Fukushima

[Anonymous No.6270231]

I thought the general consensus here was Fukishima was a bit over stated and not quite as worrisome as others would lead you to believe.

Enter Charles Perrow, Yale University Professor

>Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas including Tokyo. Because of the radiation at the site the 6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years.

> humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years.

It seems Fukushima is a bit dire. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.6270237]

>blow up hundreds of nuclear tests
>use actual nuclear bombs
>millions of people living there today

>one reactor melts
>"> humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years."

So wheres the raid thread?
/x/ or /b/ or what?

also
lel

[Anonymous No.6270244]

>>6270237
>comparing nuclear bombs to reactors
This thread is stupid and you are too.

[Anonymous No.6270246]

>>6270244
>thread about making up stupid bullshit
>complains when I make up stupid bullshit
This is for maymay posting not actual arguments