[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 231 KB, 498x407, astro01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7068680 No.7068680 [Reply] [Original]

Does time speed up if you're near a giant collection of negative mass?

>> No.7068682

>>7068680
Yeah, sure

>> No.7068683

>>7068682
Hahahahaha. Ohhh god I don't know why this made me lol

>> No.7068701

When will we stop having 10 Interstellar threads per day?

>> No.7068705

No, I tried it. I purchased a tank of helium and glued my watch to the cylinder. The thing didn't run at a significantly different rate from the clock I have in the next room, shielded with a significant amount of lead.

>> No.7068709

i will have some tomatoes aswell

>> No.7068712
File: 59 KB, 246x304, tumblr_mpderfdC3j1stl0qho3_250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7068712

No because negative mass will just create a dent in spacetime exactly like normal mass would do only in the opposite direction. But it is a warp nonetheless so time would slow down as well. You should take the absolute value of mass like you would with mass of your mom, which happens to approach infinity as r tend to any number larger than zero.

>> No.7068736

>>7068712
Prove it

>> No.7068739

>>7068736
What's to prove besides that which has already been proven? He's completely correct.

>> No.7068767

>>7068739
Then prove it

>> No.7068816

>>7068767
Educate yourself pleb

>> No.7068965

>>7068816
Perhaps you should since you can't seem to prove it

>> No.7068969
File: 50 KB, 500x129, 1409373057506.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7068969

>>7068965

>> No.7068991

>>7068965
Not the guy, but proofs in GR are usually pretty extensive, I couldn't be bothered either. /sci/ is not the right board for stuff like that, as every non-shitpost gets ignored anyway.