/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.6793172]

ITT: /sci/ humor

If a mol of moles is digging a mol of holes, what do you see?
A mol of molasses.

[Anonymous No.6793214]

>>6793172

Who made this piece of shit comic?

It makes zero sense

[Anonymous No.6793217]

>>6793214
Mad gender studies major detected

[Anonymous No.6793225]

>>6793214
You must be new here.

[Anonymous No.6793226]

>>6793172
>thinking cs is a good degree

[Anonymous No.6793260]

This whole "social sciences" meme is pretty pathetic.

Why do some of the mathematicians and other "hard" scientists on this board feel the need to criticize the intellectual interests of other people?

I want to ask those who adhere to this belief of the things that make them feel so inadequate.

[Anonymous No.6793263]

>>6793260
Because social sciences are psuedo-science. They are just ways of pushing a political agenda.

[Anonymous No.6793265]

>>6793260
Because they call it "social science" instead of what it really is, "social philosophy". Same with psycho-philosophy and bio-philosophy,

There's intellectual merit in philosophy but in the end it's all people's educated opinions.

[Anonymous No.6793267]

>>6793260
Spot the social scientist loooool

Hey why don't you go write a piece about the hegemony of the hard sciences and the internal misogyny of mathematics. I'm sure it'd be a hit on tumblr.

[Anonymous No.6793296]

>>6793260
>mathematicians
>hard sciences

Pick one, anon.

[Anonymous No.6793298]

Why has the electron never visited his twin in Idaho?

>indentical fermions cannot occupy the same state

[Anonymous No.6793303]

>>6793298

>Why has the electron never visited his twin in Idaho?

Because there's only one electron in the universe?

[Anonymous No.6793304]

>>6793303
way to spoil the joke asshole

[Anonymous No.6793309]

>>6793260
You'll see that people on /sci/ generally shit on the social sciences but cherry pick exceptions.

[Anonymous No.6793312]

>>6793260
It's about picking shit they don't like about a subject in which they are completely ignorant and attributing those defects to the entire field so they can feel better about themselves for being uncultured.

It's like taking shit Michio Kaku says as representative of the entire field of Physics. It's pretty dumb. But this is 4chan, anyway, so who cares?

[Anonymous No.6793321]

Ma and Pa in a trans configuration? It's transparent.

[Anonymous No.6793329]

>>6793267
>>6793312
>>6793309
>>6793214
Fuck off and stick to making science jokes instead of arguing this. It's been beat to death.

[Anonymous No.6793332]

>>6793329
>Fuck off and stick to making science jokes
>the base is under a salt
Why don't you start?

[Anonymous No.6793361]

>>6793332
He just did faggot

[Anonymous No.6793505]

>Taking careful aim, the corporal fired the carefully measured aliquot of hydrochloric acid into the enemy's sodium hydroxide reserves. With that, he turned back, having successfully neutralised the enemy's base.
It went something like that.

[Anonymous No.6793534]

>>6793260
>Why do some of the mathematicians and other "hard" scientists on this board feel the need to criticize the intellectual interests of other people?

The thing is, there are some people who are so invested in religion that anything that hints of a disproof makes them shit brixx. They use this concept of "separate magisteria," the idea that there are things that cannot be examined with the scientific method, to claim that just because they have no evidence doesn't mean they're wrong.

To these people I say: If it is real, it is subject to science. Societies exist. The proper term for the sciences that examine them is "Social Sciences." If you don't think that's a real thing, you need to take your religion with you back to the farm and get off /sci/.

[Anonymous No.6793872]

>A neutron walks into a bar, and asks the bartender how much for a drink. The bartender says, "For you, no charge."

[Anonymous No.6793878]

>>6793172

[Anonymous No.6793902]

>>6793878
subtle