
Not for me.
>>7229798

>> No.7230271

>>7229185
That's not true; there's lots of examples of organisms that co-evolved with extinct species but are still around. There's literally nothing about co-evolution that requires organisms to die if they're separated.

>> No.7231053

>>7228841
I know exactly what you're talking about. I felt like it cured my genetic stupidity(ignorant person would ridicule me for this comment)

>> No.7231777

>>7228854
>le smart but so lazy he can't even sleep

>> No.7231798

>>7227382
You're an idiot.

>> No.7231808
File: 176 KB, 625x699, britcucks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231808

>>7229088
>bud will make short term memory not as good though, however the pros of feeling great in life and thinking deeper than you ever have before is worth it.


The psychedelic experience is a doorway which leads to a hallway which leads to only what you want to find within yourself.

>> No.7231880
File: 589 KB, 1439x917, cannabinoids.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231880

>>7227369
>Add trigger for psychosis.
In the LESS than 1% of the population who is genetically predisposed extremely high THC strains (Sativas) can aggravate symptoms. But since CDBD is a tested and proven antipsychotic both safer and more effective than the vast majority of drugs prescribed for such conditions a pure bred Indica would actually help their condition. Correlation is not causation.

Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, as an antipsychotic drug.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=s0100-879x2006000400001&script=sci_arttext


A critical review of the antipsychotic effects of cannabidiol: 30 years
of a translational investigation.
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22716160

>> No.7231886

>>7231880
>Correlation is not causation.
and yet you're using correlative evidence (the coincidental presence of CBD) to make a firm causative statement about treatment.

nice job having intellectual consistency

>> No.7231888
File: 127 KB, 1464x742, Health_Effects_of_cannabinoids.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231888

>>7227373
>It's fun to smoke weed, but it never passed clinical trail test for being good against cancer.
Only because the fascist states of amerika has refused to allow most trials to take place. The DEA controls all of the federally legal cannabis and they only fund studies looking for harm, even with dubious science and outright lies they will revoke your funding if you don't find harm and they have done this for 30 fucking years. The US government has known cannabis shrinks and kills tumors for 30 years.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638490
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776349
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16682966
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12648025
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19914218
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893424
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15361550
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889794
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19015962
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19608284
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17237277
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11586361
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14692532
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16571653
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18286801
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16250836
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17934890

>> No.7231894
File: 194 KB, 1100x619, melanoma cured.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231894

>>7227373
>Get out.
You GTFO. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12052046
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189054
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354058
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19047095
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10913156
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9653194
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18088200
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16909207
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17342320
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19059457
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12723496
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442536
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16728591
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539619
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16500647
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189659
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14617682
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18938775
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11106791
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19394652
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20336665
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442435
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15451022
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197164
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16835997
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11903061
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675107
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17202146
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19425170
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18454173
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17065222
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10700234
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16787257
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15958274
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16139274

>> No.7231895
File: 159 KB, 700x700, good enough.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231895

>>7227373
>has anti-cancer effects
Yes, yes it does.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16624285
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16616335
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11269508
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690545
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12511587
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20307616
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818634
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952650
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818650
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16596790
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15638794
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15275820
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133838
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18339876
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9771884
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10570948
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12182964
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229996
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20546877
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916793
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21464819
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9392925
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19394652
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20336665
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21312237
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318578
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21807457
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21298280
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22447182
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23361273
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16500647
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2604798
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872061
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225529
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2812803
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2277494

>> No.7231898
File: 93 KB, 612x612, 1421436479327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231898

>>7227832
>Taking all bets
I will win.

>> No.7231901
File: 68 KB, 450x483, deaths.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231901

>>7228297
It is physically impossible to overdose to death on cannabis. You literally cannot consume enough to kill you.

>> No.7231903
File: 1.53 MB, 1168x1200, nature's best medicine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231903

>>7228340
>with no real benefits
Such a naive shill.

Cannabidiol and (−)Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants
http://www.pnas.org/content/95/14/8268.short

Neuroprotective properties of cannabinoids against oxidative stress: role of the cannabinoid receptor CB1
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00716.x/full

Cannabinoids and brain injury: therapeutic implications
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471491402022761

Cannabinoids as Neuroprotective Agents
in Traumatic Brain Injury
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cpd/2004/00000010/00000018/art00007

>> No.7231905
File: 322 KB, 680x680, 6285966_orig.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231905

>>7228363
>what's the comparison between driving drunk and driving high?
Cannabis makes people slow down and be cautious. Alcohol induces reckless behavior. They are polar opposites. It can effect driving, but far less than alcohol and the NHTSB proved it twice. See: Marijuana And Actual Driving Performance - by Robbe, NHTSA, 1993 & Marijuana And Actual Driving Performance - by Robbe, NHTSA, 1999. I quote: "[Moderate use] has not been shown to extend into the area that can rightfully be regarded as dangerous or an obviously unacceptable threat to public safety."
http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/25000/25800/25867/DOT-HS-808-078.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722956/
Surprisingly, given the alarming results of cognitive studies, most marijuana-intoxicated drivers show only modest impairments on actual road tests. Experienced smokers who drive on a set course show almost no functional impairment under the influence of marijuana, except when it is combined with alcohol.

"Alcohol impaired performance relative to placebo but subjects did not perceive it. THC did not impair driving performance yet the subjects thought it had. These studies show that cannabis in single inhaled doses up to 300 mg/kg has significant, yet not dramatic, dose-related impairing effects on driving performance. "
-U.S. Department of Transportation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(DOT HS 808 078), Final Report, November 1993.

New 2015 data reaffirms:
http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2015/nhtsa-releases-2-impaired-driving-studies-02-2015

http://blog.norml.org/2015/02/09/federal-study-thc-positive-drivers-not-more-likely-to-be-involved-in-motor-vehicle-crashes/

>> No.7231906
File: 534 KB, 581x849, 1425148646940.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231906

>>7228659
>has anti-cancer effects
Yes, it does.
Brain Cancer:
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95/n2/abs/6603236a.html
http://www.jneurosci.org/content/21/17/6475.abstract
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/308/3/838.abstract
http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/10/1/90.abstract
Breast Cancer:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20859676
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/early/2006/05/25/jpet.106.105247
http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/196
http://www.pnas.org/content/95/14/8375.full.pdf+html
Lung Cancer:
http://www.nature.com/onc/journal/v27/n3/abs/1210641a.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22198381?dopt=Abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21097714?dopt=Abstract
Prostate Cancer:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12746841?dopt=Abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339795/?tool=pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594963
Blood Cancer:
http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/70/5/1612.abstract
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.23584/abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16908594
Oral Cancer:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20516734
Liver Cancer:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475304
Pancreatic Cancer:
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/13/6748.abstract

>> No.7231909
File: 272 KB, 620x817, endocannabinoid system.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231909

>>7228991
>grows brain cells
In a sense. Natural cannabinoids certainly protect healthy cells and promote apoptosis in unhealthy cells (like tumor cells).
http://www.fasebj.org/content/19/12/1704.short

>> No.7231911

>>7231888

i see one is listed as anxiolytic, but how many are anxiogenic?

>> No.7231916

>>7231880
>CDBD
CBD. Sorry for the typo.

>> No.7231919

>>7231886
>and yet you're using correlative evidence
Bullshit. CBD has been through clinical trials you fucking moron.

>> No.7231921

>>7231911
>but how many are anxiogenic?
1 and not in everyone. Also its modulated by all the others. Synergy is what makes the medicine.

>> No.7231932 [DELETED] 

>>7231919
clinical trials are still correlative

>> No.7231933

>>7231919
Maybe CBD has as a standalone drug. That does not mean weed that contains CBD will have the same effect. That's the correlative part.

>> No.7231934

worst thing about weed is the bullshit around it these days

>> No.7231942

>>7229088
>Tinctures
>Le pseudoscience
Dumbest shit ever

>> No.7231943

>>7231933
>That does not mean weed that contains CBD will have the same effect.
Incorrect. The entourage effect makes whole plant extract the best medicine. Always has been and always will be. Different strains can be selected for different ailment, but extracts the whole plant cannabinoid profile is the best way to make the medicine. From there it can be vaporized or eaten.

>> No.7231945
File: 47 KB, 372x432, 1426102935972.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231945

>>7231942
>Tinctures
Have been standard practice in medicine for 1000 years. They still are in most of the world. It not any different than a pill its just in liquid form.

>> No.7231949

>>7231934
>worst thing about weed is the bullshit around it these days
Such as the truth? A painful truth you simply wish would go away?

>> No.7231974

>>7231945
>muh historical usage argument
Rhino horn has been used in medicine for a while, doesn't mean it does shit.

>> No.7231976

Whenever I smoke, my muscles becime very tense and I become very nervous, have bad nihilistic thoughts and constantly analyse bad moments of the past. I cant control that. The amount of how much weed I smike has no impact. But a year or two I loved to get high and I would love to get high and be normal again. What do?

>> No.7231994
File: 33 KB, 640x480, history clip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7231994

>>7231974
>Rhino horn
Has no peer reviewed studies to back it up. Cannabis literally has a thousand or more.

>> No.7232033

>why can't autistic math neets into biochem the /thread

>> No.7232047

>>7231949
right the 'truth' that weed kills people and turns you into a psychotic murderer?

because thats pretty much the only thing fueling the argument that it should be illegal. that, and people who don't even pretend there's a good reason, and just want it to be illegal because they hate potheads.

>>7231976
I would recommend you try psychedelics, if you haven't, try shrooms. Sounds like you've developed some emotional issues that the weed is forcing you to confront which stops you from enjoying it. For a while I was getting pretty bad social anxiety when I smoked, to the point where I'd have a minor panic attack if I had to interact extensively with strangers. Did some shrooms and I've been getting high as a kite everyday since

>> No.7232149

>>7232047
Man, ive done shrooms. Loved them, the experience was pleasant and amazing still got problems with the anxiety tho

>> No.7232164

>>7231943
The entourage effect is a hypothesis, not a proven phenomenon.

>> No.7232237

My friend gave me a one-hitter a while ago after I mentioned I have trouble sleeping and my insomnia meds don't work anymore. I pack it every night before I go to bed (an 8th lasts me 2-3 months.) I've never been into drugs, and I'm worried its destroying my brain without me knowing. I personally see no adverse effects or changes in daily life.

It blows my medication out of the water, and I love the feeling- though I only use when my coursework is done, & I have finished all other work for the day.

Is my drug use justifiable? Or is it better just to stop?

>> No.7232242

>>7232237
>Is my drug use justifiable?
first define the criteria by which you would begin to judge an action as worthy

>> No.7232244

>>7232242
No long term or irreversible brain damage

>> No.7232259

>>7227382
2manymoviz

>> No.7232265

>>7232244
Then no, it's not justifiable.

Many other things are also unjustifiable. Alcohol, maybe caffeine? Most psychoactive medications. Some species of plant.

>> No.7232266

smoking weed makes me want to not live anymore but I'm not sure if I just feel that way all the time and am only overwhelmed by it when really stoned

don't smoke too much weed

>> No.7232269

>>7232265
I see your point, thank you

>> No.7232270

>>7232237
if you'd be suffering from insomnia without it, then yeah.

personally, I backed myself into this problem where I became reliant on cannabis to sleep, which became problematic for my mental health. It took a week or so of not smoking to even out into a good sober sleep schedule.

>> No.7232324

This is /sci/ and I see no anecdotes of cannabis enhancing mathematical thinking. How come? It's a noteworthy effect at least for some individuals. Autism might be required for this to be induced.

>> No.7232336

>>7232324
Maybe because we aren't autists? Either that or there are no anecdotes, I won't expect a drug that makes you high and chill would make thinking much clearer. Any experiences yourself?

>> No.7232345

>>7232324
I used to be autistic and smoke weed everyday and I can assure you, it did not help me do math and made it a lot harder by impairing my working memory.

>> No.7232351

I ruined weed for myself by smoking too much of it for too long.

3 joints a day every day for a year and at one point something just snapped. I was at a party with friends I've known all my life and after toking up I suddenly became convinced they wanted to kill me. I kept telling myself I was just being paranoid from the weed, like I had been many times, but the next day I woke up sober and the feeling just wouldn't go away.

I started believing people in the street were staring at me, talking about me behind my back, whenever somebody laughed I immediately assumed they were laughing at me. I became convinced co-workers were sneaking into my house at night to watch me sleep and make fun of me. When talking to people I kept second-guessing what I was saying, convinced that it wasn't socially acceptable to say the things I said, that I was making a fool of myself.

Now I'd always been quite extroverted, had lots of friends. But I started to completely withdraw from social life. Only went out for grocery shopping, quit my job. Lost contact with just about everyone I've ever known.

Took me 2 years to recover. I found a new job and I go outside more, but I still feel like I'm not the person I used to be. I tried smoking again half a year ago and basically sat in a corner for 3 hours wishing for it to end.

Sucks.

>> No.7232356

>>7232351
Sounds like you just unlocked latent schizophrenia. It was going to happen sooner or later anyway, weed just kicked it off for you.

Because I can assure you, I've been smoking a lot more than 3 joints a day everyday for a whole hell of a lot longer than a year, and I'm not the least bit paranoid or schizophrenic, and still enjoy it just as much.

Well...I am a little bit schizophrenic but that is due to taking too much acid, not the weed.

>> No.7232360

>>7232336
>I won't expect a drug that makes you high and chill would make thinking much clearer
It affects some people very differently and the high can be a lot closer to a stimulated psychedelic state than the "chill" and foggy state of mind you're probably associating with cannabis.

>> No.7232363

>>7231994
>http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/12/05/randi-and-the-homeopath/#more-18429
Literally retarded

>> No.7232367

>>7232356
Thing is you can't really know if it's gonna hit you until it does. So I'd caution everyone to be careful with how often they smoke.

There'd been no case of mental illness in my family that I'm aware of, and I never showed any signs until I started smoking. And today I'm pretty much fine day to day, I can get pretty massively drunk without it affecting my mind too much beyond what alcohol usually does, but the second I smoke cannabis I just go nuts again.

I'm not saying it's all the weed's fault, I'm just saying it probably isn't exclusively mine.

>> No.7232371

Cannabis is the devil.

Fucking pot smokers.

>> No.7232432

>>7231888
>>7231894
>>7231895
>>7231906
What a load of bullshit.

http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/07/25/cannabis-cannabinoids-and-cancer-the-evidence-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-36791

>> No.7232449

>>7232360
Perhaps so. Any personal experience?

>> No.7232459

>>7227354
It smells like fucking shit.

>> No.7232481

>>7232432
This is correct. Besides, if you could do without weed don't do it, or at least not in public, makes for a disgusting smell.

>> No.7232497
File: 840 KB, 1000x1333, IMG_20150502_224511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7232497

Cannabinoid intoxication led me to think of and draw these circles, is this a positive or a negative aspect of the cannabinoid intoxication?

>> No.7232501
File: 543 KB, 1000x750, IMG_20150502_224725.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7232501

>>7232497

>> No.7232505

>>7232497
Nice fractal, doesn't say anything much about weed though, other things could maybe cause you to do that.

>> No.7232506

>>7232449
Not that guy but last time I smoked weed my vision got all weird, very sparkling and clear. Also some black trails behind moving people and such.

>> No.7232838
File: 103 KB, 640x330, peek a boo motherfuckers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7232838

A question to people who know what they are talking about from a person who doesn't know what he's talking about:

On a scale of 1 to 10, how well researched and up to date is pic related?

>> No.7233366

>>7227354
the most harmful effect cannabis has is when the police takes you to jail

>> No.7233950
File: 58 KB, 403x403, legal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233950

>>7232164
>not a proven phenomenon.
INCORRECT.
Antitumor Activity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma.
The Journal of Pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/318/3/1375.full.pdf

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exhibits antitumor effects on various cancer cell types, but its use in chemotherapy is limited by its psychotropic activity. We investigated the antitumor activities of other plant cannabinoids, i.e., cannabidiol, cannabigerol, cannabichromene, cannabidiol acid and THC acid, and assessed whether there is any advantage in using Cannabis extracts (enriched in either cannabidiol or THC) over pure cannabinoids. Results obtained in a panel of tumor cell lines clearly indicate that, of the five natural compounds tested, cannabidiol is the most potent inhibitor of cancer cell growth (IC50 between 6.0 and 10.6 μM), with significantly lower potency in noncancer cells.

...continued...

>> No.7233953
File: 224 KB, 1024x791, synergy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233953

>>7232164
>not a proven phenomenon.
...continued...

The cannabidiol-rich extract was equipotent to cannabidiol, whereas cannabigerol and cannabichromene followed in the rank of potency. Both cannabidiol and the cannabidiol-rich extract inhibited the growth of xenograft tumors obtained by s.c. injection into athymic mice of human MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma or rat v-K-ras-transformed thyroid epithelial cells and reduced lung metastases deriving from intrapaw injection of MDA-MB-231 cells. Judging from several experiments on its possible cellular and molecular mechanisms of action, we propose that cannabidiol lacks a unique mode of action in the cell lines investigated. At least for MDA-MB-231 cells, however, our experiments indicate that cannabidiol effect is due to its capability of inducing apoptosis via: direct or indirect activation of cannabinoid CB2 and vanilloid transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 receptors and cannabinoid/vanilloid receptor-independent elevation of intracellular Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species. Our data support the further testing of cannabidiol and cannabidiol-rich extracts for the potential treatment of cancer.

>> No.7233958
File: 414 KB, 1093x1110, Cannabis Asclepius.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233958

>>7232237
>and I'm worried its destroying my brain without me knowing.
That's a lifetime of brainwashing surfacing in your subconscious. They lied to you, anon. Ignore them and their guilt.

Cannabidiol and (−)Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants
http://www.pnas.org/content/95/14/8268.short

Neuroprotective properties of cannabinoids against oxidative stress: role of the cannabinoid receptor CB1
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00716.x/full

Cannabinoids and brain injury: therapeutic implications
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471491402022761

Cannabinoids as Neuroprotective Agents
in Traumatic Brain Injury
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cpd/2004/00000010/00000018/art00007

>> No.7233961

>>7232363
>Literally retarded
Cannabis is not homeopathy you fucking retard. It is a scientifically proven and clinically tested medicine. I will remind you that more than half of all drugs in the pharmacopeia either still come from plants or were first isolated from them.

>> No.7233962

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
You just ignored like 50 peer reviewed studies to link to a fucking blog. How fucking pathetic.

>> No.7233968
File: 115 KB, 600x400, your opinion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233968

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
The only thing you have done is project your own ignorance.

Inhibition of skin tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid receptors
The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151833/
In cell culture experiments pharmacological activation of cannabinoid receptors induced the apoptotic death of tumorigenic epidermal cells, whereas the viability of nontransformed epidermal cells remained unaffected. Local administration of the mixed CB1/CB2 agonist WIN-55,212-2 or the selective CB2 agonist JWH-133 induced a considerable growth inhibition of malignant tumors generated by inoculation of epidermal tumor cells into nude mice. Cannabinoid-treated tumors showed an increased number of apoptotic cells. This was accompanied by impairment of tumor vascularization, as determined by altered blood vessel morphology and decreased expression of proangiogenic factors (VEGF, placental growth factor, and angiopoietin 2). Abrogation of EGF-R function was also observed in cannabinoid-treated tumors. These results support a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of skin tumors.

>> No.7233970
File: 103 KB, 1280x658, VEGF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233970

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
Cannabinoids Inhibit the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway in Gliomas
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/16/5617.full
Because the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway plays a critical role in tumor angiogenesis, here we studied whether cannabinoids affect it.
Cannabinoid-induced inhibition of VEGF production and VEGFR-2 activation was abrogated both in vitro and in vivo by pharmacological blockade of ceramide biosynthesis. These changes in the VEGF pathway were paralleled by changes in tumor size (I.E. shrinking them). Moreover, intratumoral administration of the cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol to two patients with glioblastoma multiforme (grade IV astrocytoma) decreased VEGF levels and VEGFR-2 activation in the tumors. Because blockade of the VEGF pathway constitutes one of the most promising antitumoral approaches currently available, the present findings provide a novel pharmacological target for cannabinoid-based therapies.

Pic related you fucking moron. Go back to your chalk board and scribble some more abstract nonsense you autistic halfwit.

>> No.7233972
File: 15 KB, 712x507, Apoptosis.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233972

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
Antitumorigenic Effects of Cannabinoids beyond Apoptosis
Institute of Toxicology and Pharmacology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/332/2/336.2010.nih.nih.full
Over past years, the antitumorigenic effects of cannabinoids have emerged as an exciting field in cancer research. Apart from their proapoptotic and antiproliferative action, recent research has shown that cannabinoids may likewise affect tumor cell angiogenesis, migration, invasion, adhesion, and metastasization. This review will summarize the data concerning the influence of cannabinoids on these locomotive processes beyond modulation of cancer cell apoptosis and proliferation.

>> No.7233973
File: 206 KB, 640x617, Brave Mykayla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233973

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
Cannabinoids Induce Apoptosis of Pancreatic Tumor Cells via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress–Related Genes
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/13/6748.short
Pancreatic adenocarcinomas are among the most malignant forms of cancer and, therefore, it is of especial interest to set new strategies aimed at improving the prognostic of this deadly disease. The present study was undertaken to investigate the action of cannabinoids, a new family of potential antitumoral agents, in pancreatic cancer.
Cannabinoids also reduced the growth of tumor cells in two animal models of pancreatic cancer. In addition, cannabinoid treatment inhibited the spreading of pancreatic tumor cells. Moreover, cannabinoid administration selectively increased apoptosis and TRB3 expression in pancreatic tumor cells but not in normal tissue. In conclusion, results presented here show that cannabinoids lead to apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells via a CB2 receptor and de novo synthesized ceramide-dependent up-regulation of p8 and the endoplasmic reticulum stress–related genes ATF-4 and TRB3.

>> No.7233975
File: 98 KB, 1897x808, f2.4a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233975

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
Cannabidiol inhibits human glioma cell migration through a cannabinoid receptor-independent mechanism
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706134/full
We evaluated the ability of cannabidiol (CBD) to impair the migration of tumor cells stimulated by conditioned medium. CBD caused concentration-dependent inhibition of the migration of U87 glioma cells, quantified in a Boyden chamber. Since these cells express both cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors in the membrane, we also evaluated their engagement in the antimigratory effect of CBD. The inhibition of cell was not antagonized either by the selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists SR141716 (CB1) and SR144528 (CB2) or by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, indicating no involvement of classical cannabinoid receptors and/or receptors coupled to Gi/o proteins. These results reinforce the evidence of antitumoral properties of CBD, demonstrating its ability to limit tumor invasion, although the mechanism of its pharmacological effects remains to be clarified.

>> No.7233980
File: 25 KB, 737x442, thc_3d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233980

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
I can literally do this all fucking day.

Cannabinoid receptor ligands as potential anticancer
agents -- high hopes for new therapies?
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1211/jpp.61.07.0002/pdf

This review critically discusses the pharmacology of CB receptor activations a novel therapeutic anticancer strategy in terms of ligand selectivity, tissue specificity and
potency. Intriguingly, antitumour effects mediated by cannabinoids are not confined to inhibition of cancer cell proliferation; cannabinoids also reduce angiogenesis, cell migration and metastasis, inhibit carcinogenesis and attenuate inflammatory processes.

All of the growth inhibitory mechanisms of cannabinoids discussed so far are direct cellular effects. However, cannabinoids can modulate intercellular signaling, leading to modulation of important regulatory factors involved in inflammation and cellular activation and thereby influence tumor development indirectly. In this regard, the effect of cannabinoid treatment on tumor angiogenesis ranks most
prominently. [83] Different cannabinoid compounds with varying CB1 and CB2 receptor affinities decrease the formation of new blood vessels in tumours of different origin.

>> No.7233982
File: 160 KB, 1024x807, 1-1024x807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233982

>>7232432
>What a load of bullshit.
Pic related. Its something you obviously know nothing about.

>> No.7233984
File: 189 KB, 960x542, happiest dog in the world.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7233984

>>7232838
>On a scale of 1 to 10, how well researched and up to date is pic related?
1

>> No.7233991

>>7232237
Consumerism and Advertising is already destroying your brain.

>> No.7234009

>>7232336
From personal experience, the chill effect is the equivalent of being tipsy from Alcohol. When I get super-high, my thought processes are released from my usual bias. It helps me see stuff in completely different perspectives, and also allows me to focus solely on certain physics theories; away from any other distractions.

I don't recommend getting this high constantly, especially as it can be quite intense, but it can still be very beneficial.

>> No.7234031

>>7233366
>jail for känäbis

>> No.7234072

>>7227354
It fucks up your delicate brain chemistry which might cause damage

>> No.7234088

Smoking weed triggered a psychotic episode which made me jump out of a 3 story high window against pavement.
Ask me anything.

>> No.7234091

>>7228235
Slightly. Didn't see this post when it appeared, so this reply is way too late.

>>7234088
Is your first thought when you walk into a room "Hmm, I wonder what it would be like to jump out of the windows"?

>> No.7234093

>>7234088
No, my first thought is evaluating if I'm safe.
I jumped out of the window because I was absolutely sure I was in danger.
I experienced auditory hallucinations that triggered my fight or flight response, and since the threat felt so supernatural, the only logical course of action was to escape through the fastest most direct route.

>> No.7234226

ITT potheads seeking validation

>> No.7234240

>>7234093
jumping out of a 3 story window which may kill you is hardly the "only logical course of action".

>> No.7234313
File: 103 KB, 800x467, 3646303-0039704525-Golde.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234313

>>7228658
holy shit is that yajirobe?

>> No.7234369
File: 391 KB, 1068x790, Yajirobe.DBOpeningJapanese.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234369

>>7234313
same thought

I was so temped to just say ditto and post the Pokemon

>> No.7234373

Scientific evidence (of which we have a lot) strongly suggests that cannabis use by adults has no serious negative effects and in fact has many positive effects, especially when compared to other recreational drugs.

It sucks that alcohol, which we know for certain is physically and psychologically addictive and very bad for your liver, heart and brain, is so widely available and used in society. I like beer but if cannabis was more widely available I have no doubt we would see a massive decrease in a wide variety of diseases and incidental harm/death such as drunk driving/drunk accidents.

>> No.7234419

>>7234072
>>7234072
>It fucks up your delicate brain chemistry which might cause damage
Absolute bullshit. Large scale chronic abuse can TEMPORARILY impair your short term memory. That's it. Abusus Non Tollit Usum.

>> No.7234423

>>7234093
>the only logical course of action was to escape through the fastest most direct route.
Nothing logical about that and you have a genetic predisposition.

>> No.7234426

>>7234093
I think the problem there was that you're just an idiot. Please don't blame psychoactive drugs for your own idiocy.

>> No.7234442

There's no bad drugs, just bad use

>> No.7234464

>>7233962
50 peer reviewed studies you are misrepresenting.

>>7233968
>>7233970
>>7233972
>>7233973
>>7233975
>>7233980
Did you even read what I posted? It talks about everything you can throw. Clearly you are not interested in a discussion; you are just here to copy and paste an avalanche of links without making an argument. Your religious fervor does not translate into a scientific position. Cell culture experiments tell you little about how useful a substance will be in treating humans. There are thousands of substances that show good results against cancer cells in a petri dish. But no reputable scientist or doctor claims that any of them can cure or are even effective against cancer.

>> No.7234484

>>7234464
This guy is right, thousands of things show promise, you want weed to work? You best do your Science and try to prove it.

>> No.7234491
File: 11 KB, 225x225, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234491

>>7234009
This ! I usually watch documentaries with dense content f.e space exploration Somehow, abstract thinking is enhanced while high.

There are some strains that don't work so well for me , if you are concearned about damaging your brain, avoid any weed that came from hidroponics, they kick hard due to more thc%.

>> No.7234499

>>7234464
Only guy in this whole thread with a brain (+ me maybe).

>> No.7234514

>>7231906
See this is where I think the line is drawn

There's Cannabis Oil and extracts of the specific cannabinoids that get tested, and then there's smoking 420 all day erryday and people think because it's not legally available as a legal substance they can abuse like cigarettes and alcohol, it's some big deal.

It's just scheduled like every other drug, and you have some of the cannabinoids legal and used on kids, you have medical marijuana, and you have your extracts used for testing and clinical trials. All of that is necessary red tape so that doctors have the data to prescribe in certainty and insurance to cover the treatments

In the meantime, it's controlled because it just so happens to be that unlike aspirin or sunflower oil, cannabis is a popular choice for users that abuse substances

>> No.7234515

>>7234464
He's not misrepesenting the studies, though. The claim is that cannabinoids have anti-tumour properties, which is supported by every study in the avalanche.

>> No.7234517

>>7232351
>3 joints a day every day for a year and at one point something just snapped.

That's not much tho'.

>>7232356
>Well...I am a little bit schizophrenic but that is due to taking too much acid, not the weed.

You're one of those "biggest faggot of all time" - type of people.

>> No.7234526

>>7231945
That doc in your pic know's what's good tho'.

Doesn't do good to defend your position, if you ask me faggot.

>> No.7234529

>>7234526
Are you claiming that tinctures are nonsense?

>> No.7234544
File: 1.72 MB, 965x925, 4567uij.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234544

POO POO WILLY BUM BUM!

>> No.7234548

This kind of reminds me of that comic where OP asks a question and gets bombarded by different opinions

>> No.7234553

>>7234426
>>7234423
>>7234240
Do you even know what a psychotic break is?
I was obviously not thinking straight, I'm just sharing my thought process at the time.

>> No.7234557

>>7234515
No, the claim is that cannabinoids have anti-cancer effects. No one gives a shit if it kills tumor cells that don't realistically represent cancer in the human body or in blood levels that could never be reached. If that's what you want to claim cannabinoids do, then fine. But the claim is being used to misrepresent cannabis as a miracle cure. It's a toxic mix of pseudoscientific herbalism and political deception. Weed doesn't need to be magic for it to be legalized. Turning it into a religion hurts the cause more than it helps anyway.

>> No.7234611

>>7234557
Seems better than a toxic mix of pseudomoral chemophobia and political deception.

>> No.7234624

so much shilling and trolling going on in this thread.

Keep it classy, /sci/.

>> No.7234625

>>7234611
>Seems better than genocide.
Try using logic instead of false dichotomies. Pointing out that cannabis is not a magic cure for cancer does not make me anti-cannabis. Your aggressive idiocy alienates more than it convinces.

>> No.7234628

>>7234624
Shilling for what?

>> No.7234640

>>7234484
>You best do your Science and try to prove it.
I already did. In this thread. You fucking ignored it.
A) You're either too stupid to understand this data.
B) Dishonest.

>> No.7234643

>>7234514
Cannabis is also both less toxic and less addictive than coffee so your puritanical moralism holds no water in an honest world.

>> No.7234646
File: 124 KB, 546x1280, dont do drugs lol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234646

>>7234515
>which is supported by every study in the avalanche.
Troll would have known that if it had bothered to do ANY research whatsoever.

>> No.7234651
File: 106 KB, 960x538, 1421598569208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234651

>>7234557
You can live in clinical levels of denial all you want, that doesn't stop reality from being what it is.
http://www.cureyourowncancer.org/testimonials.html

>> No.7234653

>>7234640
Riiiiight, every cancer research group and doctor is just too stupid or too dishonest to say that weed cures cancer, because MUH CUNSPIRACY.

>> No.7234661

>>7234643
>so your puritanical moralism
Do you even know the words you're saying?

>Cannabis is also both less toxic and less addictive than coffee
I highly doubt combusting and inhaling organic matter is less carcinogenic than what is basically chlorogenic acid and polyphenols, with the optional sugar and cream

Oh, you must mean the extracts, in which case, I didn't say anything that disagrees and your post was useless

>> No.7234664
File: 1.73 MB, 320x240, lmfao.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234664

>>7234653
>because MUH CUNSPIRACY.
Yes. The US government has known cannabis kills tumors since the 70s. They did everything within their power for more than 30 years to suppress data and block studies.
http://www.alternet.org/story/9257/pot_shrinks_tumors%3B_government_knew_in_%2774

>> No.7234670

>>7234548
the one with all the greentext surrounding a terrified OP

>> No.7234672
File: 100 KB, 560x420, prohibitionism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234672

>>7234661
>combusting and inhaling
Again, you are WRONG.
Google Dr. Tashkin you fucking moron. Largest and most thorough study of its kind EVER done:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/large-study-finds-no-link/
http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/10/study-smoking-marijuana-not-linked-with-lung-damage/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJmQ16cGBHU


And I am correct. I posted all of the data that explains WHY I am correct, but you are either dishonestly ignoring it or too stupid to comprehend it. Go back to your chalk board and scribble some more theoretic numerical bullshit because you OBVIOUSLY can't into biochem.

>> No.7234677

>>7234651
>Anecdotes
>weed cured my cancer because it went away at some point after I smoked weed
Wow, you're really showing us how scientific you are, buddy.

If anecdotal evidence was scientific, I'd have to scientifically conclude that weed turns you into a raving wacko who thinks weed is magic. That's what you're showing us in this thread.

>>7234664
What does that have to do with the fact that scientists and doctors who actually do this research you are misrepresenting disagree with you?

>> No.7234679

>>7234661
>Do you even know the words you're saying?
Yes, actually, because to carry my 4.0 through premed I had to take medical terminology.

>> No.7234682
File: 161 KB, 640x351, defiance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234682

>>7234677
>Wow, you're really showing us how scientific you are, buddy.
>>7233972
>>7233970
>>7233968
>>7233950
>>7231906
>>7231895
>>7231894
BTFO

>> No.7234700

>>7234672
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18238947
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846283
More recent and larger studies show smoking marijuana has the same lung cancer risk as tobacco.

>>7234682
Already replied to all those posts. You can't just ignore the opinions of researchers and doctors while facetiously using their own research to support your position.

>> No.7234701
File: 452 KB, 833x619, angiogenesis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234701

>>7234677
>scientists and doctors who actually do this research
Cannabis and Cannabinoids (PDQ®)
National Cancer Institute
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4


Oh, you mean those people trying everything within their power to protect their revenue stream from a plant that can be grown for free that would cut their business in half over night? Yeah, I can understand the motivation but, see, I'm not evil. I wouldn't deny relief to suffering people just because I'm not rich enough.

>> No.7234705

>>7234700
>More recent
>2008

Fucking liar.

>> No.7234713

>>7234700
>You can't just ignore the opinions of researchers
Largest and most thorough study of its kind EVER done:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/large-study-finds-no-link/
http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/10/study-smoking-marijuana-not-linked-with-lung-damage/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJmQ16cGBHU


See, the difference between Tashkin and your "researcher" with their niggerdly algorithm (fuck you and your psychotic love for twisted bullshit math /sci/) is that Tashkin is HONEST. He didn't find the results he wanted and instead of LYING about it and using algorithms to lie for him, he told the TRUTH.

>> No.7234715

>>7234672
>Again, you are WRONG
Ok, this is where I stop and clear the air when dealing with lunatics

1) What is it you think I am wrong about?
2) What do you think we are really talking about here? Don't say weed, I mean from my two posts you have replied to, what are they about. Leading to my next question
3) From my own post
>I highly doubt combusting and inhaling organic matter is less carcinogenic than what is basically chlorogenic acid and polyphenols

How does any of your studies particularly compare what I posted about? Do they talk about the metabolic pathways chlorogenic acid go through?

What I think is happening, is that perhaps because of what I said one sentence, you projected it into an entire new discussion that you feel more comfortable in having. I think you actually spent hours into this thread performing this exact behavior, which I think is ironic, based on your choice of language here
>but you are either dishonestly ignoring it or too stupid to comprehend it
and here
>your puritanical moralism holds no water in an honest world.

>>7234679
How do you feel that adds to the discussion? Do you think anyone that went through premed now can copy and paste links with authority?

With this statement,
>theoretic numerical bullshit because you OBVIOUSLY can't into biochem.
it seems like you won't allow anyone to enter the fray of debate, unless they fit into this framework you've built up for yourself

>> No.7234741
File: 29 KB, 300x240, Moving-the-goalposts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234741

>>7234715
>How do you feel that adds to the discussion? Do you think anyone that went through premed now can copy and paste links with authority?

The question was that of grasping the nomenclature. How heavy are those goal posts?

>> No.7234755

>>7234701
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page7

>Oh, you mean those people trying everything within their power to protect their revenue stream from a plant that can be grown for free that would cut their business in half over night?
Yup, it's a conspiracy. Science is just a way to get money. Got it.

>>7234705
The articles you posted are from 2006 and 2012. The second study I posted is larger by an order of magnitude and from 2013, and it's a 40 year cohort.

>>7234713
Yeah you already posted that. Losing track of your copying and pasting or are you just not able to respond to the argument?

>> No.7234758

>>7234741
The words you used were "puritanical moralism". What does your medical education have to do with it?

>> No.7234767

>>7234701
>>7234713
I love this. This is the point at which you know you are arguing with a true believer. Science and medicine are corrupt when they disagree with him. This is no different from people who deny AIDS, vaccines, or global warming.

Time to abandon thread and leave this nutter to his echo chamber.

>> No.7234776

>>7234517
>That's not much tho'.
Yes it is, it's a humongous waste of plant material and totally excessive.

>> No.7234808
File: 199 KB, 691x489, prohibition.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234808

>>7234767
>This is the point at which you know you are arguing with a true believer.
Ladies and gentlemen, take notes. The above is the textbook definition of psychological projection.

>> No.7234812
File: 76 KB, 960x804, marijuana-map.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234812

>>7234755
>Yeah you already posted that.
And I will do it AGAIN because you ignored it.
>>7234701
>>7233980
>>7233975
>>7233973
>>7233972
>>7233970
>>7233968

>> No.7234866

Let the games begin.

>> No.7234927

It's been shown to cause lower IQs in rats

>> No.7234995
File: 37 KB, 1921x695, 1423108152246.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7234995

>>7234491
Although this flowchart relates more to psychedelic drugs, it applies somewhat to the effects of Cannabis

>> No.7235001

>>7234808
fuckin marijuana prohibition, why u gotta go kill that girl

>> No.7235024

>>7234812
How did I ignore it? I gave you a more recent, much larger, longer running study that disagrees. You're the one ignoring the evidence because it doesn't agree with your religion.

>> No.7235070

This thread isn't fun to watch anymore.

>> No.7235077

this is how you troll.

>> No.7235528

>>7231888
>>7231894
>>7231895
>>7231903
>>7231905
>>7231906
>>7231909
>>7233950
>>7233953
>>7233958
>>7233968
>>7233970
>>7233972
>>7233973
>>7233975
>>7233980

Wow, I love this thread. Am 3rd year biochem/molecular biology student and this is motivation to continue my studies.

>> No.7235564

>>7235001
>>7234808
On the other hand, the teams going in heavy for marijuana raids have killed several parents and children. Yet alcoholics roam the streets and come home to beat their children and spouses.

Im no fanatic either, but there is a point where enforcement of a law causes a great deal more harm than the offense.

Law:
The system of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties.

The better option is to regulate and tax it, but if not, at the very least fit the enforcement to the severity of the crime.

>> No.7235621

>>7227375
Well good luck getting any pro-cannabis results through peer review then.

>> No.7235760

>>7227354

People with problems will always try and treat their symptoms for those problems. Drugs help do that, whether they are official "medicines" with patents and sold by fancy men in suits or not.

The laws against marijuana is not about protecting anyone, it's about making money. As so many other laws are. How make money selling medicines if people are allowed to grow their own medicine in their back yard?

>> No.7235775

>>7235621
>waaah the lizardmen are blocking cannabis in case we open our third eyes and see what they are!

>> No.7235776

>>7227360
add potential correlation between chronic use and infertility

>> No.7235777

>>7232356
Schizofrenia like symptoms can be triggered by psychosocial harrasment too. So it may not be the weed but some people whom you've pissed off a bit too much.

>> No.7235781

>>7232459
No it smells sweet. Next question.

>> No.7235782

>>7235775
Nah. No Lizardmen.

More likely shills from pharma industry in peer-review positions who realize legalized cannabis would reduce income from their patented medicines.

>> No.7235789

>>7227436
>I think it causes memory loss, I used it in excess as a teen and noticed myself having a hard time remembering names and when things are due. Minuscule stuff that I used to just store in my head and remember later.

There is evidence to suggest that if young people smoke an excessive amount of weed this happens. It's possible you were just unlucky

>> No.7235792

>>7235789
But almost no one advocates it to be legal before like 18 or 20 years old.

>> No.7235807

>>7235792
And? I didn't say anything about that, besides there isn't an efficient way to enforce that. When I was in high school getting drunk was a fairly common thing with getting high not far behind. Regardless, I don't really care either way, I was just responding to that anon.

>> No.7235814

>>7234640
MOTHERFUCKER what degree are you holding you piece of shit, I'm not talking about copypasting literature go do your research to uncover what you want to find out.

>> No.7235816

>>7235528
You see this guy is the one I respect, not for posting links but for going through the right process that will take him to uncovering results.

>> No.7235950

>>7235807
There isn't an efficient way to enforce it when it's illegal for adults either. Like 25% of senior high schoolers report having tried marihuana.

>>7235814
You can't "uncover" what hasn't gotten the OK stamp from reviews.

>> No.7235951

>>7235950
Compare that to alcohol

>> No.7235980

>>7235951
But if it's illegal there is also probably some amount of people who lie and say they haven't tried it.

>> No.7235984

>>7235980
Or maybe lie that they have tried it

>> No.7235990

>>7235984
What is there to gain to lie that they have broken the law? Worst case they get into the police registry and then won't get an apartment, a bank loan or a job.. basically their future would be ruined. I think with that into account... 25% is an extremely high number.

>> No.7236030

Can we all at least agree that CBD has SOME positive medical effects?
I'm not going to argue for or against legalisation or even whether it has an effect on cancer cells, but can we all agree that there are some decidedly positive effects and some decidedly negative effects caused by cannabis oil, or smoking cannabis, or vaping cannabis?

>> No.7236037

>>7235760
>The laws against marijuana is not about protecting anyone, it's about making money.
As evidenced by all the top lobbying groups against cannabis:
http://www.republicreport.org/2012/marijuana-lobby-illegal/

>> No.7236042

>>7236030
Yes it is outlawed because it is too good. If people could use it legally they'd not buy "real" medicine. Could actually be bad, since who would invest in research to make better medicine if that was the case?

>>7236037
Oh it was only place 4. I thought it was higher up. Of course police and prisons make money on persecution also. Didn't even think of that one.

>> No.7236339

>>7236042
>Of course police and prisons make money on persecution also.
Of course. Most of the people in jail are there for petty drug offenses.

>> No.7236400

>>7232244
Well, actually it's the opposite, it helps grow brain cells but since it doesn't necessarily follow a given pattern it may create brain damage. Or transform you into Einstein but you'd probably got more luck with a lotto ticket.

>> No.7236438

>>7235782
>Good luck getting anti-agw results through peer review
>Good luck getting pro-intelligent-design results through peer review
>Good luck getting anti-vaccine results through peer review
IDS A CUNSPIRACY

>> No.7236457

>>7236042
>Yes it is outlawed because it is too good. If people could use it legally they'd not buy "real" medicine.
topkek, so now you're going full hippy and claiming weed is a miracle drug that replaces real medicine. This is just new age herbalism. Fuck off nutjob.

>> No.7236510

>>7236400
>but since it doesn't necessarily follow a given pattern it may create brain damage.
Absolute bullshit. See:
>>7233958
There are literally thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the benefits of natural cannabinoids. Natural cannabinoid extracts (AKA hash oil) are antiinflammatories, tumor fighting agents in vivo and vitro; they stop angiogenesis (brand new blood vessels) to tumors, they are neuroprotective antioxidants, and they induce apoptosis (suicide) in cancer cells.

Cannabinoids protect the myelin sheath (the fatty layer that protects your neurons) and promote remyelination. Myelin is like the insulation on an electrical wire. Cannabinoids actually prevent cell damage and death from ethanol poisoning by their nature as an antioxidant. And that's why it helps so much with neurological pain and diseases, such as: Several kinds of epilepsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's, and intractable neuropathic pain.

We don't have a large amount of Cannabinoid receptors in the Medulla Oblongata, the part of the Brain that controls respiration and heart rate. Large doses of many other drugs (like morphine and Valium) can cause respiratory depression, cardiac suppression, coma and death. Massive marijuana doses might make people fall asleep but consequently will not stop their breathing or heart.

There are over 480 natural components found within the Cannabis sativa plant, of which roughly 66 have been classified as "cannabinoids;" chemicals unique to the plant. The most well known and researched of these, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), is the substance primarily responsible for the psychoactive effects of cannabis.

Synthetic THC (Marinol) has proved itself so harmless that in an almost unprecedented move it was moved from schedule II, next to legal cocaine, methamphetamine and morphine down to schedule III. The plant, which is both more medically effective and less mentally intoxicating, remains schedule I -illegal federally.

>> No.7236514
File: 143 KB, 600x435, shocking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7236514

>>7236457
>This is just new age herbalism.
I understand you are desperately trying to protect your revenue stream, shill, and that is precisely why you will be completely ignored. Your opinion is completely unsubstantiated and 100% clouded by bias.

>> No.7236515

>>7236457
>new age herbalism.
That's funny, considering there is documented medical use of cannabis going back several thousand years.

>> No.7236540

>>7236510
>There are literally thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the benefits of natural cannabinoids.
Aren't you the one arguing that good results won't get past peer review because of muh conspiracy? Which one is it? You can't use research to argue for marijuana and then dismiss the conclusions of the experts who did the research as corrupt simply because they don't find that marijuana is magic. That's the definition of cherrypicking.

Also, why are you copying and pasting? https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/39173092/

>> No.7236543

>>7236514
>I understand you are desperately trying to protect your revenue stream, shill, and that is precisely why you will be completely ignored. Your opinion is completely unsubstantiated and 100% clouded by bias.
Calling someone a paid shill so you can avoid the argument is the definition of irrationality and religious thinking. Do you really think you are convincing anyone intelligent with your ridiculous conspiracy logic?

>> No.7236631

>>7236540
>Aren't you the one arguing that good results won't get past peer review because of muh conspiracy?
No. I'm the one arguing that the US government has done everything within their power for 30+ years to hide the truth. And there's far more than enough to prove that.

>> No.7236634

>>7236540
>Also, why are you copying and pasting?
Because I am the one who did the original research you fucking psychopath.

>> No.7236641

>>7236543
>conspiracy
http://www.alternet.org/story/9257/pot_shrinks_tumors%3B_government_knew_in_%2774

That's exactly what it is.

>> No.7236663

Personal Experience :

After abusing psychedelics and weed for several years, weed now gives me strong hallucinations and severe paranoia so i don't smoke it any more.

I miss weed and now all i have is alcohol.

I've found that my memory, concentration and ability to think and plan about my future has increased massively since stopping smoking weed every day.

I recognize most people have no problem using it but it was definitely having a serious negative impact on my life.

>> No.7236668

>>7236631
>No. I'm the one arguing that the US government has done everything within their power for 30+ years to hide the truth. And there's far more than enough to prove that.
Then how are there all these studies on cannabis? On the one hand you claim there is all this evidence that cannabis cures cancer. On the other you are saying that doctors and scientists don't agree because the government is hiding the truth. Which one is it? The fact is that doctors and scientists are aware of all of these studies, but they don't mean what you are trying to say they mean. You have yet to respond to the arguments here: http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/07/25/cannabis-cannabinoids-and-cancer-the-evidence-so-far/#can-treat

All you've done is call scientists shills. That's not a response, it's a pathetic cop out.

>> No.7236692

>>7236515
How is that funny? New Age is just a rehashing of old mysticism into a jumbled mess of superstition. The veneration of weed as a miracle drug falls squarely into that.

>> No.7236721

>>7236634
Oh really? So you're Zomgtforly? Because I found the page you've basically copied everything from. Interestingly though, this post >>7236510 comes from a quote on that page. So either you are the person who made the page, meaning you posted a quote of someone else as your own words, or you are the author of the quote, meaning none of this is your original research. I'm guessing the former.

>> No.7236882

>>7236663
>now all i have is alcohol.
Why'd you leave out the psychedelics, though? It's not like you have to start abusing them again.

>> No.7236884

>>7236668
>Then how are there all these studies on cannabis?
Most of them NOT done in the US, retard. And since its legal in a couple states now with more soon to follow there will be a lot more studies done here.

>> No.7236888

>>7236721
>meaning none of this is your original research.
Incorrect. Now go die in a fire you worthless pig.

>> No.7236891

>>7236668
>blog
No I don't have to respond to a bullshit blog from the UK. I posted original source material which is where I draw my info from. Fuck you and your blog.

>> No.7236900

>>7229798
Godfuckingdamnit. If you feel your heart skip a beat when smoking weed just don't fucking smoke. Holy shit.

>> No.7236931

>>7236900
>just don't fucking smoke.
Or don't hold your breath for long periods when you take a hit.

>> No.7236941
File: 19 KB, 320x342, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7236941

>being as butthurt as OP, ever

>> No.7236990

>>7236884
Almost all of the links you posted are from the NCBI database. Do you realize that the NCBI is a US government institution?

>>7236888
So you posted shit someone else said as your own words, just as I said.

>>7236891
OK, so I don't have to respond to all of your posts which are just copies of a post on a social media site. Everything you've said has been countered by actual scientists and you are ignoring it because you can't answer. You lose.

>> No.7237003

>>7236888
>>7236891
This guy is so butthurt because scientists won't say weed is magic

>> No.7237023
File: 195 KB, 947x1280, F1.large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237023

>>7237003
>magic
Nothing magic about it. Mammals have an endocannabinoid system. In fact, its one of the oldest brain systems because sea squirts have it too.

>> No.7237025
File: 39 KB, 614x299, strawman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237025

>>7237003
>because scientists won't say weed is magic
Your logical fallacy is:

>> No.7237133

>>7228340
Tea, especially green tea is usually riddled with pesticide residue and fluoride, as a matter of fact, Tea is such a good absorbent of fluoride and other toxins that some agriculturalists use it to cure land of toxin spills and/or infertile soil due to contaminants.

>> No.7237155

>>7227354
I really want to sage this now, dammit I'm a physical chemist not biomed or something, gonna leave you all to argue about weed, it still fucking smells.

>> No.7237303

>>7237155
>it still fucking smells.
FUCK you AND your opinion.

>> No.7237310

>>7237303
>>7237155

Personally I love the smell

>> No.7237311

>>7237133
You sound lost. Sure you're on the right board?

>> No.7237431
File: 8 KB, 259x194, blazeitfagets.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237431

>>7232324

for a number of grad-level math courses -- mainly logic, graph theory, and algorithms shit -- all of the work i submitted consisted of proofs that i sketched while high.

>> No.7237453

>>7237023
Every neurological drug has a receptor, that doesn't mean you get to ascribe it the status of a miracle cure for cancer when there is no scientific evidence that it is. Again, this is simply magical thinking. Just because you want weed to be a cure doesn't mean it is. You are doing harm to your cause, both by exaggerating the effects of cannabinoids and by telling gullible people to forgo real medical treatment for snake oil. As I said from the start, you should not be telling people that weed is magic just because you legalize it.

>> No.7237464
File: 383 KB, 620x345, Weed-image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237464

>bum in high school
>straight edge, never touched a drug
>no desire for school
>hate math and science and think it sucks
>start smoking weed right before college
>stumble upon Richard Feynman video while absolutely toasted
>everything makes sense
>deep realizations that science is real and shit like stars actually exist
>mfw science books are based on real things and it took marijuana for me to realize this
>mfw math is awesome
>mfw limit definition of the derivative was the first time math made me say "holy fuck" out loud
>mfw physics and math became my favorite things
>mfw transferring from community college to real university after completely turning my life around

Thanks cannabis.

>> No.7237644

>>7236438
Straw man. Those may be blocked or censored for the "correct" reasons, but definitely some things of merit gets blocked because "we'd earn less money if people know of this".

>> No.7237658

>>7236457
It's not a "miracle drug". It does relieve chronic pain and have many other benefits which would probably compete very efficiently with legal drugs if people were allowed to grow it.

>>7236540
>Aren't you the one arguing that good results won't get past peer review because of muh conspiracy?

No that was me. And it's not a contradiction, because it may not be 100% of the reviewers who are getting their income from said companies, but it may have been enough to brake progress considerably.

>> No.7237661

>>7236721
Or you could have made the page yourself to make your opponent look more crazy than they are ;)

>> No.7237735
File: 10 KB, 345x255, no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237735

>>7237644
>Those may be blocked or censored for the "correct" reasons, but definitely some things of merit gets blocked because "we'd earn less money if people know of this".
Oh I'm so glad we have you to tell us which is which.

>>7237661
1. How could I have made a page in the past full of posts he is making now?
2. Why is he copying and pasting from the page if it makes him look crazy?

>> No.7237743

>>7237658
See http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/07/25/cannabis-cannabinoids-and-cancer-the-evidence-so-far/#conspiracy

And http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/07/25/cannabis-cannabinoids-and-cancer-the-evidence-so-far/#patent

Enough with the retarded conspiracy logic.

>> No.7237763

>>7237743
YES
/thread

>> No.7237819

>>7227354
Interesting
>>>/b/613885312

>> No.7237840
File: 108 KB, 1920x1080, u86f8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7237840

>>7236510
>>There are literally thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the benefits of natural cannabinoids
and why do you seek benefits exactly ?

>> No.7238338

>>7237453
>when there is no scientific evidence that it is.
INCORRECT.
>>7234812

>> No.7238341

>>7237763
>YES
>/thread
same fagging this hard, its pathetic

>> No.7238363
File: 31 KB, 600x618, Endocannabinoids.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7238363

>>7237743
>Enough with the retarded conspiracy logic.
Your pathetic limey blog has less than a dozen primary sources, 3 of which are them citing themselves. I gave you well over 50 primary sources and you ignored them all. Fuck you and your blog.

>> No.7239144

bump

>> No.7239149

>>7239144
NO WHY, LET'S JUST AGREE TO DISAGREE
Let those who support Marijuana campaign for it, and those who do not can have their merry way.

>> No.7240454

it doesnt have enough serious long term or short term health effects to be concerned about making it illegal. its like making caffeine illegal. dont worry about it unless your brain hasnt finished developing. anyone under the age of about 24 should avoid all chronic use of drugs, to be on the safe side. HAHAHAHAHAA AS IF

>> No.7240970

>>7240454
>it doesnt have enough serious long term or short term health effects to be concerned about making it illegal.
Exactly. And its very beneficial for millions of people who use it to ease suffering in one way or another.

>> No.7241462
File: 78 KB, 1324x1069, Cannabinoid-Structures1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7241462

>>7239149
>LET'S JUST AGREE TO DISAGREE
You mean I should just agree to let you continue living in and spewing forth your delusions. No thanks, I'll pass.

>> No.7243271

bumping for Texas

>> No.7243706

bumping again

>> No.7243785

>>7227360
It also it makes you an annoying overly friendly douche bag.

>Friend smokes weed
>Hey bud are we still friends
>Do you like me
>Hey want to go do something really stupid (like take one of my swords from my collection and try to cut a tree with it)

>> No.7243789

>>7243785
The whole time he is hugging you, and clinging onto you..

I get not everyone is like this but still, its annoying.

>> No.7243792

>>7243785
It stops you from being a dick.

Wow.

What a horrible effect.

You should try smoking more weed.

>> No.7243803

Is there any benefits to smoking concentrated CBD?

>> No.7243804

>>7231895
>Drinking
good enough for these fuckin losers

Also I've never heard of George Washington smoking cannabis, hemp maybe, but I didn't even think people knew of cannabises smoking properties as far back as 1799.

>> No.7243808

>>7243792
no normally, he is a pretty cool guy, but when he gets high, he does dumb stuff, and gets really emotional.

>> No.7243847
File: 2.53 MB, 900x7293, green dragon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7243847

>>7229088
Get Everclear 195 proof and get that weak shit out of here.
Also, bake 250 for 25 minutes, then boil alcohol +cannabis tincture in hot water bath for same amount of time for quick, or mix together and store in a cool, dark place for at least 14 days for 100% absorbtion of THC (approx 85% with one round of boiling).

>> No.7243850

>>7243803
>Is there any benefits to smoking concentrated CBD?
You're better off taking it orally. Or topically if you're treating something like skin ailments or skin cancer.

>> No.7243857

>>7243847
I know the pic is kind of obnoxiously written (in that uniquely stoner way of being obnoxious), but I'll be damned if that isn't the best cannabis tincture recipe I've come across.

>> No.7243858
File: 91 KB, 607x855, Slide26.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7243858

>>7243804
>Also I've never heard of George Washington smoking cannabis, hemp maybe,

Washington grew Indica which is not hemp, it is useless for making rope. It is a small bushy plants great for medicine.
"Make the most of the Indian hemp seed (now known as Cannabis Indica) and sew it everywhere."
--George Washington.
You can find this quote in his personal writings in the Library of Congress. As well as many other because several of our founders grew cannabis for both industry and medicine.

>but I didn't even think people knew of cannabises smoking properties as far back as 1799.

Then you clearly know very little of history because this is recorded in writing as far back as Herodotus in the Western world and much much further back in China.

ca. 440 BCE
In Book IV of his Histories, Herodotus further elaborates on the Scythians and their use of cannabis:
"Hemp grows in Scythia: it is very like flax; only that it is a much coarser and taller plant: some grows wild about the country, some is produced by cultivation: the Thracians make garments of it which closely resemble linen; so much so, indeed, that if a person has never seen hemp he is sure to think they are linen, and if he has, unless he is very experienced in such matters, he will not know of which material they are.

The Scythians, as I said, take some of this hemp, and, creeping under the felt coverings, throw it upon the red-hot stones; immediately it smokes, and gives out such a vapour as no Grecian vapour-bath can exceed; the Scyths, delighted, shout for joy, and this vapour serves them instead of a water-bath; for they never by any chance wash their bodies with water."

>> No.7243865

>>7243858
>sew
Woops. Typo. Should read: sow.

>> No.7244387

Come on. Where did the debate go?

>> No.7244526

>>7234553
You're not an idiot, just not mature in the mind. Meditation...

>> No.7244711

>>7235950
>There isn't an efficient way to enforce it when it's illegal for adults either. Like 25% of senior high schoolers report having tried marihuana.

That's.. fine? What is your point? I'd agree with that point and nothing I posted contradicted that