/sci/ humor

File: 57 KB, 720x644, 1376940571443.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

/sci/ humor Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:17:38 2014 No.6625643 [Reply] [Original]

ITT: we amuse ourselves and others.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:28:06 2014 No.6625651 >>6625643 How many photons does it take to fuck your mom? None, because she's ugly LOL.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:35:52 2014 No.6625659 File: 19 KB, 191x200, 1404213549731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6625651

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:35:57 2014 No.6625660 >>6625651 How many protons are in each atom of your mom's ass? >82

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:41:10 2014 No.6625666 Your mother is so ugly that Florine won't even bind with her.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:46:23 2014 No.6625671 File: 2.84 MB, 300x300, metaphase.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] "I'm sorry, John." "I'm seeing another aster"

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 03:47:26 2014 No.6625672 File: 356 KB, 1127x940, Albinos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] post in this thread or your grandchildren will look like this.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 04:07:15 2014 No.6625681 >>6625660 Are you implying her arse is Plebeian tier?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 04:08:18 2014 No.6625682 Yo momma is so fat there are more atoms in your mom than there are moms in the Universe.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 10:40:12 2014 No.6626004 >>6625682 Its kinda hard to see a black hole

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 11:32:08 2014 No.6626027 >>6626004 But you can always find your mom in space, because the biggest black hole in the Universe is her anus.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 16:40:24 2014 No.6626259 File: 765 KB, 480x200, 1360376982134.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6626004 All your mom's does is suck

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 18:26:36 2014 No.6626358 Two men go into a bar and and the first man says "I'll have an H2O please!" The second man laughs and says "I'll have an H2O too, please!" The second man died.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 18:30:28 2014 No.6626366 >>6626358 A helium atom floats into a bar and orders a drink. The bartender says "We don't serve your type here. Get the hell out and tell all your noble gas friends to stay away too!" The helium doesn't react.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 18:51:46 2014 No.6626388 >>6626259 How does this work?

Anonymous Fri Jul 4 19:21:16 2014 No.6626432

>>6626366
A infinite amount of engineers walk into a bar. the first orders a pint of beer, the second a half pint, the third a quarter pint, and so on. The bartender just pours 2 pints of beer and calls it a day.
The engineers don't care because they're too busy fucking each other.

Anonymous Fri Jul 4 19:24:05 2014 No.6626441

>>6626388
Notice that each of those clumps is arranged like this: ball, ball, ball, magnet.

When a ball is sucked in to the magnet from the right, it's getting pulled right up next to the magnet so the magnetic field has the most effect on it. The shockwave from the ball striking is transferred through to the next balls in line, like a Newtons Cradle. The 3rd ball is far enough away from the magnet that the force of the strike greatly outweighs the force, sending it flying away at great speeds. The line repeats this process 3 times to build up the effect

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 22:10:43 2014 No.6626757 File: 18 KB, 185x217, asboorgur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6626366

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 4 22:27:05 2014 No.6626764 File: 936 KB, 500x494, orbit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How Can Ur Mum's Fat Arse Be Real If Our Eyes Arent Real

>>	me Sat Jul 5 03:15:59 2014 No.6627097 File: 43 KB, 618x494, 385700_10151470489910206_26448950205_23489096_710120273_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6625666 ..............^ t-thanks Satan?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 03:20:56 2014 No.6627104 >>6626764 was about to ask if that image was to scale because moons. then saw planets and sun and was ashamed I need to sleep

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 03:26:59 2014 No.6627109 >>6626388 another explanation if you choose: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoUNyGUCzqs This is currently my favorite effect in physics. So happy to have a nice gif

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 08:42:33 2014 No.6627355 >>6627104 Also Earth is the same size as Saturn. Sizes and distances are no where near accurate, but orbit periods seem to be, from what I know..

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 08:54:38 2014 No.6627367 >>6627109 Could this be turned into an effective weapon?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 08:57:58 2014 No.6627368 >>6626764 What a half-assed gif. I mean honestly, is a seamless loop really that hard to make?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 09:16:49 2014 No.6627382 File: 45 KB, 468x609, physicists.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 09:27:56 2014 No.6627391 >>6627367 Or some sort of fleshlight feature? Theoretically speaking.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 09:35:42 2014 No.6627400 >>6627367 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 09:51:53 2014 No.6627423 File: 1.35 MB, 360x263, W8VJp_thumb.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6627368 It's not hard, just impossible. The ratio of planetary orbits is irrational and no arrangement will ever repeat itself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 09:53:16 2014 No.6627424 >>6627423 Prove it mathematically

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 10:02:20 2014 No.6627432 File: 234 KB, 354x372, 1338523658528.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Jul 5 12:08:21 2014 No.6627565

>>6627424
That irrational orbits don't repeat, or that our solar system does not have a rational orbit.
The first is obvious - you assume that the orbit repeats and show that the length of the orbit must be some fraction of the time it takes to repeat. To show that there is zero probability of it having a rational orbit follows from the the fact that the rationals are countable and the reals not so much.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:09:50 2014 No.6627858 File: 226 KB, 500x375, ParticleAcceleration.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:32:57 2014 No.6627875 >>6627858 this gif is gay and you should feel gay for posting it and by gay, i mean you suck cock

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:35:36 2014 No.6627879 File: 241 KB, 1190x847, science-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:47:05 2014 No.6627893 File: 64 KB, 459x588, schrodinger's_cat-revenge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] And so began the worst physicist killing spree since chemists invented chlorine gas.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:49:50 2014 No.6627897 File: 26 KB, 463x271, science-research.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 16:53:45 2014 No.6627902 >>6627875 do you know how you should use it?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 17:02:51 2014 No.6627910 >>6627897 could you be so kind and provide the source for that pic please?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 17:14:33 2014 No.6627921 >>6627910 Think it might be that one futa adventure time comic. I'm sure you'll find it if you dig around enough.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 17:15:53 2014 No.6627925 File: 105 KB, 1126x939, 00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6627910 "Melting" by Incase for Prism Girls.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 17:20:22 2014 No.6627930 >>6627925 thanks.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 5 19:25:00 2014 No.6628038 >>6625672 >>>/b/ tier post >>>/b/

Anonymous Sun Jul 6 01:32:16 2014 No.6628402 [DELETED]

However, your memory vs. imagination note is very interesting in itself, I've never gave it thought, but it's clear to see that the higher your social rank, the more you lean on memory, memory of your achievements. The lower it is, the more you lean on your imagination, classical loser rationalisations (well, at least I'm the nice guy, I did the right things, I'm gonna laugh in heaven at those jerks, looking down upon them burning in hell). Also imagination vs. memory correlates with introversion and extroversion, the limits of which are indeed autistic and anti-social people. The first define themselves by their inner world, while the latter don't really have the inner world to speak of and define themselves exclusively through their achievements (people in between would get lesser achievements, but would get more satisfaction from them, because of respective serotonin levels).

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 02:05:35 2014 No.6628427 >>6627382 Noice

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 04:01:46 2014 No.6628492 >>6627925 >based incase

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 21:37:17 2014 No.6630058 >>6628492 You pun is going to a salt my feelings

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 22:20:48 2014 No.6630098 >>6627893 How many people who make jokes about Schrodinger's cat actually understand it beyond 'Zombie cat inside a death box'?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:15:46 2014 No.6630157 >>6630098 What's to understand? There's a mechanism by which decay of atom triggers the release of neurotoxin. But atom is in superposition which means it's neither intact nor decayed, until you open the box. But cant ca't be both alive and dead. Easy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:18:52 2014 No.6630160 >>6626259 this makes me want to ask where the extra energy is coming from since "magnets cannot do work"

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:42:07 2014 No.6630193 >>6627109 >>6626441 Thank you for explaining it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:46:07 2014 No.6630200 File: 32 KB, 740x308, purity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:49:38 2014 No.6630205 >>6630200 Better deliver the virgin version of this pic.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 6 23:53:05 2014 No.6630211 File: 128 KB, 251x231, 1390324375086.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 02:33:47 2014 No.6630364 >>6630160 From what I can tell, the several magnets moving right at relatively slow speeds balances out the momentum of the one magnet moving left at a high speed.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 05:47:25 2014 No.6630578 >>6630160 and this makes me want to slap you in the face it's obviously potential energy that's stored when setting everything up. It's just released at the moment of the experiment.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 05:48:27 2014 No.6630579 >>6630200 and of course the mathematician is a woman

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 05:53:06 2014 No.6630581 >>6630579 >thinking long hair means female oh sci

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 06:11:07 2014 No.6630595 >>6625672 ok

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 08:03:41 2014 No.6630668 >>6630200 Yeah, we should all be mathematicians! Society only needs those.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 08:14:13 2014 No.6630684 >>6630200 >no logician on the far right Also, I just found out there's a whole blog dedicated to being butthurt at xkcd's comics. I'm once again amazed at how people can take everything so seriously even on the internet.

Anonymous Mon Jul 7 09:09:40 2014 No.6630734

>>6630578
>and this makes me want to slap you in the face
you'd have fun trying that bitch

>>6630578
>it's obviously potential energy that's stored when setting everything up. It's just released at the moment of the experiment.

and magic trolls will bless all your postings

>educated idiots

show me how that much "potential energy" can be stored on a nearly level track

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 11:29:45 2014 No.6630852 >>6630734 >show me how that much "potential energy" can be stored on a nearly level track you have to be trolling.

Anonymous Mon Jul 7 12:10:35 2014 No.6630892
File: 174 KB, 242x624, justsaying.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6630200
>physicists work on a law/theory, but in poor mathematical form
>mathematicians bitch and growl about it
>they change it to mathematical proper terms half a decade later

mathematicians are like janitors

Anonymous Mon Jul 7 12:16:57 2014 No.6630898

>>6630160
I'll let you get it by yourself, just a hint: think about repositioning all balls in the original setup and how you spend energy in doing that.

>>6630684
>no logician on the far right
They're just so far to the right that they couldn't fit in the panel

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 17:10:40 2014 No.6631281 File: 93 KB, 804x787, theyregreat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6630734

Anonymous Mon Jul 7 17:38:02 2014 No.6631323

An infinite number of mathematicians line up in a bar.
The first one asks the bartender for 1 pint of beer.
The second one asks the bartender for 2 pints of beer.
The third one asks the barteneder for 3 pints of beer.

The bartender says "Wait, I'm subscribed to Numberphile." and pours -1/12 pints of beer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 17:44:18 2014 No.6631332 File: 618 KB, 630x426, laughing wolf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6631323 10/10

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 18:29:08 2014 No.6631354 >>6631332 >filename: laughing wolf.png >leopard You are obviously not a taxonomist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 18:43:26 2014 No.6631364 >>6630684 link it?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 18:44:29 2014 No.6631367 >>6631354 what on earth

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 18:46:33 2014 No.6631370 >>6631364 Not the same anon, but I think he refers to this xkcdsucks.blogspot.<span class="math">it[/spoiler] I thought that site was as well known as xkcd itself, especially here on /sci/

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 7 23:07:04 2014 No.6631768 File: 30 KB, 521x521, dearie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6631354 Well, well, well.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 04:05:00 2014 No.6632065 >>6631370 Yeah, that's the one.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 04:15:45 2014 No.6632072 This thread is awful. I don't have anything, but I remember losing my sides when I read one guy stating that the indefinite integral of a constant was 0.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 04:44:51 2014 No.6632107 >>6630200 Economists use shit tier math and yet rape them all in terms of success and money. Aside from looking better.

>>	Not at all reggie of youtube a(...) Tue Jul 8 15:12:21 2014 No.6632682 Why aren't jokes funny? Just ... Because they aren't. <crawling ovation> Captca son tsirynto rorsach jiving with jehoving, nt a viking.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 15:28:31 2014 No.6632702 >>6632072 I was in that thread.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 17:39:06 2014 No.6632839 >>6632072 It's true for Grassmann variables.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 17:54:11 2014 No.6632853 >>6630581 Well, how else would you draw a female stick figure?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 17:57:37 2014 No.6632856 File: 443 KB, 1280x1024, 1393645500078.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 18:03:14 2014 No.6632858 >>6625672 ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 18:22:57 2014 No.6632880 A neutron walks into a bar and asks for a drink. "How much?" he asks. "Three dollars," the bartender replies. Get it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 19:25:53 2014 No.6632962 >>6625672 ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 19:28:56 2014 No.6632969 File: 53 KB, 379x300, tits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] hey /sci/ rate my tits

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 19:44:03 2014 No.6633005 >>6632969 goood nine best tit = tuft tit /thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 19:51:28 2014 No.6633013 >>6630211 what are you, 12

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 20:05:56 2014 No.6633027 >>6632969 loled fellow birder!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 20:09:13 2014 No.6633035 >>6632969 great tits/10

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 23:45:27 2014 No.6633344 File: 126 KB, 1720x1720, uranus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] See something you like, /sci/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 8 23:55:10 2014 No.6633365 >>6633344 >you will never have an anus this clean

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 00:20:52 2014 No.6633392 File: 19 KB, 500x367, carlos2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6633365 >Methane >clean what a shitty conclusion

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 01:03:08 2014 No.6633428 >>6627423 I just figured out why raising something to the second power is called squaring it...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 02:39:53 2014 No.6633527 File: 933 KB, 240x135, pauli exclusion principle.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 02:47:36 2014 No.6633542 File: 2.94 MB, 266x138, a new poster visits sci.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 03:38:14 2014 No.6633596 File: 86 KB, 302x302, 1357611690478.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6633392 >2/10

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:06:18 2014 No.6633615 >>6633542 What's this from?

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:07:28 2014 No.6633616

>>6630892
Maybe in the 13th century that was true...

Right now in order to be a cutting edge physicist you must also be a mathematician, just as cutting edge chemistry is becoming physics and cutting edge biology is becoming chemistry. So yes, mathematics is the most pure science and the most important one.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:08:46 2014 No.6633618 >>6632107 And doctors make more money than biologists. The more applied your science is, the less scientific it is and the more money you get.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:11:42 2014 No.6633620 >>6633616 Where do you get that idea? Condensed matter is currently the most prominent field, and requires as much math as General Physics has needed since Bohr.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:12:57 2014 No.6633622 >>6627875 What makes you think he's an engineer?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:15:17 2014 No.6633624 >>6630157 >skips entirely over the tricky bit about 'observing' that atom

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:17:59 2014 No.6633627 >>6633620 Hardly the most "prominent" or cutting-edge field currently. Quantum mechanics in general and string theory are far more mathematically rigorous than physics was in the past.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:20:06 2014 No.6633630 >>6633616 Completely false. Most experimentalists use almost no math. They mostly require to be able to do some dimensional analysis and curve fitting

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:21:45 2014 No.6633631 >>6626432 An infinite number of scientists walk into a bar. The first orders a pint, the second orders two pints, the third three pints and so on. The bartender pulls out some change, buys 1/12 pint from the scientists, and calls it a night.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:22:21 2014 No.6633633 >>6633630 >experimentalists Circular argument. Experimentalists are never on the cutting edge, theoretical physicists are.

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:23:21 2014 No.6633634

>>6633627
Sure, rigorous, but there's no money in it any more. Thus it is not prominent. The place, currently, with the most research being done, applied, and paid for, is condensed matter. Quantum mechanics is more mathematically rigorous but not to the point where the people doing the research would be called mathematicians.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:24:54 2014 No.6633636 >>6633634 So money = cutting edge?. topkek. Nice backpedaling.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:26:11 2014 No.6633637 >>6633634 I mean, if that's your argument, then economists are on the cutting edge of math, and medical doctors are on the cutting edge of biology.

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:27:48 2014 No.6633641

>>6633636
I didn't say it was "cutting edge". I said it's the most prominent, the field at the front, the one with the most interest. God, /sci/, I know you're scientists but I thought we were still literate here.

>>6633637
But that's not my argument. The field of mathematics with the most *research* being done is topology, if I recall. Thus it is the most prominent field.

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:30:21 2014 No.6633645

>>6633641
But that's what I said. You know, the original post you were replying to?

>But that's not my argument. The field of mathematics with the most *research* being done is topology, if I recall. Thus it is the most prominent field.
There is very little money in topology. The place where the most money and research is being done in the mathematical field is economics.

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 04:47:39 2014 No.6633665

>>6633633
But this is not true.
There are currently way more theories to be tested than experiments done to test them. In other words, we lack experiments and have too many theories.
Also, the large collaborations (CERN etc) can be seen as big experiments on which thousands are working. Of course they have theoreticians working with them, but it's mostly to tune a little what they already predicted.
What about the fact that predictions come way before the actual tests (gravitons..)? Would you say these experiments are not cutting-edge?

>Experimentalists are never on the cutting edge, theoretical physicists are.
No offense meant, but you honestly sound like an undergrad trying to defend his current position (I wanna be Albert Hawking!) and not realizing that experiments are what makes physics an actual science.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 05:51:35 2014 No.6633712 >>6633615 its the new cosmos, the greatest and most scientifically interesting tv show ever done

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 11:33:27 2014 No.6634203 >>6633615 New Cosmos (which wasn't as good as the original but still pretty damned good)

Anonymous Wed Jul 9 11:39:02 2014 No.6634216

>>6633633
Theorists give experimentalists questions.
Experimentalists give theorists answers.

Both sides need the other but it's the experimentalists who are on the cutting edge. They're the ones going out there, inventing the brand new apparatuses and technologies and experiments to answer the big questions in physics.

A theorist can come up with a beautiful mathematical model, but it's meaningless without real experimental data to confirm it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 9 23:42:07 2014 No.6635463 >>6626366 Ha

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 00:41:35 2014 No.6635518 >>6633641 >But that's not my argument. The field of mathematics with the most research being done is topology, if I recall. Thus it is the most prominent field. SERIOUSLY? Topology?! Come the fuck on.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 01:31:37 2014 No.6635571 >>6633665 The experimentalists then are the janitors of the theorists, not the other way around. The expereimentalists answer the question "what?". The theorists answer the question "why?". The latter is the cutting edge.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 02:19:58 2014 No.6635607 >>6635571 >"why?" Feynman_interview.avi

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 02:30:13 2014 No.6635622 Why does BrO2 has lower enthalpy of formation than H2O? Because BrOes before HOes!

Anonymous Thu Jul 10 03:53:15 2014 No.6635698

>>6635571
"God did it" is a valid theory, auto-coherent and explaining pretty much anything. It doesn't make it cutting-edge and doesn't give it any value either.
In the same way, there are many theories "out there" that are elegant and could explain stuff... but were simply proven wrong.

Anonymous Thu Jul 10 10:37:13 2014 No.6636013
File: 163 KB, 200x200, tumblr_lw88vio2xF1qhgfcd.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>be me
>work at a cafe
>once this guy starts coming, and having coffee everyday
>everyday he would tip me
>thing is it is an increasing amount each day, which is really surprising
>the first day he tipped me $1. At first I thought that was pretty good, especially for a $7 coffee, and cake
>the next day, he orders the same thing, and tips me $2, again I am so surprised
>the next day after that he tips me $3
>this guy literally tips me at an increasing rate each day
>this was 7 months ago, and still continues today
>yesterday he gave me $210
>in total he has given my $22 155
>literally over 22k just in tips, I am so fucking happy
>he tells me he is going to come here every single day, and continue tipping me the same way, then he winks at me
>at first I am so happy, I am literally going to get infiite money from this guy

Then suddenly, I realize it. My jaws drop in fear and sudden realization. My blood boils with anger and betrayal.

If this guy keeps doing this forever, he is eventually going to end up taking all my money back, plus 1/12 of a dollar away from me.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 10:43:28 2014 No.6636021 >>6635698 >explaining pretty much anything ... except the data, which is what a theory does, therefore "Goddiddit" is not a theory. It's a know-nothing brushoff of data.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 10:44:06 2014 No.6636022 >>6627893 >inventing an element topkek

>>	Unsolved Problem Thu Jul 10 10:50:32 2014 No.6636034 >>6625672 >aryan master race

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 19:15:34 2014 No.6636879 File: 24 KB, 460x276, ATxt1oI[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 10 19:22:05 2014 No.6636888 >>6635698 There are many people doing arithmetic but that doesn't mean they are mathematicians. Nice try retard.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 02:28:06 2014 No.6637848 >>6625672 okey

>>	None !SSDoCt0rTo Fri Jul 11 02:29:07 2014 No.6637851 already invented time-travel, it's just that no one cares enough to listen

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 03:46:28 2014 No.6637947 >>6633641 >topology Yeah, no. Topology is most certainly not the field with the most ongoing research.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 03:51:21 2014 No.6637957 >>6633631 I've seen this series before (in word problems) and I still have no idea how it works. Could somebody throw me a link to an explanation or something?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 04:16:45 2014 No.6637975 File: 144 KB, 833x1024, Wernher von Braun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Wernher von Braun He shot for the Moon But sometimes hit London

>>	None !SSDoCt0rTo Fri Jul 11 04:26:03 2014 No.6637980 >>6637957 yes. it comes from the failure of the decimal system to realize infinity. duodecimal system illustrates the equality much more cohesively. z-1234567890xy-z $zdxdy=$kzdz kz^2 + C = 0 C/(xy) = z^2

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 04:46:30 2014 No.6638002 >>6636888 I wasn't refering to undergrad wanna-be scientists' "theories", but to real theories derived by real scientists. There's a graveyard of theories that is large enough to fill even your anal cavity.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 09:25:15 2014 No.6638222 >>6636022 Well, Chlorine isn't freely available as a pure gas on Earth, therefore you could argue that the first scifag to free it via electrolysis did 'invent' Chlorine as a gas.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 09:54:42 2014 No.6638258 >>6625672 oh boy, I surely don't want this to happen.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:01:01 2014 No.6638265 >>6626764 i'm disappointed this isn't at least a bit to scale. i mean obviously the distances have to be compressed but at least get the planets roughly right. the earth is bigger than jupiter. and the sun is tiny.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:07:55 2014 No.6638272 >>6637957 1+2+3+4+n...=-1/12 This video provides a good laymans explanation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:13:10 2014 No.6638275 >>6637957 Forgot to mention, in the video (>>6638272) there are links to other videos which explain the proof in more detail if your not a layman

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:15:56 2014 No.6638280 >>6625672 >>>/b/

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:17:27 2014 No.6638283 >>6630211 I love geometrical symmetry and how it used in industry. I am a welder by profession while I finish my prosthetics degree and I love nothing more than to do the math that the draftsman was to lazy to do (notate via autocad).

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:20:13 2014 No.6638286 >>6630098 Very few understand it beyond "A cat in a box is alive and dead", because its been hijacked by the "Lel 2nerdy4u xDDD" fags on Facebook and Leddit

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:32:16 2014 No.6638298 File: 826 KB, 320x240, 1404659280226.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6631323 Fucking kek'd

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:38:36 2014 No.6638310 File: 183 KB, 650x560, 1386094729835.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6636879 I love these

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:49:53 2014 No.6638322 >>6631323 kek

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 10:52:31 2014 No.6638324 >>6636013 i bet that's how he got all that money from the start fucking math scams

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 11:04:15 2014 No.6638338 >>6636013 And then people wonder why they shouldn't take math at school. This scammer would have gotten away with it if you didn't know your math.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 11:13:40 2014 No.6638346 /sci/ humor is the fucking worst

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 11:17:17 2014 No.6638349 >>6636879 Excuse my autism, but what is actually funny about this?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 11:34:58 2014 No.6638377 >>6638349 It's meta-retarded, therefore hip post irony is the name of the game

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 11:43:01 2014 No.6638387 >>6636013 I didn't get it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 12:14:07 2014 No.6638436 File: 41 KB, 960x717, LMFAO analysis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 14:03:22 2014 No.6638634 >>6638387 Bait! -1/12

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 14:29:28 2014 No.6638650 >>6631768 wtf is that

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 14:37:35 2014 No.6638657 >>6638387 look at an exponential graph dumbass

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 18:42:14 2014 No.6639014 >>6633527 Could also be titled double slit experiment.gif

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 19:45:24 2014 No.6639097 >>6631332 Filename made me lol harder than the actuall joke

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 19:48:46 2014 No.6639100 File: 118 KB, 456x735, solarchurch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hey /sci/, They have solar panels in stained glass now. Could they theoretically have solar panels in frosted glass?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:09:58 2014 No.6639264 >>6637975 Is that the psychopath guy?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:17:09 2014 No.6639273 >>6639014 Is that a racist joke, or a child molester joke?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:18:02 2014 No.6639275 >>6626388 magnets

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:21:22 2014 No.6639282 >>6639273 neither

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:27:54 2014 No.6639296 >>6639282 I think I may spend too much time on 4chan.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:28:51 2014 No.6639298 >>6636021 Look up Barnett's theorem

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 22:52:04 2014 No.6639323 Oh god please someone post Carlos Sagan with the 500 hypogravitons and space fleet using gasoline

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 23:13:25 2014 No.6639355 >>6625682 Erm, shouldn't that be true for any mom?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 23:15:59 2014 No.6639361 File: 575 KB, 1000x500, carlos sagan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6639323

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 23:43:01 2014 No.6639383 >>6639275 I always wonder how plebs find magnetism more mystical than gravity. No one ever asks "fucking gravity. how does it work?", although it would be a more reasonable question.

>>	None !SSDoCt0rTo Fri Jul 11 23:47:38 2014 No.6639387 >>6639383 they both work the same way.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 23:51:33 2014 No.6639391 >>6639383 Everything does gravity. Trying to explain magnetic domains and why iron and magnetite are magnetic while silica and aluminum are not, isn't the easiest thing.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 11 23:52:18 2014 No.6639392 >>6639383 either would be a reasonable question, since they both work by bending space-time around them. It just happens on different scales.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 01:10:56 2014 No.6639489 >>6639392 >>6639392 >magnetism >bending space - time 0/10, retake your exams

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 02:21:09 2014 No.6639561 File: 243 KB, 665x351, batmouse.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6639489 http://www.gizmag.com/bat-levitating-wireless-mouse/26630/

Anonymous Sat Jul 12 02:41:49 2014 No.6639588

>>6639489
>magnetism not bending spacetime
Not true.
For an otherwise vacuous spacetime with classical electromagnetism,
<div class="math">R_{ \mu \nu } \propto F_{ \mu }^{ \kappa }F_{ \kappa \nu }- \frac {7}{8}g_{ \mu \nu }F^{ \alpha }_{ \beta }F^{ \beta }_{ \alpha }</div>where <span class="math">R_{ \mu \nu }[/spoiler] is the Ricci curvature tensor (the curvature of spactime), <span class="math">g_{ \mu \nu }[/spoiler] is the metric tensor, and <span class="math">F_{ \mu \nu }[/spoiler] is the electromagnetic field tensor.

None !SSDoCt0rTo Sat Jul 12 02:58:40 2014 No.6639608

>>6639391
>Trying to explain magnetic domains and why iron and magnetite are magnetic while silica and aluminum are not, isn't the easiest thing.
but it is? it's just half-filled d/f orbitals that arrange in an order resulting in an angular difference in electronic charge distribution instead of willy-nilly distribution or even placement

just like a pencil with a sharp tip thrust forward would hurt, a pencil thrown at your face could either slap or blind.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 03:23:27 2014 No.6639641 >>6639391 "Not doing magnetism" materials are the same as "not doing gravity" things, that lie on something. Or cosmic objects, that go around one another.

4tran Sat Jul 12 05:19:46 2014 No.6639719

>>6639588
You may be right, pedant, but you missed the point of the post you're responding to. The curvature that results from typical magnetic fields is trivial. Magnetic forces operate very differently from space time curvature (unless you're assuming some Kaluza Klein compactification).

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 06:27:02 2014 No.6639766 >>6626441 so lets see 8 or 9 times

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 08:09:27 2014 No.6639833 >>6625643 how many roads must a man walk down?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 09:33:46 2014 No.6639869 File: 53 KB, 767x174, rudin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 10:34:44 2014 No.6639943 >>6639869 You should change k to j. I also don't get what the Euler's identity is doing there. Is it because it's loved by many people here and considered beautiful?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 10:36:52 2014 No.6639946 >>6639943 >mfw this guy doesn't get Barnett's Identity

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 10:38:12 2014 No.6639949 >>6639833 approximately 6

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 10:46:43 2014 No.6639959 >>6639946 Why do you think I said to change k to j, retard? Not even n, j.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 10:49:09 2014 No.6639965 >>6639959 Because you're too dumb to understand the work of Jacob Barnett, the preeminent mathematician of our time.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 12:29:31 2014 No.6640058 >>6639965 > tfw being this retarded Jacob is autistic kid, he'll never make any contributions.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 12:34:08 2014 No.6640061 >>6640058 >he'll never make any contributions >Barnett's Identity >mfw you're retarded

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 12:55:13 2014 No.6640073 >>6640058 He's already 15 and published a research paper.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 12:59:42 2014 No.6640081 >>6625660 82 = Pb (plumbum) intended?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 12:59:44 2014 No.6640082 >>6640061 Wasn't this summed long ago by Ramanujan?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 18:51:09 2014 No.6640566 >>6630734 >you'd have fun trying that bitch >show me how that much "potential energy" can be stored on a nearly level track I dont think you belong here newfriend...

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 19:08:52 2014 No.6640592 >>6638387 The short answer is take infinity, do some simple algerbra and take an average. Complete and utter bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 19:19:38 2014 No.6640606 >>6639561 That concept is almost as idiotic as solar roads. >preproduction phase. Jesus I mad.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 19:36:08 2014 No.6640642 >>6640082 No you idiot. Barnett's Identity is far more complex than some trivial Ramanujan summation. Try reading the paper, although I doubt you'll understand it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 12 20:24:52 2014 No.6640715 >>6640642 The name of the paper?

Anonymous Sun Jul 13 01:47:54 2014 No.6641078

>>6640715

> New Derivation of the Ground-breaking "Trickster"-formula

Actually, Ramanujan did derive it earlier, but it wasn't as elegant (inb4: implying anything Ram has ever done is elegant). Jacob proposed to call it "Trickster" formula, because of how many mathematicians were confident it's wrong initially.
In the conclusion Barnett writes, that implications of this maths piece may indeed be followed by some unforeseen consequences. Perhaps, this equation will bring back the need in God into science? Or even disprove the fact, that c is maximal speed in vacuum?..

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 01:58:57 2014 No.6641094 >>6641078 >les Barnett mee mee >le god may may keep goin man you're bound to rile up somebody around here

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 02:10:50 2014 No.6641110 >>6627368 so how was your first year at college bobby?

4tran Sun Jul 13 02:13:20 2014 No.6641115

>>6641078
The fact that <span class="math">\tau[/spoiler] was invoked at all implies some hipster faggotry. That earlier post was just a reexpression of a well known identity. Fine, Barnett may have a new proof of this thing. However, the conclusions you're claiming he's making are crap:

> implications of this maths piece may indeed be followed by some unforeseen consequences.
maybe

> Perhaps, this equation will bring back the need in God into science?
lolwut - totally unrelated

> Or even disprove the fact, that c is maximal speed in vacuum?..
again, totally unrelated

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 02:14:48 2014 No.6641118 >>6641115 Barnett had nothing to do with it. He's trolling you and you are falling for it.

>>	4tran Sun Jul 13 02:25:44 2014 No.6641128 >>6641118 Kid, you can't get away with claiming you created something you didn't in math. I'm pretty sure it was him.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 02:32:39 2014 No.6641130 >>6640081 That's some Lead Dead Redemption you've got right there.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 03:13:26 2014 No.6641158 >>6640058 why are you even on this board?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 03:41:25 2014 No.6641171 >>6641158 To discuss science and math related stuff, why?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 03:49:19 2014 No.6641179 science, funny- kek maybe even top kek.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 03:56:27 2014 No.6641185 >>6641128 So are you a complete idiot or only pretending?

Anonymous Sun Jul 13 13:11:01 2014 No.6641812 [DELETED]

File: 239 KB, 1600x900, potato odyssey2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

What's up, niggers?

How does it feel that you will never be a member of the first country to launch a potato into SPACE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbvKCYhPVjs&t=8m45s

>>	op Sun Jul 13 15:02:39 2014 No.6641958 File: 1.96 MB, 279x157, happening.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] i didn't want this to happen

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 15:38:04 2014 No.6641990 >>6637975 Nice.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 15:56:01 2014 No.6642014 >>6633634 I'm sincerely curious, where does one get to see which fields are moneyworthy?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 13 17:09:14 2014 No.6642093 >>6633542 This is pretty much how /sci/ works.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math