do EK and harriet still come here? What about blackman?

File: 6 KB, 344x352, 1338925329984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 02:47:50 2014 No.6381827 [DELETED]

do EK and harriet still come here? What about blackman?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 02:50:20 2014 No.6381829 File: 329 KB, 480x600, 1393487407276.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6381827 no we're all partying in the basement with aether and madsci

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 02:53:49 2014 No.6381835

>>6381827

I miss mad scientist with his hamster esperments.

Too bad they doxed him and found out he was a pedophlic sex offender. Personally I don't mind child love but apparently I'm a minority.

(not a pedo myself but wanted to be "abused" by someone as a child)

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 02:55:49 2014 No.6381838 File: 9 KB, 500x500, scipanda.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What about the old maymays? Enjoy your ban, pandas, cutescience, 300k starting, infantile cartoons, etc

>>	Blackman Thu Feb 27 02:57:49 2014 No.6381839 I'm here, but I got a new laptop so I lost all my old /sci/ pictures. Time to make some OC

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 02:58:49 2014 No.6381840 >>6381839 when was the last time you had the best troll awards?

>>	Blackman Thu Feb 27 03:02:49 2014 No.6381842 >>6381840 I feel like it was 2012, but I pretty much tried to remove everything 4chan related from my memory so that year might not be right. I honestly couldn't even name one current tripfag on this board

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:05:19 2014 No.6381843 >>6381842 How's the lyme disease

Blackman Thu Feb 27 03:10:49 2014 No.6381849

>>6381843
Haha Jesus man, who are you? Pls be Teacunt.
Great memory, but I hate antibiotics and it's not really bothering me that much anymore so I'm just hoping I get better on my own, lel (inb4 I die in my sleep tonight).

I've come to the board every now and then just for nostalgia but it seems so dead compared to before, I don't even bother posting

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:20:49 2014 No.6381855 >>6381849 I was just an anon in the best days of /sci/. Let's see, I was the one who found out EK has borderline personality disorder. Made lots of shitposting threads about pandas. Forced "Enjoy Your Ban" and "infantile cartoons" a shit ton.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:29:19 2014 No.6381863 >>6381855 yep, you're the reason most of us left.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:30:49 2014 No.6381865 >>6381863 >AL being butthurt

>>	Blackman Thu Feb 27 03:31:49 2014 No.6381867 >>6381863 Hahaha

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:32:19 2014 No.6381869 >>6381838 >Enjoy your ban, pandas, cutescience, infantile cartoons, etc >2012 >old ha ha ha ha

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:34:49 2014 No.6381873 >>6381855 >forced "infantile cartoons" a shit ton. kill yourself, seriously.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:35:49 2014 No.6381875 File: 100 KB, 1000x1000, numner numbre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6381838 I not even post infantile cartoons much but god I hated that mod with the passion of 1000 suns.

>>	Anonymoustripfag Thu Feb 27 03:36:19 2014 No.6381876 >>6381842 I always post with this name but sometimes I don't use the tripcode

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:37:19 2014 No.6381877 >>6381875 Not that guy but come on bat guano was still /sci/'s best mod... I mean look at the place now.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:38:19 2014 No.6381879 >>6381849 Over modoration killed off allot of the good ones. Under modoration drove off the rest.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 03:38:19 2014 No.6381880 >>6381827 the real question should be why carl isnt range banned yet

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 04:19:19 2014 No.6381915 >>6381835 Are you kidding me? I Madsci was the seabro designing those underwater hamster habitats right? Man, that sucks.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 04:22:49 2014 No.6381918 >>6381915 some anon doxed him and then hounded him every time he showed up. eventually he went away. most of us would rather have one madsci here than a thousand of that stupid anon that ran him off.

>>	AL !!9YCj0HNhQB4 Thu Feb 27 04:35:19 2014 No.6381931 >>6381865 wat

>>	Psistar !!bRma1Ao62vX Thu Feb 27 04:59:49 2014 No.6381954 I...I'm here guize

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:24:45 2014 No.6382167 >>6381880 I haven't seen Carl since 2012.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:32:45 2014 No.6382176 >>6381918 >most of us No. Speak for yourself.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:46:45 2014 No.6382191 >>6381849 >>6381855 >>6381931 Here we have the 3 posters who are mainly responsible for /sci/'s downfall by shitting it up for years. Can we please rangeban them?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:47:45 2014 No.6382192 ITT: cancer recidivism

>>	AL !!9YCj0HNhQB4 Thu Feb 27 09:56:45 2014 No.6382200 >>6382191 How was I shitting it up? just because you don't understand the things I post about doesn't mean its shitposting.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:59:15 2014 No.6382203 >>6382200 We're all sick of you, Teacup. You killed /sci/ and now you're ravaging its rotten corpse. When are you finallay gonna kill yourself, you insufferable autist?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 09:59:45 2014 No.6382202 >>6382200 Now you're just acting retarded to make us think you are retarded. You succeeded.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:26:36 2014 No.6382299 >>6382191 Humour kept /sci/ going. Look at the place now. It's had almost 2 years to recover from then. Overmoderation killed /sci/

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:30:06 2014 No.6382306 >>6382299 >Humour kept /sci/ going. I agree. I love /sci/'s humor. Teacup's and blackman's autistic shitposting however is the opposite of humor.

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:37:36 2014 No.6382308

>>6382299
>Overmoderation killed /sci/

Bullshit. /sci/ was better when we had the "inane garbage" guy in the mod team. The undermoderation after he left damaged /sci/ beyond repair. I'm not saying /sci/ was highest level academic discussion in 2011 but it was certainly better than it is today. At least some serious threads were possible and happened back then, without instant derailment and without the board being completely flooded with troll threads. Sure we always had the occasional religion troll but look how it is now in 2014. Nowadays religion threads are among the higher quality threads when compared to all the troll math copypasta reposts, philosophy garbage and school advice blogging.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:40:06 2014 No.6382311 >>6382308 but seriously does .99999 equal 1 I'd love it if a tripfag answered me, they earned their respect

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:43:06 2014 No.6382315 >>6382311 I'm almost missing Josef. He was a pseudo-intellectual and pretentious dumbass but at least he talked about physics.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:49:06 2014 No.6382324 >>6382308 /sci/ was never over moderated. They never deleted the religion, shitmath or homework threads, only racism and "race science facts" get deleted. Mod is a nigJew.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:50:06 2014 No.6382329 >>6382324 There was a short period of time where consciousness spam threads and 0.999 threads got deleted almost instantly after reporting them. It was the best time /sci/ ever had.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:53:36 2014 No.6382332 File: 1.33 MB, 2780x2428, 1342900397367.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382324 and posts with anime pictures and threads with math in them that look like homework threads

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 11:54:36 2014 No.6382333 >>6382329 I'm sorry I missed it. It must have been amazing.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 12:09:06 2014 No.6382348 File: 1.23 MB, 604x1422, fate_of_sci.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] OC for related Although OC and making of OC has long since been driven away from this place.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 14:05:31 2014 No.6382596 >>6382348 game of thorns a shit

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 14:09:31 2014 No.6382609 >>6382332 Hahaha justice.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 14:41:04 2014 No.6382683 File: 17 KB, 300x274, 1306852461908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382596

Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Thu Feb 27 15:15:34 2014 No.6382752

>>6381827
the downfall of sci it was predicted because of the completely influx of bad posting into 4chan drawn by the boards of useless topics and the leaving of people of the sci board of the 4chan into the boards of the other internet web places and instead we have this sci we are left with everyone could see it was coming eventually with the departure of all things EK the sci has stagnated but i hope for it to become good again

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 15:30:04 2014 No.6382774 Turtles don't have spines, guys. c + c = 2c Take your pills. Ecology >Biology >Real science

Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Thu Feb 27 15:44:52 2014 No.6382797

>>6382774
I KNOW you are making a joke of my ideas but please understand that scientific research operates under the circumstances of society and by such the convention that turtles have spines is deeply in it such that no one has ever bothered to try to not test for the falsity of turtle spines

i dont think it's a conspiracy but that turtles do NOT HAVE SPINES it's a fact it's a fact

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 15:46:22 2014 No.6382799 >>6382797 Can you please go away?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 15:46:22 2014 No.6382802 >>6382797 My herpetology professor laughed at this.

Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Thu Feb 27 15:51:52 2014 No.6382808

>>6382802
please please do not cling to their lies turtles do not have spines and it such a misconception due to lies and jokes and science cant see this and it's not the truth i just want the truth to be known every if everyone here says to stop i know that the people who support my ideas they know that i am right and turtles DO NOT HAVE SPINES IT'S ALL JUST A lie

>>6382799
please i changed i just want the truth about science

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 15:52:22 2014 No.6382809 >>6382808 Burden of proof lies upon you.

Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Thu Feb 27 15:55:52 2014 No.6382812

>>6382809
i cannot prove it but please think with me let go of your preconceived notions and please just use pure logic with me for this

if evolution did not stop for the turtle then why would it retain the useless spine if it has the shell to support the weight of its tissue

please use LOGIC please just FIX THE MISTAKE of science

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 15:56:23 2014 No.6382814 File: 440 KB, 1024x1024, 1375046484739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >Blackman never threw a cake into Josefs face :(

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:02:23 2014 No.6382821
File: 38 KB, 332x493, shiggy diggy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6382812
>i cannot prove it but please think with me let go of your preconceived notions and please just use pure logic with me for this
>i cannot prove it but please think
>i cannot prove it
>cannot prove it
>cannot prove
>use logic
Top kek.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:02:53 2014 No.6382822 >>6382812 How much did you suffer in your childhood?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:05:23 2014 No.6382826 >>6382812 Nerves. That is a spine. "Why keep the spine?" Your're right. A turtle that just lays there is MUCH better. Here, drink a gallon of semen.

>>	Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Thu Feb 27 16:10:55 2014 No.6382834 >>6382821 >>6382822 >>6382826 no one understands the pain of knowing and not being believed by anyone but your friends

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:10:55 2014 No.6382835 >>6382812 >implying the spine isn't a required support structure for the shell itself >implying the shell isn't fuzed together of multiple parts

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:13:54 2014 No.6382840 File: 375 KB, 1280x960, dieinafire.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382797 >>6382808 not sure if retarded or just trolling or what the fuck, but I for one am sick to FUCKING DEATH of retarded trolls on /sci/ pic very much related.

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 16:17:24 2014 No.6382844
File: 56 KB, 800x427, 1393535878044.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6382834
When your friends say "Whatever, fine. You're right. Go away." that does not mean they agree with you.

The spine is the nerves that go to your feet and let you if you are walking on carpet, gravel or glass. THAT is a spine.

As >>6382835
said, it is a good way to mount the shell. For that matter, those vertebra don't look extremely complex, do they?

>>	I guzzle my cum from teacups so I can be classy when I rais(...) Thu Feb 27 16:24:24 2014 No.6382849 >>6382844 My goodness! Vertebra! Turtles have them!

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:18:07 2014 No.6383339 >>6381918 Funny thing is I know all about him a year or so before he got doxed, He had a website asking for donations I sent him a small one and got his name and address which I googled. Didn't feel like outing him because he was cool though.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:20:37 2014 No.6383341 File: 21 KB, 276x221, Blue dolphin whale .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382176 He can speak for me. I loved them hamster threads.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:22:07 2014 No.6383348 File: 61 KB, 1134x856, Levitrolling.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382299 I got banned for a month for creating this image and posting it here. Kindo turned me off of this place.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:22:37 2014 No.6383347 >>6383341 You loved infantile shitposting? >>>/s4s/

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:26:37 2014 No.6383356 >>6382167 that's funny i see carl posting every single day

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:29:37 2014 No.6383361

>>6382308
Still remember this thread because I liked it, don't know why.

Something like
>I want to be closer to the ocean so lets bring it closer. If we take coal dust and sprinkle it on Greenland it will change its albeto by some factor (i dont remember it was allong time ago thread) and the energy from the sun is x watts per sq m times y hours and z amount of energy is needed to melt ice so it will only take a number of years. Lets do it guys.

A thread flowed that lasted more than a week just discussing all the maths and physics and logistics of carrying out the plan. Lots of peeps got into it.

Nowadays you post a thread like that and it will be totally ignored and no one will care one bit.

My point I guess if I had one was that people where more engaged back then.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:30:08 2014 No.6383365 >>6383363 nope

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:30:37 2014 No.6383363 >>6383356 Are you hallucinating?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:32:37 2014 No.6383367 File: 90 KB, 798x596, BAN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6382332 LOL this is literally my ban I got and appealed for posting the question about the Zygote being transplanted.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:34:07 2014 No.6383371 >>6382752 Allot of us went to >>>/diy/

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:34:37 2014 No.6383370 >>6383367 You deserved it. I wish we still had that mod. He was great and under his moderation /sci/ improved.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:35:08 2014 No.6383373 >>6383371 I don't see any science and math being posted on that board.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:35:37 2014 No.6383372 >>6383356 Where do you see him?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:36:56 2014 No.6383375 >>6383373 I don't see any science and math posted on /sci/ either.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:37:56 2014 No.6383378 >>6383370 Banning people for harmless pictures and silencers is the purest form of cancer.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:38:56 2014 No.6383383 >>6383373 The people moved and there conversations changed with the new setting.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:39:26 2014 No.6383386 >>6383378 Pictures should be on topic and informative. It's in the rules.

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:48:56 2014 No.6383405
File: 60 KB, 206x220, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6383386
>It's in the rules.
/sci/ - Science & Math
>All science and math related topics welcome.
>Homework threads will be deleted, and the poster banned.
>No "religion vs. science" threads.

Where?

You do realize that you are in the math and science section an anime and japanese culture imageboard right?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:50:56 2014 No.6383411 >>6383383 >conversations changed We're talking about people with science and math education, not NEET retards, high schoolers, and laypersons with excess spare time on their hands.

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:51:56 2014 No.6383414

>>6383405
>Where?
>>>/global/rules/3
>>>/global/rules/6
>>>/global/rules/13

>You do realize that you are in the math and science section an anime and japanese culture imageboard right?
No, I am in the science and math section of 4chan. Take a look http://www.4chan.org/
>4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images. There are boards dedicated to a variety of topics

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:52:26 2014 No.6383418 File: 93 KB, 640x480, 16720127.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6383411 And everyone with science and math education sits around doing and discussing only math and science?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:52:56 2014 No.6383419 >>6383405 http://www.4chan.org/rules#global13

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:55:56 2014 No.6383426 >>6383418 There is no reason why people who came to /sci/ to discuss science and math move to a board with a completely different topic. If they wanted to discuss science and math in the first place, that desire shouldn't change.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:55:56 2014 No.6383429 File: 86 KB, 480x702, 1393556153350.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6383419 >Pictures should be on topic and informative. It's in the rules. != >Do not use avatars or attach signatures to your posts. Quite the stretch your making there.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:57:26 2014 No.6383432 >>6383429 I'm not that guy. I just replied to the idiot posting infantile cartoons as an avatar.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:58:26 2014 No.6383435 >>6383386 Why do you cherry pick? If you wanted to follow the rules perfectly then memes, stock images, troll science, image macros, etcetera should also have been banned. The mod never deleted those.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 21:58:56 2014 No.6383437 >>6383429 that one is covered under http://www.4chan.org/rules#global3

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:02:56 2014 No.6383445 >>6383372 shitposting on /sci/

Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:03:26 2014 No.6383447
File: 56 KB, 600x424, 1337576039991.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6383437
No it's not.

That is not a macro image it has an entire story. Replys are to be on topic it does not mention pictures being related.

Your justifying your asshole attitude by internally expounding the rules to apply to what ever situation you choose.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:04:26 2014 No.6383448 >>6383445 Where? The last time I saw him was in 2012.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:05:57 2014 No.6383454 >>6383448 in a lot of shitposting threads >The last time I saw him was in 2012. very odd because carl is on right now

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:07:26 2014 No.6383458 >>6383454 >is on right now Link?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:08:26 2014 No.6383462 >>6383458 http://boards..<span class="math">[/spoiler]4chan<span class="math">[/spoiler].org/sci

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:10:59 2014 No.6383467 >>6383462 I should of seen this. YOU are Carl. Welcome back! We missed you.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:12:28 2014 No.6383470 >>6383467 wrong answer try again

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 22:25:58 2014 No.6383493 File: 180 KB, 900x648, 1341716847827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6383470 troll tan please leave

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 23:01:15 2014 No.6383574 >>6383470 R u the eggman?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 23:08:15 2014 No.6383595 File: 27 KB, 350x260, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6383574 The April Theses?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 23:17:45 2014 No.6383621 >>6383467 >should of

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 23:18:15 2014 No.6383623 File: 97 KB, 900x585, 1393561088339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6383595

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 27 23:55:15 2014 No.6383692 >>6383371 That explains why /diy/ is filled with retards with zero engineering sense. Or any sense at all.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 01:17:14 2014 No.6383805 >>6383339 http://hampture.blogspot.ca/?m=1

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:11:07 2014 No.6385019

>>6383805
That blog is an abomination of mental illness. Guessing from contents and style it appears to be written by a preteen or early teen who is severely fucked up in the head. Actually that the guy is in his late twenties. But then again he's a registered pedophile sex offender, so it becomes less surprising that his abnormal psychological condition comes along with other comorbidities.

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:23:37 2014 No.6385034

>>6385019
>That blog is an abomination of mental illness. Guessing from contents and style it appears to be written by a preteen or early teen who is severely fucked up in the head.
So it's something you don't like and because of that you project everything bad about yourself onto it and the author? You really have nothing better to do?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:24:07 2014 No.6385037 >>6385034 Science always starts with describing factual observations as accurately as possible. Please learn the scientific method.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:26:07 2014 No.6385040 >>6385037 Interesting... your vitriol was an excellent demonstration on how to do the exact opposite of that. Great work.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:32:37 2014 No.6385050 >>6385040 >ad hominem

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:36:37 2014 No.6385060 >>6385050 Oops, you misquoted my post when you meant >>6385019.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:39:08 2014 No.6385067 >>6385060 What motivates you to defend that pedo blogger?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:43:07 2014 No.6385075 >>6385067 What motivates you to repetitively insult him without any hint of underlying substance? Jealously?

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:47:37 2014 No.6385082
File: 3 KB, 150x150, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6383370

Yah i did deserve it. But I was pissed.

At first it was just a warning. So I really started bitching about the modoration hard core. Lots of other anons did too. Got banned for the bitching not the picture.

It was still fun.

I chose the picture because he looked contemplative and because allot of fags really got riled up by cartoons in those days. The picture was bait and allotuf fishes like you got hooked.

I don't really mind the bans. Sometimes I troll just to get them so I can concentrate on my homework again.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:52:37 2014 No.6385092 >>6385075 Everything I said was well substantiated. Are you illiterate?

>>	then repost as you intended Anonymous Fri Feb 28 17:58:37 2014 No.6385101 File: 29 KB, 1012x640, how to un dirp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385060

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:01:37 2014 No.6385102 File: 19 KB, 326x306, boson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6381838 >cutescience :3 >>6382812 >Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Worst tripfriend on all of /sci/ and probably on all of 4chan. When will EK be back? :(

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:03:37 2014 No.6385105 >>6382596 That's Lord of the Rings

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:07:07 2014 No.6385111

>>6385092
am not the anon you where arguing with but

Firstly he is not a pedophole as his sexual partner was late teens and he was early twenties.

Secondly what's wrong with having sex with teenagers anyhow. Fucking moral fags trying to criminalize anything that doesn't fit their version of morality.

Your hate speech is criminal.

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:11:07 2014 No.6385119

>>6385111
>Firstly he is not a pedophole as his sexual partner was late teens and he was early twenties.

She was underaged (13 or 14 if I remember correctly) and he was 22. By definition that makes him a pedophile. If you endorse such perversion, you are mentally ill.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:12:08 2014 No.6385123 >>6385102 Do you want her back? I don't think I've ever seen her make a worthwhile post.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:14:07 2014 No.6385125 >>6385119 >By definition that makes him a pedophile. By what definition? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:17:37 2014 No.6385130

>>6385123
>I don't think I've ever seen her make a worthwhile post.
Well, she knew nothing about science, thats for sure. She was especially brain-dead about the maths, which is evidenced in some screenshots. But still this board was so colourful a couple years ago when she and other tripfriends posted. It was like a small community and probably the best board on 4chan. /sci/ will never be this good again.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:17:37 2014 No.6385131 >>6385092 Absolutely nothing you've written thus far is even slightly substantiated. Are you delusional?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:18:37 2014 No.6385134 >>6385131 >denial

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:20:37 2014 No.6385141 >>6385134 Indeed, I'm denying your empty insults. Hopefully you have enough grey matter left behind that thick skull to understand this without resorting to shitposting.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:20:37 2014 No.6385142 >>6385130 Why doesn't /sci/ have any tripfags anymore?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:21:37 2014 No.6385145 >>6385141 >ad hominem

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:23:07 2014 No.6385149 >>6385145 You shouldn't use terms you don't understand. The second sentence in that post is ideally a complement.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:24:08 2014 No.6385152 File: 13 KB, 526x54, yeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385142 Ask yourself this. Why would YOU tripfag on /sci/? Right.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:27:07 2014 No.6385158 >>6385149 >projecting

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:29:37 2014 No.6385161 >>6385152 I considered tripfagging. Never done it before. But you fags would probably just try to troll me. ;(

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:30:07 2014 No.6385165 >>6385152 credibility and authority if you know what you're saying.

Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:33:07 2014 No.6385174
File: 665 KB, 500x707, 1384656694829.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6385161
>I considered tripfagging. Never done it before.
What is your area of expertise? But whatever it is (and it better be maths or physics or tcs), remember the best trick. Start obscure threads asking obscure questions that people won't know the answers for. Without your trip, of course. Proceed to answer the question an hour or two later, with your trip, of course. And an avatar, preferably.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:35:07 2014 No.6385178 >>6385158 There you are doing it again.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:49:37 2014 No.6385203 >>6385174 I could start a thread about philosophy of mind.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 18:54:37 2014 No.6385210 >>6381954 your gf isn't science

>>	wow /sci/ really sucks they literally argueing about (...) Fri Feb 28 19:00:37 2014 No.6385217 File: 101 KB, 600x391, 1393632033264.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385178 baby's first troll?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:01:07 2014 No.6385219 >>6385210 actually, she engineer.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:26:18 2014 No.6385264 File: 75 KB, 500x572, 121112-knot9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] is there any way to quantify how many people posting here were already there in "the better times", 2011 to 2012?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:36:47 2014 No.6385287 >>6385264 We could count ... Let me start: 1

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:38:47 2014 No.6385290 >>6385287 2

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:42:17 2014 No.6385295 File: 106 KB, 868x535, Re banded noip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385264 Here is some OC, I never posted this ban before. I don't think so at least because the screenshot still had the ip.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:47:47 2014 No.6385303 >>6385295 What did you post?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:49:47 2014 No.6385306 File: 68 KB, 1134x856, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385303 this variant of my levitrolliong picture

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:51:17 2014 No.6385310 >>6385303 >>6385306 the I'm on a boat like a boss youtube video was popular then, and it really pissed off the moderator. Also magnets fucking miracles from icp. Any boat thread or magnet thread would be banned instantly.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:52:47 2014 No.6385312 >>6385306 >>6385310 >posting troll science >in 2012 The troll science meme died in 2010. You fucking deserved the ban.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:54:47 2014 No.6385318 File: 144 KB, 1377x709, galois.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I liked that one enough to screenshot it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:56:18 2014 No.6385324 File: 87 KB, 540x540, 1347070549318.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385312 But I just like trolling so much.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 28 19:56:47 2014 No.6385323 >>6385318 not funny

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 01:09:40 2014 No.6385816 >>6381954 how's your gf?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 01:20:09 2014 No.6385821 Christ this thread is disgusting. /sci/ still has a long way to go

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 01:55:09 2014 No.6385862 >>6385324 because you haven't found better outlets for your emotions

Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:02:31 2014 No.6385919

0.\overline{999}\ne1[/spoiler]
Proof:
0.9\ne1[/spoiler]
0.99\ne1[/spoiler]
0.999\ne1[/spoiler]
\vdots[/spoiler]
0.\overline{999}\ne1[/spoiler]
Quod Erat Demonstrandium

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:04:30 2014 No.6385922 >>6385919 <span class="math"> 1 \neq 5[/spoiler] <span class="math"> 1+1 \neq 5[/spoiler] <span class="math"> 1+1+1 \neq 5[/spoiler] <span class="math"> 1+1+1+1 \neq 5[/spoiler] therefor <span class="math"> 1+1+1+1+1 \neq 5[/spoiler]

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:06:30 2014 No.6385924 >>6385922 If you tried that algorithm on a computer it would stop at the fifth step.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:18:00 2014 No.6385938 >>6385821 This, why haven't these autismal fucks been banned?

>>	Harriet Sat Mar 1 03:24:00 2014 No.6385943 >>6385938 That's offensive, reported

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:29:00 2014 No.6385947 >>6385943 I find it hard to believe that all these shitposters are coming out of the woodwork in a single thread.

>>	Harriet Sat Mar 1 03:35:00 2014 No.6385950 >>6385947 Harriet has always made quality posts on this board. He is not a shitposter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:37:30 2014 No.6385952 >>6385947 Harriet has always made quality posts on this board. She is not a shitposter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:41:00 2014 No.6385958 File: 11 KB, 257x187, implying 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385950 >>6385952

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:46:30 2014 No.6385961 File: 40 KB, 833x416, pseudotrolling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385958

Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:50:00 2014 No.6385965
File: 60 KB, 420x403, 1339815960893.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

/sci/ will always be shit

\rlap{\above{1em}\displaystyle \phantom{Josef will never come back}}[/spoiler]Josef will never come back[/spoiler]

;_:

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 03:54:30 2014 No.6385968 File: 31 KB, 833x327, Real_thread.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385961 Nice try

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 04:08:00 2014 No.6385976 >>6385968 http://archive.foolz.us/sci/thread/6381827/#6385950

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 04:16:30 2014 No.6385981 File: 2 KB, 210x187, 130549531.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6385968

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 04:42:30 2014 No.6385990 how to improve things?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 04:59:07 2014 No.6385999 >>6385965 wtf

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 05:06:37 2014 No.6386002 >>6385990 leave. /sci/ got 9000 times better when I stopped coming here. I enjoyed it much more too.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 05:24:48 2014 No.6386013 >>6385990 Contribute to good threads. Report bad threads. Make good threads. We could probably make an app that allowed us to mark shitposting threads in some sort of distributed fashion.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 05:29:07 2014 No.6386018 >>6385990 >>6385990 Stop driving off the best posters.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 05:55:39 2014 No.6386040 >>6386018 Who are they and how are they being driven off?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 11:23:30 2014 No.6386363 >>6385965 Thanks for the frog. I always wished I had saved the "/sci/ will always be shit" frog

>>	Violent Simians Guy Sat Mar 1 13:12:34 2014 No.6386461 Should I return?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 13:33:05 2014 No.6386491 >>6386461 Only if you tell us more about why you are still unmarried. How old are you? 40? 50?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 1 17:29:36 2014 No.6386865 I miss the dolphin sex copypasta

Anonymous Sun Mar 2 10:15:56 2014 No.6388163

>>6386865
Out of all the things we had in the past you're missing a retarded and boring copypasta which was so poorly written and unoriginal that even /b/ would ignore it? It's probably not even a copypasta. It has been reposted like maybe 3 times by the same person and then it was never seen again.

>>	Teacup !obkpuSWh5M Sun Mar 2 10:30:56 2014 No.6388170 please let the thread die it brings back the pain of not being believed and of not having my friends please delete the threads

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 2 12:18:57 2014 No.6388309 >>6388170 OP here. Had to reset my IP because the university killed my internet for torrenting. Couldn't delete it if I wanted to.

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 2 20:05:32 2014 No.6389255 >>6388170 What?

>>	Anonymous Sun Mar 2 20:06:32 2014 No.6389258 >>6388170 keep bumping and hopefully we'll lose another tripfag.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 3 04:20:31 2014 No.6389937 >>6388170 You hurt /sci/'s feelings so many times. Why should /sci/ respect yours?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]