[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 101 KB, 1020x686, 1388425150858.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6260037 No.6260037 [Reply] [Original]

What were the ethical implications of Einstein's theory of relativity?

pic unrelated

>> No.6260039

that ur a faget

>> No.6260062

>>6260059
Are you gay?

>> No.6260059

>>6260037
>implying A cups arnt the best
>more sensitive
>no sagging
>better for role-playing
>eternally looks like young breasts

not that im complaining, then the retards go for the ugly D cups, more girls for my harem.

>> No.6260072

>>6260062
no, maybe you are if you need exaggerated female traits like that.
>look how much I like boobs, there so big!
>men dont have boobs
>I like gils

>> No.6260085

D cup master race reporting in.

>> No.6260103
File: 212 KB, 619x593, 1388426402939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6260103

This is the perfect size.

>> No.6260126

>>6260103
ur gay lel

>> No.6260131

>>6260103
That's a boy.

>> No.6260151

>>6260131
why would a boy have a vagina?

>> No.6260159

>>6260151
boipussi

>> No.6260170

Great thread, everyone.

>> No.6260186

>>6260103
>tfw no qt thin gf

>> No.6260201

>>6260170
at least its better than "What were the ethical implications of Einstein's theory of relativity?"

>> No.6260326
File: 1.04 MB, 290x189, 1388435239621.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6260326

>>6260072
>men dont have boobs
Except fa-

>mfw I just realized that people that like big boobs actually like fat greasy manboobs

>> No.6260964

>>6260186
What do these acronyms mean?

>> No.6261417

>>6260964
quite
girlfriend

>> No.6261434

>>6261417
cutie, not quite

>>6260964
lurk moar

>> No.6261450

>>6260186
Please fuck off

>> No.6261914

>>6260037
How big breasts need to be is a question that needs to be observed in a case by case basis. Extensive testing over the years has taught me that the same size that fits one female doesn't necesarily fit everyone else (I pity the /v/irgins that restrict themselves to one size).

And then there are the subtle variations like density, menstrual cycle stage, and lots of other things that affect the aesthetic of the boob. Furthermore, the observer has already some preconceived notions as to which constitutes a perfect boob, that alone affects the final result of every experiment.

>>6260059
That said, given that breasts probably evolved as a sign of good health and disposition to bear children (and the huge cultural factor, and the different nutritional intake), you can't blame anyone for liking a generous size, even if you don't.

>> No.6264522

>>6260059
While you go for "girls", real men go for women.

>> No.6264549

B's and C's, nigga. Anything bigger is saggy fat bitch zone, and smaller is boy tier.

This is empirically true. I'd cite my sources, but it's so intrinsically true I'm sure I don't need to.

>> No.6264658

It is said that more than a handful is wasted. Fortunately for me, I have big hands.

>> No.6266318

>>6264658
How does this answer OP's question?

>> No.6266451

My gf has B-cups and I am very pleased, even though in the past I have often fantasized having a very busty gf.

>> No.6268722

>>6266451
You must have very low standards.

>> No.6268724 [DELETED] 

Einstein = socialist.
Socialism = stupid.
Einstein = stupid.

>> No.6268744
File: 26 KB, 500x306, 1388792321880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6268744

>>6268724
Einstein wasn't a "socialist".

Socialism is the economic equivalent of creationism.

>> No.6268815

>>6268744
>please expand this analogy?

>> No.6268830

>>6266318

Your pic must either be related or un related BUT NOT more interesting on 4chan or this happens.

>> No.6268849

>>6268744
Einstein was a socialist. He even wrote an essay titled "why socialism?". Einstein was an idiot.

>> No.6268879

>>6268849
I'm not an economist or anything, but can you explain to the layman why socialism is bad?

>> No.6268881

>>6268879
Taxation is theft, that's why.

>> No.6268889

>>6268881
what

>> No.6268901

>>6268889
Taxation is only theft where people serve the country/state, and not vice versa.

>> No.6268921
File: 393 KB, 622x607, 1388795727224.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6268921

>>6268879
Economic calculation problem.

>> No.6270961

>>6268881
No, it isn't.

>> No.6270964

>>6268901
>>6268881
>>6268879
>>6268849
>>>/pol/

>> No.6271005

>>6268879
It fails.

>> No.6272646

>>6270964
Is "/pol/" a new buzzword?

>> No.6274483

>>6272646
It seems so. "Go back to /pol/" is the new "go back to /x/"

>> No.6275568

So many replies and nobody answered OP's question ...

>> No.6275582

The ethical implications for the theory of relavity are:
In science, you can steal someone else's work, call it your own, and take all the credit for it, and you will become famous and respected. Stealing is good.

>> No.6275589

>>6268879
'Cause you need competition in order to have progress. Imagine if only IBM made computers, we'd probably still be far from having PCs. Now replace IBM with "government".

Also don't get me started on why equality is bad.

>> No.6277218

>>6275589
>Also don't get me started on why equality is bad.

Why is it bad?

>> No.6277352

This thread could have been interesting but it has been derailed

>> No.6278258

>>6270964
Holy shit, I'm not even in this fucking thread and I'm amazed that if ONE person talks shit about Einstein he gets "lol go back to /pol/" If you can't handle free speech, just go to fucking Rebbit. Sheesh.

>> No.6278261

>>6277352
>This thread could have been interesting

I disagree. It's a stupid question.

>> No.6278266

>>6278261

The question is actually quite profound its just that you lack the mental capacity to comprehend its intrinsic awe-inspiring complexity.

>> No.6279324

>>6278261
There are no stupid questions.

>> No.6279345

Protip: If any of you can demonstrate how to derive ethical implications from "empirical facts" you'll be regarded as one of the most inteligent humans of history, let alone win all prizes in science and philosophy.

Protip 2: It cannot be done.

>> No.6279395

>>6279345
You can derive ethical/oral implications from a completely self-centered view of the world.
Don't think it would qualify as "empirical facts" but saying that ethics/morals is pointless is wrong.

I've had this discussion in another thread, >>6278962 and some other posts.

>> No.6280240

>>6279345
>Protip 2: It cannot be done.

Prove it.