/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.6570070]

Hi, I am a scientist. I believe evolution is wrong and that creationist is the most likely answer (based on evidence). I am NOT a Christian. I just simply weighed the evidence and came to this conclusion.

I have talked to many people who believe otherwise and have been very successful in convincing them.

If you are a true scientist like myself, I invite you to ask me any doubts you might have about creationism or present me areas where evidence is greater for evolutionism.

Thank you! Ask away! I hope we can spark some really interesting debates here and maybe change the views of some open-minded people (like myself!).

[Anonymous No.6570071]

>>6570070
>Ask away!
I'll start.

Why?

[Anonymous No.6570074]

>>6570071
That is a really loaded question! In short, the various records we have of the time point to a creator (Gods and religions from all across the globe independently recorded the same happenings). There is obviously much more to it than this though!

[Anonymous No.6570135]

>>6570070
>I believe evolution is wrong and my belief is just as valid as Science
back to the fifteenth century with you

[Anonymous No.6570150]

>Scientist
>Believes Creationism in spite of their being no evidence backing it
>Believes Creationism, an inherently unfalsifiable ideology
You do understand the underlying philosophy of science, right?

[Anonymous No.6570184]

[Anonymous No.6570186]

>>6570070
Are you a big guy?

[Anonymous No.6570187]

OP.
Just stop. You're truly not that great of a practicing scientist if you have such beliefs..
On another note. Is their a "god" of the universe. Maybe. But it's definitely not the one portrayed by the bible.
All religions are very similar in that they just reanimate astronomical discoveries into a mythological story. This developed throughout history into what it is today.
Do some research on it.

[Anonymous No.6570190]

>>6570187
Hi guys, I bring you some popcorn.
Let's share a good time debating (sic) about creationism vs evolution (hey you know, it's just a theory, as indicated by its name)

[Anonymous No.6570193]

>>6570186
For some people.

[Anonymous No.6570201]

>>6570070
Can you explain evolution in detail?

Also, outline the creationist explanation for observable changes in DNA.

[Anonymous No.6570202]

>>6570187
>Just stop. You're truly not that great of a practicing scientist if you have such beliefs..

Eh, being a scientist does not shield one from having insane beliefs. Relatively informed people throughout history have upheld ridiculous ideas due to the manner information is made available to them.


Still, this thread will most likely be balls.

[Anonymous No.6570267]

>>6570135

>implying science and the Church weren't in bed for centuries

[Anonymous No.6570275]

>>6570070
stop

[Anonymous No.6570278]

>>6570071
>>6570135
>>6570186
>>6570201
you have responded to a troll post. you are cancer

[TrolleWarrior No.6570290]

>>6570275
These images are a "clever" way of avoiding to have to deal with trolls. It used to be an age of restraint and fairly good defenses against trolls, by simply not responding. But as I have observed, the fish/bate meme has caused increased responding to trolls and decreased overall resistance to them, for, again, the old way was restraint and not responding, which builds tolerance. I belive that this old way is better, but it can only be restored through a revolution of sorts. Hence, I declare that to each one who posts these "clever" fish/bate images, the response should be that the one "fell for the troll", as was once the way for anyone who does respond to trolls. In such a way, the "fish/bate excuse" shall be exfoliated and the immunity restored.
So I say, "you, sir, fell for the troll post of the OP, lol"

[Anonymous No.6570295]

>>6570070
What did you think of the lego movie? (Bear with me)

[Anonymous No.6570297]

>>6570070
What degrees do you hold, and what is this compelling evidence you have evaluated?

What type of creationism do you actually support?