[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 14 KB, 737x1030, H20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099114 No.7099114[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What does /sci/ think the avg IQ of /sci/ posters is?

In with 110

>> No.7099124

>>7099114
117

>> No.7099130

-1/12

>> No.7099136

What does /sci/ think the average grade in school of /sci/ posters is? In with 10

>> No.7099263
File: 170 KB, 590x653, sadsaf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099263

>>7099114

>> No.7099449

>>7099263
You're on the lower end of the curve, eh?

>> No.7099459

>>7099114
probably around 115

I wish I knew what my IQ was

when I took the test I couldn't be given an "accurate score", but I was still assess with things I was really good at, and things I was average/above average at

I know that I'm in the 99% percentile when it comes to verbal intelligence or something like that

then again I took the test when I was 17, and I'm 19 now, and I sort of stressed myself out to an extent during the test

whenever she offered me a break I declined, just wanted to keep going

honestly, IQ can't truly begin to really quantify human intelligence

its just a good way at somewhat judging someone's capacity

but it is certainly possible to be of average IQ and still be a genius

>> No.7099465

105

>> No.7099479

Average IQ on this board is between 95-100. This applies to the people that claim that have an IQ of 130+ (hint: they don't)

>> No.7099485

>>7099479
but i really do. ask me anything about science/technology

>> No.7099493

>>7099485
Knowledge and overall "intelligence" is completely different you twit.

>> No.7099498

>>7099493
where in my post did i say they were equivalent? try me bitch i'm both more knowledgeable and more intelligent than anyone on /sci/

>> No.7099500

What is the average IQ of the posters ITT?

>> No.7099506

>>7099498
Proofs? Proofs?

>> No.7099526
File: 144 KB, 625x626, 1424488212281.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099526

>>7099498
>i'm both more knowledgeable and more intelligent than anyone on /sci/

>> No.7099529

75

>> No.7099533

66

>> No.7099538

>>7099526
no questions to test my prowess? too pleb to even think of any?

>> No.7099549

Judging by the posts in this thread,
about average.

>> No.7099550

>>7099538
Solve P=NP

>> No.7099554

>>7099550
>N = 0
>P =/= NP
QED

>> No.7099555

>>7099538
Describe with mathematical equations how a black hole has infinite density.

>> No.7099557

>>7099555
>black hole has infinite density
it doesn't

>> No.7099558

>>7099538
Use integration to prove 2+2 =/= 4

>> No.7099560
File: 30 KB, 515x603, 1404090873323.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099560

>>7099557

>> No.7099566

>>7099558
>integral of some functional between x and y that evaluates to two
>integral of that function between y and z that evaluates to two
>integral of that function between x and z that does not evaluate to four

>> No.7099570

>>7099566
Wow, you're a retard.

>> No.7099659

>>7099130
Topkek

>> No.7099664

>>7099560
A black cant have infinite density, think about information transfer from within the infinitely dense structure..

>> No.7099672

>>7099538
if black holes have infinite density why are black holes different sizes

>> No.7099679

>>7099672
>black holes have infinite density
they don't

>> No.7099689

>>7099679
YES THEY DO

>> No.7099781

>>7099689
they dont, you faggot

>> No.7099800

>>7099479
You know that's not true

>> No.7099891

>>7099538
Ok, if you're still around, here are some problems. If you can solve these, then you're probably as smart as a below-average math major.

(hard) Find the Green's function of:
<span class="math">x^2 D^2 + xD-(x^2+ \alpha )[/spoiler]

(easy) The solution to the differential equation associated with the above operator is the modified Bessel function of order <span class="math">\alpha[/spoiler], <span class="math">K_{\alpha}[/spoiler]. Find the Laplace transform of <span class="math">K_{\alpha}[/spoiler].

(easy) Show that the Laplace transform and R with the usual field properties do not form a differential field.
(medium) For any elementary real function f, Is the ordinary differential operator and R an algebraic differential field over f? Justify.

(easy) Name a topology on C that is path-connected, but not Hausdorff.

(easy) Is a group whose order is the Grothendieck prime necessarily simple?

>> No.7099895

>>7099891
>math
top fucking sperg

>> No.7099899
File: 167 KB, 2042x314, waddup hoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099899

>>7099891
but I_L in pic is the modified bessel function that you're referring to

>> No.7099922

>>7099891
He made a troll thread earlier, it's best to just ignore him.

Also I'm in grad school for math and can't answer any of those except the topology one (which is indeed easy)
I had to look up what the Grothendieck prime is, and it's probably just a Sylow theorems problem but it's been forever since I've used those.

>> No.7099925

>>7099922
>He made a troll thread earlier
nah, this is the only thread I made >>7099351

>> No.7099932

>>7099925
Yeah you're totally not the whiny engineer who couldn't answer any questions earlier :^)

>> No.7099935

>>7099932
what the fuck are you talking about. i'll answer your questions if you got em tho

>> No.7099936

>>7099935
science/technology tho, none of that faggot math shit

>> No.7099943

>>7099935
How many tiny bears does it take to operate a vehicle shaped like a normal sized bear?

>> No.7099946
File: 20 KB, 222x333, bear operating bear-sized vehicle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7099946

>>7099943
it only take one tiny bear. pic related

>> No.7099963

>>7099935
>https://archive.moe/sci/thread/7091552/
epic :^)

>> No.7099969

>>7099963
that was several days ago. and i answered all the questions that actually pertained to science and technology, as was prompted in the OP.

>> No.7100306

>>7099114
My IQ is in the mid 130's

>>7099136
I graduated with first class honours and then dropped out of my PhD.

Of course, I'm only one poster here. I will say that /sci/ strikes me as one of the more cerebral boards on 4chan; possibly the most cerebral board on 4chan. That comes with the caveat that I only really frequent a few, like /sp/, /fit/, /biz/ and some others.

>> No.7100339

>>7099459
According to a study, we can actually say that, starting from 118-120 your chances to be a genius are the highest.
I mean that the capacity of linking ideas together are not affected by your IQ over approximately 120.

>> No.7100405

>>7099550
how high school going for ya ?

>> No.7100412

>>7099114
I've never seen the test results but my IQ was high enough to get into Mensa, so...

>> No.7100791

>>7099114
i dont know about /sci/ but on /b/ everyone has an IQ of "140+"

>> No.7100799

When I was around 5 Social Services tested me at 134 or something, and at 15 I got accepted to Mensa

>> No.7100818

Mines 121, what's the average?

>> No.7100915

>>7100818
>121
>Asks what is the average of a normalized test
Tippidy toppidy kekkity keks

>> No.7100921

130-140. Those tests don't shows the whole picture.

>> No.7101116

>>7099130
;)

>> No.7101262

>>7100915
>because knowledge = intelligence

>> No.7101269

>>7099114
My IQ is 140.

I don't believe that IQ is an accurate measurement of 'intelligence'. It's pretty good for diagnosing some mental disorders though.

>> No.7101298

I don't know, but my IQ is 125 and I don't know anything about Calculus and can only join in the more philosophical discussions here.

>> No.7101304

>>7101298
Oh and stardard deviation is 15.

>> No.7101328

>>7099114
Since the average /b/tard thinks his IQ is ~135 I would assume the average IQ on /sci/ is around 210

>> No.7101342
File: 1.67 MB, 360x202, 1416076125190.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101342

I don't want to know

>I might actually be stupid
>Scoring either higher or lower than my expectations would probably stress me out anyway

>> No.7101358

real intelligence is social intelligence.

what good is it being a math major and being able to solve numerous sorts of equations and what not if you can't even communicate with other human beings about your accomplishments without immediately coming off as arrogant/insulting.

here are prime examples of social plebs:

>>7099449
>>7099485
>>7099493
>>7099498
>>7099506
>>7099526
>>7099538
>>7099549

so pretty much 80-90% of this entire board

>> No.7101555

>>7099891
the indiscreet topology on C :v)

>> No.7102636

>>7099114
>not representing H20 as a dodecahedron
At least try and be convincing with pseudochemistry, rather than having it so that random hydrogens have 2 bonds rather than 3.

>>7099136
I'll throw myself in as a datapoint, Year 13 for NCEA. Not sure how that translates to the US system.

>> No.7102656

>>7101358
>immediately coming off as arrogant/insulting
>here are prime examples of social plebs
...Aaaand take a seat among them.

>> No.7102822

>>7099130
lel

>> No.7102845

Statistically speaking it's going to be 100.

Because as many of you are asian as you are african, just saying.

>> No.7102872

109.9999...

>> No.7102890

My dad and grandad both have tested IQs over 155. My mum probably has an IQ of less than 100.

I'd say mine was closer to my mums but I've never had it tested. Its worth noting that my mum actually earns a lot more than my dad because she stuck with nursing, whereas he tried and failed with a ton of creative pursuits.

>> No.7102893

>>7102890
Sounds like her IQ is a lot higher

>> No.7102895

>>7099891
>tfw the only one i can do is the "hard" green's function one
this always happens to me...

>> No.7102934

>>7099479

i don't really believe iq is an accurate mention of intelligence, but i did score 132 in a mensa test

>> No.7103018 [DELETED] 

>>7099479
>Got tested going into second grade
>Somewhere around 145
>Bitch

>> No.7103025

>>7102656
Kek. I'm so sick of people arguing "street smarts" over legitimate learning on a math and science board.

>> No.7103105

I got tested as a child. Apparently scored 142, and I was ready to either be transferred to a different school or be accelerated through two grade levels. I had violent tendencies though, and my parents figured I had to learn to socialize with kids my age 'normally', so I stayed put. Ten years later, I feel as dumb as ever and I am still a little awkward around people. I didn't keep track of my score, though I suppose it's gotten lower seeing as I am an unmotivated, Tunisian hentai board-browsing piece of shit.

>> No.7103111

>>7100306
>frequents /fit/
>not literally wooden table iq tier

Q.E.D.

>> No.7103141

>>7101358

God I'm so tired with these basic trash news magazine / LinkedIn Pulse type statements like "the number one question for a job interviewer!" ^ 10, or your "real intelligence is social intelligence".

I know people like that, they get along with anyone, and yet they practically never have anything of any REAL value to say.

Stop obsessing over IQ people, there's a lot more to life and people than that. And besides, IQ is something one is more or less born with. Being proud or ashamed of it is like being proud or ashamed of how much wealth or what skin colour you were born with: fucking pointless, since you did nothing to earn it or deserve it in the first place.

>> No.7103161

>>7103141
Sure. I see your point, but it's the same thing with beauty. And as little sense as it makes, we still get hung up over this shit.

>> No.7103176

>>7102934

I don't believe X - I say this to appease all those who share this extremely common yet false belief with me. But even if X is true, I'm still doing fine.

That whole statement was really written to make yourself look good, wasn't it? I mean, you're a tripfag, you're going to say things in line with the mentalities of autistic idiots with an arsenal of defense mechanisms. This way, people agree with you and thus think you're intelligent. But JUST IN CASE people don't agree with your former statement, the latter statement secures your intelligence.

sooooo crafty, m8.

>>7103105

Oh, yeah? Sounds to me like you're an average IQ guy concocting a story based on what you consider fairly common situations for "above average intelligence" people. "Hopefully", you say to yourself, someone with a high IQ will get onto this threads and share my feelings, thus confirming that while I actually have a low IQ, high IQ people are less efficient than me, and so I will be more successful/accomplished than them.

Good one, you semen-slurping botfly.

>>7102890
Here's an anecdote regarding my immediate family:

My dad and grandad have stratospherically high IQ (99.999%?), and yet they're less successful than my mother - who has an inferior IQ! GO figure!

I don't know my IQ, but I'll modestly say it's probably low - but that's okay because my father failed at all his creative pursuits and so the high IQ didn't prove anything.


ITT: tl;dr:

we're all geniuses, but IQ doesn't matter anyway, because we're unproductive :( :( :(

>> No.7103184

>>7103176
If that's what lets you get to sleep at night, anon.

>> No.7103200

>>7103184

Presumably a poster whose comment I tore apart, yes?

Your line of argumentation is to feign ignorance of what I'm refering to and deem my comments "lunatic" or "inane".

Potential followup comments:

(1) I'm not one of those people
(1) (a) And what you said is ridiculous nonetheless

Counterargument to (1): No one cares enough on /sci/ to respond to the rantings of someone they deem a lunatic unless they are personally involved - and feel their ego is under attack. You gain nothing from not being one of the aforementioned and wasting time commenting on my post.

(2) You take the facetious route, where you say that "if thinking you're a genius helps you sleep at night, then so be it". This route is the one you would take when you'd want to avoid argumentation due to a deep-set timidity and fear that I might ruin your "world", so to speak.

Not noting my insincerity when stating "we're all geniuses", etc. you would pretend as though my entire post was braggery.

sooooo clever.

please kill yourself, you repulsive cyst

>> No.7103208

>>7103200
Lel. I was actually referring to you getting so worked up about people answering a question about their IQ. Your aggressive denial of the possibility that one of us could be telling the truth betrays your insecurity. My post was one of resignation, since there really is no point in trying to convince you. But since you're so buttmad, I might as well have some fun.

>> No.7103210

>>7103208
One or more*

>> No.7103212

>>7103200
>"Presumably a poster whose comment I tore apart, yes?"
> ... then proceeds to tear apart his own comments in the previous post

Ahaha! 9/10! I don't even care if you're a real troll or just this sad and stupid, funny as fuck either way. :D

Keep it going!

>> No.7103215

>>7103212
Dude, the next two replies are mine, not his >>7103200

>> No.7103216

>>7103215
Oh, wait. Misunderstood that. Sorry!

>> No.7103219

>average claimed IQ
125
>actual average IQ
92

>> No.7103224
File: 182 KB, 686x960, 1393785864425.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7103224

>>7099550
N=1
P=1xP
duh.

>> No.7103252

>>7099114


lazy math undergrad here, got tested twice, scored IQ 147 at age 13 and IQ 143 at age 17.

>> No.7103257

But this is the internet, of course. So... whatever.

>> No.7103265

I got 134 according to a intenert IO test but i really doubt it was accurate so i probably got around 100

>> No.7103278

>>7102656
never claimed i am a part of it
also you just did the same, the irony