so does general relativity describe jerky frames of reference properly or do we need supergeneral relativity for it or something

File: 36 KB, 366x334, 1388058381001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu Dec 26 06:46:15 2013 No.6248766 [Reply] [Original]

so does general relativity describe jerky frames of reference properly or do we need supergeneral relativity for it or something

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 26 06:55:16 2013 No.6248781 What do you mean by "jerky frames of reference"?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 26 07:01:46 2013 No.6248787 >>6248781 d3s/dt3 m8

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 26 07:04:15 2013 No.6248790 >>6248787 Oh. The equivalence principle doesn't concern Jerk. It doesn't need to. It was a thought experiment that gave Einstein the inspiration for his idea that gravity could be described as inertial paths through curved spacetime.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 26 08:08:15 2013 No.6248828 >>6248766 yes, just use a frame with a gravity field that isnt constant

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math