[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 151 KB, 347x346, psych_brain1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6635725 No.6635725[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How much of a psychopath are you?

http://psychopath.channel4.com/quizzes.html

>> No.6635782
File: 700 KB, 997x486, psychopathy test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6635782

⇒tfw only 94%

>> No.6635785

>psychology
>science or math
>>>/out/

>> No.6635789

>>6635785
Psychology is a purer science than physics because it solely relies on empirical experimental data and doesn't need vague and epistemolgoically questionable quasi-empirical inference like string theory.

>> No.6635798
File: 736 KB, 962x639, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6635798

>> No.6635896
File: 172 KB, 640x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6635896

Eh

>> No.6635907

>>6635782
>94

Tfw 85

>> No.6635910

aberrations due to cellular age 0.3% ,aberrations to neuronal cell expression 0.6% aberrations due to chem influence and perturbed of expressions of neurons 0.9%,aberrations due to social and monetary trauma 69% ,you tell me..

btw I am joking or am I hmm...I live in a free range prison maze called earth with no escape,no space ship nothing geeze kind of unrelenting we seem to be lab mice for the 1% elite?

>> No.6635915

30%, but I feel like it's just judging me on my tendency to avoid conflict, not how much I actually care for people.

>> No.6635922

Neither science nor math.

>> No.6636207

>39%

>> No.6636214

33% master race

>> No.6636226

>>6635896
>http://psychopath.channel4.com/quizzes.html
Got same summary paragraph as you but 34%. Wierd because a personal motto is "excess in moderation" from a comedian doug stanhope

>> No.6636243
File: 95 KB, 948x624, 76.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6636243

>>6635785
Psychology is a science
>>6635789
No, it doesn't.

>> No.6636338

>>6635725
>wants personal information

nice try

>> No.6636516

>>6636338
>prefer not to say
>fuck you
>prefer not to say
>prefer not to say
>prefer not to say
>etc

It's not hard, anon.

>> No.6636529

>>6635789
We know string theory is bullshit because it is a conception made by people who thought there shoudl be a ultimate reality, and not by people who have evidence for "strings".
Stop being an idiot.

>> No.6636560

This one time, I was defending this child rapist...
and he was guilty as hell.
The prosecution made a mistake though, and I laughed and laughed at him because my client would get off with time served.
I still have a tendency to laugh when ever I recount that story.

Oh, wait, that wasn't me, that was Hillary Clinton.

>> No.6636613

>>6636243
73%
I like cats and care for a couple people. Otherwise I'm nutso.

>> No.6636644

>>6635896
52
Though your conscience is in the right place you also have a pragmatic streak and generally aren’t afraid to do your own dirty work! You’re no shrinking violet - but no daredevil either. You generally have little trouble seeing things from another person’s perspective but, at the same time, are no pushover. ‘Everything in moderation – including moderation’ might sum up your approach to life.

>> No.6636714
File: 1.38 MB, 281x500, 6ab152ac-4351-408e-9f87-f2aa70e15.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6636714

45%, as expected

>> No.6636831

39% for me!

>> No.6637697
File: 50 KB, 600x626, 1404869673440.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6637697

48%

>> No.6637785
File: 249 KB, 368x425, 1401672324870.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6637785

>>6635789
>and doesn't need vague and epistemolgoically questionable quasi-empirical inference like string theory.
You mean math?

>> No.6639705

>>6635725
61% but not science
>>>/x/

>> No.6639873

>>6635725
>Stupid non-objective tests
>Science