[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 245 KB, 500x280, profesor paradox live action.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455679 No.6455679[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

what would happen to the scientific comunity if tomorrow we find out without a glimmer of a that god exists.

god existing is now a scientific fact, what new theories do we develop around that, do we change the model of the universe? what is the scientific reaction?

>> No.6455683

>>6455679
Depends on which God obviously

>> No.6455685

Which god? There are plenty to choose from.

>> No.6455704

>>6455683
>>6455685
good point, lets make things interesting
the dafault answer is the judeo christian god.

if you feel creative pick another god and develop

>> No.6455711

>>6455704
If the judeo christian god exists the scientific method is just wrong, the two are mutually exclusive, i would go to the church and pray

>> No.6455712

>>6455711
>the two are mutually exclusive
no they aren't you tardshit

>> No.6455716

>>6455679

Well we can then send radio signals to him asking all unanswered questions. Solving the puzzles and fully understanding why we are here and how he created it. If he ignores us then we send nukes at him cause good old murica

>> No.6455718

>>6455711
I disagree.
But I would have to ask why he lied or allowed those that claimed to speak for him lie.

>> No.6455725

>>6455679
I would don my most gentlemanly fedora and prepare myself for war

>> No.6455734

>>6455712
If the book of genesis is true a lot of science is wrong, if adam and eve is true a lot of science is wrong

Maybe they aren't mutually exclusive, but you gotta admit something is wrong with the scientific method, at it's fucking core.

>> No.6455735

>>6455734

The existence of God wouldn't necessarily validate the Bible.

>> No.6455739

all atheists disintegrate with the shame of being ultimately proven wrong

>> No.6455744
File: 112 KB, 768x1024, ronswanson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455744

If irrefutable evidence of a God presented itself tomorrow two things would happen.

Scientists would review the evidence, accept it, and adjust accordingly.

The religious would divide into groups claiming it to be the God of their religion, and groups claiming it to not be the TRUE God.

>> No.6455750

>>6455744
i know scientist would adjust but what would those adjustmens involve?

does quantum mechanics makes more sense now? does it make less sense? can we now be sure that the big bang happened?

>> No.6455757
File: 125 KB, 1024x768, x9n2QDN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455757

>>6455750

The adjustments would be dependent on the nature of the God as we observe it, and any information it may present to us. It is therefore an indeterminate variable.

However the adjustments to the religious groups are determined by human nature and much more easy to speculate about.

I would guess the big three, Judaism, Christianity and Islam would begin attempting to elicit and endorsement from the God, if no such endorsement was given they would begin warring amongst themselves. If an endorsement of a single religion was given all other religions would denounce the God and claim it wasn't a God at all but instead some sort of demon, alien, or even the Anti-Christ.

>> No.6455759

>>6455735
amen to that, brother.

>> No.6455760

>>6455716
I lol'd.

>> No.6455772

>>6455704
>the dafault answer is the judeo christian god.
Which one?

>> No.6455774

>>6455757
religious people would act stupid, more news at eleven.

what conclusion can we draw about reality knowing that an entity that can clearly manipulate an arguably infinite amount of energy exists?

>> No.6455779

>>6455772
yavhe

also the "life forms" if we might call them that such as archangels, cherubs, etc also exist

>> No.6455785

>>6455779
>yavhe
Given all of the various natures and attributes ascribed to beings called that name, that doesn't help a lot.

>> No.6455786
File: 156 KB, 500x500, God.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455786

>>6455679
This anon got close
>Scientists would review the evidence, accept it, and adjust accordingly.
As did this one
>The adjustments would be dependent on the nature of the God

...

>god existing is now a scientific fact
Ok
>what new theories do we develop around that
None. There is no more guessing and there are no more theories; God did it; just ask him how.

>do we change the model of the universe?
See above. Maybe you got your model of the Universe right and you can keep it. Maybe not; if not ditch it and ask God how the Universe works.

At heart this is a stupid thread. But that's to be expected any time some anon mentions religion/god on /sci/

>> No.6455791
File: 1.12 MB, 1605x899, hudsuckerproxy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455791

>>6455779
>>6455774

Technically speaking we can't draw any conclusions about reality if specific entities can alter the observable laws of physics at will.

Basically science (measurement and observation) would cease to have a purpose and our lives would be in the hands of beings we could never hope to understand.

>mfw

>> No.6455806

>>6455718
because free will??

>> No.6455815
File: 15 KB, 440x261, 1989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455815

>>6455806

I would like to ask him why he created things we aren't allowed to do, then created us with an ability to be tempted into those things, then why he created a horrific punishment for us if we do the things he created for us to be tempted to do.

That seems like kind of a dick move.

>> No.6455847

>>6455815
because if you can only do things that please God, there is no value in doing them in the first place...

>> No.6455869

>>6455847

So God is a pissy girlfriend that wants you to do something for her but says ONLY IF YOU REALLY WANT TO when you know that if you don't you are going to get hell.

Except the hell part is literal.

>> No.6455871

>>6455679
1) How do we control it
2) How do we monetize it even further
3) Can we weaponize it?

>> No.6455877

>>6455871

>Power
>Money
>War

We were here first Scientists. Keep your dirty hands off.

>> No.6455881
File: 199 KB, 595x335, pope2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455881

>>6455877

>> No.6455890

If there is a god, I imagine him as a sort of computer programmer more than a truly divine being. Most religious books are so far from scientific fact that I don't believe the god we found would be any of those gods but rather one not described in literature so far.

>> No.6455895
File: 68 KB, 1024x576, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6455895

>>6455890
This. Besides, will all the theoretical life forms that could, and probably do exist in this universe, it's basically impossible for one religion to be correct, unless of course divine intervention did actually occur.

>> No.6455909

>>6455679
It would be the greatest day of the history of science. All would be explained.

Just like figuring out a definitive theory of everything

>> No.6455924

>>6455679
Fuck off.