[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 14 KB, 228x265, stephen-hawking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6339897 No.6339897[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Does anyone else get the impression the British government just retrofitted a tard with a wheelchair filled with electronics to make it look like he was speaking in order to spread misinformation about science to keep the plebs from attaining advanced technologies?
pic related

>> No.6339900

He used to walk and talk.
Study history.

>> No.6339899

No

>> No.6339907

>>6339897
No, your retarded.

But I used to have a similar theory about the pope a few popes back that would just mumble.

>> No.6339911

>>6339899
>>6339900
ITT dubs == shills

>> No.6339942
File: 383 KB, 460x460, a44651Z_460sa.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6339942

WTF:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-206558/Nurse-claims-Hawkings-wife-abusing-him.html

Who the fuck does this

>> No.6339951

>>6339942
This makes me profoundly sad.

>> No.6339952 [DELETED] 

>>6339942
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-206558/Nurse-claims-Hawkings-wife-abusing-him.html
>femenism in a nutshell
Women want to be dominated and usually don't even realize it. When they aren't, they lash out without concern for Humanity as a whole. The audacity to actually act against a scientist in a way designed to depress them is sickening. People need to learn to respect their intellectual betters for they are literally more Human.

>> No.6339962

>>6339942
>second smartest man in the world
>cant recognize abuse

>> No.6339965

>>6339952
gb2tumblr
gb2rebbit
gb2/r9k/

>> No.6339972

>>6339965
>failure at life
>browsing /sci/
>muh retards are just as good as intellectuals

>> No.6339974

>>6339952
>Daily mail

>> No.6339990
File: 29 KB, 482x526, leddit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6339990

>>6339974
>picking and choosing "news" sources by name rather than viewing them all objectively article by article
Why are you even here?

>> No.6339996

>>6339952
>misogyny
>>>/r9k/

>> No.6339998

>>6339996
>using the word "misogyny" non-jokingly
See pic >>6339990

>> No.6339999

>>6339996
>misogyny
That word has no place in a science board, fuck off.

>> No.6340002

>>6339999
Science is a girl thing.