[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 15 KB, 375x274, cattle-ufo-375x274.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6905347 No.6905347 [Reply] [Original]

Are humans really too dumb to make them work? or is the US gov refraining from publicizing the tool to keep losers from pointing it at the moon?

>> No.6905375

>>6905347
Can't be done.

>> No.6905381
File: 128 KB, 728x426, 1415941853700.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6905381

>>6905347
>>/x/

>> No.6905395

If there was a way to reverse gravity in the beam, maybe. Maybe if there was a portal or wormhole or something to a world where the vector of gravity is opposite that of on earth you could get things to fall up towards the portal.

>> No.6905401

Pressor beams are a more plausible concept. I think to do a "tractor beam", you'd basically be using a pressor beam to deploy some sort of tow rope, like a bunch of boron nitride nanotube filaments.

>> No.6906752

>>6905347
Simple.
Make your spaceship heavier than the earth.
Then things will fall towards your spaceship

>> No.6906843
File: 26 KB, 570x327, C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_WhaleHarpGun1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6906843

>>6905347
Impossible by now, by technology and theoretical knowledge I guess.

But pic related is a viable solution

>> No.6908854

>>6905375
>>6906843
>>6905401
>its imposibru!

>A long-range polarization-controlled optical tractor beam
http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v8/n11/full/nphoton.2014.242.html

And for the popsci people (aka most of sci):
>Tractor beam created: the ‘holy grail for laser physicists’
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/20/optical-tractor-beam-laser-physicists

>> No.6909631

>>6905375
>>6905381
tractor beams are happening on a small scale it seems like.. am i right?

>> No.6909766

>>6908854
That's not a sci-fi tractor beam. We're talking about relatively large amounts of energy to very gently move dust motes. It doesn't scale to macroscopic objects.

>> No.6910576

>>6905347
why do you ask /sci/?
they cant even explain how gravity works

>> No.6911172

>>6906843
nice file name faggot

>> No.6911199

>>6905347
we have tractor beams today:
http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v8/n11/full/nphoton.2014.242.html

Except if you tried to lift a cow you'd need gigawatts of laser and would end up turn it to ash before you moved it an appreciable distance

>> No.6911206

>>6909766
Well too fucking bad. Did you specify that the tractor beam had to move large objects in your original post because you did not OP.