[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 52 KB, 550x413, Protection-Hen-Dog1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6188667 No.6188667[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Prove we went to the moon without resorting to grainy video or "muh reflectors" bullshit. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Protip: You can't

>> No.6188672

Moon rocks.

>> No.6188674

>>6188667
Shooting a laser into space to hit a precise target and recording the signal's return with a computer isn't extraordinary for you? Who are you, James Bond?

>> No.6188673

Prove you are not sucking three dicks at this exact moment. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

PROTIP: You can't.

>> No.6188678

>>6188673
>asking someone to prove a negative

I'm an atheist and this offends me

>> No.6188681

>>6188672
How do you know they're not just rocks?

>> No.6188682

>>6188678
We can all agree that OP is a raging, flamboyant faggot and it would be quite extraordinary to claim that he's not sucking cock right now.

>> No.6188689

>>6188681
They are just rocks

From the moon

>> No.6188690

>>6188681
Because they came from the moon. Duh.

>> No.6188700

>>6188667

>Prove to me we went to the moon without the proof that we went

How about this, going to the moon was a battle between the USSR and USA, fierce rivals.

The USSR overlooked the moon landing closely, if it was false they would be the first one to see it and expose it.

Even if they could film it all and fool the public they could never fool a whole nation that happened to have satelites in orbit and already went to space.

>> No.6188745

>>6188700
Unfortunately, your opinion doesn't count as proof.

>> No.6188760

Where did the Saturn Vs go then?

>> No.6188761

>>6188667
Is there a monitor on the groin of the man who's genitalia you are currently felating?

>> No.6188777

>>6188667
where else do you think they were going on a giant fucking rocket

>> No.6188790

>>6188745
shit, you're nearly as autistic as one chick in the WoW general on /vg/ that only responds with "proof? :)" every time someone tells her she's a dumb cunt for spamming the thread with pandaren ass pictures

>> No.6188796

math says the saturn V had the power to make it to the moon and what can be observed from the launches fits with the claimed capabilities

>> No.6188803

>>6188796
Your mum is capable of eating an entire gateaux in one sitting - is that proof that she did?

>> No.6188808

>>6188667
>Caring

>> No.6190559

>>6188681
There is no erosion or new rock making systems on the moon. The age of the rocks from the moon were all around 4 billion years old.

>> No.6190570

>>6188667
Reflectors are pretty extraordinary evidence.

>> No.6190575

Why bother, any evidence we could provide OP would dismiss as fake or irrelevant, see >>6188745
OP is just a troll, saging and moving on.

>> No.6190609

Ur right, I cant GG OP, you win

>> No.6190611

>>6188678
Proving a negative is not fundamentally different from proving a positive. Put down the Popper.

>> No.6190614

Ok I'll bite faggot, but please don't delete this thread I want to see you squirm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
>The ongoing Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment measures the distance between the Earth and the Moon using laser ranging. Lasers on Earth are aimed at retroreflectors planted on the Moon during the Apollo program (11), and the time for the reflected light to return is determined.

>> No.6190631
File: 47 KB, 640x640, roflbot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6190631

>> No.6190632
File: 1001 KB, 955x957, 1379550992187.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6190632

>>6188667

>> No.6190640

>>6188674
my thoughts exactly. OP needs a truck delivery to the side of the head.

>> No.6192238

>>6190611
A negative is only a partial positive. I'd still rest by sentiment you can't prove a negative, but you can infer it from some proof positive. In other words, you need a positive to prove a negative. For example, we say that object a is not at location a only if and when we find which location object a is at.

>> No.6192262
File: 7 KB, 190x266, loui armstrong.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6192262

OP, are you insinuating that Armstrong is a liar?

>> No.6192264

>>6192238
>For example, we say that object a is not at location a only if and when we find which location object a is at.
Wait wait wait. I would say that if you search location a and not find object a, you have proved that object a is not at location a. Doesn't matter where it is or if it exists, you can be sure it's not at location a.

>> No.6192269

>>6188803
Where did all the fuel go then?

>> No.6192295

>>6192269
They flew up a tiny bit (low earth orbit), waiting a while, dumped the fuel in the sea, then flew back down

>> No.6192302

>>6192295
>dumped the fuel in the sea, then flew back down

You're seeing the issue here, right?

>> No.6192529

>>6192295
>implying the Russians wouldn't have seen this and called the US out as a fraud

>> No.6192549

>>6188667
How fucking ignorant can you get? Faking the moons landing would require 400,000 people who worked on the Apollo moon project to be "in on it". Lies on such a scale are near impossible, and somebody surely would've slipped up and leaked the "truth".

>> No.6192581

>>6188667
>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
That's just you way of dismissing any proof we have by saying "HURR DURR IDS NOD GUD ENOUGH"

>> No.6192583

>>6188678
I can prove there are no unmarried bachelors

>> No.6192603

I can mathematically prove that every other human being is a figment of my imagination.

>> No.6192635

>>6188760
First stage impacted the ocean a few minutes after separation.
Second stage reentered the atmosphere and burned up.
The third stage that sent the spacecraft to the Moon either ended up crashing into the lunar surface or in the case of Apollo 12 orbiting the sun.

>> No.6192651
File: 135 KB, 500x375, keyboardpants.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6192651

>>6188673
Hey guys OP here, I'm not sucking three cocks, I'm sucking five.

WHERE IS BUZZ ALDRIN NOW?

>>6188761
>>Is there a monitor on the groin of the man who's genitalia you are currently felating?
there is! Along with some ass-less keyboard pants. Really makes dick-sucking and posting easy.

>> No.6192654

>>6188777
>giant fucking rocket
hey guys OP here, why don't you explode your giant fucking rocket in my black hole?


My faggotry can only be measured in astronomical units

>> No.6192668

>prove X
>all this evidence of X is inadmissible because I said so
such a shame that you aren't convinced.